CSU, Chico - CISC Meeting Notes
Meeting Date: June 21, 2011
Meeting Location: MLIB 338
ATTENDING TEAM MEMBERS AND GUESTS
✔
Weddington, Phyllis
✔
Kelley, Meredith
Alber, Bob
Rethans, Arno
✔
Reed, Dan
✔
Post, Bill
✔
Foreman, David
✔
Miller, Andy - Guest
DISCUSSION ITEMS
1.
Enterprise Budget: Bill shared what he currently knew about the enterprise budget – previously discussed
dissolution/split has not been resolved; there has been suggestion of a 10% cut for FY 11/12; the $989K
reserve was swept by the budget office in March but the distribution of those funds is not known. Requests
for enterprise budget funding for training and student assistants are on the table. Becky has requested $9K to
fund student assistants for FY 2011/12 (summer-fall-spring) to work on several HR projects. Deborah F. has
a list of training requests for HCM 9.0 classes for the September/October timeframe that she will compile for
a funding estimate. If the enterprise budget cannot continue to fund training, those requests will be redirected
to individual units for funding. Deborah will continue to manage the training program in conjunction with
the CO. In summary, the questions surrounding this budget should be sorted out shortly and we will proceed
from there.
2.
Scope of CISC: Discussed whether it made sense to have the CISC serve as a governance leadership
committee for IT projects. This committee has morphed several times during the past decade as the campus
worked through CMS implementation and upgrade projects as well as providing oversight for enterprise
budget expenditures beyond CMS. Governance would add a new component to the role of the CISC.
3.
Governance documents: Reviewed the IT Governance and Data Governance draft documents and those will
be sent to the committee for further comment. More work needs to be done on the Data Governance
processes and that will be happening in the near future. Andy shared the progress that is being made on
SharePoint governance, timeline for completion, and the SharePoint value proposition (document will be sent
to the committee).
4.
Outcomes: After much discussion regarding various IT projects, concerns about data management,
speculation on the scope of governance versus the types of IT projects that may benefit from an active
governance process, the committee agreed that they uniquely positioned to assume an IT governance role.
More work will be done to define the committee’s role as well as how governance applies to different IT
efforts.
TO DO LIST SUMMARY
#
Task
1.
Send governance docs to committee
2.
3
Contact Becky/Lori re HR representation
FUTURE MEETINGS
Date: July 19, 2011
Responsible Party
Phyllis
Due Date
ASAP
Dave
ASAP
Time: 1:15 – 2:30
Status
Distributed with
meeting notes
In progress
Place: MLIB 338
FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS
Enterprise IT projects; inventory
and priority
Business process improvements
Workflow/electronic signatures
Administrative Technology
Committee status