QUALITY ENHANCEMENT CELL
BY
PROF. DR. AAMIR IJAZ
DIRECTOR
UNIVERSITY OF THE PUNJAB,
LAHORE.
SELF ASSESSMENT CRITERIA
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
Program Mission Objectives and Outcomes
Curriculum Design and Organization
Laboratories and Computing Facilities
Student Support and Guidance
Faculty
Process Control
Institutional Facilities
Institutional Support
Criterion-3: Laboratories & Computing Facilities
Intent: Laboratories and computing facilities must be
adequately available and accessible to faculty members
and students to support teaching and research activities.
In addition departments may benchmark with similar
departments in reputable institutions to identify their
shortcomings if any.
Criterion-4: Student Support & Advising
Intent: Student must have an adequate support to
complete the program in a timely manner and must have
ample opportunity to interact with their instructors and
receive timely advice about program requirements and
career alternatives.
Criterion-5: Process Control
Intent: The processes by which major functions are
delivered must be in place, controlled, periodically
reviewed and continuously improved. To meet this
criterion a set of standards must be satisfied.
Criterion-6: Faculty
Intent: Faculty members must be current and active in
their discipline and have the necessary technical depth
and breadth to support the program. There must be
enough faculty members to provide continuity and
stability, to cover the curriculum adequately and
effectively, and to allow for scholarly activities.
Criterion-7: Institutional Facilities
Intent: Institutional facilities, including library,
computing facilities, classrooms and offices must be
adequate to support the objective of the program.
Criterion-8: Institutional Support
Intent: The institution’s support and the financial
resources for the program must be sufficient to provide an
environment in which the program can achieve its
objectives and retain its strength.
Latest Status of Faculty of Economics & Management Sciences
Department
Department of
Economics
Program Teams
√
SAR
received
Sent back
for
changes
SAR
received
after
improvement
Audit
completed
Executive
Summary
Implementa
tion Plan
x
x
x
x
x
x
Prof. Dr. Khuda
Dad
Dr. Hafiz Khalil
Ahmad
Department of
Library &
Information
Sciences
√
Prof. Dr. Kanwal
Amin
Dr. Nousheen
Fatima Warriach
Ms. Syeda Hina
Batool
√
√
√
√
√
√
Institute of
Administrative
Sciences
√
Ms. Ayesha Hanif
Ms. Saba Yaseen
Mr. Ali Rehman
√
√
√
√
√
√
Institute of
Business
Administration
√
Prof. Dr. M. Ehsan
Malik
Ms. Saba Latif
x
x
x
x
x
x
Institute of
Business &
Information
Technology
√
Mr. Mansoor
Mahmood Ashiq
Mr. Asim Tanveer
√
√
x
x
x
x
6
SURVEY FORMS
Teacher & Course Evaluation Form
Proforma - 1 Student Course Evaluation Questionnaire
Proforma - 2 Faculty Course Review Report
Proforma - 3 Survey of Graduating Students
Proforma - 4 Research Student Progress Review Form
Proforma - 5 Faculty Survey
Proforma - 6 Survey of Department Offering Ph.D. Programs
Proforma - 7 Alumni Survey
Proforma - 8 Employer Survey
Proforma - 9 Faculty Resume
Proforma - 10 Teacher Evaluation Form
Teaching / Learning Process Survey Form
REVIEW
Meeting for Expediting Self Assessment Activities of Faculty of
Economics and Management Sciences held on 30-09-2010
(Tuesday) in the committee room of Dean Faculty of Economics &
Management Sciences, University of the Punjab.
PROGRESS:
Follow up with the Faculty of Economics and Management
Sciences for the submission of their SARs is done but overall
response rate is very slow.
LATEST STAUTS OF QEC
Program Teams for most of the departments/ institutes/ colleges/
centers have been formed.
Self Assessment Reports of 38 departments/ institutes/ colleges/
centers have been received and reviewed by QEC according to Self
Assessment Manual (SAM).
At the same time, executive summaries & implementation plans of
19 audited departments/ institutes/ colleges/ centers have been
sent to the respective departments, HEC and Worthy Vice
Chancellor of the University for further necessary action to
enhance the quality of education.
TEACHERS & COURSES EVALUATION
In order to enhance the quality of education, QEC has already
circulated newly developed survey forms related to the teachers
and courses evaluation.
HODs will interact & coordinate with QEC staff to conduct survey
at the end of each semester and also bring any change if required.
FUTURE PLAN
To motivate the program team members for the implementation
of Self Assessment Manual (SAM) by carrying out the meetings at
departmental level. It may also include the visits of individual
departments by QEC team if found necessary.
Follow up of changes suggested by QEC with departments who
have sent their SARs is also underway.
Follow up for the submission of SARs has already done and will
continue as well.
Follow up of the Teachers and Courses Evaluation survey forms is
also underway.
Implementation plans submitted by different departments will
also be followed up.
THANK YOU