Equity Risk Premium: Expectations Great and Small Richard A. Derrig and Elisha D. Orr Bowles Symposium April 2003 Equity Risk Premium (ERP) Definition: Difference between the market return and a risk-free return US Equity Risk Premia S&P 500 1926-2002 Horizon Equity Risk-Free Returns Return ERP Short 12.20% 3.83% 8.37% Inter 12.20% 4.81% 7.40% Long 12.20% 5.23% 6.97% Source: Ibbotson Yearbook (2002) and December 2002 Market Report Why the ERP is Important for Actuaries ? Universally accepted benchmark for pricing risk Input into simple CAPM and FamaFrench 3-factor model Affects other cost of capital estimates and discount rates Market value of liabilities Paper Objectives Introduction to the ERP Puzzle Types of ERP Time Series Analysis Catalogue ERP Puzzle Literature Selection of an ERP Summary ERP Puzzle Mehra and Prescott (1985): – Anomalous results when historical realized ERP compared to asset pricing theory values – Otherwise, must assume risk aversion level outside of “reasonable” range Led to literature to solve the “ERP puzzle” Literature to Solve the Puzzle 1st thread (Behavioral Finance) – New models and assumptions to explain historical data 2nd thread – Estimates of the ERP from standard economic models – Catalogue in Appendix B ERP Types Geometric vs. arithmetic Short vs. long investment horizon Short vs. long run expectation Unconditional vs. conditional US vs. international market data Data sources and periods Real vs. nominal returns ERP using same historical data (1926-2002) Investment Horizon Short Short Inter Inter Type of Average Arithmetic Geometric Arithmetic Geometric ERP Historical Return 8.4% 6.4% 7.4% 5.4% Long Arithmetic 7.0% Long Geometric 5.0% Source: Ibbotson Yearbook (2002) and December 2002 Market Report Converting from Geometric to Arithmetic Returns Formula: AR = GR + var/2, var, variance of the return process Time Series Analysis Stationarity Assumption – Supported by ANOVA regressions – ARIMA model projects future years as average of data No significant time trends Mean of full Ibbotson series and subset (1960+) not statistically different Why Different Estimates ? Historical – 1926-2002 – 1802-2001 (Earlier period) Dividend Growth Model – Next Ten Years + Remainder of 75 Years – Historical ≠ Expected – Conditional versus Unconditional expectations Short-Horizon ERP by Sub-periods Stock Returns Short-term Gov’ts ERP I 18021870 7.0% II 18711925 6.6% III 19261992 6.6% 5.1% 3.2% 0.5% 1.9% 2.8% 6.1% Source: Siegel (1994) Catalogue of ERP Estimates Social Security (1999, 2001) Puzzle Research – Campbell and Shiller (2001) – Arnott and Ryan (2001), Arnott and Bernstein (2002) – Fama and French (2002) – Ibbotson and Chen (2003) – Constantinides (2002) Catalogue of ERP Estimates (Cont.) Financial Analyst Estimates – Claus and Thomas (2001) – Harris and Marston (2001) Surveys – CFOs, Graham and Harvey (2002) – Financial economists, Welch (2000 & 2001) Behavioral Approach The Next 10 Years Social Security – Lower return over next 10 years – Remainder of 75 years likely to be similar to historical returns Campbell and Shiller – Current P/E and Div/P ratios far from mean – With mean reversion assumption, dismal forecast for next ten years Market decrease since 1999 is -37.6% or -14.6% annual TIPS Inflation-Indexed Treasury Securities Maturity Coupon Issue Rate Yield to Maturity 1/11 1/12 7/12 4/28 4/29 4/32 3.500 3.375 3.000 3.625 3.875 3.375 1.763 1.831 1.878 2.498 2.490 2.408 Source: WSJ 2/24/2003 Behavioral Finance Benartzi and Thaler (1995) Start with prospect theory – Loss Aversion Add “mental accounting” – Myopic Loss Aversion Selecting an ERP Rely on past data to forecast the future OR Analyze the past and apply informed judgment as to future differences What You Need To Know About ERP Estimates Range of estimates – Appendix B Data and terminology Underlying assumptions Your independent analysis is required if estimate differs from historical average Where to Go From Here Ibbotson and Chen (2003) – Appendix C – Fundamental components of the historical ERP – Change estimates based upon good judgment The puzzle is not yet solved…