THE JACKSONIAN ERA THE AGE OF THE COMMON MAN By Dan Cho, Derek Hommel and Joe Zurro “The people is firm and tranquil in its movements, and necessarily acts with moderation, because it becomes but slowly impregnated with new ideas; and effects no changes, except in harmony with the knowledge it has acquired.” -George Bancroft, historian and Jacksonian “In a country where offices are created solely for the benefit of the people no man has any more intrinsic right to official station than another.” -Andrew Jackson, President [The] Introduction: A very brief history until 1828 By the time General Andrew Jackson was elected into office, America had undergone radical changes, such as the shift toward a market economy and immense population growth. With this population growth came a shift westward, which in turn brought about the creation of improved transportation, including canals, highways, railroads and steamships. Regional political divisions had become quite pronounced. By 1824, the masses were already beginning to favor Jackson, but John Quincy Adams took the election through the House of Representatives after gaining the support of Henry Clay, who became Adams’ Secretary of State (hence the ‘Corrupt Bargain’ accusations from Jacksonians). But Adams was ignorant of the changing political atmosphere, as seen by his proposition to give Federal support for internal improvements. This did not sit well with those who opposed the 'American System', which had grown in number since 1819. So in 1828, Jackson took the presidential office, much due to his national reputation as a war hero and as a representative to the common man. Jackson used his association with the everyman to in turn help make the government better work for the masses. If anything, the barriers holding people back from influence and power were reduced during Jackson’s presidency, allowing a more democratic functioning of the government. Jacksonian politicians attempted to make decisions that would benefit the majority. [Political] Aspects of Democratic Expansion: 1828 - 1840 Political Aspects on Expansion Suffrage By 1821, New York, Maryland, South Carolina, Massachusetts and Connecticut all reduced voting requirements By the end of the 18th century, most states had done away with property requirements, instead charging ‘poll taxes’ No new state admitted between 1796 and 1821 had property requirements for voting Shift from voting out loud (viva voce) to ballots Members of electoral college were selected by popular vote in most states Blacks and women still lacked suffrage Political Aspects on Expansion Changing campaign methods Attempted to appeal to the masses Beginning in the early 1800’s, both Federalists and Republicans tried to appeal to the common people by hosting free barbecues and clambakes In the election of 1828, both parties used propaganda; Jackson was accused of being an unlearned man, while Adams was portrayed as too aloof and aristocractic Jackson used his image as a war hero to increase his popularity Political Aspects on Expansion The ‘Job’ of Politicians Politicians now had to serve the ‘common people’, and do away with the previous belief of running the government through a small aristocracy. Jackson and the “Rotation in office” Jackson believed that: any man with common sense could undertake government duty Constant rotation of government staff would prevent corruption by greed and give jobs to more people Called the ‘Spoils System” by critics Did not cause much uproar Political Aspects on Expansion The Multi-Party System Jacksonian Democrats v. Whigs (later the Republicans) Third parties, such as the Anti-Masonic* and Working Man’s Parties, arose from the belief that some voices were not being heard This is a democratic aspect because more parties meant that more people had a better chance of voicing more specific wants in government * Anti-Masonic was a Whig-supporting group that was against the fraternal order of the Masonic Lodges, which were exclusive clubs for the rich. [Democratic] Issues Of the Jacksonian Era ISSUE: The 2nd National Bank Jackson vetoed the Bank believing that there was too much cash flow and that power was concentrated in the aristocracy. Jackson took money out of federal banks and placed it into state banks This allowed state banks to make more loans, namely to speculators. ISSUE: The 2nd National Bank Jackson wished to limit the power of the deposit (“pet”) banks, but caved in and eventually signed the Deposit Act, which created more deposit banks and limited Federal control over them. Was this Democratic: YES, in theory: it attempted to take power from the rich bank owners NO: it just put power into state banks ISSUE: Nullification Calhoun argued that only tariffs that were to raise revenue were constitutional This was despite the fact that the Constitution gave the federal government the right to levy tariffs Tariff of 1828 was meant to deter shipping into the US, so it was ‘unconstitutional’ to Calhoun – it didn’t benefit all equally (it helped the North) Calhoun followed the Kentucky and Virginia compromises in stating that the US was a compact between states and that states had the right to deny, or ‘nullify’ an unjust law ISSUE: Nullification South Carolina issued the South Carolina Exposition and Protest, written by Calhoun, arguing against the tariff. SC feared that a government that passed sectional tariffs would also go against slavery SC was one of two states to have slaves as a majority of the population Slave revolts, such as Nat Turner’s, led to fear in slave states like SC In November 1832, SC nullified Tariffs of 1828 and 1832 ISSUE: Nullification Jackson’s “Olive Branch and the Sword” Tariff of 1833 – Compromise Tariff Force Bill Provided gradual lowering of duties from 1833 to 1842 Allowed the federal government to collect taxes and customs duties by force Made primarily against South Carolina Called the “Compromise of 1833” ISSUE: Nullification Was this democratic? YES: because it preserved the Union NO: went against South Carolina’s wishes and gave more power to the government On a side note, this hurt Jackson, since pronullification ‘nullifiers’ in the South joined the Whig party after this ISSUE: Charles River Bridge Owners of Charles River Bridge connecting Boston and Cambridge declared that their charter granted them a monopoly They sued the proprietors of the competing Warren Bridge 1837, the Supreme Court ruled against the Charles River Bridge owners Protected democracy because if the owners won, turnpike charters could be used against competing railroad and canal construction [Alexis] de Tocqueville: A foreign view of American democracy Alexis de Tocqueville Born in 1805 in Paris Family was highly aristocratic Learned man – studied law Began to believe that the French aristocracy was in decline – adapted more liberal views Visited America and Britain in 1831-1832 to study their governments Published Democracy in America in 1835, continuing the series in 1840 Democracy in America Tocqueville saw democracy as the inevitable product of government, and hoped to study it to discover its strengths and weaknesses Tocqueville was heavily influenced by his own aristocratic upbringing, which made him take a critical look at American democracy Part I focused on democracy as a whole in America and the institutions created to perpetuate it Part II focused on the mentality of Americans Democracy in America cont’d – Pros and Cons PROS: Progress is encouraged, since there is always hope of excelling, instead of being isolated by class restrictions “Aristocratic nations are naturally too apt to narrow the scope of human perfectibility; democratic nations expand it beyond compass” Judicial Review in America Freedom of Press Freedom of Religion Democracy in America cont’d – Pros and Cons CONS: ‘Mediocrity’ – since everyone has an ‘equal’ chance to excel, but only a few can actually ‘make it’, many people with equal skill are left out “On my arrival to the United States I was surprised to find so much distinguished talent among the subjects, and so little among the heads of the Government” Possibility of despotism from the ‘majority rule’ Equality itself – could stifle government’s function in the search to ‘please everyone’ [Social] Democracy Women’s Rights Social Aspects of the Expansion: Women’s Rights Women’s Rights: Early women’s rights advocates such as Lucretia Mott and the Grimke sisters argued against both racial and gender discrimination. The abolitionist William Lloyd Garrison argued in The Liberator against the exploitation of women slaves. The Seneca Fall’s Convention: A women’s rights conference pushing for the passage of twelve resolutions in favor of women’s rights such as suffrage. Women’s rights did not gain very much attention until after the civil war due to other problems like the Temperance movement against alcohol, public school reforms and the abolitionist movement. Lucretia Mott Elizabeth Cady Stanton Conclusion • The actual electoral processes moved toward democracy by creating ballot voting, eliminating property restrictions, and, in some states, selecting the members of the electoral college through popular vote • Events such as Jackson’s veto of the Bank, the striking down of monopolies and the limiting of the government offices to reduce corruption showed the movement toward democracy. • More people had the ability to work in government