Iredell-Statesville Schools
School Improvement Plan
A Continuous Improvement Strategic Plan
School Name: Lakeshore Elementary
P
Year: 2013-2014
Current NCLB Status: AYP Met
Current ABC Status: School of Excellence
PLAN: Identify the gap and the approach
Overall SMART Goal (Two year projection): By 2014-2015 Students with Disabilities participating in math inclusion in grades 3-5 will go from
61% to 85% proficient in Math as measured by the Common Assessment 4.
Data Analysis. Answer the question below using any data and/or information you have about your performance.
In order to meet your Overall Goal, what is the most important area that needs improving and why? (Attach data or copy and paste)
Page 1
Updated 061011
Iredell-Statesville Schools
School Improvement Plan
A Continuous Improvement Strategic Plan
Page 2
Updated 061011
Iredell-Statesville Schools
School Improvement Plan
A Continuous Improvement Strategic Plan
EC Co Teaching Fidelity Data 2012-2013
Percentage Utilized
60%
50%
40%
30%
November
12/11/2012
20%
2/19/2013
10%
O
ne
Te
a
ch
/O
ne
St
at
As
io
s
n
Te ist
ac
hi
ng
Pa
ra
lle
Al
l
te
O
Te
r
n
ne
at
am
iv
Te
e
Te
ac
ac
h/
hi
O
ng
ne
O
bs
er
In
D
ve
de
id
no
pe
ts
nd
ee
en
tP
ra
ct
ice
0%
Type
Data Analysis. Answer the data analysis questions.
1. What is contributing to your success in this 2. What opportunities for improvement do you
area and how do you know?
notice?
All but 1 student in 3rd grade math inclusion
Some students are maintaining, and not showing
has shown growth from CA 1 To CA 4.
enough growth to close gaps.
th
All students in 4 grade math inclusion have
shown growth.
Fidelity data indicates a need for more support and
th
All but 1 student in 5 grade math inclusion
training in the co-teaching model.
Page 3
3. What seems to be the root cause of
the problem and how do you know?
Make sure that EC students are placed in
the appropriate setting. If students are
more than two years below their peers,
they will be placed in a resource setting.
Updated 061011
Iredell-Statesville Schools
School Improvement Plan
A Continuous Improvement Strategic Plan
have shown growth from CA 1 to CA 4.
Target SMART Goal (One year projection): By 2013-2014, Students with Disabilities participating in math inclusion in grades 3-5 will go from 61%
to 70% proficient in Math as measured by Common Assessment 4.
What will you do during cycle 1 to address the root cause identified in #3(Identify key approach or strategy you will implement during cycle 1 to
move toward achieving your target goal.)? Inclusion model will be implemented with fidelity with the appropriate students as determined by a
student’s IEP goals and EC identification.
D
DO: Develop and Implement Deployment Plan
Step #
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Cycle 1 List the specific steps your team will
complete during the first cycle.
Person(s) responsible
for completion of the
step.
Start Date
End Date
Hinson
Measure/Indicator
(How will you know if
the step is completed
correctly?)
Completed Class Roster
Determine which students would be
candidates for the co-teaching model based
on current IEP goals and EC identification in
grades 3-5.
Sort students into co-teaching clusters.
Keep inclusion class size low and keep these
classes out of the rotation to receive new
students when possible.
If possible schedule same Teacher Assistants
with the same inclusion teacher and subject
to be consistent from year to year.
Relieve Co-teachers of afternoon/morning
duties/ taking students to enhancements on
day of planning with co-teacher. Grade level
will help transition students in these classes
6/7/13
8/20/13
Hamrick
Hinson
Class Roster
Class Rosters
8/20/13
8/20/13
9/7/13
6/9/14
Hinson
TA Schedule
8/20/13
8/25/13
Grade level
teachers/Hinson
Class schedule
8/27/13
6/9/14
Page 4
Updated 061011
Iredell-Statesville Schools
School Improvement Plan
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
A Continuous Improvement Strategic Plan
to the bus/ enhancements.
Schedule IEP meetings to addend identified
Hamrick
Invitations Sent
students IEPs to reflect inclusion.
Hold IEP meetings
Hamrick
Addended IEP’s
Create a master schedule for inclusion for
Hinson
Completed Master
both reading and math.
Schedule
Assign students to appropriate teachers
Hinson
Class Roster
Assign EC teacher to partner with general
Hinson
EC Teacher Schedule
education teacher to deliver the co-teaching
model
Provide additional training and provide
Hinson
Sign in Sheet from
planning time for teachers deploying coPlanning Time
teaching model in grades 3-5 with support of
administration, program specialist, and IF.
Continue implementation of co-teaching
Hinson
Daily Class Schedule
model in grades 3-5 for both reading and
math.
Update AIMS web so that inclusion students Semanko
Updated AIMS Data
can be identified and subgroup data tracked.
Inclusion teachers will track their own
Inclusion
Completed Tool
fidelity data using the updated fidelity tool
Teachers/Administration
from 11/12. Administration will also track
fidelity using same tool for comparison data.
Schedule 4 data days for the year, one in
Hinson
Data Day agendas
each quarter, to review data of inclusion
subgroup
Revisit fidelity tool monthly and make
EC SIP team
Goal Team Agenda
changes as needed. Ongoing
Continue providing planning sessions and
Hinson/Semanko
Agenda
time for reflections from observations for coteachers with support of administration and
IF during grade level PLC’s, ERD, and
Grade Level Team Planning Time
Page 5
8/27/13
9/21/13
8/27/13
6/29/13
9/28/13
8/19/13
6/13/13
6/1/13
8/20/13
8/20/13
8/20/13
6/11/14
8/27/13
6/10/14
8/27/13
9/28/13
9/15/13
6/9/14
9/15/13
9/28/13
9/13/13
6/19/14
9/25/13
6/9/14
Updated 061011
Iredell-Statesville Schools
School Improvement Plan
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
25.
26.
27.
28.
29.
A Continuous Improvement Strategic Plan
Lesson Plans available upon request and
Hinson/ Co-teachers
Lesson Feedback
reflect the type of co-teaching approach
being utilized
Administer CA, PA’s and EOG’s according Semanko/Regrut
Result Data
to district testing schedule
Revisit with the whole staff the co-teaching
Hinson
Agenda
model and best practices
Analyze data and determine next steps.
EC SIP team
Completed Data
Questions
Observe rising third and fourth grade EC
Inclusion teachers
Observation completed
students that would be good candidates for
inclusion in ELA /Math
Collaborate with grade level team to ensure
that all inclusion time is occurring.
Review/revisit master schedule to make sure
student’s needs are being met.
Continue implementation of co-teaching
model in grades 3,4, and 5 for both reading
and math.
Inclusion teachers will track their own
fidelity data using the updated fidelity tool
from 11/12 .
Schedule 4 data days for the year, one in
each quarter, to review data of inclusion
subgroup
Revisit fidelity tool monthly and make
changes as needed. Ongoing
Continue providing planning sessions and
time for reflections from observations for coteachers with support of administration and
IF during grade level PLC’s, ERD, and
Grade Level Team Planning Time
8/27/13
6/9/14
9/28/13
6/9/14
9/25/13
6/9/14
9/28/13
6/9/14
5/7/14
5/28/14
Inclusion team
Lesson plans
11/13/13
6/9/14
Hinson/Hamrick
11/13/13
12/1/13
Hinson
Completed Master
Schedule
Daily Class Schedule
8/27/13
6/9/14
Inclusion Teachers
Completed Tool
9/15/13
6/10/14
Hinson
Data Day agendas
9/15/13
6/10/14
EC SIP team
Goal Team Agenda
9/13/13
6/19/14
Hinson/Semanko
Agenda
9/25/13
6/10/14
Page 6
Updated 061011
Iredell-Statesville Schools
School Improvement Plan
A Continuous Improvement Strategic Plan
Continue
providing
planning
sessions
and
Hinson/Semanko
Agenda
30.
time for reflections from observations for coteachers with support of administration and
IF during grade level PLC’s, ERD, and
Grade Level Team Planning Time
Lesson Plans available upon request and
Hinson/ Co-teachers
Lesson Feedback
31.
reflect the type of co-teaching approach
being utilized
Administer CA, PA’s and EOG’s according Semanko
Result Data
32.
to district testing schedule
Revisit with the whole staff the co-teaching
Hinson
Agenda
33.
model and best practices
Analyze data and determine next steps.
EC SIP team
Completed Data
34.
Questions
Observe rising third and fourth grade EC
Inclusion teachers
Observation completed
35.
students that would be good candidates for
inclusion in ELA /Math
What resources/budget needs do you have for the first cycle? Time for training, time for planning
9/25/13
6/10/14
8/27/13
6/10/14
9/28/13
6/10/14
9/25/13
6/10/14
9/28/13
6/10/14
5/7/13
5/28/14
If you identified budget needs, what budget code will you use to meet the budget needs for this cycle?
N/A
If funding is not available, identify the steps from the implementation plan that will address the funding gap.
N/A
What professional development, if any, will be offered in cycle 1 to support the staff in implementing the approach?
Co-Teaching Refresher provided by Curriculum and/or Program Specialist
Determine the measures/data that will be used to determine the effectiveness of the first cycle approach by answering the following questions:
A. List the information or measures the team
B. List the information or measures the team will use C. List the information or measures the
will use to determine if the approach was
to determine if the approach wasn’t implemented
team will use to determine what
implemented/completed? (Completion Data)
correctly? (Fidelity of implementation data.)
worked and what didn’t work? (Impact
Fidelity Tracking Tool
data)
CA data
Page 7
Updated 061011
Iredell-Statesville Schools
School Improvement Plan
A Continuous Improvement Strategic Plan
Lesson Plans denotes Co-Teaching
Co-Teaching built into master schedule
Changes made to student IEP’s
S
Study – Analysis of data after implementing an approach
At the end of cycle 1, answer the following questions based on the data collected from the identified measures in boxes A, B, and C above:
1. What worked and how do you
2. What didn’t work and how do you
3. Do you need any additional assistance as you look at
know?
know?
your results and start planning for Cycle 2? __Yes
___No
Reflect on the answers in box 1 and 2 above for cycle 1 and check which option best describes what you will do in your plan for cycle 2 (double
click the box and select “check” to check the box)?
Target goal has been met and is changed to a new target
Target goal not met so we will continue current plan. We will make
goal.
improvements to the plan based on what didn’t work as identified in #2 above.
Target goal not met but current plan is effective so we will
Target goal not met and information indicates that we need to abandon the
continue current plan and repeat it for the next cycle.
current plan and identify a new approach.
A
Act – Revise or continue with implementation plan based on data analysis.
4. What is your focus for cycle 2 (Identify key approach or strategy)? If you are continuing with the approach from cycle 1, restate it here. If you
are changing your approach for cycle 2, state it here.
Step #
Cycle 2 List the specific steps your team
Person(s) responsible for
Measure/Indicator
Start Date End Date
will complete during the second cycle.
completion of the step.
(How will you know if
the step is completed
correctly?)
1.
2.
3.
Page 8
Updated 061011
Iredell-Statesville Schools
School Improvement Plan
A Continuous Improvement Strategic Plan
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
Implementation Plan Quality Check:
What resources/budget needs do you have for cycle 2?
If you identified budget needs, what budget code will you use to meet the budget needs for this cycle?
If funding is not available, list the steps from the implementation plan that will address the funding gap.
What professional development, if any, will be offered in cycle 2 to support the staff in implementing the approach? none
Determine the measures/data that will be used to determine the effectiveness of the Cycle 2 approach by answering the following questions
A. List the information or measures the team
B. List the information or measures the team will
C. List the information or measures the
will use to determine if the approach was
use to determine if the approach wasn’t
team will use to determine what
implemented/completed? (Completion Data)
implemented correctly? (Fidelity of
worked and what didn’t work? (Impact
implementation.)
Data)
S
Study – Analysis of data after implementing an approach
Page 9
Updated 061011
Iredell-Statesville Schools
School Improvement Plan
A Continuous Improvement Strategic Plan
At the end of cycle 2, answer the following questions based on the data collected from the identified measures in boxes A, B, and C above:
1. What worked and how do you know?
2. What didn’t work and how do you know?
3. Do you need any additional assistance as
you look at your results and start planning
for Cycle 2? __Yes ___No
From whom do you need assistance?
Reflect on the data analysis for the year so far and check the option below that best describes your direction for the 2014-15 SIP.
A
Act – Continue with the Target Goal or revise the Target Goal for next year.
Overall goal has been met and School Improvement Plan focus will change for next year.
Or…
Target goal has been met and is changed to a new target goal.
Target goal not met but current plan is effective so we will continue current plan and repeat it for the 2010-11 SIP to take our work to
sustaining..
.Target goal not met, so we will continue current plan for 2014-2015. We will make improvements to the plan based on what didn’t work
through this year.
Page 10
Updated 061011