The environmental impact of transport subsidies Chris Nash (University of Leeds) Peter Bickel and Rainer Friedrich (University of Stuttgart), Heike Link and Louise Stewart (DIW, Berlin) Paper prepared for the OECD workshop on the environmentally harmful subsidies, Paris, November 2002 1 Outline of the paper 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Introduction Alternative approaches to subsidies What is the nature of transport subsidies Evidence on overall subsidy levels Methodology for quantifying environmental costs 6. Measurement of marginal external cost 7. Effects of marginal social cost pricing 8. Conclusions 2 Alternative approaches 1. Comparison of total cost with revenue Relevant to political and equity issues 2. Comparison of marginal social cost with price Relevant for economic efficiency 3 What is the nature of transport subsidies? Explicit subsidies: • service obligations • fares obligations • investment grants Implicit subsidies: • failure to charge fully for infrastructure • favourable tax treatment • failure to charge for externalities 4 Justifications for subsidy 1. Economies of scale 2. Second best 3. Equity 4. Economic development 5 Relevant costs and charges in the transport sector? Summary of Relevant Cost and Revenue Categories Categories Costs Capital charges Infrastructure Maintenance and renewal costs Vehicle operating costs Marginal cost approach Average cost analysis marginal only Public transport only Public transport only External costs of Congestion Scarcity Mohring effect Accidents Public transport only Air pollution Noise Global warming Marginal only Public transport only Public transport only Public transport only commercial vehicle only Public transport only VAT not paid Revenues Fares and freight tariffs Fuel duty VAT on fuel duty Vehicle excise duty Key: - included 6 How significant are transport subsidies? Road Charges always cover total infrastructure costs; often also total external cost Rail Charges on average cover 37% of infrastructure and operating cost; on average 36% of total social cost Other local public transport Heavily subsidised Air Landing fees often do not cover cost of airports, let alone external cost 7 Environmental Cost Categories • Air pollution (e.g. CO, SO2, Nox, etc.) • Climate change: the emission of greenhouse gases (CO2, CH4, N2O, etc.) • Noise • Impacts on nature and landscape • Soil and water deterioration • Effects associated with electricity production • Other effects: e.g. visual intrusion in cities 8 Processes generating Environmental costs Each of the processes: • Vehicle manufacture • Vehicle use • Vehicle maintenance and support • Vehicle disposal • Fuel/electricity production • Infrastructure construction, maintenance and disposal causes environmental damage 9 The Impact Pathway Approach for the quantification of external costs caused by air pollution Impact Assessment Valuation Activity Emissions Transport and chemical conversion Concentration/ Deposition Response of receptors (humans, flora, materials, ecosystems) Physical impact Change in utility Welfare losses Monetization Costs 10 Marginal cost and revenue analysis by type of vehicle and time of day Revenue:HGV Artic, off-peak Costs:HGV Artic, off-peak 7.6 19.8 Revenue:HGV Artic, peak Costs:HGV Artic, peak 7.6 33.5 Infrastructure, operating cost & depreciation Revenue:Car, off-peak Congestion Costs:Car, off-peak 0.1 External accident costs 7.0 Air pollution Noise Revenue:Car, peak Climate change Costs:Car, peak 0.1 0 Revenue 13.2 5 10 15 20 25 30 Pence per mile 35 40 45 11 50 Effects of inter urban MSC pricing • much more variable results (toll roads, existing rail charges) • often lower rail fares, but car may be overcharged too • air charges higher (unless heavily taxed) • road freight undercharged (but rail subsidised as well) • limited mode split shifts 12 Effects of MSC pricing in urban areas • Much higher charges for use of roads, e.g. peak • Reduction in peak road traffic (5-20%) • Changes in time and route of travel • Park and ride • Higher public transport fares (esp. bus) 13 Conclusions Eliminating subsidies to cover total cost would lead to: • growth in road traffic • big reduction in public transport • environmental damage Equating price to marginal social cost would lead to : • modest reductions in road and air • growth in rail • modest environmental improvement 14