EARLY CAREER DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME GRADE 8 - RESEARCH AND TEACHING TRACK YEAR 2 - OBJECTIVES AND TARGETS Name Staff Number College School/Research Institute Date of Current Appointment FTE Name of Reviewer Name of Mentor Purpose of this Form This form should be completed as close to the first anniversary of your appointment to the University as possible. The form should be used by your line manager (Reviewer) and your Head of School/Director of Research Institute to: assess and review achievement against Year 1 objectives assess and record the extent to which you currently meet the criteria for career progression to Grade 9; set specific objectives for the year ahead which deliver the strategic requirements of the University and your School/Research Institute and the outcomes required for progression towards promotion; identify the actions required by you and your manager(s) for you to reach the required standard within the agreed timescale; use as a template for a structured discussion with your Head of School/Director of Research Institute and Mentor on your development needs and plan for how these will be met. Before confirmation of your objectives, the completed form will be reviewed by the ECDP Board of Review to ensure the objectives set are clear, measurable and realistic, aligned with the relevant promotion criteria, and are likely to lead to progression within the required timescale. Page | 1 SECTION A – TO BE COMPLETED BY STAFF MEMBER IN ADVANCE OF THE YEAR 2 OBJECTIVE SETTING MEETING Please attach a copy of your CV to this form. As you were appointed on Grade 8, you are expected to meet the criteria required for Promotion to Grade 9 (detailed below) within a maximum period of 5 years of your appointment to the ECDP. To help you plan your progress towards this standard, note below relevant outputs and achievements that demonstrate the extent to which you currently meet the criteria; include any planned activities to which you already have a firm commitment. Note the main areas you consider you need to develop, how your development might be achieved and proposed timescales. When you have completed Section A, send this form to your Line Manager at least 5 days in advance of your Objective Setting Meeting. Criteria for Promotion to Grade 9 Evidence of Achievements/Outputs in Year 1 of Programme Objectives for Year 2 of the Programme Research & Scholarship Output A scholarly output, which includes a significant contribution to at least 4 papers in the most recent 6 year period which are likely to achieve an average rating of 3* (RAE/ REF equivalent, judged against current national criteria), and with none of these below 2* A substantial monograph may substitute for two publications. Award Generation Research income equal to the Russell Group median for the discipline group: http://www.gla.ac.uk/services/humanresources/all/pay/professoria landgrade10staffperformanceandrewardpolicy/rgbenchmarkdata/ Principal Investigator or key contributor on RCUK, EU and/or other grants. Supervision PGR supervision equal to Russell Group median: http://www.gla.ac.uk/services/humanresources/all/pay/professoria landgrade10staffperformanceandrewardpolicy/rgbenchmarkdata/ Page | 2 Knowledge Exchange & Impact Record of success in knowledge transfer to improve the performance of business, commerce and/or industry. Communication of research results to the public or public bodies, leading to changes in practice/policy. Application of knowledge to improve public sector performance and quality of life by informing public policy and government and/or through partnership with the voluntary sector, or the cultural and heritage sector. Teaching & Learning Excellent standard of teaching performance at various levels, for example, access, undergraduate, postgraduate (which might include CPD provision) as judged by evaluation methods including student feedback and peer-review. Sustained record of novel / innovative approaches to teaching, supporting student learning and/ or assessment e.g. development of inquiry based approaches, design of new assessment procedures, use of technology to promote students’ learning and engagement. Engagement in quality enhancement theme networks/or similar networks to support disciplinary and/or generic improvements in the quality of learning and teaching. Contributing to growth of student population resulting in new income streams. Page | 3 Leadership & Management Successful delivery of a task which improves School/ Research Institute performance, as evidenced by e.g. student recruitment / widening participation activities/ partnership development. Major contribution to Subject/School/RI or College strategic planning or policy development. Service within the wider subject community e.g. external examining, committee service within learned bodies. Track record in mentoring of staff / management of staff including, where appropriate, delivery of PDR. Contribution to the University international profile through the development of partnerships in research and/or teaching. Esteem Fellowship of subject specific society. Invited talks at international conferences/ events and UK Higher Education Institutions. Member of editorial board. Reviewer for research bodies. Effective links with research funders e.g. through Research Council college membership. Are there any personal circumstances that may have had an impact on your ability to achieve the required standard in one or more areas on which your application will be assessed. If yes, please provide details below: (Examples: Parental leave; disability; long-term absence due to ill health; time off to care for dependants etc.) Page | 4 Professional Development Record The following should provide completion details for all the relevant aspects of the Development Framework within ECDP and module objectives as outlined http://www.gla.ac.uk/services/humanresources/all/pay/ecdp/devframe/. Reference should be made to the ECDP Development Framework and Module Objectives. Research & Scholarship Module Led by Date Completed Research Integrity and PGR Supervision College Income & Funding Generation, including Managing Research Budgets College Research Governance & Ethics College Effective Publishing & Scholarship Strategies College Knowledge Exchange & Impact Module Led by Knowledge Exchange, Strategy & Planning Date Completed College Teaching & Learning Module Postgraduate Certificate in Academic Practice Led by Date Completed Learning & Teaching Centre Page | 5 Profile Building & Reputation Development Module Equality & Diversity Essentials Led by Date Completed Equality & Diversity Unit Team Working in an Academic Environment Mentor Led Leadership & Management Module Communicating Effectively Networking Skills; with and out with College Led by Date Completed Employee and Organisational Development Mentor Led The following optional section should be complete to reflect additional development activities undertaken in the past 12 months as relevant to the Early Career Development Programme. Additional CPD Completed: Module/Learning Date Completed Comments (Optional) Page | 6 SECTION B – TO BE COMPLETED FOLLOWING OBJECTIVE SETTING MEETING The Line Manager (Reviewer) should review the above information and discuss this further with the member of staff. The discussion may cover: Further information on previous experience/achievements Clarification of the standards expected to meet the promotion criteria. Realistic timescales for completion of required activities. Based on the information above and subsequent discussion, agree a specific set of objectives for Year 2. Objectives should benefit the School/Research Institute/University and should aim to stretch and develop the individual and progress their career development. The Head of School/Director of Research Institute will meet with the individual to review and confirm objectives and targets before they are finalised. Objectives will also be reviewed by the ECDP Board of Review. Category (e.g. Esteem, Scholarship) Activity/Output Date to be completed by: Page | 7 Outline Targets for Years 3 and 4, based on the discussion and information provided above. Include the activities required to meet the promotion criteria for Grade 9. Category (e.g. Esteem, Scholarship) Activity/Output Year 3 Year 4 (tick box) (tick box) REVIEW OF PERFORMANCE IN YEAR 1 Page | 8 OVERALL PERFOMANCE ASSESSMENT This section provides an overall performance assessment level based upon general performance and achievement of objectives during the Year 1 review period. Outstanding Excellent High Quality Inconsistent Improved Performance Required Signed - Staff Member Date: Signed - Reviewer Date: Signed - Head of School/Director of Research Institute Date: Forward completed and signed form to your Vice Principal/Head of College who will complete Section C. Page | 9 SECTION C – ENDORSEMENT BY VICE PRINCIPAL & HEAD OF COLLEGE Vice Principals & Heads of College are asked to review Year 2 Objective Setting and decide whether the objectives are of the appropriate standard based on the guidance below. Where the Vice Principal & Head of College considers objectives fall into category 2 they should be returned to the Head of School for amendment and resubmission. Where objectives fall into categories 1 or 3 the form should be forwarded to hr-acadprob-ecdp@glasgow.ac.uk for consideration by the ECDP Board of Review. Outcomes Description 1. Objectives meet required standard Objectives and targets are: 2. Objectives do not meet the required standard Objectives and/or targets fall into any one or more of the following categories: 3. Discussion with Panel recommended VP & Head of College Decision (please tick appropriate category) and give comments. Clear and achievable In line with College/School/RI strategy Likely to progress the individual’s development and career at the appropriate pace. Objectives are not clear Objectives are unrealistic for the individual at this point in their career either because they are too stretching or not stretching enough Objectives are not aligned to College/School/RI strategy Objectives are unlikely to progress the individual’s development and career at the appropriate pace. This may be appropriate where: Signed by VP & Head of College Objectives/targets are at the margins of acceptability Where it may be beneficial to discuss cases to ensure consistency across Colleges. Date: Page | 10