Service user involvement and social dialogue The Case of Slovakia – interim report Marta Kahancová and Mária Sedláková Central European Labour Studies Institute Bratislava, Slovakia With financial support from the European Union Research partner meeting, Utrecht, June 6, 2014 Outline Existing structures for service user involvement National stakeholder interviews: progress Preliminary findings: an overview Healthcare (hospitals) Education (secondary schools) Why are users not involved? Conclusion (link to matrix) Structure of user involvement: healthcare Structure of user involvement: education National stakeholder interviews Healthcare sector: Association of State Hospitals (sectoral level) Trade Union of Physicians in Slovakia (sectoral level) Trade Union of Nurses and Midwives (sectoral level) Slovak Trade Union of Health and Social Services (sectoral level) Hospital Banská Bystrica (establishment level) Hospital Nitra (establishment level) Hospital Žilina (establishment level) Education sector: Trade Union of Workers in Education and Science of Slovakia (sectoral level) Preliminary findings: healthcare Sectoral level Individual cases – most common; appeals through the Healthcare Surveillance Authority Limited indirect influence on social dialogue Organized involvement at the sector-level – not existing; missing active patients’ organization at the national level (fragmentation of interests, narrow-focused organizations) No influence on social dialogue Establishment level Individual involvement – most common; questionnaires on patient satisfaction, management of quality in larger hospitals Limited indirect influence on social dialogue Organized involvement – less common; ad-hoc basis, usually result of broader dissatisfaction with a certain issue (working hours of specialists, ordering of patients, etc.) Limited indirect influence on social dialogue Preliminary findings: education Sectoral level Individual user involvement – not existing No influence on social dialogue Organized/collective user involvement – Student councils/parliaments; Representative invited to four partite committee Direct influence on social dialogue (but: effectiveness matters) Establishment Individual – daily student-teacher interaction Limited indirect influence on social dialogue Organized – three levels: class meetings (students with the teacher), student parliament, parents council Limited indirect influence on social dialogue Preliminary findings summary Healthcare: Patients organizations exists, however, they are not active at national level, do not participate and/or directly influence social dialogue Patients not part of the tripartite committee (neither formally nor informally) Education: Representative of The Student Council of Secondary Schools of the Slovak Republic invited to join the social dialogue at the sectoral level, (but: what effect of this participation?) Users formally not part of the four partite committee (Trade Unions, Employers, Ministry of Education, Regional Government) Organized vs. unorganized, collective vs. individual user involvement Why limited user involvement? Healthcare: - - Sector-level diverging interests of patients’ organizations and trade unions (e.g. criminal responsibility of healthcare professionals, working time) fragmentation in the structure of patients’ organization Lack of interest in user involvement at the Ministry of Healthcare (sectoral tripartism – limited trade union influence, patients’ organizations excluded) Establishment-level too intimate relationship between the doctor and the patient Diverging interests of patients and trade unions (e.g., right for service) Establishment Individual – daily student-teacher interaction Why limited user involvement? Education: - Importance is put on day-to-day interaction between student and teacher/ parent and teacher at the institutional level Although student parliament exist, daily interaction perceived as sufficient to represent students and parents needs expressed through already existing trade unions