Coherent X-ray Imaging
WBS 1.3
CXI Component Status, Cost and Schedule
Paul Montanez
CXI Lead Engineer/CAM
June 3, 2009
CXI Final Instrument Design Review
June 3, 2009
1
1
Paul Montanez, P.E.
montanez@SLAC.Stanford.EDU
Outline
WBS 1.3 Scope
Early Science/CD-4 Deliverables
Progress since CD-2
Status
Engineering/Design Status
Cost & Schedule Performance
Critical Path
Milestones
Risk Identification & Mitigation
Safety
Summary
CXI Final Instrument Design Review
June 3, 2009
2
2
Paul Montanez, P.E.
montanez@SLAC.Stanford.EDU
Acronyms
PRD
Physics Requirements Document
ESD
Engineering Specifications Document
SOW
Statement of Work
ICD
Interface Control Document
PDR
Preliminary Design Review
FDR
Final Design Review
BAC
Budget at Completion
BCR
Baseline Change Request
XRT
X-ray Transport Tunnel
FEH H5
Far Experimental Hall Hutch 5
CXI Final Instrument Design Review
June 3, 2009
3
3
Paul Montanez, P.E.
montanez@SLAC.Stanford.EDU
WBS 1.3 – Early Science/CD-4 Deliverables
WBS
1.3.01
1.3.02
1.3.02.02
1.3.03
1.3.03.01
1.3.05
1.3.05.01
1.3.05.01.01
WBS
1.3.01
1.3.02
1.3.02.01
1.3.04
1.3.04.01
1.3.05
1.3.05.01
1.3.05.01.01
Early Science
CXI System Integration & Design
CXI X-ray Optics
CXI KB System (1 micron)
CXI Lasers
CXI Reference Laser
CXI Sample Environment
CXI Room Temperature Environment
CXI Sample Chamber & Ion TOF
CXI 1 Micron Sample Chamber
1.3.05.01.02
CXI Precision Instrument Stand
CXI Precision Instrument Stand -- 1 Micron
CXI Detector Stage
1.3.06
CXI Hutch Facilities
1.3.06.01
CXI Hutch Specification
1.3.06.02
CXI Utilities & Hutch Equipment
1.3.07
CXI Vacuum System
1.3.07.01
CXI Vacuum Equipment
1.3.07.02
CXI Vacuum Hardware
1.3.07.02.01
CXI Spools & Bellows
1.3.07.02.02
CXI Vacuum Supports
1.3.08
CXI Installation
1.5
Diagnostics and Common Optics
1.5.02.01
Pop-in Profile Monitor
1.5.02.02
Pop-In Intensity Monitor
DCO
1.5.02.03
Intensity-Position Monitor
1.5.03.03
Slit System
1.5.03.04
Attenuators / Filters
1.5.03.05
Pulse Picker
Controls 1.6
Controls and Data Acquisition
LCLS
2.06.05.02
2.06.02.08 Cornell 2D Pixel Array Detector
CXI
CD-4
CXI System Integration & Design
CXI X-ray Optics
CXI KB System (0.1 micron)
CXI Coherent Imaging Injector
CXI Coherent Imaging Injector
CXI Sample Environment
CXI Room Temperature Environment
CXI Sample Chamber & Ion TOF
CXI 0.1 Micron Sample Chamber
CXI Ion ToF
1.3.05.01.02
CXI Precision Instrument Stand
CXI Precision Instrument Stand -- 0.1 Micron
1.3.07
CXI Vacuum System
1.3.07.01
CXI Vacuum Equipment
1.3.07.02
CXI Vacuum Hardware
1.3.07.02.01
CXI Spools & Bellows
1.3.07.02.02
CXI Vacuum Supports
1.3.08
CXI Installation
1.6
Controls and Data Acquisition
Early Science: Early Finish – April 2011
CD-4: Early Finish – January 2012
(B/L Early Finish – May 2011)
(B/L Early Finish – November 2011)
CXI Final Instrument Design Review
June 3, 2009
4
4
Paul Montanez, P.E.
montanez@SLAC.Stanford.EDU
Progress Since CD-2
CXI Engineering/Design staff
Added 1 Mechanical Engineer & 1 Mechanical Designer – October 2008
Added 2 Mechanical Engineers & 1 Mechanical Designer – March 2009
Added 1 Mechanical Engineer – April 2009
All documentation completed & released
PRDs, ESDs, SOW’s, etc.
1µm Kirkpatrick-Baez mirror system
Authorization to proceed with advanced procurement
Vendor site-visits
Mirror system RFP released, proposals received and vendor selection made April 27,
2009
Award in June 2009
Design Reviews
Preliminary Design Reviews completed
CXI 1µm Sample Chamber & Reference Laser – March 2009
CXI Detector Stage & 1µm Precision Instrument Stand – May 2009
Baseline vibration data obtained in the LCLS Far Experimental Hall
Vertical/Horizontal PSD, 1-100Hz
Measured near location of 1µm KB system
CXI Final Instrument Design Review
June 3, 2009
5
5
Paul Montanez, P.E.
montanez@SLAC.Stanford.EDU
Engineering/Design Status
CXI Early
Science
CXI CD-4
Diagnostics/Common Optics
Diagnostics &
Wavefront Monitor
1 micron Sample Environment
1 micron KB
Reference Laser
0.1 micron KB & Sample Environment,
Particle Injector and IToF
CXI Engineering/Design staff
Armin Busse, Kay Fox, Paul Montanez, William Olson, Michael
Ramos, Donald Schafer, Nathaniel Stewart
CXI Final Instrument Design Review
June 3, 2009
6
6
Paul Montanez, P.E.
montanez@SLAC.Stanford.EDU
Engineering/Design Status (2)
Documentation
CAD system model documentation hierarchy (CAD Drawing Tree/File Structure) released
XRT/FEH H5 beamline layout complete with all available models implemented & updated
26 PRDs/ESDs released, 10 SOWs/ICDs released
CXI PHYSICS REQUIREMENTS DOCUMENTS (PRD) & ENGINEERING SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS (ESD)
TOPIC AREA
PRD DOCUMENT NO.
ESD DOCUMENT NO.
CXI Instrument Start-up Plan
SP-391-001-16
Physics Requirements for the CXI Instrument
SP-391-000-19
CXI Instrument ESD
SP-391-000-85
CXI 0.1 micron Sample Chamber
SP-391-000-20
SP-391-000-67
CXI Reference Laser System
SP-391-000-21
SP-391-000-73
CXI 0.1 micron KB System
SP-391-000-24
SP-391-000-64
CXI 1 micron KB System
SP-391-000-25
SP-391-000-65
CXI Particle Injector System
SP-391-000-26
SP-391-000-75
CXI Detector Stage
SP-391-000-28
SP-391-000-70
CXI Ion ToF
SP-391-000-30
SP-391-000-68
CXI 0.1 micron Precision Instrument Stand
SP-391-000-63
SP-391-000-69
CXI 1 micron Sample Chamber
SP-391-001-41
SP-391-001-43
CXI 1 micron Sample Precision Instrument Stand
SP-391-001-42
SP-391-001-44
Eng Spec for Hutch 5 of the FEH
SP-391-001-36
Eng Spec for the CXI of the FEH
SP-391-001-37
Eng Spec for the Common Room of the FEH
SP-391-001-40
-
Hutch Design
Reviewed 30%, 60%, 90% & 100%
A/E drawings
FEH Hutch construction – June thru
December 2009 (LCLS)
APP and Risk Identification/Registry
complete and up-to-date
CXI Final Instrument Design Review
June 3, 2009
CXI STATEMENTS OF WORK (SOW) & INTERFACE CONTROL DOCUMENTS (ICD)
TOPIC AREA
SOW DOCUMENT NO. ICD DOCUMENT NO.
1 micron KB System, Mirror Substrates
SP-391-001-51
1 micron KB System Mechanics, Mechanical System
SP-391-001-52
1 micron KB System, Mirror Coating
SP-391-001-53
1 micron KB System, Mirror Metrology
SP-391-001-54
0.1 micron KB System, Mirror Substrates
SP-391-001-57
0.1 micron KB System Mechanics, Mechanical System
SP-391-001-58
0.1 micron KB System, Mirror Coating
SP-391-001-59
0.1 micron KB System, Mirror Metrology
SP-391-001-60
CXI Detector Stage Design
SP-391-001-68
CXI-DCO ICD
SP-391-001-56
-
7
7
Paul Montanez, P.E.
montanez@SLAC.Stanford.EDU
Engineering/Design Status (3)
CXI 0.1µm KB system (WBS 1.3.02.01)
PRD, ESD & SOWs released
Procurement included as an “option” for the CXI 1µm KB contract
Delivery November 2010
BAC ≈ $1,400K
CXI 1µm KB system (WBS 1.3.02.02)
PRD, ESD & SOWs released
Prime vendor to provide complete and integrated KB system, including:
Figured & Polished Substrates
Mirror Mechanics/Manipulators
Vacuum chamber and support stand
MOU for independent metrology/coating of the substrates
LLNL likely candidate based on past experience with LCLS OMS mirrors
Secured the services of an optics expert to assist with the evaluation of all procurement documents and
to participate as a member of the Proposal Evaluation Committee
Procurement Activities
Advance Procurement Review – October 2008 (required for advanced procurement authorization)
Design Review Report TR-391-003-10 “CXI 1 Micron K-B Mirror System Advanced Procurement Technical Review”
Vendor site-visits by CXI staff – Q1 FY09
Prequalification of vendors – December 2008/January 2009
Posted on Federal Business Opportunities (FedBizOpps) website
RFP sent to vendors – January 2009
Vendor proposals received – 24 March 2009
Proposal Evaluation Committee Meeting – 9 April 2009
Recommend a vendor to the Source Selection Official on April 27th
Award in June 2009
Delivery October 2010
Budget at Completion (BAC) ≈ $1,280K ($970,000 in long lead procurement)
CXI Final Instrument Design Review
June 3, 2009
8
8
Paul Montanez, P.E.
montanez@SLAC.Stanford.EDU
Engineering/Design Status (4)
CXI Reference Laser (WBS 1.3.03.1)
PRD & ESD released
Successful PDR held March 2009
Design Review Report TR-391-003-19-0
Consider Class 2, 1mW, green laser
(initially Class 3R, red)
Appropriate signage for laser safety
Additional interlocks for equipment
protection
FDR scheduled for July 2009
Start fabrication drawings
No significant design/cost changes
since CD-2
Use mechanical designs for the vacuum
chamber and 6-DOF alignment stage
that have previously sustained reviews
Leveraging existing designs (when
applicable) reduces our overall
engineering/design effort. Additionally,
helps to ensure commonality within the
LUSI instruments
Vacuum chamber
cover/laser cover
removed/sectioned for
clarity
Budget at Completion (BAC) ≈ $126K
CXI Final Instrument Design Review
June 3, 2009
9
9
Paul Montanez, P.E.
montanez@SLAC.Stanford.EDU
Engineering/Design Status (5)
Particle Injector (WBS 1.3.04.01)
PRD & ESD released
Existing Injector design from LLNL
CXI will advance the current design
Optimization of particle beam throughput
Remote operation of equipment
SLAC/LLNL Memorandum of
Understanding (MOU) signed-off February
2009
“Collaboration on the sample particle
injector for the Coherent X-ray Imagining
(CXI) instrument”
generation or exchange of research
and test results, data, and know-how
fabrication or exchange of equipment
financial or other contributions to
activities being undertaken
exchange of personnel
Physics Level of Effort (LOE) began upon
MOU sign-off, engineering to follow as
required
PDR scheduled for September 2009
BAC ≈ $1,470K
CXI Final Instrument Design Review
June 3, 2009
10 10
Paul Montanez, P.E.
montanez@SLAC.Stanford.EDU
Engineering/Design Status (6)
CXI Sample Chambers (WBS 1.3.05.01.01)
1µm Sample Chamber
PRD & ESD released
Successful PDR held March 2009
Design Review Report TR-391-003-20-0
Currently addressing PDR “Action Items”
Piezo-stage vibration/stability due to
stack-up
Equipment protection for in-vacuum
stages (potential for clashing)
FDR “Early Finish” scheduled for September
2009
FDR will be accelerated to July 2009
BAC ≈ $620K
0.1µm Sample Chamber
PRD & ESD released
PDR scheduled for March 2010
Chamber proper will likely be an integral part of
the 0.1µm KB vacuum chamber
BAC ≈ $500K
CXI Final Instrument Design Review
June 3, 2009
11
11
Paul Montanez, P.E.
montanez@SLAC.Stanford.EDU
Engineering/Design Status (7)
CXI Precision
Instrument Stands (WBS 1.3.05.01.02)
1µm Precision Instrument Stand
PRD & ESD released
Support /Interface with 1µm Sample Chamber and
Detector Stage (in all experimental configurations)
Engineering/Design effort, beyond conceptual
design, began in March 2009
PDR completed May 15, 2009: Design Review
Report TR-391-003-27-0
Determine the effect of lateral seismic loads on rod
ends
Evaluate potential back-driving of ball screws due to
seismic loading and ameliorate any effects
FDR scheduled for July 2009
BAC ≈ $240K
0.1µm Precision Instrument Stand
PRD & ESD released
Support 0.1µm Sample Chamber, Detector Stage
and 0.1µm KB System
PDR scheduled for April 2010
BAC ≈ $330K
CXI Final Instrument Design Review
June 3, 2009
12 12
Paul Montanez, P.E.
montanez@SLAC.Stanford.EDU
Engineering/Design Status (8)
Cornell/SLAC detector with
variable aperture
Detector Stage (WBS 1.3.05.01.03)
CXI Detector Stage with
Cornell/SLAC detector
PRD, ESD, SOWs & ICDs released
Cornell detector mechanical design progressing
SLAC PPA mechanical engineering completing design for a variable
aperture detector
Complete assembly by October 2009 to meet LCLS CD-4
Purchase order placed in March 2009 with a local design firm for
the mechanical design and drafting of the CXI Detector Stage – CXI
was resource limited
Move design forward in the schedule
Vendor design reviews
PDR completed May 15, 2009: Design Review Report TR-391-003-27-0
Explore options to prevent any interference between the detector and valve
aperture
Consider methods to determine the vibration amplitude of the cantilevered
detector
Develop plans for the fiducialization of the detector relative to the vacuum
chamber
FDR – July 2009
BAC ≈ $330K
CXI Final Instrument Design Review
June 3, 2009
13 13
Paul Montanez, P.E.
montanez@SLAC.Stanford.EDU
Engineering/Design Status (9)
CXI Hutch Facilities (WBS 1.3.06.01 & 1.3.06.02)
Hutch layout design
Raised flooring
Storage cabinets, work benches and tool chests
Utilities distribution
BAC ≈ $350K
CXI Vacuum System (WBS 1.3.07.01 & 1.3.07.02)
Requirements
In general, beamline vacuum better than 10-7 Torr
Better than 10-9 Torr for KB Systems – isolation/differential
pumping from HV required
Preliminary design of a compact, 2 stage, differential
pump system complete
Vacuum equipment: pumps, valves, gauges, etc.
Bellows and Spools
Use LCLS support stands where applicable (diagnostics
supports/beampipe supports) to leverage existing
engineering/design effort
PDRs
Vacuum Equipment – June 2009
Vacuum Supports – November 2009
BAC ≈ $700K
B4C “throttles” & Guard
CXI Final Instrument Design Review
June 3, 2009
14 14
Paul Montanez, P.E.
montanez@SLAC.Stanford.EDU
Engineering/Design Status (10)
Installation (WBS 1.3.08.01)
LUSI Installation Coordinator
Obtain required installation permits
Conduct daily tailgate meeting w/ UTR (University Technical Representative)
Conduit to engineering for field installation issues
Provide installation status for incorporation into LUSI schedule
CXI has a “phased installation”
Early Science
Diagnostics/Common Optics
Reference Laser
1µm Sample Chamber & Precision Instrument Stand
1µm KB System
Detector Stage
Vacuum
Equipment/Hardware/Supports
Early Finish – May 2011
CD-4
Diagnostics/Common Optics
0.1µm Sample Chamber & Precision Instrument Stand
0.1µm KB System
Particle Injector/IToF
Vacuum
Equipment/Hardware/Supports
Early Finish – January 2012
CXI Final Instrument Design Review
June 3, 2009
15 15
Paul Montanez, P.E.
montanez@SLAC.Stanford.EDU
Cost & Schedule Performance
10,000
0
1.3.2 CXI X-ray Optics
-10,000
1.3.3 CXI Lasers
-20,000
WBS 1.3 COHERENT X-RAY IMAGING (CXI)
Cumulative Values
March 2009 Status (Cumulative to Date)
Engineering / Design
$ 4,299,779
Scheduled
$
1,166,955
Proc/Fab/Assy/Test/Instl $ 5,771,806
Performed
$
1,067,834
BAC
$ 10,071,585
Actual
$
925,671
Schedule Variance $
(99,121)
Cost Variance
$
142,163
-30,000
1.3.4 CXI Coherent
Imaging Injector
-40,000
1.3.5 CXI Sample
Environment
-50,000
1.3.6 CXI Hutch Facilities
-60,000
-70,000
Engineering / Design
1.3.7 CXI Vacuum System
-80,000
Month end March 2009 cumulative schedule variance (-)
Proc/Fab/Assy/Test/Instl
43%
1.3.6 CXI Hutch
Facilities
2%
57%
1.3.5 CXI Sample
Environment
21%
1.3.7 CXI Vacuum
System
5%
1.3.2 CXI X-ray
Optics
16%
1.3.3 CXI Lasers
2%
1.3.4 CXI Coherent
Imaging Injector
54%
Month end March 2009 cumulative cost variance (+)
CXI Final Instrument Design Review
June 3, 2009
16 16
Paul Montanez, P.E.
montanez@SLAC.Stanford.EDU
CXI Critical Path
KB Mirror
AWARD &
Vendor Design
KB Mirror
Design/Fabrication
Effort
Post Vendor
Effort and
Installation
Critical path (thru 1µm KB
System) has 9d of
schedule contingency
KB Mirror
Installation
Effort
CXI Final Instrument Design Review
June 3, 2009
17 17
Paul Montanez, P.E.
montanez@SLAC.Stanford.EDU
CXI Milestones
FY08
FY09
FY10
FY11
Preliminary Design
Reference Laser – March 2009
1 micron Sample Chamber – March 2009
Detector Stage – May 2009
1 micron Instrument Stand – June 2009
Particle Injector – October 2009
1 micron KB System – September 2009
0.1 micron System – January 2010
Ion TOF – May 2010
CXI Advanced Procurement Review - November 2008
Final Instrument Design Review – June 2009
Final Design Reviews
Reference Laser – May 2009
Detector Stage – September 2009
1 micron Sample Chamber – September 2009
1 micron Instrument Stand – August 2009
Particle Injector – February 2010
1 micron KB System – January 2010
0.1 micron System – May 2010
Ion TOF – June 2010
Project Ready for CD-3 - July 2009
Award PO
1 micron KB System – May 2009
0.1 micron System – June 2009
1 micron Sample Chamber – January 2010
Detector Stage – January 2010
1 micron Precision Instrument Stand – January 2010
Receive
1 micron Sample Chamber – April 2010
1 micron Precision Instrument Stand – May 2010
Detector Stage – July 2010
1 micron KB System – September 2010
0.1 micron System – October 2010
Early Science Installation Complete - May 2011
All dates are early finish
CXI Final Instrument Design Review
June 3, 2009
18 18
Paul Montanez, P.E.
montanez@SLAC.Stanford.EDU
CXI Milestones (2)
Significant recent & near-term CXI Instrument milestones
Current schedule (March 2009 data) vs. CD-2 approved schedule
(October 2008)
Moved FIDR to June 2009 so that subsequent activities allow for the
CD-3 Review to occur in July 2009
MS Level
L2
L2
L6
L6
L4
L4
L3
L2
Activity Description
APPROVED: ADVANCE PROCUREMENT-CXI
APPROVED: ADVANCE PROCUREMENT-DCO
AWARD: CXI KB 1 System - Long Lead
AWARD: CXI KB 0.1 System - Long Lead
FIDR - Final Instrument Design Review - CXI
COMP: Final Instrument Design Review - CXI
PROJECT READY FOR CD-3 APPROVAL
COMPLETE: CD-3 REQUIREMENTS
Current
Oct 2008
Early Finish Early Finish
18-Dec-08
5-Jan-09
24-Apr-09 6-May-09
22-May-09 20-May-09
1-Jun-09
6-Jul-09
3-Jun-09
15-Jul-09
16-Jun-09
29-Jul-09
4-Sep-09
27-Oct-09
30-Oct-09
7-Jan-10
L2: DOE Site Office Authority (COMPLETE/APPROVED)
L3: Interface Milestones/Major Events
L4: Systems (COMP/RCV)
L6: Commitments/Awards (AWARD)
CXI Final Instrument Design Review
June 3, 2009
19 19
Paul Montanez, P.E.
montanez@SLAC.Stanford.EDU
CXI Milestones (3)
Six month “look-ahead” of CXI Instrument milestones
Current schedule vs. CD-2 approved dates (October 2008)
4 PDRs completed to-date
CXI Reference Laser
CXI 1µm Sample Chamber
CXI Detector Stage
CXI 1.0µm Prec. Inst. Std.
2 Vendor Contract Awards
(KBs)
2 Vendor Preliminary Design
Reviews (PDR) – KBs
5 Final Design Reviews
(FDR)
LCLS – Cornell Detector
Packaging
CXI Final Instrument Design Review
June 3, 2009
MS Level
L4
L5
L5
L4
L4
L4
L6
L6
L4
L4
L5
L5
L4
L5
L5
L4
L4
L4
L4
Activity description
FDR - Fnl Dsn Review - Cornell Detector Packaging
COMP: ESD Released - CXI 0.1um Prec Instr Std
COMP: ESD Released - CXI 0.1um SC
PDR - Prelim Design Review - CXI 1.0um Prec Inst
PDR - Prelim Design Review - CXI Detector Stage
FDR - Final Design Review - CXI Ref Laser
AWARD: CXI KB 1 System - Long Lead
AWARD: CXI KB 0.1 System - Long Lead
FIDR - Final Instrument Design Review - CXI
COMP: Final Instrument Design Review - CXI
COMP: Committee Approval - CXI 1.0um SC
COMP: Committee Approval - CXI 1.0um Prec Instr
FDR - Final Design Review - CXI 1.0um Prec Instr
RCV: CXI Ref Laser
COMP: Committee Approval - CXI Detector Stage
FDR - Final Design Review - CXI 1.0um SC
FDR - Final Design Review - CXI Detector Stage
PDR - Vendor Design Review CXI KB 1 Sys
PDR - Vendor Design Review - CXI KB 0.1 Sys
20 20
Current Early Oct 2008 Early
Finish
Finish
1-Apr-09
16-Feb-09
2-Apr-09
7-Apr-10
1-May-09
4-Jan-10
15-May-09
7-Dec-09
15-May-09
16-Mar-09
21-May-09
27-Apr-09
22-May-09
20-May-09
1-Jun-09
6-Jul-09
3-Jun-09
15-Jul-09
16-Jun-09
29-Jul-09
13-Jul-09
8-Sep-09
3-Aug-09
9-Mar-10
11-Aug-09
17-Mar-10
31-Aug-09
5-Aug-09
7-Sep-09
7-Jul-09
10-Sep-09
6-Nov-09
21-Sep-09
21-Jul-09
22-Sep-09
18-Sep-09
1-Oct-09
5-Nov-09
Paul Montanez, P.E.
montanez@SLAC.Stanford.EDU
Risk Identification & Mitigation
Risk Identification/Registry complete and up to date as per “LCLS Risk
Management Plan” PMD 1.1-002-r4
3 (of 17) risks retired prior to CD-2
9 (of 17) risks retired since CD-2
KB Mirror Systems
Vendor can’t meet 0.1µm mirror specifications – Technical
Vendor can’t meet 1µm mirror specifications – Technical
No vendor willing to bid on 1µm mirrors – Technical & Schedule
No vendor willing to bid on 1µm mirror mechanical system – Technical & Schedule
No resident experience designing mirror mechanical system – Technical & Schedule
45˚ KB configuration – Technical
Sample Chambers
Custom piezo-stages for Sample Chambers cannot be made – Technical & Schedule
Cornell detector
Last minute changes to detector design – Technical & Schedule
Detector Stage
Custom linear translation stage for CXI Detector Stage – Technical
Outstanding risks relate to
Procurement – As discussed by Tom in his introduction
(2X) Delivered KB mirror systems don’t meet specifications
(2X) Particle injector
Interfaces with adjacent beamlines
CXI Final Instrument Design Review
June 3, 2009
21 21
Paul Montanez, P.E.
montanez@SLAC.Stanford.EDU
Safety
LUSI Hazard Analysis Report (PM-391-001-34) complete
Safety issues are considered at every stage of the design, fabrication and
installation process
Safety considerations (some examples)
Ionizing Radiation
Hutch walls will comply with SLAC Radiation Safety memo RP-RPG-080606-MEM-01
Hutch PPS
Pressure/Vacuum Vessel Safety
Compliant with 10CFR851
Approved vacuum procedures
Seismic Safety
Designs compliant with: Seismic Design Specification for Buildings, Structures,
Equipment, and Systems, SLAC-I-720-0A24E-002-R002
Mechanical
Interlocks for equipment protection
Engineered solutions that prevent potential “pinch-points” with moving machinery
Hoisting and Rigging
Positioning of devices that require use of the FEH H5 overhead crane shall be
performed only by qualified personnel with an approved lift plan.
Laser Safety
CXI Reference Laser, Class 2, 1mW
Appropriate signage
CXI Final Instrument Design Review
June 3, 2009
22 22
Paul Montanez, P.E.
montanez@SLAC.Stanford.EDU
Summary
CXI designs are mature and concepts are based on proven developments
made at FLASH and SR sources
CXI scope is stable and has not changed since CD-2
Long Lead Procurement
Committee evaluation of vendor proposals for the 1µm KB system occurred on
April 9, 2009
Procurement recommendation on April 27, 2009
Contract award expected in June 2009
0.1µm KB system is an “option” included in the 1µm KB system RFP
Critical Path schedule contingency is 9d – continuously monitored
Most major risks associated with the KB mirror systems have been retired
Remaining KB risks will be addressed during design/manufacture and testing
FIDR is being held now as a prerequisite for the CD-3 review in July 2009
Replanning of LUSI WBS 1.3 (CXI) due to ARRA funding and general
scheduling enhancements in process
Pending BCR #2009-05-02: CXI Omnibus Replanning
CXI is on track to support an accelerated schedule
CXI Final Instrument Design Review
June 3, 2009
23 23
Paul Montanez, P.E.
montanez@SLAC.Stanford.EDU
CXI Final Instrument Design Review
June 3, 2009
24 24
Paul Montanez, P.E.
montanez@SLAC.Stanford.EDU
Cost & Schedule Performance
Rpt Period
03-31-2009
WBS
Level
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
4
5
6
3
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
4
5
Description
6
LUSI PROJECT MAJOR ITEM OF EQUIPMENT (MIE)
PROJECT MANAGEMENT
X-RAY PUMP PROBE (XPP)
COHERENT X-RAY IMAGING (CXI)
CXI System Integration & Design
CXI X-ray Optics
CXI Lasers
CXI Coherent Imaging Injector
CXI Sample Environment
CXI Hutch Facilities
CXI Vacuum System
CXI Installation
X-RAY CORRELATION SPECTROSCOPY (XCS)
DIAGNOSTICS & COMMON OPTICS
CONTROLS AND DATA ACQUISITION
Budgeted Cost
Work
Work
Scheduled Performed
7,695,241
2,198,852
1,997,352
1,166,955
718,488
36,625
42,869
87,096
151,386
44,823
85,668
0
749,956
1,099,369
482,757
7,411,597
2,198,852
1,938,851
1,067,834
718,488
37,042
37,031
89,654
140,794
33,758
11,068
0
704,405
1,012,930
488,725
Cumulative to Date
Actual
Variance
Cost
Work
Schedule
Cost
7,283,784
2,236,294
1,900,817
925,671
725,710
12,647
34,596
8,849
109,257
30,599
4,014
0
717,545
1,045,338
458,119
-283,644
0
-58,500
-99,121
0
417
-5,838
2,558
-10,592
-11,065
-74,600
0
-45,551
-86,439
5,968
127,813
-37,442
38,034
142,163
-7,222
24,394
2,435
80,805
31,537
3,159
7,055
0
-13,141
-32,408
30,606
Run Date:
4/20/2009
8:22:53 AM
At Complete
Perf. Indices
Latest
Revised
SPI
CPI Budgeted
Estimate
Variance
0.96 1.02 42,606,624
1.00 0.98 5,355,823
0.97 1.02 5,784,211
0.92 1.15 10,071,585
1.00 0.99 1,494,270
1.01 2.93 2,676,178
0.86 1.07
125,726
1.03 10.13 1,514,990
0.93 1.29 2,205,693
0.75 1.10
354,534
0.13 2.76
691,149
1,009,045
0.94 0.98 7,227,371
0.92 0.97 6,786,963
1.01 1.07 7,380,671
42,478,811
5,393,265
5,746,177
9,929,422
1,501,492
2,651,784
123,291
1,434,185
2,174,156
351,375
684,094
1,009,045
7,240,512
6,819,371
7,350,065
127,813
-37,442
38,034
142,163
-7,222
24,394
2,435
80,805
31,537
3,159
7,055
0
-13,141
-32,408
30,606
CXI month end March data
BCWS
BCWP
ACWP
SPI
CPI
CXI Final Instrument Design Review
June 3, 2009
25 25
Paul Montanez, P.E.
montanez@SLAC.Stanford.EDU
Cost & Schedule Performance – WBS 1.3
2.5
2.
CPI
SPI
1.5
1.
.5
.
Cum thru
OCT_08 NOV_08 DEC_08 JAN_09 FEB_09 MAR_09 APR_09 MAY_09 JUN_09
FY08
1.3
COHERENT
X-RAY
IMAGING
(CXI)
JUL_09 AUG_09 SEP_09
Cum thru
FY09
BCWS
$
638,854 $
51,078 $
73,891 $
53,939 $
77,193 $ 104,320 $ 167,681 $ 172,643 $ 156,025 $ 146,533 $ 216,564 $ 213,275 $ 187,733 $ 2,249,266
BCWP
$
639,127 $
50,812 $
63,178 $
31,307 $
80,170 $
83,243 $ 119,997 $
- $
- $
- $
- $
- $
- $
864,595
ACWP
$
642,280 $
47,657 $
53,406 $
32,777 $
35,725 $
45,686 $
68,141 $
- $
- $
- $
- $
- $
- $
811,845
CV
$
(3,153) $
3,156 $
9,773 $
(1,470) $
44,445 $
37,557 $
51,856 $
- $
- $
- $
- $
- $
- $
52,751
SV
$
(50,539) $
2,978 $ (21,077) $ (47,684) $
- $
- $
- $
- $
- $
- $
(30,359)
50,546 $ (10,712) $ (22,632) $
CPI
1.
1.07
1.18
.96
2.24
1.82
1.76
1.15
SPI
.93
.99
.86
.58
1.04
.8
.72
.92
CXI Final Instrument Design Review
June 3, 2009
26 26
Paul Montanez, P.E.
montanez@SLAC.Stanford.EDU
Cost & Schedule Performance – WBS 1.3
$2,400,000
$2,300,000
$2,200,000
CUM BCWS
$2,100,000
CUM BCWP
$2,000,000
$1,900,000
CUM ACWP
$1,800,000
CUM EAC
$1,700,000
$1,600,000
$1,500,000
$1,400,000
$1,300,000
$1,200,000
$1,100,000
$1,000,000
$900,000
$800,000
$700,000
$600,000
$500,000
Cum thru
OCT_08
FY08
BCWS
$
CUM BCWS $
BCWP
1.3
COHERENT CUM BCWP
X-RAY
ACWP
IMAGING
(CXI)
CUM ACWP
689,666 $
NOV_08
266 $
DEC_08
73,891 $
JAN_09
53,939 $
FEB_09
MAR_09
APR_09
77,193 $ 104,320 $ 167,681 $
MAY_09
- $
JUN_09
- $
JUL_09
- $
AUG_09
- $
SEP_09
- $
Cum thru
FY09
- $ 2,249,266
689,666 $ 689,932 $ 763,823 $ 817,761 $ 894,954 $ 999,274 $ 1,166,955 $ 1,339,597 $ 1,495,622 $ 1,642,155 $ 1,858,720 $ 2,071,995 $ 2,259,728
$
639,127 $
50,812 $
83,243 $ 119,997 $
- $
- $
- $
- $
- $
- $
$
639,127 $ 689,940 $ 753,118 $ 784,425 $ 864,595 $ 947,838 $ 1,067,834 $
- $
- $
- $
- $
- $
-
$
642,280 $
68,141 $
- $
- $
- $
- $
- $
- $
$
642,280 $ 689,937 $ 743,343 $ 776,119 $ 811,845 $ 857,530 $ 925,671 $
- $
- $
- $
- $
- $
-
EAC
$
642,280 $
- $
- $
- $
- $
- $
- $ 2,215,462
CUM EAC
$
642,280 $ 689,937 $ 743,343 $ 776,119 $ 811,845 $ 857,530 $ 925,671 $ 1,142,696 $ 1,340,046 $ 1,577,991 $ 1,822,984 $ 2,086,408 $ 2,367,153
47,657 $
47,657 $
CXI Final Instrument Design Review
June 3, 2009
63,178 $
53,406 $
53,406 $
31,307 $
32,777 $
32,777 $
80,170 $
35,725 $
35,725 $
45,686 $
45,686 $
68,141 $
27 27
864,595
811,845
Paul Montanez, P.E.
montanez@SLAC.Stanford.EDU
Expanded CSSR – by CAM
CA Mgr
3B Pa ul Mo nta ne z
1.3.01 CXI System Integration & Design
1.3.02.01 CXI KB System (0.1 micron)
1.3.02.02 CXI KB System (1 micron)
1.3.03.01 CXI Reference laser
1.3.04.01 Coherent Imaging Injector System Integ and Desig
1.3.05.01 CXI Room Temperature Environment
1.3.06.01 CXI Hutch Specification
1.3.06.02 CXI Utilities & Hutch Equipment
1.3.07.01 CXI Vacuum Equipment
1.3.07.02 CXI Vacuum Hardware
1.3.08.01 CXI Installation Phase
CA Mg rT o ta ls :
CXI Final Instrument Design Review
June 3, 2009
Cumulative to Date
Actual
Budgeted Cost
Cost
Variance
Work
Work
Work
Schedule
Cost
Scheduled Performed Performed
718,488
15,262
21,363
42,869
87,096
151,386
33,756
11,068
67,813
17,855
0
1,166,955
718,488
15,261
21,781
37,031
89,654
140,794
33,758
0
11,068
0
0
1,067,834
28 28
725,710
2,159
10,488
34,596
8,849
109,257
30,599
0
4,014
0
0
925,671
At Completion
Budgeted
0
-7,222
1,494,270
-1
13,102
1,394,889
418
11,292
1,281,289
-5,838
2,435
125,726
2,558
80,805
1,514,990
-10,593
31,537
2,205,693
2
3,159
54,255
-11,068
0
300,279
-56,745
7,055
296,819
-17,855
0
394,330
0
0
1,009,045
-99,121 142,163 10,071,585
Latest
Revised
Estimate
1,495,800
1,398,631
1,286,948
125,735
1,469,327
1,985,784
54,231
96,024
297,627
397,378
1,008,185
9,615,670
Variance
-1,530
-3,742
-5,659
-9
45,664
219,909
24
204,255
-807
-3,049
861
455,915
Paul Montanez, P.E.
montanez@SLAC.Stanford.EDU
Control Accounts & Work Packages – by WBS L2
WBS
WBS 1.1
WBS 1.2
WBS 1.3
WBS 1.4
WBS 1.5
WBS 1.6
Total
CXI Final Instrument Design Review
June 3, 2009
Control
Work
Accounts Packages
6
12
$
18
47
$
11
60
$
19
44
$
11
46
$
20
299
$
85
508
$
29 29
Value
5,355,823
5,784,211
10,071,585
7,227,371
6,786,963
7,380,671
42,606,624
Paul Montanez, P.E.
montanez@SLAC.Stanford.EDU
P3 Files Milestones – by WBS L2
CXI Final Instrument Design Review
June 3, 2009
30 30
Paul Montanez, P.E.
montanez@SLAC.Stanford.EDU
Labor/Non-labor Split – WBS 1.3
LABOR
NON-LABOR
$4,509,729
45%
WBS
$5,561,856
55%
TYPE
BUDGET
1.3 COHERENT X_RAY IMAGING (CXI)
CXI Final Instrument Design Review
June 3, 2009
LABOR
$
5,561,856
NON-LABOR
$
4,509,729
31 31
Paul Montanez, P.E.
montanez@SLAC.Stanford.EDU
Split by Phase – WBS 1.3
Engineering / Design
$
Proc/Fab/Assy/Test/Instl $
CXI Final Instrument Design Review
June 3, 2009
32 32
4,299,779
5,771,806
Paul Montanez, P.E.
montanez@SLAC.Stanford.EDU
Procurements and Dollars – WBS
CXI Final Instrument Design Review
June 3, 2009
33 33
Paul Montanez, P.E.
montanez@SLAC.Stanford.EDU