Chapter Four: Today’s Practice – Departments & Firms This multimedia product and its contents are protected under copyright law: •any public performance or display, including transmission of any image over network; •preparation of any derivative work including the extraction, in whole or in part, of any images; •any rental, lease, or lending of the program. Copyright © Allyn and Bacon 2006Copyright © Allyn & Bacon 2008 Overview Public relations departments Line and staff functions Public relations firms Copyright © Allyn and Bacon 2006Copyright © Allyn & Bacon 2008 Public Relations Departments Importance of PR to today’s organizations PR pros seen as strategic communication managers PR offers 184% ROI CEOs want communication that is strategic, research-based, and two-way Organizational structure Large vs. small firms Management perceptions C-suite attitudes/reporting issues Sources of influence for PR Copyright © Allyn and Bacon 2006Copyright © Allyn & Bacon 2008 Department Names PR vs. corporate communications or communications Other names Corporate etc. relations, investor relations, public affairs, Organization of Departments Leader titles Reporting hierarchy Size of departments Copyright © Allyn and Bacon 2006Copyright © Allyn & Bacon 2008 Line and Staff Functions Line manager Delegates, sets goals, hires, influences others’ work Staff function Little direct authority Indirectly influence others’ work through suggestions, recommendations, advice PR is a staff function Copyright © Allyn and Bacon 2006Copyright © Allyn & Bacon 2008 Public Relations Influence within the Organization Access to management PR influence is linked to access to top management Recommendations to management help in formulating policy Levels of public relations influence Advisory: Management has no obligation to request or act on recommendations Compulsory-advisory: Management is required to listen to public relations’ perspective before acting Concurring authority: PR and others must agree on an action Purely advisory practitioners are often ineffective This has benefits and detriments for PR Command authority: PR can require a particular action Copyright © Allyn and Bacon 2006Copyright © Allyn & Bacon 2008 Sources of Friction within Organizations Legal Department Human Resources Department Differences regarding employee communications Advertising Department Differences on public statements Competing for resources Philosophical differences Marketing Department Focuses on one public: current or prospective customers Copyright © Allyn and Bacon 2006Copyright © Allyn & Bacon 2008 Public Relations Firms Trend toward outsourcing needs to PR firms Firms can complement in-house expertise. Firms offer diverse services. Firms have regional, national, and global reach. Many firms are owned by communication conglomerates and thereby can offer integrated services (i.e., PR and advertising expertise) through affiliates. Copyright © Allyn and Bacon 2006Copyright © Allyn & Bacon 2008 Firm Structure Depends on size of firm Small firm may only have owner and one or two associates Large firms have an extended hierarchy President Executive VP Senior VP VP Account supervisor Account executive Assistant account executive Copyright © Allyn and Bacon 2006Copyright © Allyn & Bacon 2008 Deciding About Using a Firm Pros of using a firm Objectivity Expertise Resources Reach Problem-solving skills Credibility Cons of using a firm Superficial knowledge Part-time commitment Need for long briefing Internal resentment Need for direction Need for information and confidence Potentially expensive Copyright © Allyn and Bacon 2006Copyright © Allyn & Bacon 2008 Fee Structures of Firms Hourly plus Out-of-Pocket Most widely used among large firms Retainer Fixed by Project Pay for Placement Seldom used Copyright © Allyn and Bacon 2006Copyright © Allyn & Bacon 2008