PSC Assessment 1.09
EDL 8820
EDL 8820: Managing the Physical Environment/ Legal Theory Project
Beginning Leader:
Date:
Beginning Leader Signature:
BLST Approval (Signature of mentor/sponsor, coach, and university supervisor)
This assessment will be completed by the BCLST and logged in Chalk & Wire by the university supervisor.
Rating
Description
Clear and
The beginning leader’s performance offers clear, consistent, and convincing
L4
Consistent –
evidence of EXCEEDING this performance standard(s)
Exceeds
Clear –
The beginning leader’s performance offers clear evidence of MEETING this
L3
performance standard(s)
Meets
The beginning leader’s performance offers limited evidence of meeting this
L2
Limited
performance standard(s)
The beginning leader’s performance offers no evidence of meeting this
L1
No Evidence
performance standard(s)
ELCC Elements are cross-checked for building and system levels.
Criteria
1. Describe cases examining court interpretation of education clauses in state
constitutions over the past 53 years. Include names litigants and contexts
ELCC: 3.1; 6.1; 6.2
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
Describe circumstances that precipitated the lawsuit. ELCC: 3.1,3.2
What broad changes occurred in funding as a result of the litigation,
particularly in Georgia? ELCC: 6.1
Develop arguments for and against full state funding. ELCC: 3.3; 5.1
Describe current arguments related to adequacy and equity as interpreted by
current legal challenges, the U.S. Constitution and the Supreme Court
decisions. ELCC: 3.2; 6.1
Describe the relationship between financial resources and student
achievement, if any. ELCC: 3.1; 3.3
Describe the measures Georgia uses to determine accountability for taxes
spent on schools and student performance. ELCC: 3.2; 6.1
Describe the data on how Georgia addresses increases in productivity and the
allocation of resources. Support arguments with data at district level. Focus on
legal cases, laws, theories, and practices. ELCC: 3.2; 6.1
Describe how your district budget relates to the achievement of all AYP
indicators. ELCC: 3.2; 6.1
Describe how your district prioritizes funding for the most significantly low
indicators and identify areas not funded at the same level. ELCC: 3.2; 6.1
Describe how priorities for funding for the past five years have changed based
on AYP indicators and changes in demographics. Provide evidence from
available district office data. ELCC: 3.2; 6.1
Describe how funding has been allocated to school or district goals for school
or district improvement plans. ELCC: 3.2; 6.1
Describe how funding aligns with school/district vision.
ELCC: 1.2; 3.1; 3.2; 3.3; 6.1
L1
L2
L3
L4