Academic Leadership Forum PREPARING BUDGETS &

advertisement

Academic

Leadership Forum

PREPARING BUDGETS

&

THE FBM PROCESS

21 October 2014

Budgeting for Your

Unit

2

R E A L D E L D E G A N

I N T E R I M D I R E C T O R

O F F I C E O F T H E B U D G E T

21 October 2014

Content

3

 The “Big” Picture

 Impact of academic units on University revenues

 Building the University’s budget

 Academic units and the budget process

The Big Picture: Total Operating Revenues estimated at $768.8M for FY2015

4

$’000

Short-term investments,

3,007, 0.4%

Endowment investments,

1,913, 0.2%

Tuition and student charges;

254 468; 33,1%

MESRSoperating grant,

361,202, 47.0%

Gifts and bequests;

5 240; 0,7%

Sales of Goods

& Services ;

117 530; 15,3%

FICOR; 25 400;

3,3%

The Big Picture: Total Operating Expenses estimated at $775.8M for FY2015

Special Projects; 9 000 ;

1,2%

5

Pay Equity Phase 2;

6 350 ; 0,8%

$’000

Academic Salaries;

227 129; 29,3% Non-Salary

Expend.;

150 819; 19,4%

Net I/F Transfers out ;

54 500 ; 7,0%

Benefits; 81 718; 10,5%

Student Salaries; 9 985;

1,3%

Student Aid; 27 623;

3,6%

Admin & Support

Salaries; 208 664;

26,9%

140 000

120 000

100 000

80 000

60 000

40 000

20 000

0

The Big Picture: “Financed”

Accumulated Deficit Outlook

6

Apr-14 Apr-13

Building the University’s Budget

See handout

7

Impact of academic units on University revenues

8

 Enrolment changes

 Research

- Indirect costs of research

- CRC / CFI allocation calculations

 Endowments / Gifts

 Specific grants / contracts / community service

Major Revenue Components

9

• Enrolment Changes

• Provincial Grant

• Tuition

Academic Units and the Budget Process

10

 Faculty-level (not directly with academic departments)

 Each Faculty can adopt its own specific budget process

“The Agreement”

 Reached with each Faculty stating:

 priority investments,

 targets, and

 proposed new initiatives

 Multi-year and ALL funds

 Involves performance measures

 Not just incremental

Academic Units and the Budget Process

11

 Faculties prioritize requests from their academic units

 NOT done directly by the Provost’s Office

Priority-focus of the Agreement:

Open, Connected, Purposeful: McGill and the Next Five years

 Student Life and Learning

 Research

 Engagement

 A Learning Organization

 Space

The Agreement:

What’s new for the FY16 exercise?

 Draft agreement documents stipulated between the AP(BR) and the

Faculties (or Admin units)

- No template

- No dropdown menus and formatted sections

- No responses to documents – just one document

 Meetings between AP(BR) and units to culminate with a signed agreement by end of November/early December

 Integrating with other planning processes:

- Enrolment targets

- Academic Renewal

- Space, IT, etc.

The Agreement: What can units expect for FY2016?

 Previous year’s budget +/- allocations for the new year

 Cuts from the MESRS will continue:

 No indication of changes to the tuition framework

• assume rules remain unchanged

 No changes to FIO (ancillary fees) framework

Budget allocations:

What can an academic unit expect?

15

 Allocations are to Faculties, not directly to academic departments

 Faculties each adopt their specific budget allocation rules

 Some allocations provided:

- Academic Renewal

- Salary Policy

- Benefits

- Enrolment Driven Allocation

- Indirect Research Cost Allocation

- CFI LOF envelope (for wet lab areas)

- CRC allocation

- Graduate Student Support (through GPSO)

- Funding for specific initiatives (priority pool envelopes)

Academic Renewal

16

 Target complement for each Faculty

 TT salaries covered by central

 Related allocations include:

- Start-ups

- Endowed chair contributions

- Provostial hires

- Salary award incentive contribution

- Contribution to recruitment costs

- Moving expenses (including immigration fees)

- French courses

 Funds for salaries revert to the central pool when TT staff depart

http://www.mcgill.ca/provost/files/provost/academic_renewal__hr-budget_feed_1-oct-

2012.pdf

The Financial Budget

Model (FBM)

17

C R I S T I A N E T I N M O U T H

I N T E R I M

A S S I S T A N T V I C E - P R I N C I P A L

F I N A N C I A L S E R V I C E S

Managing the Budget and year-end results

18

 Dean has statutory responsibility for the Faculty’s budget

 But, Chairs definitely have a role

 Results (positive or negative) are carried forward to the next fiscal year

 Positive carry forwards in 1A funds (unrestricted operating) are put into a reserve at the Faculty level

 Use of the reserve funds require permission from the Provost

The Financial Budget Model (FBM)

-

-

-

-

-

-

The Financial Budget Template is used for submitting the agreed upon multi-year and multi-fund planning has an Excel-based tool capturing all revenues and expenditures per org provides an overview of the spending capacity on a multi-year, multi-fund basis (e.g., provision of carry forward for future expenditures) allows a financial plan aligned with the Agreement is aligned with the Budget Book and Financial Statements must be completed by the Faculty Financial Officer with input from various

Faculty/Unit members, upon request

Enables stewardship and management of all fund types

-

Allows for variance analysis:

Budget allocations vs. Actuals by account grouping

Planning with the FBM

-

-

-

Forecasting is not an “exact science” a projection into the time period(s) under consideration based on assumptions, previous experiences, and reasonable expectations

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

FFO must consult with VP, Dean, Chairs, Directors, professors, others for input be familiar with your Unit’s historical data (prior year actuals) have supporting documentation and estimates proactively seek information from professors, researchers and fund holders plan for the use of carry-forwards and ensure that these are included the

Agreement

Remember that the FBM must cover 3 fiscal years of budget includes ALL fund types

Variance Analysis

 Reports for Variance Analysis with:

Recording of changes relative to the Budget (e.g., Academic

Renewal Plan)

Adjusted Budget (if applicable) versus Actual

Actual to Actual

 Enables a more accurate analysis of the financial situation

 Close coordination with FFO/FST

Resources and Support

 FBI website: www.mcgill.ca/fbi

 FBI reports: http://www.mcgill.ca/fbi/support/reportstools

 FAQ ’s :http://www.mcgill.ca/fbi/faqs

 fbi.budget@mcgill.ca

Other Highlights

-

-

-

PCard default FOAPAL

Tri-Agency funds will no longer be accepted as default funds

Requires an alternate default fund for all Pcards

Communications are going out and most successful to date

 Picture Receipts

Change in procedure for Research Grants and Contracts only

Effective 15 November 2014, all expense claims submitted on research grants/contracts must include original receipts for reimbursement

Capturing pictures of receipts with an iPhone is not considered an acceptable substitute for original receipts when charging research grants and contracts

Questions for discussion

 Can my unit increase its enrolment-driven budget by accepting more graduate students?

 Are there resources available to fund teaching for new graduate programs?

 What mechanisms in place for funding the development of new initiatives and programs?

Enrolment-Driven allocation

25

- Current allocations for FTE changes for regulated students:

Faculty

Agric & Env Sc

Arts

CCE

Dentistry

Education

Engineering

Law

Management

Medical Residents

Medicine

MSE

Music

Relig. St.

Science

Ugrad

$3,500

$2,400

$2,400

$9,000

$2,400

$3,000

$2,400

$2,400

$3,500

$3,000

$3,500

$2,400

$3,000

Masters PhD

$6,000 $11,000

$4,000

$3,600

$7,500

$6,000 $11,000

$4,000 $7,500

$5,000 $11,000

$4,000 $7,500

$3,600

$4,000

$7,500

$6,000 $11,000

$4,000

$5,000

$4,000

$7,500

$7,500

$6,000 $11,000

Questions for discussion

 Unionization is increasing our costs for TAs and possibly lecturers, but our budgets are not increasing. What can we do?

 My unit pays a number of course lecturers, and

McGill’s hourly rates are not as competitive as some of our neighbours’. How can I best manage this situation?

Questions for discussion

 Is budget-interpretation training offered to new chairs/directors?

 What are chairs/directors expected to do when it comes to reviewing budget reports and statements?

Download