EARLY CAREER DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME GRADE 7 NEWLY APPOINTED STAFF ON RESEARCH AND TEACHING TRACK - INITIAL OBJECTIVES AND TARGETS 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. Name College School/RI Name of Reviewer Date of Current Appointment Grade 7 Track: Research & Teaching Context The expectation is that newly recruited staff appointed at Grade 7 to the Early Career Development Programme will progress to Grade 8 within 3 years of their initial appointment and Grade 9 within 8 years of their initial appointment. Purpose of this Form This form should be completed as soon as possible after you take up your appointment. The form should be used by your line manager (Reviewer) and your Head of School/Director of Research Institute to: assess and record the extent to which you currently meet the criteria for career progression to Grade 8; set specific objectives for the year ahead which deliver the strategic requirements of the University and your School/Research Institute and the outcomes required for progression towards promotion; identify the actions required by you and your manager(s) for you to reach the required standard within the agreed timescale; use as a template for a structured discussion with your Head of School/Director of Research Institute and Mentor on your development needs and plan for how these will be met. Before confirmation of your objectives, the completed form will be reviewed by the ECDP Panel to ensure the objectives set are clear, measurable and realistic, aligned with the relevant promotion criteria, and are likely to lead to progression within the required timescale. SECTION A – TO BE COMPLETED BY NEW ACADEMICS IN ADVANCE OF OBJECTIVE SETTING MEETING Please attach a copy of your CV to this form. As you were appointed on Grade 7, you are expected to meet the criteria required for Promotion to Grade 8 (detailed below) within a maximum period of 3 years of your appointment to the ECDP. To help you plan your progress towards this standard, note below relevant outputs and achievements that demonstrate the extent to which you currently meet the criteria; include any planned activities to which you already have a firm commitment. Note the main areas you consider you need to develop, how your development might be achieved and proposed timescales. When you have completed Section A, send this form to your Line Manager at least 5 days in advance of your Objective Setting Meeting. Criteria for Promotion to Grade 8 Research & Scholarship Output Published research which demonstrates an upward trajectory in terms of research quality at internationally excellent standard. A scholarly output which includes 4 publications in the most recent 6 year period with two at 3* (RAE/REF level) and with none of these below 2*. A monograph may substitute for two publications. Award Generation Principal Investigator or key contributor on a significant RCUK, EU and/or other grants. Independent research development including authorship of highly rated grant applications. Supervision Leading of PGR and research supervision. Evidence of Current Achievements/Outputs and Areas for further development not yet Planned planned, required activities and timescale. (Timescales should reflect the requirement to meet the criteria within 3 years of appointment – identity Year 1, Year 2 and Year 3 activities.) Draft Objectives for Year 1 in Research and Scholarship Draft Objectives Knowledge/Skills Development and Support Note here the skills and knowledge you need to develop to meet the Research and Scholarship criteria Development/Support Needs Knowledge Exchange & Impact Success in knowledge transfer to improve the performance of business, commerce and/or industry. Communication of research results to the public or public bodies across a range of stakeholders relating to changes in practice/policy. Public and/or cultural engagement and engagement with policy development leading to knowledge transfer or cultural exchange. Draft Objectives for Year 1 in Knowledge Exchange & Impact Knowledge/Skills Development and Support Note here the skills and knowledge you will need to develop to meet the Knowledge Exchange & Impact criteria. Draft Objectives Development/Support Needs Teaching & Learning Excellent standard of teaching performance involving a range of teaching methods as judged by evaluation methods including student feedback and peer review. Application of an enhancement-based approach to teaching, supporting student learning or assessment e.g. use of inquiry based approaches, effective assessment procedures, effective use of technology. Innovative curriculum development e.g. to promote retention, enhance employability, develop graduate attributes. Sustained record of design and marking of assessments with effective and timely feedback to students. Draft Objectives for Year 1 in Teaching & Learning Draft Objectives Knowledge/Skills Development and Support Development/Support Needs Note here the skills and knowledge you need to develop to meet the Teaching & Learning criteria. Leadership & Management Sustained performance of academic administrative duties, either within or on behalf of the Subject /School /Research Institute (e.g. course leadership). Engagement in the broader arena of the School/Research Institute/College, including, e.g. a role in student guidance /pastoral/welfare type activities and/or the professional arena outside the University. Guidance and advice to junior colleagues and/or support staff where such opportunities exist. Contribution to Subject/School/Research strategy in relation to research/teaching. Institute Evidence of research project management responsibility. Draft Objectives Management for Year 1 in Leadership & Knowledge/Skills Development and Support Note here the skills and knowledge you need to develop to meet the Leadership and Management criteria Draft Objectives Development/Support Needs Esteem Invited talks at national/international conferences/ events and UK Higher Education Institutions. Engagement in peer review of publications/grants. Effective research collaborations Draft Objectives for Year 1 in Esteem Draft Objectives Knowledge/Skills Development and Support Development/Support Needs Note here the skills and knowledge you will need to develop to meet the Esteem criteria. SECTION B – TO BE COMPLETED FOLLOWING OBJECTIVE SETTING MEETING The Line Manager (Reviewer) should review the above information and discuss this further with the member of staff. The discussion may cover: Further information on previous experience/achievements Clarification of the standards expected to meet the promotion criteria. Realistic timescales for completion of required activities. Based on the information above and subsequent discussion, agree a specific set of objectives for Year 1. Include objectives to be achieved within the 6-month probationary period. Objectives should benefit the School/University and should aim to stretch and develop the individual and progress their career development. The Head of School/Director of Research Institute will meet with the individual to review and confirm objectives and targets before they are finalised. Objectives will also be reviewed by the ECDP Panel. Category (e.g. Esteem, Scholarship) Activity/Output By When Outline Targets for Year 2 and 3, based on the discussion and information provided above. Include the activities required to meet the promotion criteria for Grade 8. Category (e.g. Esteem, Scholarship) Activity/Output Year 2 (tick box) Year 3 (tick box) Outline the Development Activities which will support you in achieving your objectives and targets. Category (e.g. Esteem, Scholarship) Activity/Output 1. Signed (Staff Member) 2. Signed (Reviewer) 3. Signed (Head of School/Director of Research Institute) Forward completed and signed form to your Vice Principal/Head of College who will complete Section C. To be completed by: Date: Date: Date: SECTION C – ENDORSEMENT BY VICE PRINCIPAL/HEAD OF COLLEGE Vice Principals/Heads of College are asked to review Initial Objective Setting and decide whether the objectives are of the appropriate standard based on the guidance below. Where the Vice Principal/Head of College considers objectives fall into category 2 they should be returned to the Head of School for amendment and resubmission. Where objectives fall into categories 1 or 3 the form should be forwarded to hr-ecdp@glasgow.ac.uk for consideration by the ECDP Panel. Outcomes Description 1. Objectives Meet required standard Objectives and targets are: Clear and achievable In line with College/School/RI strategy Likely to progress the individual’s development and career at the appropriate pace. 2. Objectives and/or targets fall into any one or more of the following categories: Objectives are not clear Objectives are unrealistic for the individual at this point in their career either because they are too stretching or not stretching enough Objectives are not aligned to College/School/RI strategy Objectives are unlikely to progress the individual’s development and career at the appropriate pace. Objectives do not meet the required standard 3. Discussion with Panel recommended Signed by VP/Head of College: VP/Head of College Decision (please tick appropriate category) and give comments. This may be appropriate where: Objectives/targets are at the margins of acceptability Where it may be beneficial to discuss cases to ensure consistency across Colleges. Date: