EETT AR Mentors: Getting Started August 2008

advertisement
EETT AR Mentors:
Getting Started
August 2008
Review of AR’s Purpose in EETT
• To document the effects of EETT
funding on student learning
• To include teachers’ voices in statewide
report to legislature
• To support teachers as they
systematically & intentionally study their
laptop use
2
AR Process
•
•
•
•
•
Identify the AR Inquiry
AR Context
Data Collection
Data Analysis
Implications & Actions
3
Identify the AR Inquiry
• Keep student achievement at the forefront
– Participants (i.e. 5th graders, low achieving 3rd
graders, etc.)
– Knowledge, skill or ability to be measured (i.e.
science content, phonemic awareness, social
skills, etc.)
– Intervention (i.e. collaborative learning strategies,
reading buddies, lab simulations, etc.)
4
Identify the AR inquiry
• Examples
– How does the use of simulations within a
1:1 environment influence low achieving
5th grade students’ mathematics learning
during a unit on fractions ?
5
AR Context
•
•
•
•
•
•
Content area
Grade level
Goals for inquiry
Targeted students
Type of school
Etc
6
Data Collection
• Possible strategies; use multiple when
possible
-Test scores
-Student artifacts
-Anecdotal records
-Focus groups
-Fieldnotes
-Rubrics
-Journals
-Informal interviews
-Reflective journals
-Literature
7
Data Collection
• Should be a part of rather than apart
from classroom practices
• Create a time line to help keep the
inquiry on track and ensure feasibility
8
Data Analysis
• Most challenging part of process
• Need to mesh data & gut reactions
• Individual teacher decisions
9
Data Analysis
• Read and reread data to get an idea of what’s
there
• Organize data in a logical way
– Chronologically, by student, by strategies, by
class, etc.
• Interpret data; support findings with artifact
10
Example finding 1
• Audio recording software and laptop
use improved my two lowest achieving
students’ test scores on weather and
simple machine between 39 and 55
points.
11
STUDENT #1
Pre-Tests (No
technology)
Post-Tests
(Technolgoy)
Difference
#1 Р Simple Machines
15
70
55
#2 - Weather
20
73
53
#1 РSimple Machines
Pre-Tests (No
technology)
40
Post-Tests
(Technolgoy)
79
39
#2 - Weather
50
90
40
STUDENT #2
Difference
12
Example finding 2
• Audio recording software and laptop
use improved my two lowest achieving
students’ behavior during tests on
weather and simple machine.
13
1 Р5
Low - High
Willingness to
take the test
Pre Р Test
#1
1
Pre Р Test
#2
1
Post Р Test
#1
5
Post Р Test
#2
5
Focus on the
test
Avoidance
behaviors
during the test
3 Р staring off
3 Р staring off
3 Рrepeated
attempts to
use the
restroom,
sharpen
pencils
5 Р repeated
requests to
read questions
to student
4 Р left the
extended
response
questions
(ones t hat
require more
reading) blank
3 Р repeated
attempts to
use the
restroom,
sharpen
pencils
5 Р repeated
requests to
read questions
to student
4 Р left the
extended
response
questions
(ones t hat
require more
reading) blank
5 Р very
focused
5 Р no
avoidance
behaviors
5 Р very
focused
5 Р no
avoidance
behaviors
1 Р asked no
questions
1 Р asked no
questions
5 Р completed
the whole test
5 Р completed
the whole test
Questions
asked during
test
Completeness
of the test
14
Example finding 3
• After starting with an average of 23.3
wpm, three of the four students
achieved 115 words per minute, the 5th
grade word per minute standard, on
their DIBELS fluency tests.
15
16
Implications and Actions
• Action in classroom
• Action in district
• Professional dissemination via
conferences & publications
• Grant writing
17
18
Where should you be right now?
• Determine how many AR mentors you
will need and whether you want us to
provide them.
• Make a plan for running AR in your
district (consider running 2 phases)
20
Where should you be right now?
• Make initial contact with teachers at
your earliest convenience
• Be encouraging; the process is pretty
straightforward but the majority of
teachers end up really enjoying it
21
What are we doing right now?
• Working with FCIT to get the online tool
on a stable and secure server.
• Collecting information from each district
regarding EETT participants.
22
Contact us
• Please do not hesitate to contact us:
Kara: dawson@coe.ufl.edu
Cathy: cathycavanaugh@coe.ufl.edu
23
Download