FORM 2: Application for Recognition of Prior Experiential learning (RPEL) for CiLT Module 1 Complete both parts of this form if you are applying for exemption from CiLT Module 1 (or part thereof) on the basis of prior experiential learning. This includes applicants who have achieved AFHEA status through direct application to the HEA or via an unstructured institutional pathway. All applications must be supported by items of evidence. Evidence comes in many forms (see the Notes on Evidence at the end of this document). NOTE: You must establish your eligibility to apply for RPL before making an application see: http://www.sheffield.ac.uk/lets/cpd/exemptions Name: Dept: Date of application: Email: Tel: Additional information (optional): PART ONE: Details of your prior teaching experience Include all teaching activities (e.g. credit bearing modules, CPD courses, research supervision, demonstrating, personal tutoring etc) Institution Department Level Programme Module/subject Role UG/PG Responsibilities/ Delivery activity details dates University of Kestle Tourism UG Y1 BA in Tourism Introduction to marketing Seminar tutor Design and deliver seminar sessions 02/201206/2012 University of Hulford Music PG M MA in Orchestration Film scoring Module Leader Design and delivery of module (inc supporting seminar leaders (PGRs) 09/201202/2012 Design and deliver lectures Design and deliver 1 Hours No of learners 2 hrs x 10 wks Total 20 hrs 40 120 1 hr x 12 wks Total 12 hrs 2 hrs x 10 Institution Department Level Programme Module/subject UG/PG Role Responsibilities/ Delivery activity details dates seminars Hours learners wks Total 20 hrs NOTE: This table follows the same format as section E in the CiLT application form (you can therefore transfer the information from your application form; however you may need to add further detail if you only provided an outline on your application). 2 No of PART TWO: MAPPING YOUR PRIOR EXPERIENTAL LEARNING TO MODULE 1 LEARNING OUTCOMES Use this section to demonstrate how your prior experience maps to the CiLT Module 1 Learning Outcomes. For each outcome write a statement detailing how you meet each learning outcome by providing specific examples from your teaching practice and scholarship. Consult the CiLT Module 1 Assessment Criteria (which follows this table) to guide your writing. All applications should be supported by artifacts of evidence to support the claims made (see explanatory notes at the end of this document). NOTE: If you are invited to attend an RPL viva you will be examined in accordance with the Viva Assessment Criteria at the Pass level. CiLT Module 1 Identify, evaluate and deploy teaching methods/strategies to design, plan and manage learning experiences Learning Outcome 1.1 appropriate to the given subject and academic level and assess their impact on students’ learning experiences. 3 Supporting statement and examples from practice. Description of the artefacts of evidence provided and relevance (what each demonstrates). 4 CiLT Module 1 Identify, evaluate and deploy teaching theories, models, methods/strategies to create and manage learning Learning Outcome 1.2 environments that engage students in the learning process and support the development of academic and transferable skills. Supporting statement and examples from practice. 5 Description of the artefacts of evidence provided and relevance (what each demonstrates). CiLT Module 1 Identify and take account of learner diversity to facilitate equality of learning opportunity for their learners Learning Outcome 1.3 and the given learning community. 6 Supporting statement and examples from practice. 7 Description of the artefacts of evidence provided and relevance (what each demonstrates). CiLT Module 1 Take a systematic approach to analysing and evaluating their performance and experiences as teachers to Learning Outcome 1.4 inform and develop their own practices to support learners and learning. 8 Supporting statement and examples from practice. 9 Description of the artefacts of evidence provided and relevance (what each demonstrates). CiLT Module 1 Confidently articulate, discuss and share their knowledge of theories and models associated with learning Learning Outcome 1.5 and teaching in Higher Education (HE) in relation to their personal teaching philosophy and practices. 10 Supporting statement and examples from practice: 11 Description of the artefacts of evidence provided and relevance (what each demonstrates). NOTES: Artifacts of evidence These are items that you provide to support the statements you make about meeting the Learning Outcomes for CiLT Module 1. The possible types of evidence are numerous. Crucially, the relevance of each item of evidence to your application must be made clear on the form as indicated. All artifacts of evidence must be clearly labelled. It may also be necessary to annotate (write on) some of the items you provide to make their relevance clear. For example, writing next to the relevant parts of a lecture handout to specify what it is providing evidence of. In cases where you are illustrating a change in an aspect of your practice (e.g. redesign of a module/activity or part thereof) it may be beneficial to include the ‘before’ and ‘after’ versions. Artifacts of Evidence could include (but are by no means limited to): Teaching observation forms and feedback Feedback given by students Feedback provided to students Session/Lesson plans 12 Programme specification documents and E1 forms Module outlines Assessment materials Handouts, worksheets etc Records of CPD courses/workshops/events attended accompanied by brief account/s of the impact on your practice (e.g. TELUS, EATS, Bitesize, Supporting the Supporters) Records of ‘in situ’ CPD activity such as targeted and structured peer discussions accompanied by brief account/s of the impact on your practice Accounts of self-evaluation of your teaching practice (e.g. journal entries or notes) Screen dumps from online activities resources (e.g. MOLE) Materials from CPD events you have designed and delivered to support the learning and teaching practices of others 13 Module 1 Assessment criteria 1.1 Identify, evaluate and deploy teaching methods/strategies to design, plan and manage learning experiences appropriate to the given subject and academic level and assess their impact on students’ learning experiences. Portfolio: Viva: Identifying, evaluating & deploying methods/ strategies appropriate to the subject and academic level Assessing the Not applicable Proceed to Viva Resubmit Pass Resubmit Not applicable Methods/strategies are clearly Methods/strategies are clearly Methods/strategies may be referred to; articulated with reasons given for their articulated with reasons given for however, this may be too generalised or appropriateness to the their appropriateness to the superficial. teaching/learning of the particular teaching/learning of the particular Reasons for the appropriateness of the subject and academic level. This subject (e.g. mechanical engineering, methods/strategies and the includes discussion of the factors philosophy etc) and academic level teaching/learning of the particular subject underpinning the selection and (e.g undergraduate, postgraduate, (e.g. mechanical engineering, philosophy evaluation of the methods/strategies foundation, outreach, CPD training etc) and academic level (e.g and consideration of alternatives in the etc). undergraduate, postgraduate, foundation, design and planning of learning. outreach, CPD training etc) are difficult to identify, tenuous or missing. Detailed examples from practice are Examples from practice are referred Examples from practice to demonstrate given to support this discussion and to that demonstrate how the how the methods/strategies are being demonstrate how the methods/strategies are being deployed in practice (in designing, methods/strategies are being deployed deployed in practice (in designing, planning and managing/delivering in practice (in designing, planning and planning and managing/delivering learning) are missing and/or their managing/delivering learning). learning). relevance is unclear. Approaches used to assess the impact Approaches used to assess the Approaches to assessing the impact of the 14 impact of of the chosen methods/strategies on impact of the chosen chosen methods/strategies on student chosen student learning are explained and methods/strategies on student learning may be referred to; however, methods/ justified in light of potential learning are explained and explanation is vague or missing. strategies on alternatives. supported by referring to examples Supporting examples from participant’s learning Detailed examples from participant’s from participant’s practice. practice are absent and/or their relevance unclear. practice are discussed which demonstrate how the information gained is used to inform future practice. 15 1.2 Identify, evaluate and deploy teaching theories, models, methods/strategies to create and manage learning environments that engage students in the learning process and support the development of academic and transferable skills. Portfolio: Not applicable Proceed to Viva Resubmit Pass Resubmit Not applicable Viva: Creating learning environments that engage students in the learning process Theories, models, methods/strategies Reference is made to the rationale There may be limited or no reference to the deployed to create learning for creating learning environments rationale for creating a learning environment environments that engage students in that engage students in the learning that promotes student engagement with the the learning process are identified, process. learning process. explained and justified. This includes The theories, models, Theories, models, methods/strategies discussion of the role/value of student methods/strategies deployed to deployed to engage students in the learning engagement in the learning process. engage students in the learning process may be referred to; however, process are identified and explained. explanations are vague or missing. Detailed examples are given to This is supported by reference to Supporting examples from participant’s demonstrate the implementation of the relevant examples from practice are absent or their relevance unclear. chosen theories, models, participant’s practice. methods/strategies in participant’s practice and the associated highlights and challenges. Creating Specific academic and transferable There is reference to specific There may be limited or no reference to learning skills are identified and accompanied academic and transferable skills (e.g. specific academic and transferable skills (e.g. environments by a detailed account of the independent learning, critical independent learning, critical thinking, team that support methods/strategies used to support thinking, team working, working, communication skills) and the the their development including their communication skills) and the theories, models, methods/strategies used to development justification. theories, models, methods/strategies support their development. of academic 16 and This includes discussion of the transferable role/value of identified academic and skills transferable skills in students’ work at university and beyond. Detailed examples from participant’s used to support their development. This is supported by reference to Supporting examples from participant’s relevant examples from practice are absent and/or their relevance is participant’s practice. unclear. practice are provided to support the discussion. 17 1.3 Identify and take account of learner diversity to facilitate equality of learning opportunity for their learners and the given learning community. Portfolio: Viva: Identifying and accounting for learner diversity Not applicable Proceed to Viva Resubmit Pass Resubmit Not applicable The range of factors that can underpin The range of factors that can Factors underpinning learner diversity for learner diversity for individuals and a underpin learner diversity for individuals and a given learning given learning community and action individuals and a given learning community may be referred to; however, taken to identify and account for this in community are articulated. these may be generalised or superficial. practice are explained and justified in Methods to identify and address this Explanations of methods to identify and detail. to facilitate equal opportunity for address diversity to facilitate equal This includes discussion of the associated learning are explained. opportunity for learning are vague or highlights and challenges of facilitating missing and/or not clearly linked to the equality of learning opportunity for Examples from participant’s factors identified. individuals and learning communities practice are referred to that Supporting examples from participant’s and how these might be addressed. demonstrate methods used to practice are absent and/or their relevance Detailed examples from participant’s identify diversity and account for it unclear. practice are provided to support the in practice. discussion. 18 1.4 Take a systematic approach to analysing and evaluating their performance and experiences as teachers to inform and develop their own practices to support learners and learning. Portfolio: Viva: Not applicable Proceed to Viva Resubmit Pass Resubmit Not applicable There is detailed explanation of the In the portfolio, teaching Throughout the portfolio, accounts of role/value of systematic analysis and performance and experience is teaching performance and experience are evaluation of one’s own teaching usually scrutinised and evaluated mostly descriptive with occasional or no experiences and practices to develop and rather than just described. self-scrutiny or evaluation. and learning. The self-evaluative (reflective) The self-evaluative (reflective) elements of Systematically Detailed examples from practice are elements of the Module 1 the Module 1 assignments/activities (e.g. analysing and discussed to demonstrate how the assignments/activities (e.g. personal personal teaching philosophy, reflections evaluating process of systematic analysis and teaching philosophy, reflections on on teaching observations, Record of performances evaluation has informed and developed teaching observations, Record of Impact of CPD) usually describe and practice to support learners and learning Impact of CPD) usually identify and experiences and issues with few or no experiences as thus far. examine issues and raise questions questions raised in relation to one’s own a teacher to This includes explaining how aspects of in relation to one’s own practice practice and experience. develop own participant’s practice are identified for and experience. Supporting examples from practice to practice. scrutiny and the factors and evidence Specific examples are given to illustrate how participant’s practice has or taken into account when: analysing illustrate how participant’s practice will be informed and developed to support aspects of practice (e.g. challenges, has or will be informed and learners and learning are absent or their highlights); considering potential action developed to support learners and relevance unclear. (e.g. seeking advice, CPD activity); learning in light of the implementing change (e.g. planning, issues/questions raised. inform future practice to support learners evaluation). 19 An account is also given of how the systematic analysis and evaluation of practice can be sustained throughout one’s teaching career. 20 1.5 Confidently articulate, discuss and share their knowledge of theories and models associated with learning and teaching in Higher Education (HE) in relation to their personal teaching philosophy and practices. Portfolio: Viva: Not applicable Proceed to Viva Resubmit Pass Resubmit Not applicable Specific theories and models associated Theories and models associated with Theories and models associated with with learning and teaching in higher learning and teaching in higher teaching and learning in higher education education (generic and subject specific) education (generic and subject may be referred to; however, the are confidently discussed in detail in specific) are identified, clearly relationship to the personal teaching relation to participants’ developing articulated and evaluated in relation philosophy and/or practice is very general Articulating, personal teaching philosophy and to one’s developing personal or lacking. There is little or no evaluation discussing and practices. teaching philosophy and practices. of the theories and models. sharing of This includes the evaluation of given This is supported by referring to Supporting examples from practice to theories and theories or models and a sound examples from practice which illustrate how the given theories and models academic justification for the stance held illustrate how the given theories and models have informed or been applied to associated about the key concepts and their models have informed or been participant’s current and/or future with learning relevance to one’s practice. applied to participant’s current practice are absent or their relevance and teaching This is supported by detailed examples and/or future practice. unclear. in HE from practice to evidence how the given All theories and models are cited and Theories and models are likely to be cited theories and models have informed or referenced in accordance with and referenced; however this may be been applied to participants’ current academic conventions and drawn inconsistent and include sources that are and/or future practice. from sources that are suitable for unsuitable for academic purposes (e.g. the academic purposes. use of Wikipedia without an academically justifiable reason). 21