SOCIAL WORK STUDENTS’ KNOWLEDGE OF MULTIRACIAL DIVERSITY WITHIN THE AFRICAN AMERICAN POPULATION A Project Presented to the faculty of the Division of Social Work California State University, Sacramento Submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SOCIAL WORK by Nia Ridgle SPRING 2014 SOCIAL WORK STUDENTS’ KNOWLEDGE OF MULTIRACIAL DIVERSITY WITHIN THE AFRICAN AMERICAN POPULATION A Project by Nia Ridgle Approved by: __________________________________, Committee Chair Maria Dinis, Ph.D., M.S.W. Date ii Student: Nia Ridgle I certify that this student has met the requirements for format contained in the University format manual, and that this project is suitable for shelving in the Library, and credit is to be awarded for the project. __________________________, Graduate Coordinator Dale Russell, Ed.D., LCSW Division of Social Work iii Date _________________ Abstract of SOCIAL WORK STUDENTS’ KNOWLEDGE OF MULTIRACIAL DIVERSITY WITHIN THE AFRICAN AMERICAN POPULATION by Nia Ridgle In order to ensure diverse populations receive the best services, social work students must be aware of diversity within multiracial groups. While there are many different multiracial subgroups, this research focuses on the African American multiracial subgroup and the issues and historical context surrounding why it is so important to be sensitive to the needs of the multiracial African American population. This quantitative survey research study administered a survey to 136 undergraduate and graduate level social work students. The sampling method was a non-probability quota sample. Both Graduate and undergraduate participants overwhelmingly were in agreement that biopsychosocial assessments must include multiracial questions; this association was statistically significant in the chi-square test. Implications for social work practice and policy are discussed. __________________________________, Committee Chair Maria Dinis, Ph.D., M.S.W. ____________________________ Date iv TABLE OF CONTENTS Page List of Tables ................................................................................................................... viii List of Figures .................................................................................................................... ix Chapter 1. INTRODUCTION ...........................................................................................................1 Background of Problem ...........................................................................................3 Statement of Research Problem ...............................................................................5 Purpose of the Study ................................................................................................6 Research Question ...................................................................................................6 Theoretical Framework ............................................................................................7 Social Learning Theory…………………………………………...……………….7 Application of Social Theory and Jacobs’s Identity Development in Biracial Children…………………………………………………………..………...……...9 Definition of Terms................................................................................................10 Assumptions...........................................................................................................13 Justification ............................................................................................................13 Delimitations ..........................................................................................................14 Summary ................................................................................................................14 2. REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE ...............................................................................16 Historical Background: African American Multiracial Identity ............................17 v Multiracial Identity Development ..........................................................................23 Force Choice Dilemma of Multiracial People .......................................................27 Multiracial Identity Theory ....................................................................................30 Gaps in the Literature.............................................................................................36 Summary ................................................................................................................39 3. METHODS ....................................................................................................................40 Research Question .................................................................................................40 Study Design ..........................................................................................................40 Study Population ....................................................................................................42 Data Collection Procedures....................................................................................43 Data Gathering and Procedures .............................................................................44 Instrumentation ......................................................................................................45 Data Analysis .........................................................................................................46 Statistical Analysis Plan .........................................................................................46 Protection of Human Subjects ...............................................................................47 Summary ................................................................................................................48 4. DATA ANALYSIS .......................................................................................................49 Demographics ........................................................................................................49 Summary ................................................................................................................68 5. CONCLUSIONS ...........................................................................................................69 Summary ................................................................................................................69 vi Discussion ..............................................................................................................71 Limitations .............................................................................................................73 Implications for Social Work Practice and Policy .................................................73 Recommendations ..................................................................................................75 Conclusion .............................................................................................................76 Appendix A. Consent to Participate in Research ...............................................................78 Appendix B. Survey Instrument ........................................................................................79 Appendix C. Research Data ...............................................................................................82 References ..........................................................................................................................92 vii LIST OF TABLES Page 1. Table 1 Years of Social Work Experience .............................................................54 2. Table 2 Racial Identity ...........................................................................................56 3. Table 3 Classification of Race ...............................................................................57 4. Table 4 Social Constructionism of Race and Multiracial Identity .........................59 5. Table 5 One-Drop Rule and Multiracial People of African Descent .....................60 6. Table 6 Confidence and African American Multiracial Issues ..............................63 7. Table 7 Diversity within African American Population and Cross-cultural Courses at Sacramento State University ................................................................64 8. Table 8 Multiracial and Biopsychosocial Assessment...........................................66 9. Table 9 Understanding Multiracial Diversity and Social Work Skill Level ..........67 viii LIST OF FIGURES Page 1. Figure 1 Participants’ Social work Program Standing Gender ..............................50 2. Figure 2 Participants’ Social work Program Standing Education Level ...............51 3. Figure 3 Participants’ Masters of Social work Standing Level .............................52 4. Figure 4 Prior Work Experience Level .................................................................53 ix 1 Chapter 1 INTRODUCTION In the United States, the study of race relations has traditionally focused on the struggles of people who identify as a single race or racial group (Jackson, 2007). Increasingly, individuals are identifying themselves with more than one racial, and so it is imperative that social work students be prepared to work with multiracial diversity within minority groups. Currently, the California State University, Sacramento Division of Social work curriculum provides social work students with enriched and culturally diverse courses, which covers a range of subgroups, including those groups that identify monoracially and multiculturally. However, the curriculum does not highlight the complexities of racial diversity within groups such as racial diversity within monoracial subgroups of African Americans (Dr. Russell, Fall 2010). Multiracially diverse literature, such as the research in this thesis, is imperative to large and diversely integrated cities, as in this case, specifically Sacramento. In 2000, for the first time, the Census allowed respondents to identify with more than one racial identity. Citing 2000 census data, Jones and Bullock (2012) stated that Americans who identify themselves as more than one race grew from 6.8 million to 9.0 million. More specifically, Jones and Bullock report that from the 2000 to 2010 census, Americans who identified as being both Black/African American and White grew by over a million people, or 134 percent. This striking statistic brings up many important questions, such as “How much of the 134% population increase will affect the African American multiracial population in Sacramento?” More importantly, “Is the lack of 2 diverse multiracial social work curriculum at California State University, Sacramento, which is currently unable to provide the education, necessary to work with this newly emerged multiracial population?” To better understand race and its relationship to the field of social work, social work students need to have an awareness of racial diversity within monoracial groups. According to Jackson (2007) research, participants felt disconnected from traditional means of accessing race. If my research outcome, in fact, states that social work students at California State University, Sacramento are not aware of the mixed-race African American population, it would be beneficial for faculty and staff to consider implementing issues of multiracial identification topic into the human diversity course. This research can serve as a point of reference for a social work faculty to utilize when discussing the importance of racial classification within the social work profession. Furthermore Jackson (2007) added that it is vital that social workers are aware of significant environmental factors that contribute to issues experienced by multiracial people. For example, the study participants indicated that they felt socially disconnected from their peers due to encountering racism from within their own community and from peers at school. If social work students at California State University Sacramento are knowledgeable of this category of diversity and the effects of preconceived notions regarding race labeling maybe significantly reduced in the field of social work or between provider and client. Social work students may also increase their knowledge of cultural competency among this population. 3 In this chapter, the background problem of the research, the research problem, the study purpose, the research question, theoretical framework, and definition of terms are introduced. Finally assumptions and delimitations will be discussed in this chapter along with a summary to conclude the chapter. Background of Problem In order to understand why there is an urgent need for awareness of multiracial diversity within the African American community, social work students must first understand the social system in which society has historically classified race, as well as how race is classified by society currently, and how that system affects students’ views on multiracial people. The concept of racial identity has been subconsciously immersed into our society, which focuses on monoracial identification, through the passing of laws dating back to the birth of our nation (William, 1980). In 1865 after the abolishment of slavery (Khanna, 2010), Abraham Lincoln began implementing his plan for reconstructing the nation; this plan became historically known as the Reconstruction Era. What is referred to as the “Old South” into today’s society was completely reorganized. An underlying value of the Reconstruction Plan deemed it unethical and illegal to own another human being. African slaves were no longer considered material property or 3/5 of a person. The abolishment of slavery gave African Americans the freedom to earn a working wage in the United States (Spikard, 1991). New roles of ascribed status were being established among African Americans and those of multiracial descent. However, with the adoption of the Thirteenth Amendment, multiracial (Mulatto) individuals of African descent were left without a racial label. 4 Although the Reconstruction Era occurred almost a hundred and fifty-years-ago many of the racist ideologies still affect what were known as Mullatto people back then but they are now known as multiracial African Americans today. Racial identity theories did not specify mixed-race African Americans. It was not until the social movements such as the Civil Rights and Black Power movement that the concept of “Blackness” and its connection to the one-drop-rule was acknowledged. The concept of “Blackness” was redefined and theorist began to recognize multiracial as a separate racial subgroup within the African American population. Historically researchers assumed Black/White multiracial people were only a part of the African American population. During the Post Civil Rights Era there was no need to distinguish between multiracial African Americas and African Americans. This notion of this thinking derived from the One-Drop-Rule, which for hundreds of years defined the notion of what “Blackness” was (Brunsma, Delgado & Rockquemore, 2009). The acknowledgement of distinction created a catalyst for modern research specifically geared towards the multiracial population Racial mixing has a long history within the United States. However, legalizing interracial marriage has been come with an increase of people self-identifying as multiracial rather than one single race. This is evident in our current multiracial President Barack, Obama whose father is a native Kenyon and mother is White. The One-drop-rule utilized to differentiate between Black and Multiracial is now being demolished by the emergence of people who want to be recognized as multiracially and not monoracially. As previously stated, the 2000 census data revealed Americans who identify themselves as more than one race grew from 6.8 million to 9.0 million (Jones & Bullock, 2012). The 5 Census data demonstrates the rapid increase of people identifying with more than one race. There is a need for social workers to be knowledgeable about this increasing population. Sanchez (2009) states, “Racial distinction between different groups has changed overtime in accordance with the cultural and political climate of the day. The predominant view among social scientists today is that racial categories are socially constructed and are not fixed, immutable categories. They point to the fact that variance within racial groups is much greater than variance between racial groups and that race cannot account for biological variation” (p. 3). Social work students need to be knowledgeable of the subgroups within the African American population in order to properly provide their clients with the proper resources. This historical concept of racially classifying who is considered African American must be acknowledged within the social work curriculum. Statement of Research Problem Understanding how multiracial clients develop is imperative. To effectively serve diverse populations, social work students must have the capability to differentiate healthy identity development from unhealthy identity (Deters, 1997). If social work students at California State University, Sacramento are not knowledgeable of multiracial theory they will less likely be capable of assisting multiracial clients through the process of developing positive racial identities. Gibbs (1989) believes social work practitioners should have the ability to be sensitive to racial factors, as well as validate feelings pertaining to biracial identity and its connection to society. It is also essential for 6 practitioners to provide confirmation and assurance to clients by reassuring their feelings are not illogical. Providing clients with diverse coping skills specific to their multiple racial backgrounds is also essential diverse practice methods. Purpose of the Study The purpose of this research project is to explore the level of undergraduate and graduate student awareness of multiracial diversity among African Americans in the field of social work and/or applied to the field of social work in general. This research also aims to reveal whether the academic curriculum of the Department of Social Work specifically at California State University, Sacramento prepares undergraduate and graduate level students to work with this population. In order to ensure this diverse population receives the best services, social work students must be aware of diversity within multiracial groups. While there are many different multiracial subgroups, this research is focused on the African American multiracial subgroup. The issue and historical context of why it is so important to be sensitive to the needs of the multiracial African American population will be discussed at length in subsequent chapters of this thesis. Research Question The research question posed for this study is: Do Social work students at Sacramento State University recognize multiracial diversity among African Americans? 7 Theoretical Framework Erickson’s Life Span Theory and Jacobs Three Stage developmental theoretical model of Biracial Children will direct the social learning theory of this research project. This theory will be described and then applied to the research question. Social Learning Theory Many social work students are taught Eurocentric theories to understand the process of self-identification. Well known traditional theorists, such as Erickson and his theory of Life Span Development, are used are used in the social work curriculum to give students an understanding of the identity development process. Erikson’s Life Span theory examines the process of self-identification through five developmental stages from birth to late adolescence. The older the child becomes, the more cognitively aware they are of their racial identity (Erikson, 1980). This cognitive awareness of self is influenced by the individual’s interaction with relationships, environment, and societal rules and norms of race. According to Erikson’s theory, as the child grows into late adolescence, they are able to cognitively develop their own concept of racial classification (Erikson, 1980). While Erickson’s theory has served as a foundation to identify development for social work students, there are limitations to this theory. According to Jackson (2007), Erikson’s theory is not specific to the multiracial identity development process and should not be generally applied to clients. The research in this thesis will discuss the limitations of Eurocentric theories, such as Erikson’s Life Span Theory, and provide an alternative theoretical framework, such as Jacobs’s (1992), Identity development in 8 biracial children model, which is more applicable to mixed-race African American clients. Jacob’s Identity development in biracial Children theory identifies identity steps specifically for multiracial individuals. Unlike Erickson’s life span theory, which is universally applicable, Jacob’s theory highlights the identity stages of children specifically. Jacob’s theory can help social workers understand that multiracial identity development is not a linear process but rather a unique unpredictable process that requires a multiracial parent or parents’ support to assist with the formation of their own individual identity. Multiracial children will have to differentiate between their ascribed status and their individual self-definition. Jacob’s third stage highlights these distinctions that multiracial children will have to make unlike their monoracial peers. Children between 8 and 12 years will learn that racial categorization or group membership is related but not determined by their phenotype but rather by the racial heritage of their parents (Jacob’s 1992). Multiracial children are faced with the obstacle of choosing a racial identity dissimilar from their parents. Multiracially specific theory such as Jacob’s multiracial identity model is useful for clinicians when working with multiracial clients and their parents. Parents can utilize Jacob’s theory to assist with understanding and normalizing their biracial children and assisting their children with creating a unique identity. Jacob’s second stage emphasizes rejection and the importance of ambivalence. If a multiracial child can remain ambivalent during this stage it is more likely they will be able to progress and develop a unified identity rather than reject one of their racial identities (Jacob, 1992). Outside influences 9 such as rejection from monoracial could make a negative impact on a multiracial child. Social work students can assist with guiding multiracial individuals and their parents through this complicated stage. Social workers can utilize narrative therapy, which allows multiracial people to explore their own assumptions of racial identity (White & Epston, 1990). This method will also provide the social worker with a perspective of the clients’ conflicts with race. Application of Social Theory and Jacobs’s Identity development in biracial Children The application of Erikson’s Life Span Theory is commonly utilized within the social work department to demonstrate the life stages of human development from birth to late adolescence. Students are taught to apply Erickson’s Life Span Theory to future clients regardless of their ethnic identity. Although Erickson’s theory is utilized, it is not directly applicable to mixed-race individuals. Multiracial customs and beliefs is a variable where different social factors may conflict with Erickson’s Life Span Theory. For example, during the development of Erickson’s Life Span Theory, it was less likely to have parents from two different racial subgroups participate in research studies. It was not until the 1960s, the U.S Supreme Court legalized interracial marriages. The 1967 Loving v. Virginia court case ruling made it legal for people of different racial backgrounds to freely marry (Deters, 1997). After this ruling Black and White interracial marriages increased, and the1989 U.S Census reported 218,000 interracial marriages had an increase of 300% in less than 20 years. This increase contributed to an increase in biracial births by more than 260% since the 1970s and in 1989 over 100,000 multiracial 10 births were reported (Deters, 1997). Despite these statistical findings, Erikson’s Life span theory did not include specific developmental tasks specific to multiracial individuals. The introduction of modern theory is needed to distinguish between traditional problemfocused Eurocentric theories which have been recognized as not being conductive to understanding complexities of multiracial identity. Due to the racial uniqueness of multiracial identity, this researcher applied Jacob’s Multiracial Identity theory to the research question. The research question is specific to the multiracial population within the African American community. Although Erikson’s Life span theory is more commonly referenced within the social work curriculum, it does not highlight specific multiracial experiences encountered by multiracial individuals. Jacob’s theory provides a more information specific to the multiracial life stage identity development process. Categories of force-choice and multiracial identity are more applicable to the presented research question and identified population. Definition of Terms It is important to provide definitions of terms commonly utilized throughout this thesis and social science literature. Specific terms will emerge throughout this thesis which may appear highly complex due to difficulty distinguishing between terms, and may appear to have the same definition. For example the terms “mixed-race,” “biracial” and “multiracial” are terms utilized throughout this thesis to describe a person of mixed and ethnic heritage (Dhooper, 2003). It should be noted that the terms biracial, mixedrace and multiracial will be utilized interchangeably. Social science terms may have 11 different meanings depending on culture, language, beliefs, and values. These factors may pose as an obstacle when reading about multiracial identity and the construction of identity. The terms “social work practitioners” and “social workers” will also be used interchangeably. Please see terms and definitions provided below: Betweenness: Leaves multiracial people ‘between’ two or more racial groups without a single racial group in which to identify (Rockquemore and Brunsma, 2002). Biracial: An individual with parents from two dissimilar racial groups (Root, 1996, p. ix) Ethnic Group: An ethnic group of people who share historical traditions, values, and customs. (Banks, 2004). Ethnic identity: An individual who has a sense of belonging to a specific ethnic group and their beliefs. This individual has an ethnic association with the particular ethnic group (Phinney, 1990). Miscegenation: A word utilized to describe marriage and sexual relationships between two people of different racial background. (Daniel, 1992) Mulatto: Spanish derived word meaning a hyrbrid mule and was used to describe descendants of White men and African slave women (Graves, Jr., 2005) Race: Used to distinguish race not by a person's DNA but instead their outside features was used to base what race he or she was. This was a common practice used to construct non white individuals. (Jackson, 2007) Racial Identity Theory: Used to describe the patterns of personal, reference group, and ascribed identities. (Helms, 1990, p.6) 12 Stereotypes: Unreliable and exaggerated commentary about all members of a race or group of people. These generalizations does not take into account the individual person as a whole. (Schaefer, 2011, p. 20, 54) 13 Assumptions The assumptions to be considered in this study include: 1) the consumer of this research has knowledge of social work-specific vocabulary pertaining to the subjects of culture and race, as well as traditional development of models grounded in Western culture ideology; 2) the consumer is aware of social work practitioners who work with diverse populations; 3) the reader is aware of the National Association of Social Work Code of Ethics. Justification Jones and Bullock (2012) report that from the census pertaining to the years between 2000 and 2010, Americans who identified as being both Black/African American and White grew by over a million people, or 134 percent. The current increase of individuals identifying as multiracial in preference to monoracial serves as an indicator that more multiracial-specific literature is required to further diversify social work literature in effort to meet the clients’ needs effectively. The objective of this research is to provide the Social work Department at California State University, Sacramento, as well as the social work student population, with an awareness of multiracial diversity within the African American community. This research also aims to promote and encourage diverse cultural sensitivity within the social work field. According to the National Association of Social work Code of Ethics, it is a social workers obligation to, “Obtain education about and seek to understand the nature of social diversity and oppression with respect to race, ethnicity, national origin, color, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity or expression, age, marital status, political belief, religion, immigration 14 status, and mental or physical disability” (National Association of Social workers, 2012, p.3). Social workers assist a variety of diverse populations. To enhance social workers skills to assist the African American multiracial population, this research study and others alike are critical to the social work profession. Providing students with a knowledge pertaining to diversity within monoraical subgroups will minimize bias and prepare students to enter the profession with a more modernized awareness of race. Delimitations Delimitations of the presented research does not include qualitative data to further explore possible factors related to other beliefs systems and attitudes of individual students that could also contribute to their awareness of multiracial diversity within the African American population. The data collected is limited to only graduate and undergraduate students enrolled in the Social work program at California State University Sacramento. Further long-term data collection would be needed to explore that factor. Additionally, the researcher only focused on multiracial diversity within the African American population and did not apply this study to other multiracial groups and subgroups. Summary This section demonstrated the significant need for awareness of mixed-race African Americans. Future social work practitioners can increase their level of sensitivity if they have an understanding of a multiracial client’s societal barriers, self-esteem, peer influence, family dynamics of race, and social ideological views of race within their community. Culturally skilled social workers will increase their level of versatility and 15 have the capability to work within communities they are not familiar with. This level of skill provides Social work students with the ability to provide services to any type of client, regardless of their community. This all relates to the social worker familiarizing him/herself with the historical background of the client whom they are serving. The purpose of this study was to highlight social work students’ awareness of multiracial diversity within the African American population. In chapter 2, literary review will provide background information, a more precise understanding of the problem, and reference the current research regarding mixed-race African Americans. The research methods will be discussed in Chapter 3, and Chapter 4 will provide data results obtained from the administered research survey. Chapter 5 will discuss the significance of the results, present a conclusion for the research project, and introduce further future research areas. 16 Chapter 2 REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE Multiculturalism is a more defined way of representing social workers’ awareness of cultural diversity by demonstrating expressions of empathy, respect and appreciation for cultural diversity (Jackson, 2007). Multiculturalism symbolizes a point of reference in social work education that requires a reflection of America’s diversity within staffing, program curriculum and instructional practices of academic institutions. Historically, social workers have considered themselves advocates for social justice. To continue that legacy of social justice, social workers need to recognize the new classifications of multiracial identity. The profession is aware of the importance of culture and the influence it has on an individual functioning in society, but it has yet to place emphasis on multiracial diversity--for example, multiracial diversity among African Americans. Root’s (1994) research interviewed six self-identified European Americans and multiracial therapists. The interviews focused primarily on the therapists’ experience in working with multiracial clients; the research reviewed the therapists’ methods of working with multiracial clients. The interviews exposed the common issues these therapists struggled with, such as the lack of formal training to understand the developmental dilemmas their multiracial clients encountered pertaining to identity development. The study also revealed that the therapists collectively, at some point in their careers when working with multiracial clients, felt a sense of helplessness due to their lack of knowledge about specific issues related to multiracial individuals. These feelings of helplessness are a consequence of the limited trainings available; however, 17 many of the therapists sought information and advice from other co-workers regarding their work with multiracial individuals and found it very helpful. In this chapter, the first section is a discussion of the history of multiracial African Africans, the second section is multiracial identity development, the third section presents force choice dilemmas, and the fourth section is gaps in the literature. Finally, a summary of the literature concludes this chapter. Historical Background: African American Multiracial Identity Multiracial identity development differs greatly from monoracial identity development; therefore, we must look at the historical social construction of race and, more specifically, its effects on the African American multicultural population. In America, the concept of race is social rather than biological (Deters, 1997). Historical records show the first significant interracial relationships between African slaves and European indentured servants began in Virginia and Maryland in the 17th and 18th centuries (Williamson, 1980). Due to the increased number of interracial relationships between these groups, Virginia and Maryland passed anti-miscegenation laws in the 1660s, with the purpose of controlling and discouraging sexual encounters in order to “keep the white race pure.” These laws became the blueprint of anti-miscegenation legislation being passed among the southern states. Although Europeans created laws to discourage interracial relationships, they continued. This included European slave owners and their black female slaves, whom the owners either raped or had secret relationships with (Khanna, 2010). While relationships between Black slaves and European indentured servants were discouraged, interracial 18 relationships between slave owners and female slaves were deemed socially acceptable. An example of a European slave owner and female slave relationship is President Thomas Jefferson and his house slave Sally Hemmings, which was confirmed via DNA testing conducted in the1990s. Historians concluded that the relationship between Thomas Jefferson and Sally Hemmings continued for more than thirty-five years at Monticello, Jefferson’s plantation, in Charlottesville, Virginia. President Thomas Jefferson fathered as many as seven children with Hemmings (WPVI, 2011) According to historians, Thomas Jefferson and Sally Hemmings had one child, Madison, who lived as an African American (Foner, 2008). Madison’s descendents currently identify as Black/African American and have had different perspectives of racial identity. Reverend Doug Banks, of North Wales, Wales a sixth generation grandson of Madison Jefferson stated, “I’ve known of my ancestry for as long as I can remember. Thomas Jefferson is part of human history. “He doesn’t define it. I’ve always seen myself a descendant of slaves that Jefferson owned” (Foner, 2008, p.1). There are more stories like that of Thomas Jefferson and Sally Hemmings. Reverend Banks is one example of how the past relationships that occurred during slavery continue to affect a family’s racial identity generationally. Many multiracial people who are aware of their mixed-race heritage do not identify as multiracial due to the negative historical context. The One-Drop-Rule is an important factor in determining multiracial identity and remains important today (Khanna, 2010). The One-Drop-Rule was established during the Reconstruction Era. The One-Drop-Rule prohibited multiracial individuals, such as African Americans, claiming their European ancestry. If a multiracial person of African 19 descent had one drop of Black blood they were considered Black. Ultimately, the ‘One Drop of Black blood’ rule forced multiracial people of African descent to disown their white lineage and identify exclusively as Black. Booker T. Washington, a multiracial person of African descent who identified as Black and was an advocate for the rights of African Americans, was aware of the injustices placed on multiracial African Americans. He stated: It is fact that, if a person is known to have one percent of African blood in his veins, he ceases to be a white man. The ninety-nine percent of Caucasian blood does not weight by the side for the one percent of African blood…. The person is a Negro every time (Zack, 1993, p.83). This rule divided the African American community by phenotype The strict regulations of the One-Drop-Rule provided a clear definition of who was considered “Black and who was considered White,” but there was an unwritten escape clause that forced multiracial people to deny the existence of one of their racial identities. The unwritten escape clause determined that any multiracial person who could “pass” for white—that is, have an outward appearance that resembled that of a person of White descent—they were privileged with the same rights and opportunities as those of a person who was solely of White descent. Therefore, the One-Drop-Rule was not applicable to mixed-race African Americans whose phenotype resembled their white linage. Many mixed-race African Americans who benefited from this escape clause did so as a means of survival, at times even utilizing the clause as a way to improve their family social and economic status 20 (Roth, Senna & Whitehead, 2007). This system of racial classification continues to contribute to the social lens that society utilizes to identify race today. To understand racial classification, social work students must understand the historical burden to identify with only one racial identity placed on multiracial people of African descent. Skin tone for example, is a major factor in the racial identity of a multiracial person. A research study conducted by Patricia Rockquemore & Arend (2002) looked at multiracial African Americans’ choice to identify as White. One of their participants stated: There were probably about 40 or 50 people, high school seniors, and they were all black and a few of them, maybe three were mixed and I was just like, I was really quiet. I felt kinda [sic] uncomfortable…….. and I mean no one was discriminating…… no one was shunning me or whatever, but I didn’t really have a good time. It was just very different. It was a lot different from the other weekends I visited at colleges where it was white, White students mostly (p.56). According to Rockquemore’s and Arend (2002) the participant, ‘Michelle’, recognized her experience in predominantly Black environments “as different” than when she was in all White environments. Because she had more history with Caucasian environments, she developed a greater connection to that social environment despite her multiracial connection to African Americans. Michelle added, “I’ve been raised mostly around white people, in a white neighborhood in white schools, I wouldn’t say that I’m black. Sometimes I’m also curious, I never really know if people can tell. Sometimes people will ask, what’s your ethnic background?” (p. 56). 21 The above research suggests that because Michelle’s primary caregiver is a Caucasian woman, she identifies as Caucasian. The researchers suggest that the primary caregiver is the most influential factor in a child’s life at this stage of identity development (Rockquemore & Arend, 2002). Further research is requested by the researcher to understand a multiracial child’s development of racial identity if the child’s primary caregiver is African American. Herman (2004) states, “There is evidence that phenotype affects the level of ethnic discrimination individuals experience particularly in the job market” (p. 732). Social work students must be aware not to imply or infer a client’s racial classification based upon the clients phenotype. Understanding multiracial issues related to phenotype will provide clinicians with an understanding of multiracial identity issues pertaining to racial identity. An awareness of family dynamics will also strengthen social work students’ ability to work with multiracial clients and their families. Jackson’s (2007) research findings reported a significant correlation between social relationships specifically pertaining to family dynamics. Three of the participants reported having past and present issues with their mothers regarding their racial identity. Bowles (1993) studied ten teenagers and young adults from Black/White, multiracial backgrounds. In four cases, the mothers were Caucasian and the fathers were African American. Of the four cases, teenagers and young adults identified themselves as white because their Caucasian mothers did not want them to identify as African American or Multiracial. Each of these mothers told the same story. They believed their children’s identification should be the 22 same as their own. In fact, two mothers expressed the idea that being white would make for an “easier life” for their daughters (Bowels, 1993). In each of these cases, the daughters stated they felt a sense of racial confusion because they were forced to deny a part of their identity. The participants expressed feelings of not knowing who they were racially and “feeling false or not being real”. One of the young women experienced multiple levels of confusion stating: I am 20 plus years of age and deep down; I don’t know who I am. I am always fearful that others will not see me as white and that makes me anxious all the time. My boyfriend asked me why don’t I identify as black or as mixed? And I fell apart because I cannot be who I am (Bowles, 1993, p.421). This study highlights racial confusion experienced by multiracial individuals. Bowles’s study also demonstrated that parents have a very big influence in their child’s racial identity choice. Social work students need to have an understanding of the roles parents play in the identity development of their multiracial children. This understanding will serve as a tool social workers can utilize when collecting information for the assessment In a research study by Jackson, Kerwin Harris, Ponterotto (1993), they discussed racial identity among biracial children and addressed the complexities parents commonly experience when addressing their multiracial children’s racial identity. Their research finding revealed that the core problem in identity formation for the parents of multiracial children was racially labeling their children. One African American father participant stated that not having a racial label meant his children would have to choose one race over the other. A White father respondent from the same study stated, “Interracial is only 23 a problem because race is a problem.” The research found that many of the participants in the study expressed distress about filling out census forms that pertained to racial/ethnic designations for their children. The study revealed that many of the families who participated in the study had racial labels that varied. Many of the parent participants in the study preferred to label their children mixed, interracial, both Black and White, and biracial. Multiracial Identity Development Social work students should be aware that racial identity is a process in which a multiracial individual negotiates their identity with racial guidelines constructed by the larger society in which they live (Khanna, 2010). An understanding of perception and how the larger society views multiracial people of African descent will enable social work students to empathize with the positive and negative influences of multiracial selfidentification. Take for example Tiger Woods; Woods is an example of a multiracial African American who refused to fit into a constructed category of race by the media. Tiger Woods is known for his exceptional golf skills, but more importantly he is known for becoming the first multiracial golf champion. The media attempts to label Tiger Woods as the first African American golf champion failed. In an interview, Tiger Woods described himself as a “Cablinasian” to claim his Caucasian, Black, Indian and Asian ancestry (Eddings, 1997). Although the media defined Woods as the first African American golf champion, he refused to denounce his multiple ethnic identities. Woods made it known publicly that he was multiracial. He did not accept being identified as solely African American. 24 Similarly, President Barack Obama is publicly recognized as the first African American president of the United States, when in fact he is the first multiracial president. However, unlike Woods, President Barack Obama chooses to identify himself as an African American, despite his multiracial heritage. This was made evident in his 2010 U.S Census choice. According to an article written in the Los Angeles Times, President Obama checked only one racial box under racial category, “Black, African American, or Negro” (Oscar, 2010). President Obama had the option of checking six different racial categories, which would include all of his multiracial identities, but he checked only one. In his book titled Dreams From My Father, President Obama discussed his struggles with his racial identity. In the book Obama recalled challenges he faced growing up as a multiracial child raised by a white family, but viewed in society as an African American male. Obama (2008) stated: When people who don’t know me well Black or white, discover my background (and it is usually a discovery, for I ceased to advertise my mother’s race at the age of twelve or thirteen, when I began to suspect that by doing so I was ingratiating myself to whites), I see the split second adjustments they have to make, the searching of my eyes for some telltale sign. They no longer know who I am (p. xv). Many multiracial individuals, similarly to President Barack Obama, not only need to justify their identity to themselves, but they also feel obligated to identify and defend their choice to society (Sanchez & Shih 2005). Rockquemore and Brunsma’s (2008) research points out the multiracial experience of “betweenness.” The concept of 25 “betweenness” leaves multiracial individuals discarded by their monoracial subgroups and without a racial group to identify with. This viewpoint, alongside racial discrimination against multiracial people of African descent within the African American community, leaves multiracial people finding themselves a minority twice, due to their socially constructed double minority status. Mixed-race individuals are viewed as minorities within larger society and within their minority community due to their (lack of racial purity) multiple biracial identities (Johnson, 1992). Many multiracial people do not feel they are fully accepted by any of their racial subgroups and attempt to identify as multiracial/biracial but remain perceived by others as Black (Rockquemore & Brunsma, 2008). This research further suggests that social factors, such as feelings of closeness to other African Americans, must be obtained in order for mixed-race individuals of African descent to feel a connection with their African American lineage. For example, the same study stated, “Participants who experienced negative treatment from Black networks pushed the participants away from developing a Black identity” (Rockquemore & Brunsma, 2008 p.4). Similarly, within social work racial profiling based on phenotype can be misunderstood if social work students are aware that many multiracial people with mixed African heritage can choose to identify solely as African American or multiracial (Sanchez & Shih, 2005). This awareness on the part of social work students can serve as a tool to understand the societal barriers that influence a multiracial client’s ability to navigate within their social system. 26 Multiracial individuals with parents from two different minority groups are commonly not accepted by the minority racial group considered to have higher social prestige (Deters, 1997). Multiracial individuals who encounter this type of marginalization may experience depression, anxiety, and anger (Root, 1994). Both studies demonstrate a correlation between rejection by society at large and issues of selfidentification. Jaret and Reitzes (1999) examined the importance of race to one’s identity among 50 Blacks, 48 multiracial and 389 White individuals. Their research found that racial-self-identity was more important to Black participants than the multiracial participants and less important to White study participants than to multiracial participants. This research demonstrates the importance of racial classification within the African American community. Often multiracial African Americans are rejected by the African American community due to factors such as their phenotype, customs, and cultural beliefs. Melissa Herman’s (2004) research suggested that different levels of discrimination and self-esteem are two significant contributors to racial identity choices among multiracial adolescents. The part-Black multiracial participants perceived as much ethnic discrimination as their monoracial minority counterparts. Her results also demonstrated that respondents were more likely to report being White if their outside features appeared White. Self-verification theory suggests people generally have the desire to be perceived by others accurately. Other internalized conflicts due to historical factors, such as racial oppression, influence identity conflict. Quintana (1999) conducted a study on multiracial ethnic 27 students who identified as monoracial. The research findings revealed that multiracial students identified with the parent who was non-white, basing their choice on the historical fact that Whites were the oppressors of those who were non-white. The study also revealed that students’ self- identified as monoracial because they found it less complex than identifying as biracial. Force Choice Dilemma of Multiracial People One of the most critical conflicts multiracial African Americans face is between self-identification and the racial identification imposed on them by society (Nakashima, 1992). To avoid marginalization of our clients, students studying social work need to be aware of the self-identification process. Research suggests one of the most common multiracial obstacles is Force Choice Dilemmas. Force choice dilemmas require multiracial people to identify with one specific racial identity over the other. According to Sanchez (2010), this ideology dates back to the foundation of the One-drop-Rule instituted during the Reconstruction Era. Force-choice dilemmas make multiracial people feel pressured to reject part of their racial heritage in an effort to feel inclusion by society or the racial group they phenotypically resemble. Jackson’s (2007) study found that multiracial participants desired friendships with peers who shared similar unique cultural experiences. Sanchez (2010) studied 317 individuals (57 males, 260 females) over a 3-month period (July 2006- October 2006). Participants were asked questions, Based on the following statement, “People have often told me that I should identify with one single race” (p. 1664). Participants were requested to respond if they agreed, strongly agree or disagreed. The research findings 28 demonstrated a direct relationship between force-choice dilemmas and depressive symptoms among Black/White participants. Contributing factors from force choice dilemmas resulted in participants having symptoms of depression, which was a result of how society viewed them. This perception resulted in multiracial participants feeling their multiple racial identities were undervalued. The research also suggests that a more positive public regard for multiracial individuals could increase their sense of autonomy. The Consequences of negative regard for multiracial multiple identities resulted in multiracial individuals rejecting one of their racial identities. Rather than identify as multiracial participants instead chose to identify monoracially. Milan and Keiley’s (2000) research results showed that on a five-item measure of self-worth given to 3, 521 monoracial majority (White) participants, as well as 272 multiracial and 1,941 monoracial minority adolescents in the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health, multiracial adolescents reported significantly lower levels of self-worth compared with both monoracial minority and monoracial majority adolescences. In a similar study conducted, Field (1996) research also found that monoracial majority adolescents reported higher self-esteem on the Self-Perception Scale of Adolescents than multiracial adolescents. In the same study, Sanchez (2010) researched referenced findings from a study conducted by Townsend, Markus, & Bergsieker (2009). Their research examined identity denial among multiracial people. Participants were unsystematically allocated racespecific questions. Participants were given multiple choices but were instructed they 29 could only choose one race as opposed to the other group of participants who could choose all the races/boxes that applied. The research findings showed that participants who were given instructions to only check one racial identification box had a decreased level of self-esteem and performance. Students’ who had only one box to chose from performed poorer on the word-search task and were more likely to reiterate their multiracial identity (since they were not given the option to do so). The research findings also demonstrated the relationship between selfidentification and self-esteem. If multiracial people are not given the opportunity to independently choose their racial identification due to force choice dilemmas, such as the inability to check more than one race box on a survey or assessment, the result can be very detrimental to a multiracial client. Brunsma’s (2006) research findings revealed the importance of identity validation within society among multiracial individuals. This analysis showed that 75% of the participants who self-identified as biracial, but who was socially rejected as biracial, checked “Black” on the 2000 U.S. Census This research demonstrates the influence that social perception contributes to multiracial self-identification. The census is an example of force-choice dilemmas that contribute to multiracial clients self-identifying as monoraical rather than multiracial. Age also is an important factor in force choice dilemmas. Mary. E Campbell’s (2006) research findings state that generational differences and age can be factors in multiracial self-identification. Participants were questioned during an initial CPS survey. They were required to identify with a single race: White, Black, Latino, American Indian, 30 Asian, or some other race). The research findings suggest that 8% of older multiracial participants were more likely to identify the force choice option of Black as their racial identity, and 9% were less likely to choose the option, “some other race” label than those from recent generations within the last fifty years. Multiracial Identity Theory Helms (1990) stated that racial identity theoretical perspectives seek to clarify the potential of patterns in the personal, reference group, and ascribed identities. These perspectives also attempt to predict the varied states of mind, thoughts, and/or behaviors that correspond to differential weightings of components. According to Hutchison (2013), Eriksson’s psychosocial theoretical framework is one of the most comprehensively known perspectives to understanding life course development. Erickson’s Psychosocial Life span Theory focuses on the development stages of identity. According to Jackson (2009) historically, social scientists have regarded multiracial people as damaged and confused. Theorists such as Hall’s (2005) Biracial Identity Across the Lifespan theory and Root’s (2003) Ecological Framework of Racial Identity Development, recognize the impact of historical, social and environmental stressors that interfere in the identity process of multiracial individuals. Erikson’s theory does not reference these categories specific to multiracial people. The use of Eurocentric psychoanalytic development stage models minimizes the importance of social factors that affect the identity of individuals. Many of the Eurocentric models tend to have a beginning and an end to identity development process (Jackson, 2007). 31 Sanchez’s & Shih (2005) research findings revealed that although researchers such as Gordon, (1964); Root, (1996) and Wardle (1999) have suggested multiple identity theories. They commonly lack an explanation of multiracial identity, depression, and anxiety. Their research findings suggest multiracial individuals may suffer internally with negative feelings within themselves to a greater extent than their monoracial peers. According to Erickson, the central task of adolescence is developing a stable identity (Hutchison, 2013). He believed that in order to develop a healthy identity, one must successfully negotiate a series of developmental tasks. These tasks include developing a personal identity, identifying a sexual preference, establishing a career, and becoming independent from one’s parents. All of Erickson’s tasks can be applied to multiracial individuals as well as monoracial individuals; however, people of mixed-race face additional developmental tasks, specifically the conflict of negotiating their mixed-race identity. According to Erikson the psychosocial struggle in young adulthood is intimacy versus isolation. This is the time when individuals move from identity division to confusion to exploration with significant others (Hutchison, 2013). If this stage is applied to biracial children, this is the stage where biracial children begin to distinguish between racial subgroups and create their definition of what sub-group they belong to, if any. At this stage, biracial children are faced with force-choice dilemmas and stereotyping, which may contribute to low self-esteem and behavioral issues due to the inability to connect with one or both of their racial sub-groups. 32 However, Deters (1997) points out that Erikson historically constructed his theories centered on White monocultural experiences and fails to include the experiences of biracial children. If future social work practitioners solely utilize standard developmental theory without understanding theoretical bias, he or she runs the danger of pathologizing the biracial client. To expand options for the biracial clients, Root (1990) suggests helping the biracial client accept their entire racial heritage, which will provide them with more self-identity options. Deters (1997) emphasizes that to assume a biracial person will racially identify with how they look is subjective. Frequently people perceive biracial people differently than they perceive themselves. Many people misconceive that biracial people are privileged to have racial identity choice, but in fact Root (1989) states multiracial people are commonly forced to battle extensively for the right to exercise their racial identification choices that are not visually harmonious. This contributes to the discrepancy between how a biracial person is perceived by society and how they perceive themselves. To decrease the risk of preconceived notions of race, labeling, and lack of cultural competence, social work students need to be knowledgeable of diverse theories such as Jacobs (1992). Root (1990) argues that utilizing theory explicit to biracial individuals will empower the client to begin to understand negative influences associated with ignorant and bias views of race when developing their self-identity. Deters’s (1997) literature review analyzed Jacobs (1992) Three Stage developmental theoretical model of biracial children, and found the Three Stage model very valuable when working with multiracial clients and their parents. The First stage is 33 the pre-color constancy stage (under 4 years of age). At this stage the child does not have a racial label for his or herself. They also do not understand the concept of skin color. The second stage is the post-color constancy (4-8.5 years). The child at this stage has a greater understanding of skin color and its meaning in society, and thus the child has already self-identified with a racial label. During this stage, multiracial children typically reject their Black identity. Additionally, if, during this stage, the child is not provided the ability or opportunity to explore their racial uncertainty, he or she will often stop actively exploring their biracial identity and will feel there is something wrong with their racial status. The participation of the parent is vital during this stage. Parents should support their children in exploring their multiple racial identities. The third and final stage is biracial identity (8 to 12 years). Throughout this stage the child learns that racial group acceptance is correlated with, but not determined by, skin color, rather it is determined by their parent’s racial heritage. Children are able to recognize that their parents’ differing racial heritages, and not their skin colors, define the child as multiracial. When providing services for multiracial clients, social workers should be capable of referencing theoretical framework specific to this particular population. Teramoto Pedrotti, J., Lopez, L. M., & Lopez, (2008) research suggests utilizing narrative therapy when working with multiracial clients. Edward’s research found that narrative therapy provides clinicians with the ability to understand their multiracial clients’ individual needs. The research gives the example of a case of a multiracial girl who grew up in a diverse community and came to terms with her racial identity by identifying as biracial rather than denying one of her racial identities. After graduating high school and traveling 34 to a racially homogenous region for college, it became difficult for her to identity as biracial. She found herself having to explain and describe her biracial classification. Additionally, the girl found herself struggling with her identity, and thus began to reevaluate the way she identifies herself racially (Teramoto Pedrotti, J., Lopez, L. M., & Lopez, 2008). This example highlights the complexities of multiracial identification. Research suggests Erickson’s Life Span theoretical perspective does not identify identity development as a fluid process (Jackson, 2007). There are many factors related to multiracial identity development. Commonly, if multiracial people are not met with conflicting factors that may make them rethink or reevaluate their multiracial identify label, they may never encounter an experience such as the above example. Identity development within the multiracial population is very individualized, thus making the process very unique and not applicable to linear theoretical perspectives such as Erickson’s Life span theory. Jacob’s theory highlights the importance of parental support to reduce factors such as force choice dilemmas. Social work students should be aware of environmental factors indicated in the above example that may cause a multiracial African American to self-identify as monoracially rather than multiracially due to their interactions with their others. Teramoto Pedrotti, J., Lopez, L. M., & Lopez, (2008) research also notes that multiracial people find identifying as monoracial rather than multiracial facilitates easier social relationships in particular environments. Root (1990) found it useful to understand the multiracial self-identity process as a continuous process and that integration may not be the only healthy option. A Deters (1997) research participant stated she found, when 35 working with multiracial clients, the concept of ” belonging” was a common theme among her multiracial clients. The therapist was faced with the obstacle of assisting the client with working through her issues of “belonging” without having a clear understanding of how to address her issues. Another participant encountered a multiracial adolescent male client who was brought to therapy by his White mother seeking services for his aggression towards his father for abandoning himself and his mother. The client denied his African American heritage as a result of his father leaving and associated his African American heritage with, “badness”. Visually the client’s phenotype resembled African American, but the client self-identified internally as White and could not comprehend why White girls did not want to date him. To his understanding they all belonged to the same race. Deters’s (1997) research findings suggest that when working with multiracial clients’ there needs to be an awareness of the social construction of race and its effects on the multiracial identity formation that will highlight the importance of racial ambiguity in the developmental process of multiracial identity. Deters (1997) further suggests that working from a non-oppressive theoretical perspective will provide professionals working with multiracial clients the ability to understand that the multiracial identity process is not linear. This understanding will aid in the process of assisting multiracial clients through racially specific issues. 36 Gaps in the Literature The intent of this study was to explore social work students’ awareness of multiracial diversity among African Americans at California State University, Sacramento. This research project utilized an exploratory-quantitative survey to examine social work students’ understanding of multiracial diversity within the African American population. The literary review provided a historical connection to the current issues related to multiracial diversity within the African American community. The objective of this study was not only to reference the awareness level of African American and White mixed-race individuals but to also reference African Americans who identify with other racial sub-groups such as Hispanic and Asian. However the researcher found many biases in the literature used. The biases such as a majority of research available referenced African American mixed-race individuals who also identified as White and African American. This specific information may not be applicable to multiracial clients who do not identity with those particular racial categories. A review of literature demonstrated a need for more diverse multiracial literature specific to the multiracial African American populations. This bias needs to be addressed to enhance a multiracial body of knowledge and enable them to understand these diverse populations within the African American community. Research findings revealed a need for identity development and theoretical framework applicable to social work students at California State University California to reference when potentially working with this population. This study purpose also highlighted the lack of awareness of this population 37 among social work students at California State University Sacramento Social work department. A review of literature also revealed a need for social work research correlating with multiracial theory and implementation of theoretical perspectives into the social work practice when working with multiracial African American clients. The lack of research may serve as a future barrier for social work practitioners when working with this population. For instance, social workers may lack the educational background necessary to identify possible social barriers pertaining to self-identification. A majority of research highlighted the diversity within racial classification because racial classification varies among contexts and observers. There is not a pattern identified to multiracial classification, which creates a barrier for fluid racial concepts. For example, Deters (1997) research focused on how therapists can explore the impact of multiracial identity within the therapeutic setting. Many of the racial identification views varied depending on ethnicity, race internalized rules of racial categorization and prejudicial tendencies contributed to the different approaches to servicing multiracial clients. Each therapist who participated in the research had his or her own concept of the multiracial population. This variance in response to perceptions of this population creates a barrier to the validity and reliability of multiracial research. Upon reviewing multiracial literature the research also discovered that many of the researchers chose to conduct qualitative research interviews as their methodology. This method of research provided individual concepts and perceptions of race but was limited in the sample size. For example, Jackson (2007) research interviewed 10 38 multiracial individuals. Participants were instructed to share their individual experiences and tell their individual story related to their multiracial experience through a narrative interview process. This form of narrative research could also be bias in the way the researcher interrupts the interview. The researcher found it important to highlight concepts that were not addressed in the research as well as gaps regarding to multi-racial individuals in the literature reviewed. In an effort to address the identified gaps in literature, this research study aimed to examine a theoretical framework applicable to different multiracial subgroups. Jacobs (1992) Three Stage developmental theoretical model of biracial children provides social workers with a framework to reference but also provides “suggestive” stages which enables the client to individually experience his or her own identity development process. Commonly utilized identity development theoretical models were found to be linear and not applicable to multiracial individuals. The research highlighted the importance of introducing well-known identity models such as Erickson's Life Stage Identity model but also provide an alternate life-stage model applicable to multiracial clients as well. The research also highlights the importance of the multiracial identity development models due to the increase of individuals in large diverse cities such as Sacramento who identity with more than one racial background. This research also sought to provide knowledge of multiracial diversity within the African American population as well as reveal the historical connection between the social construction of race and the effects of multiracial grouping or the effects of multi-racial people putting themselves in the groups that best fit them and or what they are accustomed. An acknowledgement of bias discovered in 39 multiracial literature was also highlighted in this research study in an effort to promote future literature specific to particular multiracial subgroup. Summary In this chapter, the historical background of multiracial diversity with the African American population was described. The following sections were also discussed: Multiracial identity development, Force Choice Dilemma of multiracial people, Multiracial identity Theory and Gaps in Literature. The next chapter will focus on methodologies of the current study. The next chapter will begin to address the gaps in the current literature. 40 Chapter 3 METHODS To reiterate, the development of this research project was to identify the knowledge social work students at California State University, Sacramento had pertaining to multiracial diversity within the African American population. This chapter provides a description of the methods used carry out the study. Topics in this section include the research question, research design, instruments, population, protection of human subjects, data collection procedures, data analysis plan, and study limitations. Research Question The research question posed for this study is: Do Social work students at Sacramento State University recognize multiracial diversity among African Americans? Study Design This study utilized an exploratory survey research method to analyze the proposed research question. An exploratory research method is used to examine specific topics not clearly defined (Stebbins, 2001). The researcher applied this method to explore social works students’ awareness of multiracial diversity within the African American population. The exploratory method is stated to be the most applicable method to utilize when developing research questions to employ in the study (Babbie, 2010). This method of research allows researchers to survey a large population utilizing the quantitative survey method. The researcher chose this method because of the ability to measure statistical data and provides an outline to describe the research findings. One of the 41 difficulties of utilizing this specific type of research design is the lack of individual perspective from participants (Rubin & Babbie, 2005). Exploratory research designs utilized in this study are considered to have the purpose of providing “a beginning familiarity with” the topic according to Rubin and Babbie (2005, p. 123). In this study, multiracial diversity is an increasing area of awareness in society and there is a body of equivalent research. However, at current moment, it is not known to what extent graduate students in social work program such as at California State University, Sacramento are aware of this knowledge. In this research this presents an area of exploratory research with the goal of attaining a basic understanding of students’ awareness. This research only required a basic understanding of any correlation between students’ awareness of African American multiracial diversity and their educational background can be attained because of the weakness of exploratory studies which, according to Rubin and Babbie (2005),“ Seldom provide satisfactory answers to research questions” (p.124) partly contributed to the sampling methods. The survey design is a questionnaire, which requires participants to read the questions and responds without an interviewer in attendance. Research questions presented in the survey were measured by the Likert scale method to answer the proposed question. Research participants will have the option to answer with the following “strongly agree,” “agree,” “disagree,” or “strongly disagree,” responses which provide a standard format and allows the researcher the ability to create an index score (Rubin & Babbie, 2005). The researcher purposely did not include the option “undecided” on this Likert scale category. This method was applied to enhance the number of responses for 42 each research question for data collection purposes. Dudley (2011) describes these questions as having “forced-response questions that are easy to answer without any assistance from the researcher” (p. 155). Advantage to this survey design is the limited time it requires to answer questions. This could potentially result in a higher response rate than questionnaire surveys that utilize an open-ended questions format. The researcher was aware of the weaknesses to quantitative research surveying methods and needed to carefully consider these weaknesses when selecting this data collection method. One weakness of quantitative research found is the “limited ability” (Rubin & Babbie, 2005) to demonstrate causality. Causality is a difficult concept to determine when conducting social science research due to the prospect of unaccounted variables; this weakness serves as a major barrier when conducting exploratory research. Another weakness in this research method is the low validity rate due to the self-reporting component of the research. This component may not allow participants the ability to articulate themselves clearly on a survey. The researcher took the indentified as well as other research weakness into consideration when selecting this method as a research tool. Study Population The population for this study was California State University Sacramento Social Work students currently enrolled in the program who were recruited through the permitted classes. The researcher went to various selected Social Work graduate and undergraduate classes in order to introduce the research project. There were a total of 136 social work students: 44 undergraduate and 92 graduate students. A majority of the participants, 43 85.3% were female and 14.7% were males. A total of 55 participants identified as Caucasian and 80 participants identified as non-Caucasian. Data Collection Procedures A random probability sampling method was used to measure the data collected. The researcher chose to obtain information in this matter to avoid collecting duplication of data and to guarantee data collection from social work students only. Overall, six classes totaling 136 graduate and undergraduate Social Work students participated in the research project. The student researcher requested and was granted permission from the following social work instructors to administer the research questions to their respective classes: (1) Anderson, Joseph; (2) Barranti, Chrystal; (3) Larson, Nancy; (4) HillHughes, Mary; (5) Nyland, David (6); Lial, Janet; and (7) Montgomery, Janice. The researcher was able to successfully administer the surveys to the above listed professors’ students. Once the application for the Protection of Human Subjects was reviewed and approved, the researcher scheduled appointments to administer the questionnaire at dates and times permitted by the various instructors. It was assumed that the questionnaire would take approximately 15 minutes for each class to complete. After data entries were completed, hard copies of the questionnaire were shredded or destroyed in a confidential matter before June 2014. The raw data was only accessible and able to be reviewed by the researcher and her project advisor before May 2014. It was requested that students complete the survey during class time. The specified Social Work professors granted the researcher access via email (confirmation of emails attached). The researcher introduced herself stating the following: 44 Hello my name is Nia Ridgle, and I am a second-year graduate student in our program here at Sac State. I am here to invite you to participate in my research. ‘Do Social work students at Sacramento State University recognize multiracial diversity among African American’s [sic]? The researcher instructed the participants by stating the following: You may answer the questions to your own capacity. There are no wrong answers. This research is based off your individual understanding. During the duration of the survey I will step outside of the classroom until all participants have completed the survey and left the class. The professor will hand the survey to whoever participates. If there are any additional questions about the research please feel free to contact me via email. The researcher’s email address will be provided to all participating students. Data Gathering and Procedures The researcher utilized a non-probability quota sample of 136 Bachelor of Social Work students and Master's of Social Work students at California State University, Sacramento. The researcher chose to utilize Social Work students at California State University, Sacramento (CSUS) due to accessibility. The strengths of surveying only social work students are that it provides representation of the social work student population at CSUS for diversity and level of skill applicable to the social work field. The sample size represented a variety of graduate and undergraduate students with different educational and professional experiences in the social work field. The weakness of the 45 sample is it was limited to only those participants who are current CSUS social work students, making this study only applicable to the CSUS Social Work Division. Instrumentation A quantitative methodology was utilized to explore social work students’ awareness of multiracial diversity among African Americans at California State University, Sacramento. This research project utilized an exploratory-quantitative survey to examine social work students’ understanding of multiracial diversity within African American populations. A one part, two-page questionnaire was utilized to obtain data from student participants regarding their awareness of multiracial diversity within the African American community. A brief survey instrument was designed for this quantitative research project, which consisted of 20 Likert-scale questions regarding multiracial diversity within the African American population. Questions in the survey were related to the basic understanding of diversity within the African American population. Specific questions related to the social work curriculum, the background of African American mixed-race population and the social work students’ knowledge of the mixed race African American population were presented on the survey. There was no specific reliability or validity tests conducted. A Likert-scale range-response was utilized to provide students with choices that could be analyzed with minimal bias. The researcher advisor provided feedback to researcher to ensure the survey items had face validity. 46 Data Analysis The independent variables utilized in this research study are demographics of the survey respondents. The demographic variables were represented by ethnicity and years of education within the California State University Division of Social Work department. Students from Undergraduate to Graduate level were utilized in this research study. The questions on the survey were designed to understand participants’ knowledge of multiracial diversity within the African American community. The dependent variables are the independent responses to the Likert-scale survey questions pertaining to multiracial diversity within the African American population. The knowledge and understanding of variables pertaining to multiracial diversity within the African American population were self-reported by participants’ responses in the survey questions. The survey included questions that accessed students’ knowledge of African American mixed-race diversity. The independent variables are within the nominal level of measurement. Utilizing a Likert-Scale format, the dependent variables were measured at the ordinal level. Statistical Analysis Plan Once the survey packets were collected from the student participants, the researcher input the data by using SPSS (Statistical Package for the Social Sciences). All variables were coded from the analysis. Correlation matrixes were used to explore relationships between variables and those with a p value < 0.05 were identified as statistically significant. Data analysis may include a combination of descriptive and inferential statistics. After data entries were completed, hard copies of the questionnaire 47 were shredded or destroyed in a confidential manner before June 2014. The raw data was only accessible to the researcher and her project advisor before May 2014. The research data obtained from student participants were transported into an SPSS data file. A chi-Square test was utilized to examine the different presented variables, such as the independent level of education variables and the dependent variable questions. For example, the question, “I believe diversity within the African American population should be discussed in our cross-cultural courses at Sacramento State University” was compared using a 2x2 chi-square test to determine if there was a correlation between level of education and knowledge of multiracial diversity within the African American population. Particular questions could not be utilized in the research due to the number of responses per cell not being adequate. Protection of Human Subjects A human subject’s application was submitted to the Division of Social Work Review Committee at California State University, Sacramento on November 15, 2014. The study was approved as “Exempt” and the researcher was provided the following approval number: 13-14-048. Informed consent was obtained through implied consent. The researcher verbally explained the researcher’s purpose, confidentiality, and the protection of the data set to the prospective subjects. After the researcher completed her explanations, subjects who were willing to participate in the research project completed the survey questionnaire and returned it to their participating professor. Those students that did not want to participate also returned the survey to the participating professor. 48 To ensure confidentiality of the participants in this research study, participants were not required to provide any identifiable student data (such as participant’s name, student ID, or date of birth) or identifying academic information (such as class time, class title, or section number). All hard copies of survey data were kept in a locked box with only the researcher and the thesis advisor having access to this data. One month following the filing of this research with the Graduate Studies office, all hard copies were destroyed, by June of 2014. Summary This chapter discussed the methodology used in the conducting the research project. Project participants and recruitment methods were demonstrated. The participant population and sample were discussed, along with any difficulties presented during the research procedure. This chapter examined the variables, the quantitative survey questionnaire, collecting data procedures, data analysis, and human subjects’ protection procedure, Chapter 4 will present the data analysis. 49 Chapter 4 DATA ANALYSIS In this chapter, the data collected from the research survey is examined. The analysis of this survey will identify areas of awareness among social work students pertaining to multiracial diversity within the African American community. Chi-square tests are used to introduce relationships between certain data variables. At the end of this section, a summary will highlight all of the significant variables. Demographics A total of 136 California State University Sacramento Social work undergraduate and graduate students participated in this study. As shown in Figure 1, a total of 85 percent of the research participants were identified as female (n=116) and 14 percent (n=20) were identified as males. 50 Figure 1 Participants’ Social Work Program Standing Gender Gender: 1 Male_____ 2 Female _____ Figure 1 displays that two-thirds of the participants identified as graduate students (68 percent). The remainder identified as undergraduate students (30 percent). GENDER Male 14.7% Female 85.3% Figure 1 51 Figure 2 Participants’ Social Work Program Standing Educational Level Are you an undergraduate or graduate student? Figure 2 demonstrates that two-thirds of the participants were identified as graduate students (68 percent). The remainder identified as undergraduate students (30 percent). EDUCATION LEVEL Undergraduate 32.4% Graduate 67.6% Figure 2 52 Figure 3 Participants Master’s of Social work Standing Level If you are a graduate student, are you a MSW I or MSW II? Figure 3 indicates the number of Master’s of Social Work One students (MSW I) and Master’s of Social Work Two students (MSW II) sampled. As shown below, the majority of responders are MSW I students (63 percent). MSW II students represent 37 percent. GRADUATE SCHOOL LEVEL MSW II 37.0% MSW I 63.0% Figure 3 53 Figure 4. Prior Work Experience Level Do you have prior work experience? When asked about prior social work experience, the majority of the students surveyed have some prior experience in the social work field (61 percent). This is followed by 39 percent who have no prior social work experience. PRIOR SOCIAL WORK EXPERIENCE No 39.0% Yes 61.0% Figure 4 54 Table 1. Years of Social work Experience If yes how, many years of work experience do you have? In reference to social work experience among research participants, 21 percent of research participants’ reported having six or more years of work experience, and 38 percent reported having no prior work experience. Table 1 YEARS OF SOCIAL WORK EXPERIENCE One To Five Years Six or More Years Frequency 52 29 Percent 38.2 21.4 55 The research question posed for this study is: Do Social work students at Sacramento State University recognize multiracial diversity among African Americans? Racial Identity When looking at areas concerning phenotype, 52 percent (n=42) of undergraduate student participants’ agreed they ask people who resemble African American descent their racial identity rather than assuming (Table 2). In reference to the same statement, 65 percent (n=91) of graduate student participants’ agreed with this statement. When it comes to disagreement, 38 percent of undergraduate student participants’ and 61 percent of graduate students disagreed with the statement, “I ask people who resemble African Americans their racial identity rather than assume.” The chi-square test was not statistically significant. Classification of Race Table 3 reveals social work students awareness of reasons why multiracial people of African descent choose to identify themselves as multiracial or African American only. Research data revealed 90 percent (n=44) of undergraduate and graduate students (n=91) agreed with the statement, “I believe larger society classification of race cause multiracial individuals to choose only one racial identity,” On the other hand, nine percent of undergraduate students’ and ten percent of graduate students’ disagreed with this research statement. The chi-square test was not statistically significant. 56 Table 2. Racial Identity Undergraduate/Graduate Students and Racial Identity q5g I ask people who resemble African Americans their racial identity rather than assume. q2 Are you an undergraduate or graduate student? 1 Undergraduate 2 Graduate Total 1 Disagree 20 2 Agree 22 Total 42 % within q2 Are you an undergraduate or graduate student? 47.6% 52.4% 100.0% % within q5g I ask people who resemble African Americans their racial identity rather than assume. 38.5% 27.2% 31.6% % of Total 15.0% 16.5% 31.6% Count Count 32 59 91 % within q2 Are you an undergraduate or graduate student? 35.2% 64.8% 100.0% % within q5g I ask people who resemble African Americans their racial identity rather than assume. 61.5% 72.8% 68.4% % of Total 24.1% 44.4% 68.4% 52 81 133 Count 57 Table 3. Classification of Race Undergraduate/Graduate Students and Classification of Race q5h I believe larger society classifications of race cause multiracial individuals to choose only one racial identity. q2 Are you an undergraduate or graduate student? 1 Undergraduate Count % within q2 Are you an undergraduate or graduate student? % within q5h I believe larger society classifications of race cause multiracial individuals to choose only one racial identity. % of Total 2 Graduate Count % within q2 Are you an undergraduate or graduate student? % within q5h I believe larger society classifications of race cause multiracial individuals to choose only one racial identity. % of Total Total Count % within q2 Are you an undergraduate or graduate student? % within q5h I believe larger society classifications of race cause multiracial individuals to choose only one racial identity. % of Total 1 Disagree 4 2 Agree 40 Total 44 9.1% 90.9% 100.0% 30.8% 32.8% 32.6% 3.0% 29.6% 32.6% 9 82 91 9.9% 90.1% 100.0% 69.2% 67.2% 67.4% 6.7% 60.7% 67.4% 13 122 135 9.6% 90.4% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 9.6% 90.4% 100.0% 58 Social Constuctionism of Race and Multiracial Identity This research data found 77 percent of undergraduate (n=44) social work students’ and 97 percent (n=90) of graduate students’ agreed they are aware of how social constructionism contributes to multiracial identity within African American populations (Table 4). The chi-square test was not statistically significant. One-Drop-Rule and Multiracial People of African Descent Table 5 displays participants’ familiarity with the “One-Drop-Rule” and its connection to the identity of multiracial people of African descent. When asked to respond to the statement, “I am familiar with the ‘One-Drop-Rule’ and its connection to the identity of multiracial people of African descent, 50 percent (n=44) undergraduate students’ and 62 percent (n=88) of graduate students agreed with this statement. On the other hand, 50 percent of (n=44) undergraduate participants and 40 percent (n=88) of Graduate students’ disagreed with the above statement. The chi-square test demonstrated no statistical significance. 59 Table 4. Social Constructionism of Race and Multiracial Identity Undergraduate/Graduate Students and Social Constuctionism q5o I am aware of how social construnctionism contributes to multiracial identity within the African American population. q2 Are you an undergraduate or graduate student? 1 Undergraduate Count % within q2 Are you an undergraduate or graduate student? % within q5o I am aware of how social construnctionism contributes to multiracial identity within the African American population. % of Total 2 Graduate Count % within q2 Are you an undergraduate or graduate student? % within q5o I am aware of how social construnctionism contributes to multiracial identity within the African American population. % of Total Total Count % within q2 Are you an undergraduate or graduate student? % within q5o I am aware of how social construnctionism contributes to multiracial identity within the African American population. % of Total 1 Disagree 10 2 Agree 34 Total 44 22.7% 77.3% 100.0% 45.5% 30.4% 32.8% 7.5% 25.4% 32.8% 12 78 90 13.3% 86.7% 100.0% 54.5% 69.6% 67.2% 9.0% 58.2% 67.2% 22 112 134 16.4% 83.6% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 16.4% 83.6% 100.0% 60 Table 5. One-Drop Rule and Multiracial People and Multiracial People of African Descent Undergraduate/Graduate Students and One-Drop-Rule q5p I am familiar with the, "One-Drop-Rule" and the connection it has to the identity of multiracial people of African descent. q2 Are you an undergraduate or graduate student? 1 Undergraduate Count % within q2 Are you an undergraduate or graduate student? % within q5p I am familiar with the, "OneDrop-Rule" and the connection it has to the identity of multiracial people of African descent. % of Total 2 Graduate Count % within q2 Are you an undergraduate or graduate student? % within q5p I am familiar with the, "OneDrop-Rule" and the connection it has to the identity of multiracial people of African descent. % of Total Total Count % within q2 Are you an undergraduate or graduate student? % within q5p I am familiar with the, "OneDrop-Rule" and the connection it has to the identity of multiracial people of African descent. % of Total 1 Disagree 22 2 Agree 22 Total 44 50.0% 50.0% 100.0% 40.0% 28.6% 33.3% 16.7% 16.7% 33.3% 33 55 88 37.5% 62.5% 100.0% 60.0% 71.4% 66.7% 25.0% 41.7% 66.7% 55 77 132 41.7% 58.3% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 41.7% 58.3% 100.0% 61 Confidence and African American Multiracial Issues In Table 6, more than two-thirds (60 percent) of the social work graduate students and three-fourths (75 percent) undergraduate felt confident in their ability to understand multiracial issues within the African American community. A little more than one-third (40 percent) social work graduate students’ and one-fourth (25 percent) of undergraduate students’ disagreed with this statement. The chi-square test displayed no statistical significance. Diversity within the African American population and cross-cultural courses at Sacramento State University When asked if research participants believed multiracial diversity within the African American population should be discussed in Sacramento State University’s cross-cultural course, there was an overwhelming 96 percent (n=92) of graduate students’ and 90 percent of undergraduate student participants’ agreed with the above research statement. On the other hand, nine percent of undergraduate students’ and three percent of graduate students’ disagreed with the research statement. Chi-square test showed no statistical significance. Multiracial and Biopsychosocial Assessment Graduate and undergraduate participants were overwhelming in agreement to the statement, “I believe that the biopsychosocial assessment must include multiracial questions.” Table 8 indicates 80 percent (n=44) of the survey undergraduate participants agreed with this statement and 90 percent (n=91). Despite the fact that 20 (n= 91) of 62 graduate and seven percent (n=44) of undergraduate students’ disagreed with the same statement. The chi-square test was statistically significant (χ =4.624; df=1;p=.032). 63 Table 6. Confidence and African American Multiracial Issues Undergraduate/Graduate Students and confidence in multiracial issues q2 Are you an undergraduate or graduate student? 1 Undergraduat e Count % within q2 Are you an undergraduate or graduate student? % within q5j I am confident in my ability to understand multiracial issues within the African American community. % of Total 2 Graduate Count % within q2 Are you an undergraduate or graduate student? % within q5j I am confident in my ability to understand multiracial issues within the African American community. % of Total Total Count % within q2 Are you an undergraduate or graduate student? % within q5j I am confident in my ability to understand multiracial issues within the African American community. % of Total q5j I am confident in my ability to understand multiracial issues within the African American community. 1 2 Disagree Agree 11 33 Total 44 25.0% 75.0% 100.0 % 25.0% 36.3% 32.6% 8.1% 24.4% 32.6% 33 58 91 36.3% 63.7% 100.0 % 75.0% 63.7% 67.4% 24.4% 43.0% 67.4% 44 91 135 32.6% 67.4% 100.0 % 100.0% 100.0 % 100.0 % 32.6% 67.4% 100.0 % 64 Table 7. Diversity within African American Population and Cross-Cultural courses at Sacramento Sate University Cross-cultural courses at Sacramento State University q5k I believe multiracial diversity within the African American population should be discussed in our cross-cultural course at Sacramento State University. 1 2 Disagree Agree q2 Are you an undergraduate or graduate student? 1 Undergraduate Count % within q2 Are you an undergraduate or graduate student? % within q5k I believe multiracial diversity within the African American population should be discussed in our cross-cultural course at Sacramento State University. % of Total 2 Graduate Count % within q2 Are you an undergraduate or graduate student? % within q5k I believe multiracial diversity within the African American population should be discussed in our cross-cultural course at Sacramento State University. % of Total Total Total Count 4 40 44 9.1% 90.9% 100.0 % 57.1% 31.0% 32.4 % 2.9% 29.4% 3 89 3.3% 96.7% 100.0 % 42.9% 69.0% 67.6 % 2.2% 65.4% 7 129 32.4 % 92 67.6 % 136 65 % within q2 Are you an undergraduate or graduate student? % within q5k I believe multiracial diversity within the African American population should be discussed in our cross-cultural course at Sacramento State University. % of Total 5.1% 94.9% 100.0 % 100.0% 100.0% 100.0 % 5.1% 94.9% 100.0 % 66 Table 8. Multiracial and Biopsychosocial Assessment Biopsychosocial assessment q2 Are you an undergraduate or graduate student? 1 Undergraduat e 2 Graduate Count % within q2 Are you an undergraduate or graduate student? % within q5l I believe that the biopsychosocial assessment must also include multiracial questions. % of Total Count % within q2 Are you an undergraduate or graduate student? % within q5l I believe that the biopsychosocial assessment must also include multiracial questions. % of Total Total Count % within q2 Are you an undergraduate or graduate student? % within q5l I believe that the biopsychosocial assessment must also include multiracial questions. % of Total q5l I believe that the biopsychosocial assessment must also include multiracial questions. 1 2 Disagree Agree 9 35 Total 44 20.5% 79.5% 100.0 % 56.3% 29.4% 32.6% 6.7% 25.9% 32.6% 7 84 91 7.7% 92.3% 100.0 % 43.8% 70.6% 67.4% 5.2% 62.2% 67.4% 16 119 135 11.9% 88.1% 100.0 % 100.0% 100.0 % 100.0 % 11.9% 88.1% 100.0 % 67 Understanding multiracial diversity and social work skill level Research findings revealed that 90 percent of participants, both graduate and undergraduate level students, overwhelmingly agreed that understanding multiracial diversity within the African American community would enhance their social work skill level (Table 9). Only seven-percent of undergraduate and six-percent of graduate students disagreed. The chi-square test was not statistically significant. Table 9. Understanding Multiracial Diversity and Social Work Skill Level Multiracial diversity and social work skill level q2 Are you an undergraduate or graduate student? 1 Undergraduat e Count % within q2 Are you an undergraduate or graduate student? % within q5n I believe understanding multiracial diversity within the African American community will enhance my social work skill level. % of Total 2 Graduate Count % within q2 Are you an undergraduate or graduate student? q5n I believe understanding multiracial diversity within the African American community will enhance my social work skill level. 1 2 Disagree Agree 3 41 Total 44 6.8% 93.2% 100.0 % 37.5% 32.8% 33.1% 2.3% 30.8% 33.1% 5 84 89 5.6% 94.4% 100.0 % 68 % within q5n I believe understanding multiracial diversity within the African American community will enhance my social work skill level. % of Total Total Count % within q2 Are you an undergraduate or graduate student? % within q5n I believe understanding multiracial diversity within the African American community will enhance my social work skill level. % of Total 62.5% 67.2% 66.9% 3.8% 63.2% 66.9% 8 125 133 6.0% 94.0% 100.0 % 100.0% 100.0 % 100.0 % 6.0% 94.0% 100.0 % Summary This chapter research project analyzed Social work students at Sacramento State University’s knowledge of multiracial diversity among African Americans. This chapter also explored social work students’ perception of California State University Sacramento social work curriculum. The next chapter will examine the significance of the data gathered and present the conclusions, implications and limitations for social work practice. 69 Chapter 5 CONCLUSIONS This chapter will summarize the main data collected in this research study. The demographics of social work students who participated in the research study will also be discussed as well as the data. This chapter will include the limitations of the study. The implications of the findings for social work students and finally, policy and future research will be discussed. Summary Little research has been conducted to highlight the identity development of multiracial African Americans. This study explored social work students’ awareness of multiracial diversity among African Americans at California State University, Sacramento. This research project utilized an exploratory-quantitative survey to examine this awareness. The premise of this research was to identify social work students at California State University awareness of multiracial diversity within the African American population. Graduate and undergraduate participants were overwhelming in agreement to the statement, “I believe that the biopsychosocial assessment must include multiracial questions.” Eighty percent (n=44) of the survey undergraduate participants and 90 percent (n=91) of the graduates agreed with this statement. Despite the fact that 20 (n= 91) of graduate and seven percent (n=44) of undergraduate students disagreed with the same statement. The chi-square test was statistically significant (χ =4.624; df=1;p=.032). 70 Research findings also revealed that both undergraduate (90%) and (100%) of graduate students believed multiracial diversity within the African American population should be discussed in cross-cultural courses at CSUS. Although this finding was not statistically significant, this demonstrates the need for the social work department to provide students with a more diverse learning curriculum that not only reference monoracial diversity but also multiracial diversity. When looking at areas concerning phenotype, a chi-squared test was used to test the statistical significance association between undergraduate (n=42) and graduate (n=91) student participants’ and the following statement, “I ask people who resemble African Americans their racial identity rather than assume.” The results of the chi-square test were not statistically significant because the minimum expected count was less than 16.42. For the statement, “I believe larger society classification of race cause multiracial individuals to choose only one racial identity,” a chi-square test was performed to test for significance between the association of undergraduate (n=44) and graduate (n=91) student participants,’ and their level of agreement with the statement. The results of the chi-squared test revealed there was no statistical significance because the minimum expected count was less than 4.24. 71 Discussion This study was created to explore Social work students’ awareness of multiracial diversity within the African American population. The researcher compared the Awareness of undergraduate and graduation students within demographics of the participants, including ethnicity, gender, type of Social work student, prior work experience. When utilizing identity development models to examine the research findings, it was vital to be conscientious that different of cultural views pertaining to race. A review of literature also revealed a need for social work research, specifically correlating multiracial theory and implementation of theoretical perspectives into the social work practice when working with multiracial African American clients. Harris, Jackson, Kwerwin and Ponterotto’s research highlighted the different experiences of racial discrimination experienced by biracial children with a dominant parent who identified as White and a dominant parent who identified as Black. Their research found a difference between how parents prepared their children for possible racial discrimination. The research found that the Black parent was more color conscious than their White spouse. A Black father participant stated that his children have to be “the best” in order to survive racism. Black parents in the research study referenced the need for their children to be confident in their multiracial identity as a means of survival against discrimination The research findings from this study found that an number of undergraduate (80%) and 90% of graduate students believed they had an awareness of identity issues like the example referenced in Harris, Jackson, Kwerwin 72 and Ponterotto’s research that multiracial people encounter due to the social constructionism of race. This research finding also found that the majority of participants agreed having an awareness of multiracial diversity within the African American community would enhance their social work skill level. Incorporating the multiracial specific theory, such as Jackson’s (2007) Three-stage developmental theoretical model of biracial children, was previously found to be more sensitive and influential when dealing with complex multiracial specific issues of identity. Knowledge of coping strategies is utilized to help children cope with their racial individuality. For example, Deter’s idea of ‘uniqueness’ is used as an affirmation to help young children develop their racial individuality. This coping technique is used as an affirmation to help young children develop a positive sense of individuality while still asserting his or her sense of belonging. The research findings from this study implied additional research is required to further investigate this topic in effort to improve social work students’ awareness of historical construction of race such as the influence of the One-Drop-Rule. When research participants were asked to respond to the statement, “I am familiar with the ‘One-Drop-Rule’ and its connection to the identity of multiracial people of African descent, 50 percent (n=44) undergraduate students’ and 62 percent (n=88) of graduate students agreed with this statement. On the other hand, 50 percent of (n=44) undergraduate participants and 40 percent (n=88) of Graduate students’ disagreed with the above statement. The chi-square test demonstrated no statistical significance. Future research could examine the significance other multiracial sub- 73 groups such as Hispanic, Asian and Native American. An exploration of multiracial identity development and its connection to behavior could also be explored. The impact of the race, age, and ethnicity of multiracial clients and struggles with substance abuse could also be further researched. It was recommended in the above sections to duplicate this Study in effort to validate the research findings. Limitations The limitations of this study include the number of student participants (N=136), the collection of the participants, data collection methods, the research survey, as well as the student participants. The research findings of this study are not applicable to larger populations outside of CSUS due to the non-participation of outside student participants. The participants’ self-awareness of the purpose of the study could have potentially affected the research findings. Due to researcher's specific interest in multiracial diversity within the African American population could have lead to a bias that may have altered the research study design, data collection, and the analysis of the findings. The researcher suggests a further duplication of this research study utilizing a larger population including changes made to the research survey and probability-sampling methods are recommended and a qualitative study method would also be valuable for further understanding of this research topic. Implications for Social Work Practice and Policy The findings from this research study can provide strength in the awareness of multiracial diversity within the African American population. Currently a minimal amount of research referencing African American multiracial diversity is exists. This 74 research study will assist in increasing the knowledge available about this specific population. Additionally this research attempts to encourage additional research related to the research topic. It is assumed social work students on a micro level, are aware of their own perceptions and biases of race. It is imperative for social work students to be aware of bias prior to entering into a working relationship with diverse clients. For example, research findings in the literature review revealed multiracial clients at some pointencountered discrimination. Social work students should have an awareness of their own race; physical appearance, cultural values and beliefs may impact their treatment services. Social work students should seek to improve their educational level of this population and in effort to reduce potential barriers contributed by cultural incompetence. If students utilize the information presented in this research study, it could potentially improve their self-awareness about multiracial diversity within the African American population. The research findings on the mezzo level, in this research study can improve social work student educators to highlight this population when discussing cultural competency in social work courses. An awareness of the complexities of culture, environment and family and the contributions these factors play in the identity development of multiracial individual can benefit social work students when working with clients experiencing these social issues. It is important to encourage educators to provide social work students with an awareness of specific theoretical frameworks to assist with guiding multiracial clients through identity difficulties. Educators can also 75 focus more on engagement techniques to minimize and potential barriers that clients face when seeking assistance for their issues. Current policies for social work on the macro level, can offer modern ways to understand concepts of race. The increase of multiracial individuals highlights the inequalities of multiracial specific services due to dated concepts of racial categorizing. Social work can advocate for multiracial individuals by joining task force created to educate the public about multiracial inequalities and lack of resources. Social workers can hold trainings, advise school staff, provide written material and create support groups for multiracial individuals. Advocating for policy changes at the local, state and federal level in how racial information is collect can contribute to multiracial individuals an example of this type of policy change is the 2010 Census modification which gave people the option to choose more than one racial category. Recommendations The purpose of this study was to explore the Social work students’ awareness of multiracial diversity within the African American population. The following section includes a recommendation list of future research and resolutions how this study could potentially obtain better research results. This list will also contain a list of barriers social workers may encounter when working with the multiracial population. The researcher could have extended the survey population size by allotting more time for data collection of CSUS social work students. 76 The survey instrument could have accessed social work students’ knowledge of specific multiracial theories, such as Jacobs (1992). The Three-stage developmental theoretical model of biracial children. The researcher could have included an additional open-ended research question to analyze social work challenges when working the African American multiracial population. The researcher could have utilized a qualitative research method design to question to gather social work students’ personal experiences and challenges when working with the African American multiracial clients. The lack of research may serve as a future barrier for social work practitioners when working with a multiracial population. For instance, social workers may lack the educational background necessary to identify possible social barriers pertaining to self-identification. More African American multicultural specific literature is necessary to enhance the proficiency, skill level, and adaptability of current and future social work practitioners. Conclusion The primary purpose of this chapter was to provide a conclusion on the key research findings. This chapter discussed the research finding results and the summary results found in chapter four. The results were compared to the literature review discussed in chapter two. The research study limitations were also presented followed by proposed research recommendation for future research pertaining to this topic. The 77 research findings from this study assisted in highlighting possible future research topics in effort to conduct this study more sufficiently. In conclusion, this research determined that social work students’ at CSUS have awareness of multiracial diversity with the African American population but also it is important for social work courses to include multiracial African American specific course work content. 78 APPENDIX A CONSENT TO PARTICIPATE IN RESEARCH CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY, SACRAMENTO DIVISION OF SOCIAL WORK To: Nia Ridgle Date: November 25, 2013 Cc: Dinis From: Research Review Committee RE: HUMAN SUBJECTS APPLICATION Your Human Subjects application for your proposed study, “Social Work Students at Sacramento State University's Knowledge of Multi-Racial Diversity Among African Americans”, is Approved as Exempt. Discuss your next steps with your thesis/project Advisor. Your human subjects Protocol # is: 13-14-048. Please use this number in all official correspondence and written materials relative to your study. Your approval expires one year from this date. Approval carries with it that you will inform the Committee promptly should an adverse reaction occur, and that you will make no modification in the protocol without prior approval of the Committee. The committee wishes you the best in your research. Research Review Committee members Professors Maria Dinis, Jude Antonyappan, Serge Lee, Francis Yuen, Kisun Nam, Dale Russell, 79 APPENDIX B Survey Instrument 1. Gender: 1 Male_____ 2 Female _____ 2. Are you an undergraduate or graduate student? 1 Undergraduate _____ 2 Graduate_______ If you are a graduate student, are you an: 1 MSW I _____ 2 MSW II _____ 3. Do you have prior social work experience? 1 Yes ____ 2 No ____ If yes, how many years do you have? _________Years 4. My racial background is (please circle only one answer) (1) Asian or Asian American, including Chinese, Japanese, Pacific Islander and others (2) Black or African American (3) Hispanic or Latino, including Mexican American, Central American, and others (4) Caucasian, European American; not Hispanic (5) American Indian/Native American (6) Mixed; Parents are from two different groups (7) Other (write in): _____________________________________ 5. Please select only one answer for each statement. Choose the answer you feel most accurately represents your beliefs. A. B. C. My Social work education at Sacramento State University has made me aware of multiracial diversity within the African American community. I am aware of the identity issues multiracial people encounter. I am aware of the identity process among multiracial Strongly Agree Agree Disagree Strongly Disagree 4 3 2 1 4 3 2 1 4 3 2 1 80 D. E. F. G. H.. I. J. K. L. M. N. people. I understand how to utilize techniques such as, ECOmapping to understand multiracial individuals culture and racial identity. In our family racial identification was never important. African American people racially identify themselves based on their physical appearance. I ask people who resemble African Americans their racial identity rather than assume. I believe larger society classifications of race cause multiracial individuals to choose only one racial identity. Multiracial diversity among African Americans is a new concept to me I am confident in my ability to understand multiracial issues within the African American community. I believe multiracial diversity within the African American population should be discussed in our cross-cultural course at Sacramento State University. I believe that the biopsychosocial assessment must also include multiracial questions. I am aware of some reasons why multiracial people of African descent choose to identify as multiracial or solely African-American I believe understanding 4 3 2 1 4 3 2 1 4 3 2 1 4 3 2 1 4 3 2 1 4 3 2 1 4 3 2 1 4 3 2 1 4 3 2 1 4 3 2 1 4 3 2 1 81 O. P. multiracial diversity within the African American Community will enhance my social work skill level. I am aware of how social constructionism contributes to multiracial identity within the African American population. I am familiar with the, “OneDrop-Rule” and the connection it has to the identity of multiracial people of African descent. 4 3 2 1 4 3 2 1 82 APPENDIX C Research Data q1 Gender Frequency Valid 1 Male 20 2 Female 116 Total 136 Percent 14.7 Valid Percent Cumulative Percent 14.7 14.7 85.3 85.3 100.0 100.0 100.0 q2 Are you an undergraduate or graduate student? Valid 1 Undergraduate 2 Graduate Total Frequency 44 Percent 32.4 Valid Percent 32.4 Cumulative Percent 32.4 100.0 92 67.6 67.6 136 100.0 100.0 q2a If you are an graduate student, are you a: Valid Missing Valid Percent 63.0 Cumulative Percent 63.0 25.0 37.0 100.0 67.6 100.0 Frequency 58 Percent 42.6 2 MSW II 34 Total 92 1 MSW I System Total 44 32.4 136 100.0 q3 Do you have prior social work experience? Valid 1 Yes Frequency 84 Percent 61.8 Valid Percent 61.8 Cumulative Percent 61.8 100.0 2 No 52 38.2 38.2 Total 136 100.0 100.0 83 q3a If yes, how many years do you have? Valid Missing Valid Percent 7.4 Cumulative Percent 7.4 55.1 92.6 100.0 59.6 100.0 Frequency 6 Percent 4.4 2 6 Or More Years 75 Total 81 System 55 40.4 136 100.0 1 1 To 5 Years Total q4 My racial background is. Frequency Valid Valid Percent Cumulative Percent 1 Caucasian, European American 55 40.4 40.7 40.7 2 All Other 80 58.8 59.3 100.0 135 99.3 100.0 1 .7 136 100.0 Total Missing Percent System Total Q5g I ask people who resemble African Americans their racial identity rather than assume. q5g I ask people who resemble African Americans their racial identity rather than assume. 2 1 Disagree Agree q2 Are you an undergraduate or graduate student? 1 Undergraduate 2 Graduate Count % within q2 Are you an undergraduate or graduate student? % within q5g I ask people who resemble African Americans their racial identity rather than assume. % of Total Count % within q2 Are you an undergraduate or graduate student? Total 20 22 42 47.6% 52.4% 100.0% 38.5% 27.2% 31.6% 15.0% 16.5% 31.6% 32 59 91 35.2% 64.8% 100.0% 84 % within q5g I ask people who resemble African Americans their racial identity rather than assume. % of Total Total Count 61.5% 72.8% 68.4% 24.1% 44.4% 68.4% 52 81 133 q5h I believe larger society classifications of race cause multiracial individuals to choose only one racial identity. q5h I believe larger society classifications of race cause multiracial individuals to choose only one racial identity. 2 1 Disagree Agree q2 Are you an undergraduate or graduate student? 1 Undergraduate Count % within q2 Are you an undergraduate or graduate student? % within q5h I believe larger society classifications of race cause multiracial individuals to choose only one racial identity. % of Total 2 Graduate Count % within q2 Are you an undergraduate or graduate student? % within q5h I believe larger society classifications of race cause multiracial individuals to choose only one racial identity. % of Total Total Count % within q2 Are you an undergraduate or graduate student? Total 4 40 44 9.1% 90.9% 100.0% 30.8% 32.8% 32.6% 3.0% 29.6% 32.6% 9 82 91 9.9% 90.1% 100.0% 69.2% 67.2% 67.4% 6.7% 60.7% 67.4% 13 122 135 9.6% 90.4% 100.0% 85 % within q5h I believe larger society classifications of race cause multiracial individuals to choose only one racial identity. % of Total 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 9.6% 90.4% 100.0% q5o I am aware of how social construnctionism contributes to multiracial identity within the African American population. q5o I am aware of how social construnctionism contributes to multiracial identity within the African American population. 1 2 Disagree Agree q2 Are you an undergraduate or graduate student? 1 Undergraduate Count % within q2 Are you an undergraduate or graduate student? % within q5o I am aware of how social construnctionism contributes to multiracial identity within the African American population. % of Total 2 Graduate Count % within q2 Are you an undergraduate or graduate student? % within q5o I am aware of how social construnctionism contributes to multiracial identity within the African American population. % of Total Total Count % within q2 Are you an undergraduate or graduate student? Total 10 34 44 22.7% 77.3% 100.0% 45.5% 30.4% 32.8% 7.5% 25.4% 32.8% 12 78 90 13.3% 86.7% 100.0% 54.5% 69.6% 67.2% 9.0% 58.2% 67.2% 22 112 134 16.4% 83.6% 100.0% 86 % within q5o I am aware of how social construnctionism contributes to multiracial identity within the African American population. % of Total 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 16.4% 83.6% 100.0% q5p I am familiar with the, "One-Drop-Rule" and the connection it has to the identity of multiracial people of African descent. q5p I am familiar with the, "One-DropRule" and the connection it has to the identity of multiracial people of African descent. 1 2 Disagree Agree q2 Are you an undergraduate or graduate student? 1 Undergraduate Count % within q2 Are you an undergraduate or graduate student? % within q5p I am familiar with the, "One-Drop-Rule" and the connection it has to the identity of multiracial people of African descent. % of Total 2 Graduate Count % within q2 Are you an undergraduate or graduate student? % within q5p I am familiar with the, "One-Drop-Rule" and the connection it has to the identity of multiracial people of African descent. % of Total Total Count % within q2 Are you an undergraduate or graduate student? Total 22 22 44 50.0% 50.0% 100.0 % 40.0% 28.6% 33.3% 16.7% 16.7% 33.3% 33 55 88 37.5% 62.5% 100.0 % 60.0% 71.4% 66.7% 25.0% 41.7% 66.7% 55 77 132 41.7% 58.3% 100.0 % 87 % within q5p I am familiar with the, "One-Drop-Rule" and the connection it has to the identity of multiracial people of African descent. % of Total 100.0% 100.0% 100.0 % 41.7% 58.3% 100.0 % 88 q5j I am confident in my ability to understand multiracial issues within the African American community. q2 Are you an undergraduate or graduate student? 1 Undergraduate Count % within q2 Are you an undergraduate or graduate student? % within q5j I am confident in my ability to understand multiracial issues within the African American community. % of Total 2 Graduate Count % within q2 Are you an undergraduate or graduate student? % within q5j I am confident in my ability to understand multiracial issues within the African American community. % of Total Total Count % within q2 Are you an undergraduate or graduate student? % within q5j I am confident in my ability to understand multiracial issues within the African American community. % of Total q5j I am confident in my ability to understand multiracial issues within the African American community. 1 2 Disagree Agree 11 33 Total 44 25.0% 75.0% 100.0% 25.0% 36.3% 32.6% 8.1% 24.4% 32.6% 33 58 91 36.3% 63.7% 100.0% 75.0% 63.7% 67.4% 24.4% 43.0% 67.4% 44 91 135 32.6% 67.4% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 32.6% 67.4% 100.0% 89 q5k I believe multiracial diversity within the African American population should be discussed in our cross-cultural course at Sacramento State University. q2 Are you an undergraduate or graduate student? 1 Undergraduate Count % within q2 Are you an undergraduate or graduate student? % within q5k I believe multiracial diversity within the African American population should be discussed in our cross-cultural course at Sacramento State University. % of Total 2 Graduate Count % within q2 Are you an undergraduate or graduate student? % within q5k I believe multiracial diversity within the African American population should be discussed in our cross-cultural course at Sacramento State University. % of Total Total Count % within q2 Are you an undergraduate or graduate student? q5k I believe multiracial diversity within the African American population should be discussed in our cross-cultural course at Sacramento State University. 2 1 Disagree Agree 4 40 Total 44 9.1% 90.9% 100.0% 57.1% 31.0% 32.4% 2.9% 29.4% 32.4% 3 89 92 3.3% 96.7% 100.0% 42.9% 69.0% 67.6% 2.2% 65.4% 67.6% 7 129 136 5.1% 94.9% 100.0% 90 % within q5k I believe multiracial diversity within the African American population should be discussed in our cross-cultural course at Sacramento State University. % of Total 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 5.1% 94.9% 100.0% q5l I believe that the biopsychosocial assessment must also include multiracial questions. q5l I believe that the biopsychosocial assessment must also include multiracial questions. 1 2 Disagree Agree q2 Are you an undergraduate or graduate student? 1 Undergraduate Count % within q2 Are you an undergraduate or graduate student? % within q5l I believe that the biopsychosocial assessment must also include multiracial questions. % of Total 2 Graduate Count % within q2 Are you an undergraduate or graduate student? % within q5l I believe that the biopsychosocial assessment must also include multiracial questions. % of Total Total Count Total 9 35 44 20.5% 79.5% 100.0% 56.3% 29.4% 32.6% 6.7% 25.9% 32.6% 7 84 91 7.7% 92.3% 100.0% 43.8% 70.6% 67.4% 5.2% 62.2% 67.4% 16 119 135 % within q2 Are you an undergraduate or graduate student? 11.9% 88.1% 100.0% % within q5l I believe that the biopsychosocial assessment must also include multiracial questions. 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 91 % of Total 11.9% 88.1% 100.0% 92 References Babbie, E. R. (2010). The practice of social research. Belmont, Calif: Wadsworth Cengage. Banks, J. A (2004). Multiethnic education Characteristics and goals. In J. A Banks C.A.M. Banks (Eds.), Multiracial education: Issues and perspectives (5th ed., pp.3-30). Indianapolis, In: John Wiley & Sons. B. D. (n.d.). Socially embedded identities: Theories typologies, and process of racial identity among Black/White biracials. S (Vol. 43) (R. K., Author). Bowels, D. (1993). Biracial identity: Children born to African- American and White couples. Clinical Social work Journal, 21, 417-428. Brunsma, D. L (2006) Public categories, private identities: Exploring regional differences in the biracial experience. Social Science Research, 35, 555-576. Byrd, C. M., & Chavous, T. (2011). Racial Identity, School Racial Climate, and School Intrinsic Motivation Among African American Youth: The Importance of PersonContext Congruence. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 21(4), 849-860. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-7795.2011.00743.x Campbell, M. (2006). “What about the children?”: The psychological and social wellbeing of multiracial adolescents. The sociological Quarterly, 47. Daniel, G. R. (1992). Passers and pluralists: Subverting the racial divide. In M.P.P. Root (Ed.), Racially mixed people in America (pp. 91-107). New bury Park, CA: Sage. 93 Deters, K. A. (n.d.). Belonging nowhere and everywhere: Multiracial Identity development. In Bullton of Menninger Clinic. (Summer 97 ed., Vol. 61, Ser. 3, p. 368). Retrieved December 12. Dhooper, S. S (2003). Social work response to the needs of biracial Americans. Journal of Ethnic & Cultural Diversity in Social Work, 12, 19-47. Dudley, J. R. (2011). Research methods for social work. Being producers and consumers of research (updated 2nd ed.) Allyn and Bacon: Boston, MA Eddings, J. (1997). Counting a ‘new” type of American: The dicey politics of creating a ‘multiracial’ category in the census. U. S. News &World Report, 123,22-23. Erikson, E. H. (1980). Identity and the life cycle. New York: Norton. Foner, E. (2008, October 6). Master and the Mistress. New York Times. Retrieved November 13, 2013, from http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/times/people/h/sally_hemmings/ Gibbs, J. T (1992). Negotiating ethnic identity: Issues for Black-White adolescents. In M. P. P. Root (Ed.), Racially missed people in America (pp. 223-238). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Gibbs, J. T (1989). Biracial adolescents. In J. T Gibbs (Ed.), Children of color: Psychological interventions with culturally divers youth (pp. 305-322). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Graves, Jr. J. L (2004). The race myth: Why we pretend race exist in America. New York: Dutton. Grove, A (1964). Intermarriage: Interethnic, interracial, interfaith. Boston: Beacon. 94 Helms (1990). Black and White racial identity: Theory, research and practice. New York: Greenwood Press. Herman, M. (2004). Forced to Choose: Some Determinants of Racial Identification in Multiracial Adolescents. Child Development, 75(3), 730-748. Retrieved April 08, 2014, from http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/3696590?ref=searchgateway:27798b1c75c607c7ddcb7b916cde63cd Harris, D. R. (2003). Review: Beyond Black: Biracial Identity in America. Social Forces, 82(1), 436-437. Retrieved April 08, 2014, from http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/3598168?ref=searchgateway:60e9e667fb8bc499ca041d5d90bb377a Hutchison, E. D. (2013). Dimensions of human behavior: Person and environment (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Jacobs, J.H. (1992). Identity development in biracial children. In M. P. P. Root (Ed.), Racially mixed people in America (pp. 190-206). Newbury Park, CA: Sage. Jackson, K. F. (2007). Beyond Race: Examining The Cultural Identity of Mulitracial Individuals, 8-135. Retrieved Summer, 2013. Jackson, K. F. (2009). Beyond Race: Examining the Facets of Multiracial Identity Through a Life-span Developmental Lens. Journal of Ethnic And Cultural Diversity in Social Work, 18(4), 293-310. doi: 10.1080/15313200903310759 95 Jaret, C., & Reitzes, D.C. (1999). The importance of racial-ethnic identity and social setting for Blacks, Whites and Multiracials. Sociological perspectives, 42, 711737. Johnson, R.C., (1992). Offspring of cross-race and cross-ethnic marriages. In M.P. P. Root (Ed), Racially mixed people in America (pp.239-249). Newbury Park. CA: Sage. Jones, N. A., & Smith, A. S. (2001). The two or more races population, 2000. Washington, DC: U.S. Dept. of Commerce, Economics and Statistics Administration, U.S. Census Bureau. Jones, N. A., & Bullock, J. (2010). 2010 Census Briefs. The Two or More Races Population, (2012), 3-13. Retrieved June 12. Jones, N. A., & Symens Smith, A (2001, November). The tow or more races population: 2000. (Census 2000 Brief No. C2KBR/01-6). Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau. Kerry Ann Rockqumore & David L. Brunsma (2004) Negotiating Racial Idenfity, Women & Therapy, 27: 1-2, 85-102, 10.13.14/J015v2v27n01 06. Kerwin, C., Ponterotto, J. G., Jackson, B. L., & Harris, A. (1993). Racial identity in biracial children: A qualitative investigation. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 40(2), 221-231. doi: 10.1037//0022-0167.40.2.221 96 Khanna, N. (2010). "IF YOU'RE HALF BLACK, YOU'RE JUST BLACK": Reflected Appraisals and the Persistence of the One-Drop Rule. The Sociological Quarterly, 51(1), 96-121. Retrieved April 08, 2014, from http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/20697932?ref=searchgateway:2bb3a8bf7a0169e23dc4fa3a527cf585 Milan, S., & Keiley, M K. (2000). Biracial youth and families in therapy: Issues and interventions. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 26. 305-315 Nakashima, C. L. (1996). An invisible monster: The creation and entail of mixed-race people in America. In M. P. P. Root (Ed.), Racially mixed people in America (pp. 162-178). Newbury Park, CA: Sage. National Association of Social Workers (NASW). (2012). Code of ethics of the National Association of Social Workers. Retrieved fromhttp://www.naswdc.org/pubs/code/code.asp Obama, B. (2008). Dreams from my father: A story of race and inheritance. New York: Three Rivers Press. Oscar, A. (2010, April 4). Obama's Census-form choice: 'Black' Los Angeles Times. Retrieved December/January, 2013, from http://articles.latimes.com/print/2010/apr/04/nation/la-na-obama-census42010apr04 Park, R. E. (1928). Human Migration and the Marginal Man. American Journal of Sociology, 33(6), 881-893. doi: 10.1086/214592 97 Phinney, J. S (1992). The multigroup ethnic identity measure: A new scale for use with divers groups. Journal of adolescents Research, 7, 156-176. Quintana, E. D (1999). Racial and ethnic identity development in biracial people. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B. The Physical Sciences & Engineering, 60(3-B), 1313. R. K., & B. D. (2002b). Socially embedded identities: Theories, typologies, and process of racial identity among Black/White biracials. Sociological Quarterly, 43, 335356. Retrieved Summer, 2013, from htttp://web.ebscohost.com.proxy.lib.csus.edu/ehost/delivery?sid=ab93a6ba-30e94717-98 Renn, K. A. (2008). Research on biracial and multiracial identity development: Overview and synthesis. New Directions for Student Services, 2008(123), 13-21. doi: 10.1002/ss.282 Rockquemore, K., & Brunsma, D. L. (2002a). Beyond Black: Biracial identity in America. Thousand Oaks, CA, CA: Sage Publications. Rickquemore, K. A., & Brunsma, D. L (2002b). Socially embedded identities: Theories, typologies , and processes of racial identity among Black/White biracials. Sociological Quarterly, 43, 335-356. Rockquemore, KA, Brunsma DL and Degado DJ (2009). Racing to theory or retheorizing race? Understanding the struggle to build a multiracial identity theory. Journal of social Issues 65(1): 13-34. 98 Rockquemore, K. A. (2003). Multiple Realities: A Relational Narrative Approach in Therapy with Black-White Mixed-Race Clients. Family Relations, 52(2), 119128. Retrieved April 08, 2014, from http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/3700213?ref=searchgateway:aa1494bcd33ad0c84ba8a4fccc5a7d6e Root, M. P. (1992). Illogic of America racial categories. In Racially mixed people in America (pp. 12-23). Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications. Root, M. P. (1992). Racially mixed people in America (pp. 223-238). Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications. Root, M. P. P. (1996). The Multiracial Experience: Racial Borders as the New Frontier. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Root, M. P. P. (1994). Mixed-race women. In M. P. P. Root (ED.), Women of color: Integrating ethnic and gender identities in psychotherapy (pp. 455-478). New York: Guilford Press. Root, M. P. P. (2003). Multiracial families and children. In J. A. Banks & C. A. McGee Banks (Eds.), Handbook of research on multicultural education (pp. 110–124). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Rubin, A., & Babbie, E. (2001). Research methods for social work. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth/Thomson Learning. Russell, D (2010). Syllabus for SWRK 102 Cross Cultural Theory and Practice. (Available from Sacramento State Social work Deparment, 6000 J Street, Sacramento, CA 95819). 99 Sanchez, D. T. (2009). When race matters: Racially stigmatized others and perceiving race as a biological construction. Personality and social Psychology Bulletin 35(9): 1154-1164. Sanchez, D. T. (2010). How Do Forced-Choice Dilemmas Affect Multiracial People? The Role of Identity Autonomy and Public Regard in Depressive Symptoms. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 40(7), 1657-1677. doi: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.2010.00634.x Schaefer, R. T. (2011). Sociology: A brief introduction. New York: McGraw-Hill. Shih, M., & Sanchez, D. T. (2005). Perspectives and Research on the Positive and Negative Implications of Having Multiple Racial Identities. Psychological Bulletin, 131(4), 569-591. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.131.4.569 Spickard, P. R. (1991). Mixed blood: Intermarriage and ethnic identity in twentiethcentury America. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press. Stodghill, R., & Bower, A. (2002, July 25). Time Magazine. Welcom to America's Most Diverse City. Retrieved September/October, 2013, from http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599.340694,00.html Teramoto Pedrotti, J., Lopez, L. M., & Lopez, S. J. (2008). Working with Multiracial clients in Therapy: Bridging Theory, Research and Practice. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 39(2). Retrieved January/February, 2014, from http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0735-7028.39.2.192 Townsend, S., & Markus, H. (2009). My choice, your categories: The denial of multiracial identities. Journal of Social Issues, 65 ( 1 , 1 8 3 – 2 0 2 . 100 White, M., & Epston, D. (1990). Narrative means to therapeutic ends. New York: Norton. Williamson, Joel. 1980. New People: Miscegenation and Mulattoes in the United States. New York: The Free Press. Zack, N., (1993). Race and Mixed Race. Temple University Press, Philadelphia.