Overview of Earth System Modeling and Fluid Dynamical Issue Model and Data

advertisement
Overview of Earth System Modeling
and Fluid Dynamical Issue
Model and Data
Hierarchies for
Simulating and
Understanding Climate
Marco A. Giorgetta
Overview
1. The Earth System – and Earth System Models (ESMs)
2. Research with ESMs
–
A GCM study on emission pathways to climate stabilization
3. Fluid dynamical issues in the development of ESMs
1. The Earth System – and Earth System Models (ESMs)
The Earth System
In general terms:
The Earth and everything gravitationally bound to it
–
–
–
–
–
Earth interior
Oceans with sea ice
Land surfaces: soil, ice shields, glaciers
Atmosphere up to ~100 km
Life in all compartments
•
•
•
Land vegetation and soil organism
Marine biota
Humans!
The Earth System
In climate science:
A relatively new term, chosen to describe:
–
–
–
–
–
The physical climate system …
… and geo-bio-chemical processes …
… as necessary to understand the climate of the past …
… and to “predict” the future climate of the next ~100 years …
… where climate = [T, wind, q, precipitation]
Explicitly account for the interaction of bio-geo-chemical
processes with climate, and anthropogenic influences.
Key for understanding climate: Energy transfer
•
Radiation + heat fluxes and storage in A, O, and L
–
–
Distributions of T, q and wind,
Hydrological cycle
Globally averaged
vertical energy transfer
in the atmosphere
Source:
IPCC AR4 WG1 Rep., Ch. 1, FAQ Fig.1
Components of the climate system,
interactions, and changes
(Source: IPCC AR4 WG1 Ch.1, FAQ 1.2, Figure 1)
Earth System Models (ESMs)
•
Simplified/idealized descriptions of the ES
[Cf. “Model” in architecture, fashion, engineering, …]
–
–
•
Formal description, allowing for computational
experiments  What if …
–
–
–
•
Test understanding of the functioning of the ES
Explain observed features
Turbulent mixing in oceans was stronger
“Major” volcanic eruptions happened?
…
Highly complex models within the model hierarchy
–
Fortran code of ~105 lines
The Earth System
History of “Type II” models
1. General circulation models of atmosphere or ocean
 weather, seasonal cycle, …
2. Coupled atmosphere ocean models = “climate model”
 El Niño/La Niña, “small” climate change, …
3. Earth system model = “climate model” +
–
–
–
Land and ocean bio-geo-chemistry
Clouds/aerosols/chemistry in the atmosphere
Cryosphere: Glaciers, ice shields, shelf ice
 Climate of other periods, “large” climate change
 ESMs are most complex
Schematic view of the ES
Health
Wealth
Food
etc.
Atmosphere
Energy
Momentum
Land
Substance cycles
H2O, C N S P …
Ocean
Use & management
of the environment
Society
Construction of ESMs
1. Decide on spatial and temporal scales, and on
processes, which are scientifically relevant and
practically feasible ( model hierarchies)
–
–

Length of simulations
~102 years
Required turnover rate ~102 years/week
~200 km horizontal resolution
2. Equations for the dynamics of atmosph., ocean, and ice



200 km  Primitive equations
Numerical methods  discretized, i.e. computable, equations
“Dynamical core”  Christiane’s talk
Construction of ESMs (cont.)
 Transport scheme for the advection of vapor, cloud
particles, … / salt, plankton, …
 “Physics package” for the physical, biological, chemical
and unresolved dynamical processes; atmosphere:








Radiation
Turbulent vertical fluxes (“vertical diffusion”) of heat, momentum, tracers
Surface (snow cover, albedo, evaporation, transpiration, lateral water flows)
Microphysics
Convection
Cloudiness
Sub-grid-scale orographic effects
Non-orographic gravity wave drag
Construction of ESMs (cont.)
Parameterizations rely on assumptions, e.g.:

Radiation





Grid scale << Earth radius
Grid scale >> layer thickness
Local thermal equilibrium
Earth
Gas = air + small variations
…
 plane parallel assumption
 neglect fluxes trough lateral boundaries
 valid up to ~70 km in the atmosphere of
 valid for the atmosphere of Earth
2. Research with ESMs
A GCM study on emission pathways to climate stabilization
E. Roeckner, M. Giorgetta, T. Crüger,
M. Esch, and J. Pongratz
Submitted to Climatic Change
Motivation
• United Nations Framework on Climate Change:
– Article 2: ‘... to achieve stabilization of greenhouse gas concentrations ...
that would prevent dangerous anthropogenic interference with the
climate system‘
• Questions
– For a given CO2 concentration pathway into the future:
• What is the climate change?
• What anthropogenic CO2 emissions are allowable?
– What fraction of anthrop. carbon remains in the atmosphere?
– What is the role of feedbacks between climate change and the C-cycle?
• Use Earth system model including the carbon cycle
– simulate the carbon flux between atmosphere, and ocean or land
• Use two scenarios for the future until 2100:
– “SRES A1B” scenario
• No mitigation
– “E1” scenario developed for ENSEMBLES (Van Vuuren et al., 2007)
• Agressive mitigation scenario E1
• Limit global change in surface air temperature to 2°
• (implies stablization of CO2 concentration in 22nd century at ~450 ppmv
• European ENSEMBLES project
– Other models  multi model ensemble
Methodology
Method proposed for the future CMIP5 experiments, i.e. experiments for
the 5th IPCC assessment of climate change (Hibbard et al., 2007):
Policies
Story lines
Impacts
(Mitigation) Scenario
Emissions
2B
Concentrations
1
2A
Carbon cycle - climate model
Surface
temperature
Experiments
1860 1900 1950 2000 2050 2100
Control
“1860”
1000 yr
Historic
1860-2005
SRES A1B
E1 450 ppm
: full coupling;
: C-cycle decoupled
Ensembles of
5 realizations
Scenarios for CO2 concentration
CO2 concentration in ppmv
• 1860-2005: observations
• 2005-2100: scenarios
Others: CH4, N2O, CFCs
CO2 [ppmv]
2050
2100
A2
522
836
A1B-S1
522
703
B1
482
540
A1B-450/E1
435
421
… and of the model used here
X
(no feedback)
A: ECHAM
Energy
Momentum
L: JSBACH
Substance cycles
H2O, C
O: MPIOM +
HAMOCC
Prescribed BCs from
observations+scenarios
Society
Pre-industrial control simulation
Global annual mean surface air temperature (°C) and CO2 concentration (ppmv)
Pre-industrial conditions, thick lines: 11-year running means
Surface air temperature
(left scale, °C)
Atmospheric CO2
concentration
(right scale, ppmv)
• Climate of undisturbed system stable over 1000 years
Global mean surface air temperature
Global annual mean surface air temperature anomalies w.r.t. 1860-1880 (°C)
5 year running means
simulated (5 realizations)
observed (Brohan et al., 2006)
• Simulated surface air temperature less variable than observed.
• Natural sources of variability like volcanic forcing or the 11 year
solar cycle are excluded from the experiment.
• Simulated warming in 2005 slightly underestimated.
Global mean CO2 emissions 1860 to 2005
CO2 emissions from fossil fuel combustion and cement production (GtC/yr)
Global annual mean; 11-year running means
Implied emissions
from simulations
Observed
(Marland et al., 2006)
• Model allows for relatively higher emissions before 1930.
• Minimum in 1940s
• Similar emissions in 2000.
Simulated carbon uptake 1860 to 2005
Simulated carbon uptake (GtC/yr)
11-year running means
Simulated ocean uptake
Simulated land uptake
• Ocean carbon uptake very similar to land uptake
• Reduced uptake in 1950s
Carbon uptake by ocean and land
Fraction of simulated fossil fuel emissions (%)
Remaining in the atmosphere
Absorbed by ocean
Aborbed by land
• 50% of simulated fossil fuel emissons remain in the atmosphere
• In 2000: simulated ocean uptake = ~2 x simulated land uptake
Global surface air temperature anomalies
Global annual mean surface air temperature anomalies w.r.t. 1860-1880 (°C)
Historic 1950-2000
A1B 2001 – 2100
E1 2001 – 2100
• Initially stronger warming in E1 than in A1B because of faster
reduction in sulfate aerosol loading, hence less cooling.
• Reduce warming in E1 after 2040
• Warming in 2100: ~4°C in A1B and ~2°C in E1
 Climate – carbon cycle feedback differs after 2050
Implied CO2 emissions 1950 to 2100
Implied CO2 emissions with and without climate – carbon cycle feedback (GtC/yr)
Historic 1950 – 2000
A1B 2001 – 2100
E1 2001 – 2100
without feedback
with feedback
•
•
•
Implied CO2 emissions of E1 scenario drop sharply after ~2015 (unlike
emissions for A1B scenario)
Implied emissions are reduced by feedback
In 2100: -2 GtC/yr in E1 and -4.5 GtC/yr in A1B
Implied emissions of E1 close to 0 in 2100.
Accumulated C emissions: Coupled – Uncoupled
Reduction in accumulated C emissions by climate – carbon cycle coupling (GtC)
(11-year running means)
Historic 1860 – 2000
A1B 2001 – 2100
E1 2001 – 2100
• Climate – carbon cycle feedback reduces implied carbon
emissions until 2100 by 180 (E1) to 280 (A1B) GtC.
Conclusions
• The E1 scenario fulfills the EU climate policy goal of limiting the
global temperature increase to a maximum of 2°C.
• In the 2050s (2090s) the allowable CO2 emissions for E1 are about
65% (17%) of those of the 1990’s.
• As in previous studies, a positive climate-carbon cycle feedback is
simulated.
 Climate warming reduces the ability of both land and ocean to take
up anthropogenic carbon.
 Climate – carbon cycle feedback reduces the allowable emissions by
about 2 GtC/yr in the E1 scenario.
3. Fluid dynamical issues in the development of ESMs
Conservation properties of numerical models
•
The discretized system shall have the same
conservation properties as the underlying continuous
system
–
–
–
Mass and tracer mass – consistent continuity and transport eq.
Momentum – “Radiation upper boundary condition”
Energy – Energy conversion due to wave dissipation
Adaptivity
•
Grid refinement
–
–
–
–
–
•
Dynamical core
–
•
Adjust scheme to expected errors ( FE schemes)
Parameterizations:
–
•
static or dynamic?
Redistribute grid points or create/destroy grid points?
2d or 3d?
Single time integration scheme or recursive schemes?
Conservation properties?
Submodels: embedded dynamical models – “super-parameterizations”
Cost function
–
–
How to predict the need for refinement, and what for?
How to confine cost?
High performance computing
•
Parallelization:
–
–
–
•
From ~102 cores to 105 cores
Model integration, data handling, post processing
Hardware and software reliability
Data
–
–
Storage capacity grows less than computing power
Limited bandwidth for data access
END
Title
•
text
Title
•
text
Title
•
text
Title
•
text
Title
•
text
Download