Market Efficiency 7/2/16 Efficient Markets How well do markets respond to new information? If the market is efficient, should it be possible to decide between a profitable and unprofitable investment given current information? Efficient Markets The prices of all securities quickly and fully reflect all available information Current price reflects o Past information o Current information o Information that can be reasonably inferred The market is efficient if investors are unable to earn abnormal profits by using information available The adjustment in prices is unbiased o Adjustment on the average balancing out and correct Conditions for an Efficient Market Large number of rational, profit-maximizing investors that Actively participate in the market and Individuals cannot affect market prices (price takers) Information is costless, widely available, generated in a random fashion Investors react quickly and fully to new information Consequences of Efficient Market Quick price adjustment in response to the arrival of random information Prices reflect all available information Price changes are independent of one another and move in a random fashion Price changes are independent of past price changes because changes are based upon new information which is independent of past information 1 7/2/16 Market Efficiency Forms Efficient market hypothesis To what extent do securities markets quickly and fully reflect different available information? Three levels of Market Efficiency Weak form o market level data o past price or volume information Semistrong form o public information o past information Strong form o All public information o all (nonpublic) information Weak Form Prices reflect all past price and volume data Past price changes unrelated to future price changes Implication for technical analysis, which relies on the past history of prices, is that it is of little or no value in assessing future changes in price Market adjusts or incorporates this information quickly and fully Semistrong Form Prices reflect all publicly available information and all past information Investors cannot act on new public information after its announcement and expect to earn above-average, risk-adjusted returns Encompasses weak form as a subset Tested by event analysis Strong Form Prices reflect all information, past, current and private No group of investors should be able to earn abnormal rates of return by using publicly and privately available information Encompasses weak and semistrong forms as subsets Evidence on Market Efficiency Keys to testing validity of any of the three forms of the EMH: In order for the EM not to exist abnormal returns must be achieved o Consistently o For an extended time over which excess returns are earned 2 Economically efficient markets Assets are priced so that investors cannot exploit any discrepancies and earn unusual returns transaction costs matter Weak Form Evidence 7/2/16 Tests: Statistical test for independence (randomness) of stock price changes o If independent, trends in price changes do not exist o Serial correlation test between price changes for various lags Specific Trading Rules after transaction costs o Technical Analyst believe that trends do exist and can be used successfully o Overreaction hypothesis (DeBondt & Thaler) provide contraevidence to the weak-form hypothesis People overreact to unexpected and dramatic news Stocks with extreme positions go through reversals Semistrong Form Evidence Event studies Empirical analysis of stock price behavior surrounding a particular event Examine company unique returns o The residual error between the security’s actual return and that given by the index model o Abnormal return (Arit) =Rit - E(Rit) Where: Arit = the abnormal rate of return for security i during period t Rit = the actual rate of return on security i during period t E(Rit) = the expected rate of return for security i during period t, based on the market model relationship o Cumulative abnormal return (CAR) is the sum of the individual Arit for stock i Stock splits Implications of split reflected in price immediately following the announcement Accounting changes Quick reaction to real change in value 3 7/2/16 Initial public offerings Only issues purchased at offer price yield abnormal returns (under-pricing by Investment bankers) Announcements and news (economic, monetary, political, company,etc.) Little impact on price after release Strong Form Evidence Test performance of groups which have access to nonpublic information Corporate insiders have valuable private information Evidence that many have consistently earned abnormal returns on their stock transactions Insider transactions must be publicly reported Implications of Efficient Market Hypothesis What should investors do if markets efficient? Technical analysis Not valuable if weak form holds Fundamental analysis of intrinsic value Superior fundamental analysis becomes necessary Those that use the same data and make the same interpretations experience average results For professional money managers Less time spent on individual securities o Passive investing favored (Index fund management) o Otherwise must believe in superior insight Tasks if markets informationally efficient Maintain correct diversification Achieve and maintain desired portfolio risk Manage tax burden Control transaction costs Market Anomalies www.investorhome.com Exceptions that appear to be contrary to market efficiency Earnings announcements affect stock prices SUE (Latane′ Jones & Rieke,1974) SUE=unexpected earnings/standard error of the estimate Adjustment occurs before announcement but significant amount after Contrary to efficient market because the lag should not exist 4 Market Anomalies Low P/E ratio stocks tend to outperform high P/E ratio stocks Low P/E stocks generally have higher risk-adjusted returns (Basu,1977) But P/E ratio is public information Should portfolio be based on P/E ratios? o Also consider financial strength of the company, dividend yield should be higher than the average, company has an increasing earnings growth o Low P/E strategy does well in a “full blown” bear market o Could result in an undiversified portfolio Size effect Tendency for small firms to have higher risk-adjusted returns than large firms(Banz,1981; Reingnanum, 1981) Data on small vs large cap funds: DATE SMALL CAP FUNDS LARGE CAP FUNDS 1926-1979 12.2% 8.2% 1980-1996 13.3% 15.9% 7/2/16 January effect Tendency for small firm stock returns to be higher in January (Keim,1983) Of the 30.5% small size premium, half of the effect occurs in January (Haugen & Jorion,1996) Value Line Ranking System Advisory service that ranks 1700 stocks from best (1) to worst (5) o Probable price performance in next 12 months 1980-1993, Group 1 stocks had annualized return of 19.3% Best overall performance by any investment letter Transaction costs may offset returns (Stickel,1985) 5 7/2/16 Conclusions About Market Efficiency Support for market efficiency is persuasive Much research using different methods Also many anomalies that cannot be explained satisfactorily Markets very efficient but not totally To outperform the market, fundamental analysis beyond the norm must be done If markets operationally efficient, some investors with the skill to detect a divergence between price and semistrong value earn profits Excludes the majority of investors Anomalies offer opportunities Controversy about the degree of market efficiency still remains 6