Extension NTT Committee
2014-2015
Non-tenure Track at Large –
Chair
Tenure Track at Large
4-H Youth Development
Agriculture
Business Development
Community Development
Johanna R. Adams*
Stephen D. Ball
Kathleen N. Bondy*
Mary S. Sobba
Chris V. Thompson
Bev Maltsberger*
Human Environmental Science M. Kathy Dothage
* Terms Expire August 31, 2015
Extension NTT Committee
2015-2016
Non-tenure Track at Large
Tenure Track at Large
4-H Youth Development
Ray Massey*
Stephen D. Ball
Don Nicholson*
Agriculture
Business Development
Mary S. Sobba
Chris V. Thompson
Community Development Van Ayers*
Human Environmental Science M. Kathy Dothage
* Terms Begin September 1, 2015
Level 1: Assistant Extension Professional
Should at the time of application, hold an earned doctoral degree. If no doctoral degree is held, the candidate must have an appropriate terminal degree, OR a master’s degree and normally at least five years of Extension and/or equivalent full-time academic experience.
The candidate’s dossier must clearly reflect excellence in
Extension as determined by the Extension NTT Promotion
Committee.
Move into the promotion system
Professional development award ($2,000)*
*upon availability of funds
Level 2: Associate Extension Professional
At the time of application hold an earned doctoral degree and normally at least 5 years of Extension and/or equivalent academic experience.
If no doctoral degree is held the candidate must have an appropriate terminal degree, OR a master’s degree and normally at least ten years of Extension and/or equivalent full-time academic experience.
The candidate must demonstrate a high degree of competence in
Extension scholarship as well as local and statewide participation in professional activities and services.
$3,500 salary increase*
*upon availability of funds
Level 3: Extension Professional
– At the time of application, hold an earned doctoral degree and normally at least ten years of Extension and/or equivalent academic experience.
– If a doctorate is not held, the candidate must hold the appropriate terminal degree, OR a master’s degree, and must have typically 15 years of Extension and/or equivalent full-time academic experience.
– The candidate must demonstrate sustained excellence in Extension scholarship as well as local, statewide and national participation in professional activities and services.
– (Appendix A.3)
$4,500 salary increase*
*upon availability of funds
Content Outline For
Promotion Dossiers
(pages 7 and 15)
(Tab I) Appointment Folder
• Initial letter of appointment
(Tab II) Departmental Summary Letters and Recommendations
(Tab III) College/School Summary Letters and Recommendations
(Tab IV) Complete C.V. (Not to exceed 25 pages)
(Tab V) Summary of Accomplishments (Not to exceed 25 pages)
Also consider:
5 samples of work
Each sample of work should not exceed 5 pages
Up to 4 colleague/peer review letters
(Tab VI) External Reviews
(Tab VII) Departmental and Divisional Guidelines
Non-tenure track promotion
• http://extension.missouri.edu/hr/ntt.aspx
• Next round of applications due to supervisors by midnight Sept. 30 (Oct. 1, 2015)
Preparing promotion dossiers
• Format: Dossiers should be prepared following
American Psychological Association’s Formatting and Style Guide. Documents should be prepared using a 10- to 12-point font. See: APA Style from
Purdue Online Writing Lab . https://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/section/2/10/
Preparing promotion dossiers
Be sure the History and Recommendation Summary is complete. The total for each year must be 100 percent. Any variations from the initial appointment during the preceding five years must be explained as an addendum. Examples of variations may include leaves, administrative appointments, change in teaching load, etc. History and
Recommendation Summary (PDF).
Preparing promotion dossiers
• Letters of recommendation from reviewers will be added by regional directors/supervisors to both the paper and electronic dossiers.
The paper dossier should be placed in a light blue pressboard report binder with fasteners along the left side. Ring and spring-clip binders are not acceptable.
• Tabs, using the exact Roman numeral tab and the names specified in
Appendix D: Content Outline (PDF) , should be used to separate the sections in the dossier.
• Faculty members should label the front of their binder with the following information:
• Name
Division of Extension Dossier in Support of Promotion to the Level of
(Assistant Extension, Associate Extension or Extension Professional)
Submission Date
• Faculty members should send one original paper copy of the dossier to their supervisor.
Sample dossier label and tabs
• A copy of the dossier should be submitted via SharePoint, which provides maximum confidentiality while allowing access to individuals in the review process.
• Candidates should create PDF files of their dossier. Scanned documents must be readable; scanning at 200 to 300 dpi with
OCR is recommended. Review documents for legibility before submitting. To reduce PDF file sizes for Word documents, choose "Save as" and select "Minimize size (publishing online)."
• SharePoint site for Non-Tenure Track Promotions Applications
(PawPrint login required). Request SharePoint site and an email will be sent to you when granted.
A set of dossier folders for each candidate will be created when the supervisor or regional director is notified of their intent to seek promotion. Materials should be uploaded to the appropriate folders:
Inside front cover
• Tab I – Appointment Folder
• Tab II – Departmental Summary Letters and Recommendations
• Tab III – College/School Summary Letters and Recommendations
• Tab IV – Complete C.V.
• Tab V – Summary of Accomplishments
• Tab VI – External Reviews
• Tab VII – Departmental and Divisional Guidelines
• Tab VIII – Other
• Keep in mind the Timeline for dossier submission. Individual access will be determined according to the posted deadlines. Once the documents are uploaded and application is final, candidates will no longer have access to the files. Be sure that documents are in their final form before uploading them.
• Be well organized and follow the instructions in the most
recent promotion call letter. http://provost.missouri.edu/promotion-and-tenure/callletter/index.php
• Include all requested information in the specified format.
• Never assume that your accomplishments are obvious to others.
• Provide detailed information on your accomplishments and contributions.
• Know your strengths and emphasize them in your CV.
• What’s the Difference?
• A resume is “a summary, as of one’s employment, education, etc., used in applying for a new position.”
• A resume is a career and educational summary meant to highlight your skills and experience.
• A resume is written in the third person so as to appear more objective and factual.
• “A curriculum vitae (CV) is noted as “a regular or particular course of study of or pertaining to education and life.”
• A CV is a list meant to document every job and degree you’ve ever received in your life.
• A CV is written in a paragraph style, not broken up with bulleted or italicized information to highlight any skills, accomplishments, or achievements for each specific position.
• Each paragraph lists the responsibilities from a first person perspective “I” and “my” which is just not done in a professional resume.
Criteria for the Summary of
Accomplishments
1.
Statement of Personal Extension/Teaching
Philosophy
Criteria for the Summary of
Accomplishments
2.
Creation & Transfer, Programming, and Curriculum
Development in Areas of Scholarly Work
- excellence in transferring or applying knowledge
- incorporates current and appropriate research in educational efforts
- organizes, presents and implements high quality, stimulating, educational programming
-effectiveness in program development
- outcomes and impacts in high priority knowledge areas/named or branded programs
Criteria for the Summary of
Accomplishments
3. Extension Scholarship and Research
- publication/dissemination of scholarly work
- contributions to eXtension
Criteria for the Summary of
Accomplishments
4. Innovation & Creativity in Teaching,
Programming, and/or Research
- new teaching techniques, delivery systems & learning approaches to subject matter
- new & innovative approaches to reaching underserved communities/constituent groups
- application of existing research to new problems, creation of novel research approach to problem, adaptation of research agenda to new needs
Criteria for the Summary of
Accomplishments
5. Revenue Generation
- Provide examples of grants/contracts, classes generating fees, and/or gifts/endowments established or secured
Criteria for the Summary of
Accomplishments
Professional and University Related Service
- pursuit of professional development and improvement
- participation in professional service organizations utilizing position expertise
- contribution to the achievement of the goals of Extension
- recognition by profession as a leader
Criteria for the Summary of
Accomplishments
Also consider:
5 samples of work
Each sample of work should not exceed 5 pages
Up to 4 colleague/peer review letters
• Reviews of the candidate’s performance are essential components of the promotion process, and they are a critical part of the dossier.
• The regional director or unit supervisor, in consultation with the candidate, will be responsible for identifying external reviewers.
• External reviewers are from outside the University of Missouri System.
The candidate should give the supervisor a list of names of potential reviewers who are qualified to provide an expert objective review.
• In a separate process, the supervisor should also compile a list of potential reviewers. (Appendices E, F, G)
• Two external reviewers should be selected by the supervisor.
2015 NTT Timeline
Timeline for Entry into the NTT System
(The deadline for each is intended to be midnight the day prior to the stated date. Materials need to be submitted by midnight Sept. 30.
Aug. 1 Candidate request SharePoint Site
Oct. 1 Candidate submits one paper copy and one electronic via SharePoint to his/her supervisor.
Oct. 1 – Oct. 31
Nov 1 – Nov. 30
Jan. 15
Jun. 1
Supervisor (i.e., regional director/continuing education director) submits letters of recommendation to NTT Promotion
Committee. Supervisor submits paper and electronic dossier to NTT Promotion Committee.
Program Director submits letters of recommendation to NTT Promotion Committee.
Chair of the Extension NTT Promotion Committee provides the Vice Provost with written notice of the committee’s vote and recommendation.
Vice Provost of Extension forwards the candidate’s dossier, the Vice Provost’s vote and recommendation to the Provost.
Aug. 1
Sept. 1
Provost completes reviews of all dossiers.
If approved by the Provost, the candidate’s promotion becomes effective.
NTT
Checklist
(bottom of page 4 – Guidelines Document)
Unranked faculty who serve in positions that are eligible for NTT rank and who meet the requirements described in the “Attributes” section may make a decision to apply for a promotion within the NTT system.
…Once rank is established it is anticipated that in many cases it may take as many as five or more years before criteria for the next level can be achieved.
Subsequent promotions will consider only work that occurred from the last promotion to the desired promotion.
• Refer to the document on the MU Extension website.
• http://extension.missouri.edu/hr/documents/NTT
%20Appeal%20Process%20Revised%20April%202
014%20(2)%20(3).pdf
Guidelines
Resume vs. CV (accumulative)
Narrative of accomplishments – clear cut
Sustainable outcomes can be included
Grammar should be professional
RD’s can be general reviewers, not editors
Applicants edit for content. Consider a professional editor
If not sure about rank talk to supervisor but, it is the decision of the applicant as to which rank to pursue
Checklist used by faculty and RDs on website
Focus on FAQ’s
Announcements on SharePoint – Documents posted in PDF Format!!!
Use APA Citations – links to resources online
Examples of dossiers previously submitted.
Access 205A Whitten. Can only take notes, can’t copy or remove. Contact Tamra or HR Staff.
Titles for Promotion System
Assistant Extension Professional
Associate Extension Professional
Extension Professional
Factors Considered for
Promotion
Degree held, education experience
Scholarly work
Quality and quantity of Extension programming
(outcomes/impacts)
Leadership in professional activities/service