PART 2 ITEM NO. REPORT OF THE DIRECTOR OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES TO THE LEAD MEMBER FOR DEVELOPMENT SERVICES AND TO THE LEAD MEMBER OF CORPORATE SERVICES ON 23rd AUGUST 2004 TITLE: CADISHEAD WAY STAGE 2 – ACCOMMODATION WORKS TO BRIDGEMERE SITE (formerly owned by Clariant) RECOMMENDATIONS: 1. That approval in principle is given to a package of measures as detailed in paragraph 2.8 of this report to enable the continued construction of Cadishead Way Stage 2. 2. That an exception be made to Part 4:Section 7 (Contractual Standing Orders) of the Council’s Rules of Procedure to enable a negotiated price to be accepted. 3. That the Director of Corporate Services be instructed to complete the legal formalities EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Lead Member approved on the 15th December 2003 the award of contract for the construction of Cadishead Way Stage 2 to Birse Civils Ltd. An important factor for the successful construction of the scheme is the accommodation works to the site formerly owned by Clariant, but now owned by Bridgemere Properties Ltd BACKGROUND DOCUMENTS: Reports to the Lead Member for Development Services as follows Block 3 Transport Capital Programme 2003/04 and Structural Maintenance Revenue Programme 2003/04 - 12th May 2003 Approval of Contractors – 2nd June 2003 Appointment of preferred contractor – 3rd November 2003 Approval of award of Contract – 15th December 2003 Approval of Accommodation works to Univar – 22nd December 2003 (Available for public inspection) ASSESSMENT OF RISK: Low THE SOURCE OF FUNDING IS: The Transport Capital Programme (Block 3) LEGAL ADVICE OBTAINED: Cobbetts Solicitors FINANCIAL ADVICE OBTAINED: D McAllister c:\joan\specimen new report format.doc CONTACT OFFICER : D A Dean – Extension 3866 WARD(S) TO WHICH REPORT RELATE(S): Irlam, Cadishead KEY COUNCIL POLICIES: Safer Salford, Stronger Communities DETAILS (Continued Overleaf) Updated : 19/07/2002 c:\joan\specimen new report format.doc 1.0 BACKGROUND 1.1 Government Office for the North West in their letter of the 25th November 2003 have confirmed funding of £19,905,000 for Cadishead Way Stage 2 as indicated in the LTP expenditure settlement of December 2002. 1.2 Lead Member approved that the construction of Cadishead Way be awarded Birse Civils Ltd., for the sum of £11,344,775.00. 1.3 The form of contract for the works is the Engineering and Construction Contract (ECC) Second Edition published in 1995 by the Institution of Civil Engineers using Option C Target Cost Contract with Activity Schedule. In this form of contract, the contractor tenders a target price, but is paid actual cost. The target price is adjusted as a result of compensation events. The difference between actual cost and the adjusted target price is shared between the contractor and the employer under a predefined mechanism. 1.4 The line of Cadishead Way required the acquisition of private land. A public inquiry was held in May 2003 that resulted in the Compulsory Purchase Order being confirmed in August 2003. 1.5 The report to Lead Member on the 15th December detailed that extensive accommodation works were necessary to the Univar site (formerly Ellis and Everard) on Martens Road and at the Bridgemere site (formerly Clariant) on Hayes Road. 1.6 Accommodation works to the Univar site have been agreed and the expenditure approved by Lead Member on the 22nd December 2003. 1.7 In the report to Lead Member dated 15th December 2003, reference was made to extensive discussions with Clariant which addressed the effect of the construction of Cadishead Way Stage 2 on the existing ground contamination, anticipated remediation and future use of their site. Clariant’s consultant Celtic technologies had been commissioned to produce a detailed design for the accommodation works required. Their detailed design was valued at approximately £1,600,000. This design however was not considered to be entirely satisfactory and a further period of negotiation and discussion took place early in 2004. 1.8 In April 2004 the City Council received notification that the Clariant site had been bought by Bridgemere Properties Ltd. Initial discussions with the new owners suggested that the accommodation works that had been negotiated with Clariant were not in accordance with Bridgemere’s proposals and requirements for the site. 1.9 New discussions have produced an alternative strategy that will satisfy the requirements of both Bridgemere and the City Council. c:\joan\specimen new report format.doc 2.0 DETAILS 2.1 Clariant used to treat and store a wide variety of hydrocarbon based chemicals, and it is accepted that the site had become contaminated. In 2002, consultation with the Environment Agency identified a risk to Controlled Waters and Clariant undertook to develop a remediation strategy for the clean up of their site. 2.2 The existing site has a high proportion of impermeable concrete cover. A drainage system collects surface water from these areas and delivers it through a network of underground pipes to a drop shaft where it is pumped to storage in three large above ground tanks at the south east corner of the site. The tanks act to separate any oils, tars and solids from the water, which is then pumped around the site to the United Utilities public sewer on Hayes Road. 2.3 Construction of Cadishead Way has a considerable impact on this drainage system. The land acquired under the CPO process for the construction of the highway contains two of the three large storage tanks and much of the pumping system. Removal of the tanks can only be achieved if either an alternative drainage layout can be provided, or a remediation package for the main site can be developed to render the tanks redundant. 2.4 Initial discussions with Clariant explored both of the above options. However, whilst the timescale of the highway construction became clearer, the remediation and future end use of the main Clariant site remained less defined. As such the emphasis was placed on providing an alternative drainage layout that would be designed to free the CPO land for construction of the highway. 2.5 The City Council commissioned Clariant’s consultant Celtic Technologies to design an alternative drainage system. Celtic’s design was based on providing new underground storage tanks at the western side of the site adjacent to Hayes Road. This system was designed to be gravity fed which removed the need for much of the current pumping system, however, at a cost of £1.6m it was considered to be very expensive. 2.6 As detailed in paragraph 1.8 above, Bridgemere Properties Ltd bought the Clariant site in April 2004. Discussions with Bridgemere suggest that they have a clearer plan for the future redevelopment of the site for the purposes of housing and as such are more committed to undertaking a remediation process within the near future. 2.7 The discussions with Bridgemere have been focused on developing a strategy for the removal, rather than the diversion of the existing drainage system. However, the economics of both strategies have been compared to ensure the most advantageous for the City Council is chosen. c:\joan\specimen new report format.doc 2.8 The package of measures proposed below will allow the removal of much of the existing drainage system from the Bridgemere site and clear the land acquired under the CPO for the construction of Cadishead Way. A ‘Heads of Terms document is currently being prepared and will form part of a legal agreement between the City Council and Bridgemere Properties Ltd. Bridgemere will also be undertaking extensive remediation works to their site at their own cost. a) The City Council will construct at their expense alternative surface water and foul water sewers and connections onto Hayes Road for the future use by Bridgemere. – (These works will ensure Bridgemere remain connected to the public sewer system and provide development potential for their site. It is considered appropriate for these works to be carried out during the reconstruction of Hayes Road. Bridgemere will provide to the City Council confirmation that permission has been granted from United Utilities for any connections required into the public sewers. Furthermore, Bridgemere will enter into Section 104 agreements with United Utilities for the future adoption of these new sewers. However, the City Council will undertake to construct the sewers in such a manner as to enable their adoption.) b) The City Council will break up the concrete slabs and building foundations, crush to 6F2 material and stockpile for reuse and remove the existing drainage from a defined proportion of the Bridgemere site. (This work is important in making the existing drainage system redundant.) c) The City Council will pay Bridgemere the sum of £225,750.00 as compensation for the removal of contaminated hot spots from the site. (The removal of contaminated hot spots is necessary to Bridgemere’s remediation strategy and will reduce the risk of pollution once the drainage system has been removed. Bridgemere anticipate having to remove in excess of 10,000 cu,m of contaminated materials from their site and originally requested that 5,000 cu.m, be removed by the City Council as part of these accommodation works. Current rates for excavation and disposal value Bridgemere’s request at £350,000. Changes to the Landfill Regulations 2002 became operational on the 16th July. Whilst the full implications of these changes are as yet unknown it is probable that tipping charges for contaminated materials will rise. Negotiations with Bridgemere have concluded that Bridgemere will carry out all excavation and disposal of hot spots from the site but that the City Council will pay the sum of £225,750 equivalent to 3225 cu.m at current rates, as compensation. d) The City Council will construct at their expense an appropriate interceptor trench for Bridgemere at the southern boundary of their site. (The purpose of this 5.0m deep trench is to intercept any oil based contamination in the groundwater and prevent pollution of the Manchester Ship Canal. The City Council will ensure that the trench is suitable for purpose but Bridgemere will be responsible for future operational and maintenance costs.) c:\joan\specimen new report format.doc e) Bridgemere will provide an appropriate letter of indemnity from any future liability for the City Council as a result of the works carried out by them and written confirmation that the proposals form part of a remediation package which has the approval of the Regulatory Bodies. (The City Council will be carrying out some of the works under instruction from Bridgemere as part of Bridgemere’s overall remediation package for their site. As such, Bridgemere will remain responsible for satisfying the Regulatory Bodies as to the sufficiency of their remediation scheme.) f) The City Council will redesign and construct at their expense revised access into the Bridgemere site. In return, Bridgemere will construct a means of access into the land owned by Peel Holdings and transfer an area of land to the east of Cadishead Way to the City Council. (The access from Hayes Road onto the Bridgemere site was originally designed to accommodate industrial traffic and the appropriate area of land was acquired from Clariant under the CPO process. As Bridgemere intend the use of the site to be residential, the access arrangements are considered to be an uneconomic use of potentially developable land. It is proposed to redesign the access arrangements and transfer the residual land back to Bridgemere. The assumed value of this land has been factored into the calculations associated with these proposals, so has the reduction in the reconstruction cost of Hayes Road. There is also a plot of land between the Bridgemere boundary and Cadishead Way that is owned by Peel Holdings but leased to Bridgemere. This land had an access onto Hayes Road which was stopped up by the CPO / SRO procedure. It was a condition of the CPO / SRO procedure that access to this Peel owned land is maintained. If access to this Peel land can not be provided, the City Council would be obliged to acquire it. As part of the proposals Bridgemere will construct an appropriate means of access from their land, and guarantee the right of access from Hayes Road for Peel Holdings. In addition, Bridgemere will transfer a further area of redundant land to the east of Cadishead Way which the City Council would otherwise have been obliged to acquire under the CPO / SRO process. g) The City Council will facilitate access to the bypass prior to completion for remediation traffic to the Bridgemere site (Bridgemere have been advised by the Planning Officer that any traffic associated with the remediation of their site must use Cadishead Way and not Hayes Road. Details of their remediation traffic are expected to total approximately 20 vehicular movements per day. It is considered appropriate to allow this traffic through the roadworks under supervision and thus enable Bridgemere to commence remediation before the Cadishead Way is completed. Access will only be permitted during the normal working hours of the Cadishead Way scheme.) h) The City Council will remove and dispose of at their expense the existing drainage tanks, foundations and associated plant from the site, as they become redundant by the completion of other works. i) The City Council will construct a close boarded timber fence along the southern boundary of the Bridgemere site (Bridgemere have requested an amendement to the concrete post and chainlink fence which was to be erected around the former Clariant site as part of the highway scheme) c:\joan\specimen new report format.doc j) Bridgemere will grant approval for the City Council and their Contractors to enter Bridgemere land for the purpose of carrying out the works listed above. 3.0 FINANCIAL DETAILS 3.1 Government Office for the North West in their letter of the 25th November 2003 confirmed funding of £19,905,000 for Cadishead Way Stage 2 as indicated in the LTP expenditure settlement of December 2002. The budget for the scheme as identified at that time is set out below; Costs already incurred and committed in 2003/04 Landscaping contract (post highway construction) Land Purchase estimated costs Accommodation works to Univar (E&E) Accommodation works to Clariant (now Bridgemere) Service Diversions Site Supervision costs Works revised target sum Available contingency for works TOTAL SCHEME COSTS £ 708,000 £ 500,000 £2,500,000 £1,307,000 £1,600,000 £ 252,000 £ 906,000 £11,345,000 £ 787,000 £19,905,000 3.2 The detail of the current proposals for the works to the Bridgemere site is still incomplete, however, it is anticipated that the total cost to the contract will be in the region of £855,000, offering a considerable saving to the scheme. 3.3 The construction of Cadishead Way is progressing well and the accommodation works to the Bridgemere site are seen as the most significant unresolved element that may affect the outcome of the project. Quotations from Birse have already been used to assess the viability of the proposals and it is recommended that an exception to Part 4; Section 7 (Contractual Standing Orders) of the Council’s Rules of Procedure be made to enable Birse to undertake the civil engineering works required above as a variation to the construction contract for Cadishead Way. The variation will be treated as a compensation event as detailed in paragraph 1.3 above and it is hoped that savings may arise when the works are constructed. In accordance with the terms of the contract, any such savings will be shared on a 50:50 basis between the Council and the contractor. 3.4 A significant element of the proposed accommodation works lies within the site of the highway contract. The introduction of a contractor other than Birse would create major contractual complications 4.0 CONCLUSION 4.1 The construction of Cadishead Way Stage 2 will both relieve the centre of Cadishead of much through traffic and also provide better access to the Northbank Industrial Estate. Completion of the accommodation works to the Bridgemere site will enable construction to continue towards completion. Malcolm Sykes Director of Development Services c:\joan\specimen new report format.doc