SHARED GOVERNANCE COMMITTEE
SELF-EVALUATION FORM
Shared Governance Committee:
Educational Planning Committee____________
Evaluation for Academic Year: ___2010-11________________
1. Please indicate the dates of each of your meetings in the past year.
Are the minutes of these meetings all posted on your web site?
2010
 July 19
 August 2 and 23
 September 14 (EMP) and 20
 October 4, 11 (EMP), 18, and 25 (EMP)
 November 1 and 15
 December 6
2011
 January 24
 February 7 and 28
 March 7, 14 (EMP) and 21
 April 4 and 11
 May 2 and 16
Minutes for 2010 are posted, 2011 in progress
2. What would you consider to be the main accomplishments/tasks that your
committee achieved this academic year?







Development and approval of the 2010-2015 Educational Master Plan
Development and approval of the Program Review Handbook
Revision of the Program Review unit assessment tool
Development and implementation of the Program Review unit update tool
Comprehensive program reviews for PACE, Social Sciences, Physical
Sciences, Life Sciences, Child Development, Library
Reconstitution of the Strategic Enrollment Management Committee
Completion of the Strategic Enrollment Management Plan 2011-2015
3. What prioritized goals for this year were you unable to complete or are still in
progress?






Viability reviews – in progress (collaboration with Academic Affairs )
Completion of the unit self-assessment update tool - done
Completion of the unit self-assessment update tool - done
Comprehensive program reviews of five units – to be selected - done
Continuation of strategic enrollment management plan – draft completed
Approval of Educational Master Plan 2010-2015 document - done
4. Please list your prioritized goals for the next academic year.
 Implement faculty suggestions for Program Review unit assessment tool
 Complete the strategic enrollment management plan
 Review and/or refine charter language
 Review and monitor progress of the Educational Master Plan
responsibilities
 Implement an annual update of the Educational Master Plan
5. Does your charter accurately reflect the committee’s focus? If not, please explain.

Wording is being reviewed to reflect the relationship with Academic
Senate
6. Is membership tenure reflected accurately on the web site?

Yes
7. Is your membership adequate to meet the work challenges of the committee?

The addition of three voting members has had a positive impact on the
workload.
8. Please list the dates that one or both of the co chairs of your committee attended
the SGTF monthly meetings.

One or both co-chairs attended every meeting
9. Do you have any suggestions for the SGTF that could improve our Shared
Governance process or make it more efficient?

Continue to emphasize the importance of chairs’ attendance at SGTF
meetings
10. What progress have you made on the SGTF recommendations from your previous
self-evaluation?
1) Webpage updates
 done
2) Delineation of responsibilities between Academic Senate and EPC for
viability review
 collaborative oversight process with Academic Affairs
3) Clarification of role of EPC in its responsibility of ensuring the proper
functioning of:
 faculty hiring priority committee – Academic Senate responsibility
with EPC administrative representation
 viability review committee - collaborative oversight process with
Academic Affairs,
 curriculum committee – Academic Senate responsibility with report to
EPC
 distance education committee – reports to EPC
 essential skills sub-committee – reports to EPC
 (rubrics, cycles etc.) – Program Review rubric and cycles completed,
Distance Education committee annual review
4) Update charter to reflect committee membership limits, add semester to
absence policy
 done
SIGNATURES: _________________________________Co-Chair
_________________________________Co-Chair
_________________Date