Chapter 11 Monopolistic Competition and Product Differentiation Assumptions of the Monopolistic Competition Model • Free entry and exit in the long run No barriers to entry • Many firms, each one small relative to the size of the market Firms will have limited market power. • Each firm produces a differentiated product Consumers view the goods as close substitutes, but not perfect substitutes. Copyright © 2006 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved. 11-2 Short-Run Profit Maximization for the Monopolistic Competitor • Product differentiation creates a small amount of market power due to customer loyalty. Even if the firm raises its price, it will still retain some of its customers. Copyright © 2006 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved. 11-3 Economic Efficiency • Is a monopolistic competitive industry Allocatively efficient? Productively efficient? Technologically efficient? Copyright © 2006 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved. 11-4 Figure 11.3 Short-Run Profits Copyright © 2006 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved. 11-5 Loss Minimization and the Shut-Down Point • If demand decreases or costs increase, profits will fall. If the demand curve just touches the ATC curve at the profit-maximizing level of output, the firm will earn normal economic profits. If the demand curve just touches the AVC curve at the profit-maximizing level of output, the firm will be indifferent between operating and shutting down. Copyright © 2006 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved. 11-6 Figure 11.4 Minimizing Losses and Reaching the Shutdown Point Copyright © 2006 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved. 11-7 Monopolistic Competition in the Long Run • In the short run, monopolistically competitive firms behave much like a monopolist. • In the long run, however, monopolistic competition differs from monopoly because of free entry into the market. Copyright © 2006 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved. 11-8 Firm Entry in Monopolistic Competition • If firms in a monopolistically competitive market are earning positive economic profits, then new firms will enter the market. Similar to perfect competition Copyright © 2006 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved. 11-9 Figure 11.5 Effects of New Entrants on the Demand for Cheesesteaks at John’s Roast Pork Copyright © 2006 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved. 11-10 Firm Entry in Monopolistic Competition • An important difference between monopolistic competition and perfect competition is that price does not fall to the minimum point on the long-run average cost curve. The firms are not efficient. Copyright © 2006 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved. 11-11 Summary of Monopolistic Competition • Each firm maximizes profits by producing the output for which MR = MC. Price is determined by the demand curve. • Long-run entry implies that firms will be driven towards zero economic profits in the long run. P = LAC • Price will be greater than the minimum point of LAC. • Firms have different demand and costs, leading to long-run turnover of firms. Copyright © 2006 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved. 11-12 Allocative Efficiency • For monopolistically competitive firms, the profit-maximizing level of output is less than that which minimizes LAC. Monopolistically competitive firms are not as efficient as perfectly competitive firms. Copyright © 2006 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved. 11-13 Figure 11.6 The Long-Run Monopolistic Competition Equilibrium Versus the Perfect Competition Equilibrium Copyright © 2006 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved. 11-14 Excess Capacity • As a result of underproduction at both the firm and industry level, monopolistically competitive firms are said to exhibit excess capacity. Output could be increased without any firms earning losses. Copyright © 2006 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved. 11-15 The Benefits of Variety • Is the reduction in efficiency associated with monopolistic competition bad for society? • Not necessarily: Because consumers value variety, the benefits of product differentiation may offset the costs of excess capacity. Copyright © 2006 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved. 11-16 Table 11.1 Summary of Market Structure Characteristics for Perfect Competition, Monopolistic Competition, and Monopoly Copyright © 2006 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved. 11-17 Advertising: Information or Persuasion? • Unlike perfectly competitive firms or monopolists, monopolistically competitive firms will advertise to inform customers about their product. Copyright © 2006 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved. 11-18 Brand Identity and Brand Loyalty • The goal of advertising is to create: Brand Identity—the consumer’s ability to recognize a product and associate it with a specific name. Brand Loyalty—a consumer’s willingness to remain with a specific product despite the existence of competing products. • Makes demand less elastic Copyright © 2006 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved. 11-19 Types of Advertising • Informational—increases consumers’ knowledge of important product characteristics and price. • Persuasive—attempts to alter consumer tastes and preferences by using subjective information. Copyright © 2006 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved. 11-20 Summary (cont’d) • In the long run, because of free entry and exit, monopolistically competitive firms will earn zero economic profits. • Monopolistically competitive firms are less efficient than perfectly competitive firms. Excess capacity • Product differentiation offsets some of the loss of efficiency. Copyright © 2006 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved. 11-21 Summary (cont’d) • Firms use adverting to differentiate their product from competing products. Informational Persuasive Copyright © 2006 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved. 11-22