EPC self-evaluation for SGTF 12-13

Shared Governance Committee: _____Educational Planning______
Evaluation for Academic Year: ____2012-2013_______
1. Please indicate the dates of each of your meetings in the past year.
Are the minutes of these meetings all posted on your web site?
 9/17/12; 10/1/12; 11/5/12; 11/19/12; 12/3/12; 2/11/13; 3/4/13; 3/18/13;
4/8/13; 4/15/13; 5/6/13
 All are posted but the most recent, which has not yet been approved.
2. What would you consider to be the main accomplishments/tasks that your
committee achieved this academic year?
 Redesign of the Program Review system for academic programs, including
screens for new data, clarification of questions, rescheduling (to begin in
spring 2014)
 Examination of the ILO’s and their assessment process
 Implemented action-item and attendance tracking systems
 Reviewed and approved DE proposal to switch to Etudes
3. What prioritized goals for this year were you unable to complete or are still in
 Redesign of the Viability process (scheduled for completion 5/20/13)
4. Please list your prioritized goals for the next academic year.
 Implement the redesigned Program Review system
 Revise screens to enhance Program Review of DE, Library, and LRC
 Conduct academic Program Review, including examination of annual updates
 Work with Academic Affairs to prioritize academic budget items
5. Does your charter accurately reflect the committee’s focus? If not, please explain.
 Yes.
6. Is membership tenure reflected accurately on the web site?
 Yes.
7. Is your membership adequate to meet the work challenges of the committee?
 Yes.
8. Please list the dates that one or both of the co chairs of your committee attended
the SGTF monthly meetings.
 One or both chairs attended every meeting.
9. Do you have any suggestions for the SGTF that could improve our Shared
Governance process or make it more efficient?
 Consider easing term limits for chairs.
 Consider provisions to provide mentoring for new chairs.
10. What progress have you made on the SGTF recommendations from your previous
Membership list is current; new-member recruiting already in progress.
All documents posted in a timely manner.
EPC has begun strict attendance monitoring. Attendance at meetings has been
problematic this year, as several members played leading roles in
accreditation, and conflicts arose. This should not be a problem next year, but
is something EPC/College Council should consider in future accreditation
SIGNATURES: _________________________________Co-Chair