Unit Plan
Unit Title: All students will engage effectively in a range of collaborative discussions, writing , reading, and skill student centered activities throughout the theme of Clever
Ideas and Thinking of others
Essential Questions: How do people respond to natural disasters?
Standards: PA Core Standards, PA Academic Standards/Anchors (based on subject)
L.3.5b—Identify real life connections between words and their use.
L.3.6—Acquire and use accurately grade appropriate conversational general academic and domain specific words and phrases.
RI,3.2 Record stories, fables, folk tales, and myths from diverse cultures, determine the central message or morals and explain how it is conveyed through key details in the
text
RI.3.1 Ask and answer questions to demonstrate understanding of a text, referring to the text as the basis for the answers
RL.3.3 Describe characters in a story and explain how their actions contribute to the sequence of events.
R1.3.9 Compare and contrast the themes, settings, and plots of stories written by the same author or similar characters
L.3.4a Use sentence level content as a clue to the meaning of a word or phrase.
L.4.4 Consult reference materials to clarify the precise meaning of key words and phrases.
L.3.5-Distinguish literal and nonliteral meaning of words and phrases in context
Summative Unit Assessment : The weekly test, unit test, workbook pages, book logs, response to readings, and response to
leveled readers
Summative Assessment Objective
Assessment Method (check one)
Students Will be able to comprehend the expository text “Earthquakes” and
understand, interpret information presented visually, orally—(graphs,
diagrams, time lines)
____ Rubric ___ Checklist ____ Unit Test ____ Group
_x___ Student Self-Assessment
__x__ Other (explain) vocabulary word cards, reading responses
Teacher Name :
4th
TRACY WISDO
Subject :
ELA
Proposed Dates: September 21st
Grade Level (s)
Building : WHEMS
Day
1
Objective (s)
Students will-interpret
information in the expository
genre. They will be able to
explain information to an
understanding of the text in
which it appears.
DOK
LEVEL
Activities / Teaching Strategies
Grouping
DAILY PLAN
1, 2
Demonstrate vocabulary cards
Give examples in sentence.
Respond to the story
State facts from the story
Whole
Differentiated
Independent
Materials / Resources
Visual vocabulary cards
Journals
Workbook vocabulary page
McGraw Hill Resources
Leveled readers
Assessment of Objective (s)
Formative discussion-Red/green
assessment cards
Summative- graphic organizer
Student Self - Assessmentresponse to reading
Vocabulary examples
Small group discussion
2
Students will-be able to review
the key ideas expressed and
explain their own ideas and
understanding in light of the
discussion.
1,2
Read story.
Read teacher read aloud
Respond to reading
Use graphic organizer
Write important details
Whole
differentiated
independent
Graphic organizer
Workbook page
computers
Formative-workbook page
Graphic organizer
Summative- comprehension
questions
Student Self - Assessment- oral
discussion, center skills
3
Students will-paraphrase
portions of a text read aloud or
information presented in diverse
media and formats, including
visually and orally.
1,2
Workbook page
Use spelling visual cards to go over the short vowels
Write about the reading—write an analysis
Do Reading/writing workshop
Compare/contrast writing
Whole
differentiated
independent
Workbook page
Spelling visual cards
Teacher read aloud
Leveled readers
Venn diagram
Formative-workbook page
Think—Pair--Share
Summative- analysis about the
reading
Student Self - Assessment-oral
discussion, center skills
4
Students will- be able to use
combined knowledge of all letter
sound correspondences,
patterns, and read accurately
unfamiliar multisyllabic words in
context and out of context.
1,2
Students will-be able to use
concrete words and phrases and
sensory details to convey
experiences and events
precisely.
1,2,3
Use spelling cards
Do workbook page
Do Spelling handout
Journals—go over proofreading
Whole
Differentiated
paired
Spelling cards
Workbook page
Journals
computers
Formative-worksheet, journal
Summative- workbook page
Student Self - Assessmentdiscussion with groups
Write a response to the reading.
Go over daily language proofreading
Go over the guided readers with the questions.
Respond to the guided readers.
Give weekly spelling test.
Whole
Differentiated
paired
Daily language proofreading
Guided readers
Writing prompt—proofread and
share
Formative- guided reader
responses
Summative- spelling test
Student Self - Assessmentproofreading their daily language
5
6
7
8
Students will-be able to describe
the overall structure
(cause/effect) comparison
problem/solution of events,
ideas, and concepts, or
information in a text or part of a
text.
1, 2,3
Students will-be able to use
combined knowledge of all
letter-sound correspondences,
syllabication patterns, to read
accurately unfamiliar
multisyllabic words in context
and out of context.
1,2
Students will-be able to analyze
models to understand how
supporting details explain main
ideas. The students will develop
the topic with facts, definitions,
1,2,3
Reading/Writing workshop--- recall key
characteristics of expository texts
-Go over hand out with text features—headings,
photographs, and captions
--Do nonfiction packet and pick out facts and text
evidence
Do Reading/Language workshop proofreading
Go over spelling cards
Do student centered activities (centers)
Do spelling packet
Go over fluency reading
Do read aloud—model
Do the student model and proofread
Do week 3 daily language/discuss
Do practice book
Whole
Differentiated
Pair
Independent
Whole
Differentiated
Independent
Whole
Differentiated
independent
Daily language—proofreading
Leveled readers
Nonfiction packets
Worksheet
workbook
Daily language –proofreading
Spelling cards
Centers
Workbook
Spelling packet
Daily language
Writing prompt
Workbook
Formative-red/green assessment
cards
Summative- work book page
Nonfiction packet
Student Self - AssessmentTeacher / student interview
Formative-observation/centers
Summative-workbook page
Student Self - Assessment-daily
language self check
Formative-proofread their writing
Summative- finished writing
Student Self - Assessment-daily
9
10
11
12
concrete details, quotations, or
other information and examples
related to the text
Students will-be able to use
context (examples—definitions,
examples, or restatements in a
text) as a clue to the meaning of
a word or phrase.
They will recognize and explain
the meaning of common idioms
and proverbs
Do the expository writing
1,2,3
Whole
Paired
Differentiated
independent
Daily language proofreading
Vocab sheet
Leveled reader
Centers
Vocabulary notebooks
Formative-red/green assessment
Observations throughout centers
Summative- vocabulary sheet
sentences
Student Self - Assessmentstudent centered skiills
Students will-be able to
comprehend the expository text
to cite evidence throughout the
text.
--The students will be able to
evaluate their writing,
1,2
Students will- be able to refer to
details and examples in a text
when explaining what the text
says explicity and when drawing
inferences from the text.
1,2
Students will-use combined
knowledge of all letter sound
correspondences, patterns and
morphology with unfamiliar
multisyllabic words in context
and out of context.
1,2
Example for Teachers
Do vocabulary sheet
Do vocabulary center activity
Use the words in sentences
Read the leveled readers and do the response to
reading questions.
Do figurative language, context clues centers
language practice—self check
Weekly assessment test
Do Benchmark skill test
Work on their expository writing
(Wrapping up the story)
Share expository writing
Introduce text structure—cause/effect
Do read aloud
Go over vocabulary cards
Read “Forces and Motion”
Do comprehension questions
Nonfiction packet
Do spelling cards
Do center activity
Do spelling packet
Do daily language
Do grammar---text—(quiz)
Whole
Paired
Differentiated
independent
Weekly assessment test
Benchmark test (paper)
Expository writing
Formative-proofreading their
writing
Summative- weekly assessment
Student Self - Assessment- self
proofreading and sharing their
writing.
Whole
Differentiated
independent
Whole
Differentiated
independent
Anthology book
Cause/effect worksheet
Nonfiction packet
Formative-discussion
Spelling packet
Center activity
Daily language
Journal
Spelling cards
Formative-red/green cards
SummativeComprehension questions
Student Self - Assessmentdiscussing vocab cards
Summative-packet
Grammar--quiz
Student Self - Assessmentcenters
Objective (s)
Every performance or learning
objective contains at least three
parts:
Observable Action (task),
At Least One Measurable Criterion
(standard), and
Conditions of performance.
DOK
LEVEL
1
2
3
4
Grouping
DAILY PLAN
Activities / Teaching Strategies
Activities
What was used during instruction to address skills and
knowledge (ex. Labs, research projects, interviews,
presentations)
Teaching Strategies
Instructional strategies determine the approach a
teacher may take to achieve learning objectives.
W
S
I
Materials / Resources
Assessment of Objective (s)
Materials;Resources
Textbooks, manipulatives, supplies,
tools, or other pertinent
supplemental materials that aid or
enhance learning expectations and
instruction.
Formative
is a process used by teachers and students
during instruction that provides explicit
feedback to adjust ongoing teaching and
learning to improve students’ achievement
of intended instructional
objectives/outcomes.
Ex.
Students will
use knowledge of letter-sound
correspondence to decode gradelevel vocabulary when reading
orally and silently.
Summative
are cumulative evaluations used to
measure student growth after instruction
and are generally given at the end of a
course/unit in order to determine whether
long term learning goals have been met.
Student Self - Assessment-
DOK Level 1 - Recall - measure, recall, calculate, define, list, identify
DOK Level 2 - Skill/Concept - graph, classify, compare, estimate, summarize.
DOK Level 3 - Strategic Thinking - assess, investigate, formulate, draw conclusions, construct.
DOK Level 4 - Extended Thinking - analyze, critique, create, design, apply concepts
Grouping
W – Whole Group; Whole class instruction is when teachers present a lesson to the whole class with little differentiation in either content or assessment for any student's
ability. The purpose of whole class instruction is that all students are presented with a series of learning tasks to allow them to acquire and/or practice their learning. The pace
of instruction is such that all students can master it. Learning is then assessed using standardized measures such as graded assignments or topic tests.
S – Small Group; typically refers to a teacher working with a small group of students on a specific learning objective. These groups consist of 2-4 students and provide these students with a reduced
student-teacher ratio. Small group instruction usually follows whole group instruction. It allows teachers to work more closely with each student, reinforce skills learned in the whole group
instruction, and check for student understanding. It allows students more of the teacher's attention and gives them a chance to ask specific questions they may have about what they learned.
Teachers often use small group instruction to provide struggling students with intervention as well.
I – Individual; is an instructional method that personalizes instruction to the needs and learning style of the learner. This is done by varying the pace of instruction, the method of learning employed
and the content to be learned. Often this is accomplished within the context of a larger group through the use of high-quality instructional materials and reduced lecture time. Individualized
instruction is not the same as one-to-one instruction; it is simply varying the process to meet the needs of each individual learner in the group.
Directions for Building Administrators
OBJECTIVE(S)
Objectives are like road maps for both you and your students: they help you to focus your instruction on a goal and they help your students understand why they
are learning the day's material. Objectives also allow you to decide how you will assess student learning, as they require students to demonstrate what they have
learned in some way.
The Three Parts of an Objective
Every performance or learning objective contains at least three parts:
1. Observable Action (task)- This describes the observable performance or behavior. An action means a verb must be in the statement, for example “type a
letter” or “lift a load.” Each objective covers one behavior, hence, normally only one verb should be present. If there are more than one behaviors or the
behaviors are complicated, then the objective should be broken down into one or more enabling learning objectives that supports the main terminal
learning objective.
2. At Least One Measurable Criterion (standard)- This states the level of acceptable performance of the task in terms of quantity, quality, time limitations,
etc. This will answer any question such as “How many?” “How fast?” or “How well?” For example, “At least 5 will be produced”, “Within 10 minutes”,
and “Without error.” There can be more than one measurable criterion. Do not fall into the trap of putting in a time constraint because you think there
should be a time limit or you cannot easily find another measurable criterion — use a time limit only if required under normal working standards.
3. Conditions of performance - Describes the actual conditions under which the task will occur or be observed. Also, it identifies the tools, procedures,
materials, aids, or facilities to be used in performing the task. This is best expressed with a prepositional phase such as “without reference to a manual” or
“by checking a chart.”
DEPTH OF KNOWLEDGE (DOK)
What is the DOK and Why Do We Need It?
The Depth-of-knowledge (DOK) was created by Norman Webb from the Wisconsin Center for Education Research.
The Depth of Knowledge is the degree of depth or complexity of knowledge standards and assessments require; this criterion is met if the assessment is as
demanding cognitively as the expectations standards are set for students.
Completely aligned standards and assessments requires an assessment system designed to measure in some way the full range of cognitive complexity within each
specified content standard. Norman Webb identified four levels for assessing the DOK of content standards and assessment items.
The DOK levels are Recall (Level 1), Skill or Concept (Level 2), Strategic Thinking (Level 3) and Extended Thinking (Level 4). Of course to accurately
evaluate the DOK level, each level needs to be defined and examples given of types of student behaviors.
DOK implies the interaction of how deeply a student needs to understand the content with different ways of responding and interacting with the content.
DOK Level 1 - Recall - measure, recall, calculate, define, list, identify.

This category involves basic tasks that require students to recall information and/or reproduce knowledge/skills. This may involve simple procedures or
working with facts or terms. Students do not need to figure out this level of DOK they either know the answer or they don't.
DOK Level 2 - Skill/Concept - graph, classify, compare, estimate, summarize.

This DOK level requires students to compare and contrast, describe or explain, or convert information. It may involve going beyond describing, to
explaining how or why. At this level students may need to infer, estimate, or organize.
DOK Level 3 - Strategic Thinking - assess, investigate, formulate, draw conclusions, construct.

At this level students are required to use higher order thinking processes. They may be asked to solve real-world problems, predict outcomes, or analyze
something. Students may need to access knowledge from multiple subject areas to reach a solution.
DOK Level 4 - Extended Thinking - analyze, critique, create, design, apply concepts.

Higher ordered thinking skills are essential at this level of DOK. Students must employ strategic thinking to solve problems at this level. Students will
need to conduct, and synthesize as well as manage at level 4.
ACTIVITIES/TEACHING STRATEGIES
Activities: exploratory or reinforcing experiences that help students attain learning expectations.
Teaching Strategies: all approaches that a teacher may take to actively engage students in learning. These strategies drive a teacher's instruction as they work to
meet specific learning objectives. Effective instructional strategies meet all learning styles and development needs of the learners.
Types:
Direct Instruction - is highly teacher-directed and is among the most commonly used. This strategy is effective for providing information or
developing step-by-step skills. It also works well for introducing other teaching methods, or actively involving students in knowledge construction.
Examples - Structured Overview, Lecture, Explicit Teaching, Drill & Practice, Compare & Contrast, Didactic Questions, Demonstrations,
Guided & Shared - reading, listening, viewing, thinking
Indirect Instruction - indirect instruction is mainly student-centered, although the two strategies can complement each other. Indirect instruction
seeks a high level of student involvement in observing, investigating, drawing inferences from data, or forming hypotheses. It takes advantage of
students' interest and curiosity, often encouraging them to generate alternatives or solve problems.
In indirect instruction, the role of the teacher shifts from lecturer/director to that of facilitator, supporter, and resource person. The teacher arranges
the learning environment, provides opportunity for student involvement, and, when appropriate, provides feedback to students while they conduct
the inquiry.
Examples - Problem Solving, Case Studies, Reading for Meaning, Inquiry, Reflective Discussion, Writing to Inform, Concept Formation,
Concept Mapping, Concept Attainment, Cloze Procedure
Interactive Instruction - relies heavily on discussion and sharing among participants. Students can learn from peers and teachers to develop social
skills and abilities, to organize their thoughts, and to develop rational arguments. It is important for the teacher to outline the topic, the amount of
discussion time, the composition and size of the groups, and reporting or sharing techniques. Interactive instruction requires the refinement of
observation, listening, interpersonal, and intervention skills and abilities by both teacher and students.
Examples - Debates, Role Playing, Panels, Brainstorming, Peer Partner Learning, Discussion, Laboratory Groups, Think-Pair-Share,
Cooperative Learning, Jigsaw, Problem Solving, Structured Controversy, Tutorial Groups, Interviewing, Conferencing
Experiential Instruction - is inductive, learner centered, and activity oriented. Personalized reflection about an experience and the formulation of
plans to apply learning to other contexts are critical factors in effective experiential learning. The emphasis in experiential learning is on the
process of learning and not on the product. Experiential learning can be viewed as a cycle consisting of five phases, all of which are necessary:





experiencing (an activity occurs);
sharing or publishing (reactions and observations are shared);
analyzing or processing (patterns and dynamics are determined);
inferring or generalizing (principles are derived); and,
applying (plans are made to use learning in new situations).
Examples - Field Trips, Narratives, Conducting Experiments, Simulations, Games, Storytelling, Focused Imaging, Field Observations,
Role-playing, Model Building, Surveys
Independent Study refers to the range of instructional methods which are purposefully provided to foster the development of individual
student initiative, self-reliance, and self-improvement. While independent study may be initiated by student or teacher, the focus here will be on
planned independent study by students under the guidance or supervision of a classroom teacher.
\
Examples – Essays, Computer Assisted Instruction, Journals, Learning Logs, Reports, Learning Activity Packages, Correspondence
Lessons, Learning Contracts, Homework, Research Projects, Assigned Questions, Learning Centers
GROUPIING
W – Whole Group; Whole class instruction is when teachers present a lesson to the whole class with little differentiation in either content or assessment for any
student's ability. The purpose of whole class instruction is that all students are presented with a series of learning tasks to allow them to acquire and/or practice
their learning. The pace of instruction is such that all students can master it. Learning is then assessed using standardized measures such as graded assignments or
topic tests.
S – Small Group; typically refers to a teacher working with a small group of students on a specific learning objective. These groups consist of 2-4 students and
provide these students with a reduced student-teacher ratio. Small group instruction usually follows whole group instruction. It allows teachers to work more
closely with each student, reinforce skills learned in the whole group instruction, and check for student understanding. It allows students more of the teacher's
attention and gives them a chance to ask specific questions they may have about what they learned. Teachers often use small group instruction to provide
struggling students with intervention as well.
I – Individual; is an instructional method that personalizes instruction to the needs and learning style of the learner. This is done by varying the pace of
instruction, the method of learning employed and the content to be learned. Often this is accomplished within the context of a larger group through the use of highquality instructional materials and reduced lecture time. Individualized instruction is not the same as one-to-one instruction; it is simply varying the process to
meet the needs of each individual learner in the group.
MATERIALS/RESOURCES
Materials: are the physical items used to support the presentation of and interaction with the curriculum content.
Resources: textbooks, manipulatives, supplies, tools, or other pertinent supplemental items that aid or enhance learning expectations and instruction.
ASSESSMENT OF OBJECTIVE(S)
Formative - is a process used by teachers and students during instruction that provides explicit feedback to adjust ongoing teaching and learning to improve
students’ achievement of intended instructional objective(s)/outcome(s).
Examples: Observations, Questioning, Discussion, Exit/Admit Slips, Learning/Response Logs, Graphic Organizers, Peer/Self Assessments, Practice
Presentations, Visual Representations, Kinesthetic Assessments, Individual Whiteboards, Laundry Day, Four Corners, Constructive Quizzes, Think Pair
Share, Appointment Clock, As I See It
Summative - A summative assessment is a more formal method of testing student knowledge about a previously learned concept or unit of study. This type of
evaluation is also commonly given at the end of the quarter, during the middle of the year and as a final, cumulative exam. Summative assessments give the
instructor an idea of how much content the students have retained and may use the results to determine effective learning and teaching techniques for the class.
Examples: End of unit tests or projects, standardized assessments, portfolios.
Relation to
Instruction
Frequency
Relation to
grading
Students role
Requirements
for use
Examples
Purpose
Everyday Connection
Formative
Occurs during instruction
Summative
Occurs after instruction
Occurs on an ongoing basis (daily)
Occurs at a particular point in time to determine
what students know
Graded
Not graded – information is used as feedback
to students and teachers, mastery is not
expected when students are first introduced to a
concept
Active engagement – self assessment
Clearly defined learning targets that students
understand
Clearly defined criteria for success that
students understand
Use of descriptive versus evaluative feedback
Better thought of as a process rather than a
thing.
Examples include observations,
interviews, evidence from work samples, paper and
pencil tasks
Designed to provide information needed to
adjust teaching and learning while they are still
occurring
Passive engagement in design and monitoring
Well designed assessment blue print that
outlines the learning targets
Well designed test items using best practices
State assessments, interim assessments, end of unit
assessments, common assessments
Designed to provide information about the
amount of learning that has occurred at a
particular point
Since summative assessments occur after
instruction every few weeks, months, or once a
year, they to help evaluate the effectiveness of
programs, school improvement goals, alignment
of curriculum, or student placement in specific
Getting your drivers license.
“A good analogy for this is the road test that is required to receive a driver's license.
What if, before getting your driver's license, you received a grade every time you sat behind the wheel to
practice driving?
What if your final grade for the driving test was the average of all of the grades you
received while practicing?
Because of the initial low grades you received during the process of learning to drive, your final grade
would not accurately reflect your ability to drive a car.
In the beginning of learning to drive, how confident or motivated to learn would you feel?
Would any of the grades you received provide you with guidance on what you needed to do next to improve
your driving skills?
Your final driving test, or summative assessment, would be the accountability measure that establishes
whether or not you have the driving skills necessary for a driver's license—not a reflection of all the driving
practice that leads to it.
Student Self-Assessment: Involving students in the assessment and evaluation process is an essential part of balanced assessment. When students become partners
in the learning process, they gain a better sense of themselves as readers, writers, and thinkers. As students reflect on what they have learned and on how they
learn, they develop the tools to become more effective learners.
Students need to examine their work and think about what they do well and in which areas they still need help. To guide students in understanding the process of
self-evaluation, you may want to have them complete a Self-Reflection/Self-Assessment sheet of your own (teacher developed).
Once students have reflected on their learning, they are ready to set new goals for themselves. As they work toward these goals, they should be encouraged to
reflect on their learning journey at regular intervals. You might have students record their observations during these periods of self-reflection to help reaffirm their
goals and motivate them to move toward meeting each goal. With practice, students who self-assess become more conscious learners, able to apply knowledge of
their learning needs and styles to new areas of study.
As students become more active participants in the assessment process, they will begin to evaluate their strengths and attitudes, analyze their progress in a
particular area, and set goals for future learning.
Examples: writing conferences, discussion (whole-class, small-group, or individual), reflection logs, weekly self-evaluations, self-assessment checklists
and inventories, teacher-student interviews