Division of Student Affairs Disability Support Services Annual Report 2006-2007 1 I. Departmental Mission Statement The mission of Disability Support Services, which parallels the mission of CSU, Chico, is to increase access and retention for students with permanent and temporary disabilities by ensuring equitable treatment in all aspects of campus life. The program acts as a catalyst and agent for compliance with Federal, State, and CSU laws, regulations and policies mandating equal opportunity and access for persons with disabilities. Disability Support Services provides co-curricular and academically related services which empower students with disabilities to achieve academic and personal success. The University is committed to assisting students in their search for knowledge and understanding and to prepare them with the attitudes, skills, and habits of lifelong learning in order to assume responsibility in a democratic community and be useful members of a global society. DSS programs and services are administered to achieve this goal. Here at Chico State, we know that students with and without disabilities are on a journey to explore their identity, and to define their role in society. The role of Disability Support Services is to guide students through the process, so that ultimately students can identify their own personal strengths, understand the impact of their disability, think creatively about solutions, communicate their needs effectively, and assume responsibility as members of a global society. II. Departmental Accomplishments ATI participation and met deliverables Developed policies and procedures for DSS Upgraded equipment and software in the Assistive Technology Center Conducted two ADA workshops for staff and faculty Met goals and deliverables for EnACT grant Developed learning outcomes for DSS Revised DSS website to improve usefulness and accessibility Created faculty brochure regarding campus accessibility policies Developed program evaluation system for DSS Conducted a student satisfaction survey Had successful disability awareness events on campus Reduced average number of days for text conversion Forged partnerships with bookstore, electronic reserve Initiated conversation with data warehouse to improve reporting capability Hired Braille transcriber Secured funding from Department of Rehabilitation for assistive technology devices Connected DSS with Summer Orientation, including conducting a parent workshop Worked with the Bookstore to offer the Book in Common in alternate format Developed duty statements for student employees and educational assistants Revised the training manual for student employees. Division of Student Affairs Disability Support Services Annual Report 2006-2007 2 Accomplishments- A Highlight Accessible Technology Initiative (DSS goals 2 and 3) Disability Support Services has taken on a major role in the planning and implementation of the Accessible Technology Initiative. As program manager, I maintain the ATI website, distribute both electronic and nonelectronic publications to campus about the status of the ATI project; staff and coordinate the work of three committees associated with each of the ATI priorities, facilitate logistics for required measurement of progress and coordinate reports due to Chancellors office on the project progress. Each DSS Advisor, as well as the office manager, is on at least one of the three committees. We have achieved all of the first year deliverables and committee goals, which include: Form the priority committees Develop a portal for information/ ATI website Purchase and deploy Hi-soft web accessibility monitoring software Evaluate the top administrative websites Develop the First Year Web Accessibility Plan Develop the Instructional Materials Accessibility Plan This is an incredible opportunity for DSS to influence the activities of programs and divisions across campus and to improve DSS visibility across campus. Successful participation and engagement with the ATI allows DSS the opportunity to promote awareness of the needs and capabilities of students with disabilities, as well as to serve as a resource for members of the university community. Disability Support Services Policies and Procedures (DSS Goal 4) According to the Office of Civil Rights, disability programs are at the greatest risk of liability when they do not have policies and procedures in place that address how to make requests for reasonable accommodations, and how to seek grievance. At the beginning of this year, there were very few standards in place for how DSS serves students, documents relevant information and communicates with faculty, nor was there a clear statement in place regarding how DSS responds to requests for accommodations. In order to reduce CSU, Chico and DSS risk for complaints, ineffective services and grievances, I developed several policies and office procedures. Additionally, I revised request forms to be clearer, developed a quick reference timeline for request of services, and updated the DSS website to reflect current policies and procedures. With policies and procedures in place, we can focus on improving the quality of our services, and consider service expansion. Please see Section III for list of policies and procedures. Upgraded equipment and software in the Assistive Technology Center (DSS Goal 3) Technology is playing an increasingly important role in the delivery of classroom and online instruction; Students with disabilities are arriving at college technologically savvy and willing to make requests for appropriate assistive technology, especially in the area of student computing. Efforts to stay current and proactive with adaptive technology are an on-going challenge for DSS and the Assistive Technology Center, as neither program has dedicated human resources to research and maintain adaptive technology. This year, DSS worked collaboratively with ATC to evaluate the hardware and software available for students with Division of Student Affairs Disability Support Services Annual Report 2006-2007 3 disabilities. We determined that the ATC was not well prepared to handle new students with new technology or updated technology. As such, DSS successfully lobbied for additional funds for equipment and software. We were able to upgrade all computer stations at the ATC with current versions of software, as well as upgraded memory on some computers. We also purchased several new computers to create dedicated AT stations assigned to specific software packages. III. Changes in Policies and Procedures The Office of Civil Rights recommends clearly written and communicated policies regarding how to access academic adjustments and services for students with disabilities; and suggest that the lack of clear policies is the most common cause for complaints to Office of Civil Rights. The following policy statements, procedures and business practices were developed this year: Policy on Documentation of Disability Policy on Confidentiality Policy on File Review Policy on Student Records Management Policy on Alternate Media Services Alternate Media Agreement Alternate Media in-house process Alternate Media Conversion tracking procedure Alternate Media Request Form Alternate Media Search Procedures Alternate Media processing and tracking databases Policy on Attendance/Student Absence Cart Driver Policy Cart Driver Agreement Policy on Educational Assistants Policy on Service Animals Service Animal Agreement Policy on Specialized Furniture Grievance Procedure Division of Student Affairs Disability Support Services Annual Report 2006-2007 4 IV. Resources Summary Budget Summary: Beginning allocation: $435,002 One time budget mitigation 06/07: $15,787 ADA Month: $2,000 Mid Year allocation: $30,000 Work Study: $9,100 Additional work study allocation: $3,000 Rollover from 06/07: $16,949 Late Allocation (Raises/bonus): $14,293 Misc. Income (Selling old Cart, Interpreter fee, commencement) $841 Total DSS Budget Allocation 06/07: $ 526,972.00 Total DSS Expenditures: $511,836.85 Rollover to 07/08: $15,135.15 Budget Unmet Needs Request for AY 2007-2008* C:\Documents and Settings\skparsons\My Documents\BUDGET\unmetbudget needs2007.xls Staffing: Debbie Boyes position (ASA II) was re-classed to an ASC I, effective 9/2007. Debbie’s new working title is Assistant to the Director. *Alternate Media position (See Budget Unmet Needs Request AY 2007-2008) Facilities/Equipment: New and upgraded equipment was purchased for the ATC. See Part II. Additional assistive technology was purchased for use within DSS, including the KNFB Reader, Tiger Embosser and two laptops. Division of Student Affairs Disability Support Services Annual Report 2006-2007 5 V. Program Evaluation of Past Year DSS goals support the DSS mission; reflect the goal and values of the Student Affairs division, as well as, the standards set forth in CAS and Ahead. Goal 1 (CSU, Chico Strategic Priority 1): To provide accommodations that will assist students to overcome barriers and reduce the impact of their disabilities on their college experience. Measures of Performance and Progress toward Goal: Continue to meet individually with students in order to determine appropriate academic accommodations. Continue to assist students to appropriately advocate for classroom and facility accommodations with faculty and other appropriate university entities. Advisors continue to have an average of 400 student contacts per semester. Develop and provide an orientation and training to new Educational Assistants hired to facilitate accommodations for students by December 2006. A new Orientation manual has been developed this year, as well as a training curriculum to be used effective Fall 2007. Goal 2 (CSU, Chico Strategic Priority 1 and 2): To promote awareness of the needs and capabilities of students with disabilities among students, faculty, staff, administration and the surrounding community. Measures of Performance and Progress toward Goal: DSS will implement a Community of Practice for ENACT and Universal Design by spring 2007. EnACT community of practice was implemented Fall 2006 and has increased its faculty membership from 3 to 6 this year. DSS has meet all grant objectives associated with the EnACT grant. 2007-2008 is our final year for the grant. DSS will participate in one new faculty orientation. Working closely with Human Resources, DSS is now a part of the new staff and new faculty orientation schedule. DSS participated in orientations Fall 2006 and is already scheduled for Fall 2007. DSS will offer quarterly workshops to faculty and staff on disability related topics. This year, DSS offered two workshops on the Americans with Disabilities Act and two workshops on Universal Design. DSS will meet with 3 new departments each year. This year, I met with the following academic departments: Biology, Adaptive PE, English, History, and Multicultural Affairs. DSS will collaborate with CELT to provide consultation for faculty. Division of Student Affairs Disability Support Services Annual Report 2006-2007 6 DSS presented a workshop at the CELT conference on Universal Design and academic adjustments. DSS will provide disability- related training. Disability- related training, specifically accessibility issues, was provided for the following programs/divisions: Housing Resident Advisors, Writing Center, Disabled and the Law, Introduction to Special Education (students), Web Services team, TLP, EPPC, Academic Senate, Adventure Outings and the AS Bookstore. DSS will be actively involved in the planning of the Recreation Center to assure that the center is physically and programmatically accessible to all students. DSS Director sits on UCAC and CPEC. DSS will support Chico’s residential community by providing training to residential advisors and housing staff on the unique needs of students with disabilities. Training was provided to all new Resident Advisors this year. DSS will promote conversations on diversity through brown bag lunches that focus on disability awareness issues. DSS coordinated a disability awareness “conversation” with “Stomp Out Stigma,” a panel of persons with mental illness. DSS will promote awareness by planning an annual celebration in honor of National Disability Awareness Month. October 2006 was a successful month full of various awareness activities, including a comedic presentation, brown bag informational lunches, an informational fair on the quad, an ADA presentation, and art by people with disabilities in Kendall Hall. DSS will collaborate with university student programs in order to promote equal access and participation of students with disabilities. DSS has met with Adventure Outings to promote modified recreation activities for new students with disabilities. Adventure Outings is now advertising that they have modified recreation equipment and inviting students who need accommodations to contact them. This is a great first step! Goal 3 (CSU, Chico Strategic Priority 4): To serve as a resource for members of the University community, prospective students, parents, and members of the public. Measures of Performance and Progress toward Goal: DSS will meet with community colleges annually to coordinate transition of students with disabilities to Chico State. Division of Student Affairs Disability Support Services Annual Report 2006-2007 7 DSS Director and one Advisor met with Butte College DSPS Director and Advisors to discuss collaboration, as well as participated in disability awareness information fair. We agreed to meet once each semester. DSS will offer a transition orientation for community college students interested in Chico State. DSS offered a brief transition orientation to students, but this will be strengthened this coming year. DSS will collaborate with Summer Orientation to be sure students and visitors with disabilities are afforded equal access and participation in orientation activities. DSS met with Summer O staff who agreed to include language on registration material regarding the need for accommodations. As such, DSS and Summer O have been able to coordinate accommodations before visitor’s arrival to ensure a successful orientation. DSS allows Summer Orientation use of our CART to provide mobility for visitors who require it. DSS will collaborate with Butte County high schools and the California Department of Rehabilitation Transition Program regarding the transition of high school students with disabilities. This has not been tackled, but will be this coming year 2007-2008. Provide support and resources for the Assistive Technology Initiative by providing tools, tips and resources on the DSS website by June 2007. The ATI website is live with various resources. The DSS website will be live before the end of the summer 2007. DSS will work collaboratively with TLP to develop effective teaching opportunities for faculty. DSS and TLP continue to collaborate extensively regarding teaching opportunities for faculty, especially in light of the ATI. TLP sits on the ATI sub committee for accessible instructional materials, as well as a participant of the EnACT community of practice. DSS Director and staff will continue to participate in university workgroups and committees as appropriate. DSS Director sits on the following committees: ATI Steering Committee Accessible Instructional Materials Accessible Procurement Web Accessibility Emergency Preparedness Committee Campus Climate Committee Diversity Scorecard University Construction Advisory Committee Campus Planning Executive Committee Americans with Disabilities Act Committee EnACT Community of Practice Brain Injury Taskforce (community based) DSS Staff sit on the following committees and/or workgroups: Accessible Instructional Materials Accessible Procurement Web Accessibility EnACT Community of Practice Environmental Affairs Committee Division of Student Affairs Disability Support Services Annual Report 2006-2007 8 Goal 4 (CSU, Chico Strategic Priority 1): To determine student needs and improve program quality through ongoing assessment of Disability Support Services. Measures of Performance and Progress toward Goal: Audit services, publications, policies and practices to determine barriers to our program and Services (EO 926) by the end of Fall 2006 Prepare a plan for developing, revising and implementing policies. Audit process for requesting and producing alternative media by the end of Fall 2006 Develop internal procedures for responding to accommodation requests (EO926) by end of fall 2006. Update publications/web site to reflect internal procedures by June 2007 Audit grievance procedures per EO 926 by end of Fall 2006 Develop standards for documentation by end of Fall 2006 Streamline student file system by end of Fall 2006 All of the above has been completed. See Section III. Establish a DSS student advisory committee with both campus entities and community representatives by the end of Fall 2006. This was not achieved; More planning is required in Fall 2007. VI. Ongoing Assessment Efforts This year, I focused on developing a data-driven system of assessment opportunities for DSS, based on the AHEAD assessment framework, as follows: Provide services that are based on institutions mission and service philosophy Collect student feedback to measure satisfaction and quality of services. Collect data to monitor use of and evaluate the effectiveness of services Report program evaluation data to administrations. Student Data: Primary Disability Fall 2006 Spring 2007 Communication Disability 13 12 Deaf Learning Disability Mobility Limitation Other Functional Limitations Visual Limitations Total 3 242 53 197 13 521 3 195 42 161 10 423 Quick Data AY 2006-2007: Division of Student Affairs Disability Support Services Annual Report 2006-2007 9 DSS Primary Service Fall 2006 Spring 2007 Registration Assistance 118 101 Disability related counseling services Specialized equipment, materials, supplies Test taking facilitation services Interpreter services On campus mobility services Note taker services Other services Reader services Total 4 4 4 2 341 3 16 11 20 4 521 270 3 12 10 17 4 423 Quick Data AY 2006-2007 1321 tests administered 80 texts converted 40 course packs converted 528 hours of in-class EA 192 hours of out of class EA 60 psycho ed. tests administered 1240 hrs. Sign language interpreting 9000 Cart Rides Services by disabilities data- Fall 2006: Services Registration assistance Disability related counseling Specialized equipment Test Taking Interpreter services On campus mobility Notetaker Other services Reader services Total Communication 4 Deaf 4 LD 61 1 1 172 Mobility 1 1 2 32 Other 51 2 10 1 3 2 3 9 2 197 127 Visual 1 1 6 3 5 13 Services by disabilities data- Spring 2007: Services Communication Registration assistance 4 Disability related counseling Specialized equipment Test Taking 3 Interpreter services On campus mobility Notetaker 5 Other services Reader services Total 12 3 Deaf 2 3 2 242 LD 53 1 1 135 53 5 13 Mobility 1 1 1 25 Other 42 2 Visual 1 102 5 10 1 3 2 2 9 2 161 4 3 3 2 1 2 195 Graduation rate for CSU, Chico Students with disabilities 44% Persistence rate for CSU, Chico Students with disabilities 50% 42 19 Total 118 4 4 341 3 12 11 20 4 521 Total 101 4 2 270 3 12 10 17 4 423 Division of Student Affairs Disability Support Services Annual Report 2006-2007 10 Student Access Survey DSS administered a web based Student Access Survey in spring 2007, yielding a 19% response rate. The survey asked students to consider availability and quality of staff and services of DSS, as well as, learning outcomes. Full Survey results and student comments are attached at the end of this section. The following highlights survey results. Availability and Quality of Support Services 100% 90% 87% 84% 83% 80% Percent Good + Excellent 80% 80% 77% 80% 75% 72% 71% 72% 70% 67% 62% 60% 56% 54% 50% 50% 57% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% er pr et in g y Quality of Service In t te c hn ol og g ap tiv e N Ad uc Ed Availability of Service ot et ak in ts ss is la at io na tra s am pu ta n es rib Sc io n po ns in i ad m st Te rta t tio n st ra rk in pa ed ca an di H C Ac ce ss ib ilit y pp in f or m at io n g 0% Division of Student Affairs Disability Support Services Annual Report 2006-2007 11 Alternate Format Services 80 textbooks converted 40 course packs converted 18.6 days is the average # of days to covert print based instructional material 25% of print based materials were provided to students by the first day of school Alternative Format Materials (Caution - low N's) Time it takes to reproduce textbooks Accuracy of reproduced textbook materials 36% 57% 20% 7% 73% 7% Check-out process for software/equipment is clearly stated/easy to follow 33% 56% 11% Return process for software/equipment is clearly stated/easy to follow 33% 56% 11% Services from RFB&D are adequate 0% 27% 46% 20% % Very satisfied 40% 27% 60% % Somewhat satisfied 80% % Not very satisfied 100% Division of Student Affairs Disability Support Services Annual Report 2006-2007 12 Learning Outcomes: DSS Student Learning Outcomes are consistent with CSU, Chico Strategic Priority One: believing in the primacy of learning, we will continue to develop high-quality learning environments both inside and outside the classroom. DSS Student Learning Outcomes are based on the belief that the key to a successful academic journey for students with disabilities is the ability and openness to realize their personal strengths and limitations, the desire and aptitude to take responsibility for managing their academic and personal success, and the maturity to utilize resources and services available to assist them. The role of Disability Support Services is to guide students through the process, so that ultimately students can identify their own personal strengths, understand the impact of their disability, think creatively about solutions, and communicate their needs effectively. Upon completion of a semester, students registered with the Disability Support Services will be able to: Identify their specific disability and functional limitations resulting from the disability; Demonstrate the ability to determine and state their accommodation needs; Describe the process involved in requesting disability accommodation for curriculum requirements Learning Outcomes I can determine what academic accommodations I need. 91% 3% 6% I can independently request the DSS services I need. 92% 3% 5% I can successfully advocate for academic accommodations I need with instructors. 80% I am aware of how my disability impacts my life. 8% 3% 4% 93% 0% 20% 40% % Agree + Strongly agree % Neither 12% 60% 80% 100% % Disagree + Strongly disagree Division of Student Affairs Disability Support Services Annual Report 2006-2007 13 Summary Most students believe that services are available when they need them, that the quality is effective and appropriate to assist them to gain access to their instructional materials and activities, and that they are learning appropriate advocacy skills. Most students say they would recommend CSU, Chico to other students with disabilities. See Section VII for additional analysis. The Bottom Line: Would you recommend a student with a disability attend CSU, Chico? 6% 21% 73% % Highly recommend Full Survey and results % Might recommend % Would not recommend Division of Student Affairs Disability Support Services Annual Report 2006-2007 14 VII. Analysis After considering assessment opportunities, as well as demographic trends with respect to people with disabilities, the following is offered as discussion of how to take CSU, Chico to the next level. Effectiveness of Alternate Format services Analysis shows that a significant number of students are not satisfied with the effectiveness of alternate text services. The Office of Civil Rights has defined “effective” as timely and accurate. “Timely” means that students with disabilities receive their print based instructional materials at the same time as students without disabilities. Only 25% of our students received their texts and course packs by the first day of school. The average number of days to convert text is 18.6; however, it took DSS ninety-five days to covert a text book resulting in a three month delay for the student to receive the text. This is clearly unacceptable. This is a complex issue that necessitates consideration of several factors involving several campus divisions. Campus Wide Factors: Only 20% of text books are ordered by faculty in a timely manner. Instructors have not been required to meet deadlines associated with text book adoption. Additionally, there are a significant number of late hire instructors which impacts text book adoption. Electronic Reserve does not have efficient scanning hardware or software to produce accessible electronic media which results in additional conversion required by DSS. Student Factors: Only 35% of texts were received in DSS in enough time to complete the conversion process by the first day of school. This is due, in part, to the textbook adoption issue, however, not entirely. Students who require alternate text need to understand the policy and process in requesting conversion services. This year, DSS implemented clear policy and procedures for the conversion service and will begin reminding students of their responsibility to understand the process for timely conversion services. DSS Factors: DSS has been operating without the benefit of a full-time position dedicated to the coordination and production of instructional materials in alternate format. The Alternate media job function is split between too many people, including professional staff members, and several students. This results in multiple scanners and editors handling one book; insufficient space to maintain a well-organized system of receiving and organizing text books; an insufficient number of trained scanners and editors; and outdated conversion software because no one is specifically assigned to this job function full time. DSS has requested a full time Alternate Media position. The Accessible Technology Initiative will be the catalyst to improving the effectiveness of this service. Specifically, the Instructional Materials Accessibility Plan is a comprehensive plan addressing the issues associated with timely and accurate print based instructional materials. The plan spans the whole campus, including Student Affairs, Information Resources, Academic Affairs, Human Resources and Associated Students. Division of Student Affairs Disability Support Services Annual Report 2006-2007 15 Professional Development To facilitate equal access to postsecondary education for students with disabilities, DSS needs to provide DSS staff with on-going opportunities for professional development. DSS needs to refine its orientation and staff development of student personnel, as well. Anecdotal information from the DSS survey, direct feedback from students and campus staff, as well as personal observation, demonstrates that the DSS staff needs to develop a clear and consistent message about DSS mission and goals; understand how our program is aligned with the CSU strategic priorities; and re-affirm our understanding and commitment to providing high quality customer service. Within this framework, we need to consider how DSS can broaden our services to really fulfill our mission and student learning outcomes. For example, students (according to responses on survey and observation) would like DSS to consider providing social opportunities as a way to acclimate to campus and job readiness training specific to needs of students with disabilities. As such, DSS staff requires training in areas outside of the usual scope of academic support, but within a broader scope of disability services; Specifically, DSS staff requires professional growth in the area of transition, employment for persons with disabilities, and social and cultural adjustment, as well as community resources for students with disabilities. The effectiveness of assessment We are doing an adequate job with assessment; however, in order to really take DSS to the next level of excellent quality services, we need to better understand who and what we are doing now. There are currently substantial gaps in our program evaluation system which impacts our ability to do a thorough assessment of the program and services. Data Elements: PeopleSoft has serious limitations for DSS. Specifically, PeopleSoft only tracks six disability categories: Communication, Deaf, Learning Disability, Mobility Limitations, Other Functional Limitations and Visual Limitations. These data elements are insufficient, especially considering that 41% of the students we serve fall under the “Other Functional Limitations” category. We are not reporting an accurate picture of who we serve. For example, only students who use sign language interpreting are reported as being deaf, which shows three on our campus. However, there are eight deaf/hard of hearing students on our campus at this time. In order to make informed decision about who we are presently serving, what services are necessary and the cost implications, we need to have these data elements expanded. Additionally, People Soft only tracks nine services: Registration assistance, disability-related counseling, specialized equipment, test taking, and interpreter services, on campus mobility, note taker, reader services and “other”. There are several problems with these data elements. There is no standard definition for the data elements. For example, what is registration assistance? Is that priority registration or is it help finding classes that are appropriate for one’s disability issues? What is a reader service? Is that having a person read text for you or is it having texts produced in alternate format? This year, I have spent some time with the DSS Advisors working on some standardized definitions of data elements, but in order the issue to be really addressed, we need to work outside of DSS. As such, DSS is working with Information Resources (Data Warehouse) to expand and define the PeopleSoft elements, as well as, working with Enrollment Management to define and create better reports. Additionally, I am on a system wide workgroup with the Chancellor’s Office to address the same issue. Division of Student Affairs Disability Support Services Annual Report 2006-2007 16 Reports: Additionally, the reports that are generated from the present data elements (Enrollment Management Reports) only reflect the primary disability and primary services. Most of our students have more than one disability and receive several services. This is evidenced in Section VI, which shows that the most utilized service we have is test-taking. However, it does not reflect the whole picture. If someone has test taking, and alternate media, and on-campus mobility, the report only reflects test-taking. The data is dependent upon how the advisors enter the information and how they are personally defining the elements. Additionally, DSS is working with Enrollment Management to create report parameters that include the following: DSS and class level, grades, academic programs, and persistence and graduation rates. Once we have easy access to this information, we can more effectively assess the scope and trends related to DSS students and our services. Customer Feedback DSS needs to consider all of its “customers” when analyzing the effectiveness of our services. Faculty feedback regarding the quality and effectiveness of services is missing from our program evaluation. This year, DSS needs to continue to develop a system to evaluate how DSS is serving the faculty community and specifically, assess the training and support issues important to faculty. Additionally, DSS needs to implement a Disability Advisory Council that can advise the DSS Director and staff about the needs and issues that impact students with disabilities and their success on our campus. This type of feedback, though anecdotal, is crucial as part of a thorough program evaluation system. Other Assessment Opportunities DSS has the means to capture additional assessment opportunities, such as conducting an “exit interview” for students upon graduation, as well as conducting evaluations of student staff- educational assistants. This information will be helpful to round out DSS program evaluation. VIII. Goals for next academic year 1. Use the platform of ATI and the Instructional Materials Accessibility Plan to improve the effectiveness of Alternate Media Services at Chico State by refining processes within DSS as well as in other campus programs. (CSU, Chico Strategic Priorities #1 and #3) 2. Strengthen our role as disability professionals on campus and in the community: On-going professional development, outreach to campus and community groups, community colleges, and disability services agencies. (CSU, Chico Strategic Priority #2) 3. Develop additional assessment opportunities: Work with Data warehouse team, implement DSS Student Advisory Council, use exit interviews, and student staff evaluations. (CSU, Chico Strategic Prioriy #5)