A Systematic Approach To Training Dr. Steve Training & Development INP6325 Systems Approach to Training Systems Theory – Darwinian model applied to organizations Orgs must adapt to their environment to survive Specify Objectives Control learning experiences to achieve objectives Specify Criteria For Acceptable performance Feedback Evaluate Benefits of Systems Approach 1. 2. Feedback helps modify and improve training program Treats training program as a complex system of interacting parts 3. 4. Forces one to think about how a change in one component affects the other components Focuses on process rather than outcome Views training program as a system within a larger system Generic Training Development Model Needs Assessment Org Support Org Analysis Req’ment Analysis Training & Development Evaluation Training Validity Levels Training Validity Task Analysis Person Analysis Instructional Objectives Selection And Design Of Instructional Programs Training Development Of Criteria •Reaction •Learning •Behavioral •Results Transfer Validity Intra-Org’l Validity Inter-Org’l Validity Use of Evaluation Models Phase 1: Needs Assessment Organizational Support Make friends with P.O.C. Establish liaison teams/work groups Gain acceptance by supervisors and employees Minimize intrusiveness Follow org’s rules, norms, policies Phase 1: Needs Assessment Organizational Analysis – Determine the general goals of the organization (not just training) Determine what org goals are because training may not be the solution Potential questions (Schuler 1994) Is there a sufficient supply of people? How do you attract, retain, and motivate a diverse workforce? How do you compete for individuals with the right KSAs? What do your employees need to do for the org to be competitive? Phase 1: Needs Assessment Requirements Analysis What jobs are being examined? Who are the SMEs for each job? What methods will be used to collect information? What is the target job? Phase 1: Needs Assessment Task and KSA Analyses – Analysis of the job for which individuals will be training Basic Steps 1. 2. Job Description – Specify duties and conditions in which job is performed. Task Specification – The what, how, to whom or what, and why of the job. Professor: Disseminates information through lectures and discussions to college students to prepare them for careers in their profession 3. KSA requirements – What KSAs are necessary to perform the tasks described? Phase 1: Needs Assessment Person Analysis – Determine characteristics of group to be trained What do they already know? What is the criteria for performance? Who needs the training? Everyone? New employees? Specific dept? Those with poor evaluation? Those using new equipment? Those needing refresher? Phase 1: Needs Assessment Instructional Objectives – Specify what trainee should be able to do or know upon completion of training Use to determine behavioral criteria for evaluation List the behaviors required for effective performance Phase 2: Training Development Choosing the training environment Match the medium to the learning objectives Common error – using existing training program/technology and simply modifying it w/out considering objectives Training should be guided by learning principles Acquisition – knowledge, skills, abilities, attitudes Transfer – applying what is learned to the job Learning principles derived from various disciplines (cognitive psych, behaviorism, education, etc.) Phase 3: Evaluation Determine whether training helped meet goals Should use systems approach to provide feedback for program improvements/modifications Process 1. Establish criteria – how will you know training was successful Performance standards determined during needs assessment Behavior req’d to show proficiency & conditions of performance 2. Ex: typist training – measure improvement in WPM, errors, etc. Assess improvement and transfer Separate criteria for training performance & job performance Phase 3: Evaluation 1. 2. 3. 4. Criteria Reaction – opinion of trainees (survey) Learning – mastery of training material (test) Behavioral – trainee job performance (ratings) Results – org profit by training ($$$$) Phase 3: Evaluation 1. 2. 3. Goals – empirical test of whether goals are met: Training Validity – did trainees learn desired skill? Transfer Validity – were trainees able to use that skill on the job? Intraorganizational Validity – do later training groups perform as well as original trained group? 4. W/in org comparison Interorganizational Validity – can training program be successfully used in other orgs? Between org comparison Phase 3: Evaluation Experimental design – depends on goal you are trying to meet Individual differences – compare differences in training performance to job performance Can then use scores as a selection tool Problem is that doesn’t necessary mean training helped, good trainees may be good workers Content validity – did training target correct KSAs? Empirical data then used to determine training effectiveness and needs for modification Changes in content, medium, transfer, etc.