The Cold War The Beginning 1945 – 1950 There are now two great nations in the world, which starting from different points, seem to be advancing toward the same goal: the Russians and the Anglo-Americans. . . . Each seems called by some secret design of Providence one day to hold in its hands the destinies of half the world. Alexis de Tocqueville, Democracy in America (1835) Roots of the Cold War Munich Conference Summer 1938 – Tensions between Germany and Great Britain, Czechoslovakia, and France escalated as Adolph Hitler insisted the Sudetenland be transferred from Czechoslovakian to German control. Representatives from France, Britain, Germany and Italy meet at Munich in September to discuss Hitler’s demands. Edouard Daladier (France) Neville Chamberlain (Britain) Adolph Hitler (Germany) Benito Mussolini (Italy) Chamberlain informed Czechoslovakia England and France were unwilling to go to war over the issue of the Sudetenland but also informed Hitler that German occupation was unacceptable. Roots of the Cold War Hitler realized both Britain and France were unwilling to go to war or form an alliance with the USSR because of the totalitarian system they hated more than they hated Hitler’s fascist government. Mussolini recommended that Hitler hold a four power conference including Britain, France, Germany and Italy but excluding Czechoslovakia and the USSR. This would increase the likelihood of an agreement AND undermine the solidarity that was beginning to develop against Germany. Frantic to evade hostilities, and eager to escape an alliance with the USSR Chamberlain and Daladier agreed to German control of the Sudetenland. Hitler in turn pledged not to make any further territorial demands in Europe. Eduard Benes, the Czechoslovakian head of state, protested the agreement but was informed by Chamberlain that Britain was unwilling to go to war over the Sudetenland. Roots of the Cold War APPEASEMENT Chamberlain returned to England proclaiming “peace in our time.” Many, including Winston Churchill and Anthony Eden attacked the agreement claiming Chamberlain – and therefore the British government had acted dishonorably and had lost the respect of the Czechoslovakians and their military which was one of the best in Europe at the time. When Germany seized Czechoslovakia in March 1939Hitler broke the Munich Agreement and Chamberlain finally understood Hitler could not be trusted and his (Chamberlain’s) appeasement policy had been waste of time. Throughout the Cold War US and British politicians and policy makers continually pointed back to the Munich Agreement as an example of what NOT TO DO in their relations with the USSR. The led to several policies including the Truman and Eisenhower Doctrines. War Conferences Atlantic August 1941 Moscow September/October 1941 Arcadia Dec. 1941 – Jan. 1942 Casablanca January 1943 Cairo November 1943 Bretton Wood July, 1944 Dumbarton Oaks August 1944 2nd Quebec September 1944 4th Moscow October 1944 Malta January/February 1945 Yalta February 1945 United Nations April – June 1945 Conference on International Organization Potsdam July/August 1945 Britain and the US Britain, the US and the USSR Britain and the US Britain, the US and France Britain, the US and China 44 Nations 39 “United Nations” Britain and the US Britain, the US and the USSR Britain and the US Britain, the US and the USSR 50 Nations Britain, the US and the USSR The World - 1945 Roosevelt’s Three Part Plan Economic Liberalization Collective Security Political Self-determination International Monetary Fund – Bretton Woods Conference World Bank – Bretton Woods Conference United Nations – United Nations Conference Together these organizations would lessen the probability of future depressions by: lowering tariff barriers stabilizing currencies coordinating government planning with the workings of markets provide the means to: contain future aggressors if necessary defeat future aggressors. The International Monetary Fund, the World Bank and the United Nations provided for economic liberalization and collective security: political self-determination would have to wait until after the defeat of Nazi Germany. The Yalta Conference 4 to 11 February 1945 GB – Winston Churchill US – Franklin D. Roosevelt USSR – Joseph Stalin Key Issues: Dividing Germany The formation of the United Nations German war reparations The entry of Soviet forces into the Far-Eastern front (Japan) The final, and most difficult issue, the future of Poland Declaration of Liberated Europe Establish conditions of internal peace Carry out measures for the relief of distressed peoples Form internal governmental authorities broadly representative of all democratic elements in the population and pledged to the earliest possible establishment through free elections of governments responsive to the will of the people. Facilitate where necessary the holding of such elections. The Potsdam Conference "The Governments of the United Kingdom, the United States and the U. S. S. R. consider it necessary to begin without delay the essential preparatory work upon the peace settlements in Europe. …” THE PRINCIPLES TO GOVERN THE TREATMENT OF GERMANY IN THE INITIAL CONTROL PERIOD POLITICAL PRINCIPLES ECONOMIC PRINCIPLES REPARATIONS FROM GERMANY DISPOSAL OF THE GERMAN NAVY AND MERCHANT MARINE WAR CRIMINALS POLAND The Iron Curtain Winston Churchill – March 1946 Westminster College, in Fulton, Missouri The United States stands at this time at the pinnacle of world power. It is a solemn moment for the American democracy. For with this primacy in power is also joined an awe-inspiring accountability to the future. As you look around you, you must feel not only the sense of duty done, but also you must feel anxiety lest you fall below the level of achievement. Opportunity is here now, clear and shining, for both our countries. To reject it or ignore it or fritter it away will bring upon us all the long reproaches of the aftertime. From Stettin in the Baltic to Trieste in the Adriatic an iron curtain has descended across the Continent. Behind that line lie all the capitals of the ancient states of Central and Eastern Europe. Warsaw, Berlin, Prague, Vienna, Budapest, Belgrade, Bucharest and Sofia; all these famous cities and the populations around them lie in what I must call the Soviet sphere, and all are subject, in one form or another, not only to Soviet influence but to a very high and in some cases increasing measure of control from Moscow. The Transformation War aims translated into a wartime alliance between what would become known as the western democracies and the Soviet block because both, in Nazi Germany, faced a common enemy. As the war drew to a close the future enemies came into conflict over the nature of the post war world. US Vision • Self-determination • Territorial Integrity • Free Trade • Traditional Western Freedoms USSR Vision • Secure borders • Control over those nations closest to Russia • Refashion Eastern Europe in its own image Critical Issues of the Transformation GERMANY POLAND GREECE, ROMANIA AND OCCUPIED EASTERN EUROPE ATOMIC ENERGY ECONOMIC RECONSTRUCTION Critical Issues of the Transformation GERMANY Should Germany be de-industrialized? Should Germany be permanently divided among the allies? How much must Germany pay in war reparations? Critical Issues of the Transformation POLAND USSR Poland had been used on three occasions by European powers to invade Russia – once by France and twice by Germany. A Polish government subservient or at the very least friendly to the Soviets was an overriding aim of Soviet leadership – especially Stalin. Western Allies The very reason for the war was the right of Poland concerning the matter of self-determination. The right of Poland to democratically elect its own government was a basic test of the principle of the Atlantic Charter. Critical Issues of the Transformation EASTERN EUROPE, GREECE and ROMANIA USSR The Soviet Union, fearing for its security, strongly desired to control its neighbors. Western Allies Envisioned a postwar world of capitalists democracies. The US specifically had dreams of a US-led coalition. When England could not live up to commitments made to Greece, President Truman challenged the US – the Congress, and the people, that, “We shall not realize our objectives, however, unless we are willing to help free peoples to maintain their free institutions and their national integrity against aggressive movements that seek to impose upon them totalitarian regimes.” Critical Issues of the Transformation ATOMIC ENERGY USSR The US monopoly over atomic weapons represented an American effort to intimidate the Soviet Union. Western Allies The US refused to relinquish control of its nuclear secrets. Soviets would be able to share in nuclear weaponry only if they agreed to a comprehensive system of control and inspection by a United Nations agency. The Atom Bomb Hiroshima Nagasaki "Seldom if ever has a war ended leaving the victors with such a sense of uncertainty and fear, with such a realization that the future is obscure and that survival is not assured." Critical Issues of the Transformation ECONOMIC RECONSTRUCTION Who should receive rehabilitation loans? Who should finance rehabilitation loans? What should be the terms and limitations of rehabilitation loans? Capitalism vs. Socialism The Marshall Plan The most serious threat to western interests in Europe was not Soviet military intervention but the risk that hunger, poverty and despair might cause Europeans to elect communists to office. Elected communists would then obey the desires, wishes and directions of Moscow. American economic assistance would produce immediate psychological benefits and later material benefits. The Soviet Union would not accept such aid. The Soviet Union would not allow its satellites to accept aid straining the relationship between the USSR and the satellites. Once this occurred the US could sieze both the geopolitical and the moral initiative in the emerging Cold War. The Berlin Blockade Stalin responded to the Marshall Plan by tightening the Soviet Grip wherever he could. Stalin announced the formation of Cominform in September, 1947: Cominform was a post-war version of the prewar Comintern whose task had been to enforce socialist orthodoxy within the international communist movement. Stalin approved a plan by Czechoslovakian communists to seize power in that country which remained the only Eastern European state with a democratic government – with the coup the prospects of any independence within Stalin’s sphere of influence disappeared. Stalin found Tito of Yugoslavia – who had come to power in his own right – to be outside the realm of Soviet power and by June, 1948, following several attempts to subject Tito to Cominform Tito broke with Moscow. Tito began to receive aid from the US. Dean Atcheson that while Tito might be a true “son-of-a-bitch” he was “our son-of-a-bitch.” During all this, Stalin began the blockade of Berlin. The Marshall Plan Country 1948/49 1949/50 1950/51 Austria 232 166 70 488 Belgium and Luxembourg 195 222 360 777 Denmark 103 87 195 385 1,085 691 520 2,296 Germany 510 438 500 1,448 Greece 175 156 45 366 Iceland 6 22 15 43 Ireland 88 45 — 133 Italy and Trieste 594 405 205 1,204 Netherlands 471 302 355 1,128 Norway 82 90 200 372 Portugal — — 70 70 Sweden 39 48 260 347 Switzerland — — 250 250 Turkey 28 59 50 137 United Kingdom 1,316 921 1,060 3,297 Totals 4,924 3,652 4,055 12,741 France Cumulative Containment Containment was a strategy used by the United States during the early years of the Cold War. The basic policy of containment was to prevent the supposed domino effect. According to the so called domino effect nations, especially eastern European nations, were moving politically towards Soviet Union-based communism, rather than EuropeanAmerican-based capitalism. The idea was to “contain” the spread of communism. George F. Kennan maintained the principal objective of the United States was to stop the spread of communism – to contain communism with the borders in which it already existed. Containment, along with the Marshall Plan became integral policies of the overall Truman Doctrine. NSC-68 When Truman signed National Security Council Report 68 in April 1950 containment became the paramount aim of the overall US national security policy. NSC-68 shaped US government actions in the Cold War becoming a “blueprint” well into the 1970s. The document described the US and the USSR two powers existing in a polarized world. The USSR wished to “impose its absolute authority over the rest of the world.” The US was “the center of power in the free world …” NSC-68 called for significant peacetime military spending, in which the US possessed “superior overall power.” The report strongly encouraged and later formed the basis for the US military buildup that occurred during the Cold War. Communism in 1940 to 1954 Characteristics of the Cold War High degree of tension between the United States and the Union of Soviet Socialists Republic (USSR) Costly and dangerous arms race Polarization of domestic and international politics Division of the world into economic spheres Competition and conflict in the third world The Cold War The Cold War shaped the foreign policies of the United States and the Soviet Union and deeply affected their societies and their political, economic, and military institutions. By providing a justification for the projection of US power and influence all over the world, the Cold War facilitated the assumption and assertion of global leadership by the United Sates. By providing Soviet dictator Joseph Stalin and his successors with an external enemy to justify their repressive internal regime, the Cold War helped legitimate an unrepresentative government and maintain the grip of the Communist Party on the Soviet Union.