Assigned reading: chapter 2 of Zimmer and Emlen text Chapter 2 Biology: from natural philosophy to Darwin Natural vs. Supernatural explanations All societies have or had creation myths that invoke the action of supernatural forces to explain the origins of life and the history of the earth. Ideas invoking the role of gods and divine actions are supernatural (i.e., beyond nature). Darwin’s book published in 1859 On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or the Preservation of Favored Races in the Struggle for Life Descent with modification All species share common ancestry Changes occur through natural selection Darwin and the origin In “The Origin” Darwin presented a detailed strongly, supported argument, that life had originated naturally and that over time organisms had evolved by means of a mechanism he called natural selection. How did this transition from supernatural to a natural explanation for the diversity of life occur? Development of Natural Philosophy The early Greeks were among the first to develop natural philosophy to explain the world. Natural philosophers aimed to develop sets of physical laws to explain the world around them and how it worked. Methodological Naturalism The Greeks’ approach of trying to explain the world using only natural phenomena is sometimes called Methodological Naturalism. Methodological because this strategy provides a procedure or method for scientifically explaining the world and natural because it focused on nature. Anaximander’s cosmology An early example of methodological naturalism is Anaximander’s cosmology. He proposed the earth is a disk surrounded by huge wheels on which the moon and sun rotate around the earth. His explanation is mechanistic because it invokes a natural (although incorrect) mechanism to explain the presence and motion of celestial objects. Aristotle (384-322 BC) Aristotle was the first Greek philosopher to emphasize observation and the testing of ideas to explain those observations (i.e., hypothesis testing). Supernatural explanations are inherently untestable. The Greeks also emphasized the importance of logic in moving from observations to general principles. Understanding Nature before Darwin In the two centuries before Darwin’s birth in 1809 there was a great expansion in the understanding of Nature. For example, Carolus Linnaeus developed his taxonomy that grouped all life into a rational hierarchical system that is the basis of modern classification. Understanding Nature before Darwin Carl Linnaeus (1707-78): Father of modern taxonomy Understanding Nature before Darwin Nicolaus Steno in the late 1600’s recognized that triangular rocks known as “tongue stones” were in fact shark’s teeth that had been transformed into stone (fossilized). Nicolas Steno (1638-86): Father of geology and stratigraphy Understanding Nature before Darwin The new science of paleontology led to the discovery that life on the planet had changed greatly over time. George Cuvier, a famous French paleontologist, documented the fact that many species had become extinct, which suggested that the fauna and flora of the earth changed over time. Paleontology provided evidence that life changed Georges Cuvier (1769-1832) Fossils resemble but are not exactly the same as modern species Many past species are extinct An ancient and ever-changing earth That the earth is old and undergoes constant change was not widely accepted until recently in western thought. Most of Darwin’s contemporaries considered the earth to be young (only thousands of years old rather than 4.6 billion). Geologists recognized that change was gradual James Hutton Observable processes produce small changes that accumulate over time Implies the earth must be old William Smith Different rock layers contain distinct fossils William Smith (1769-1839) Smith created first geological map Geologists named rock formations from different periods based on the fossils they contained An ancient and ever-changing earth By time Darwin was a young man the idea that the Earth was young was being challenged. Opposition based on principle of Uniformitarianism. Idea that geological processes happening today are the same as have operated in the past. An ancient and ever-changing earth Uniformitarianism contrasted with Catastrophism which proposed that current geological formations had resulted from catastrophic events (such as biblical flood) which occurred on scale unknown today. Uniformitarianism, first proposed by James Hutton, was championed by Charles Lyell in his book Principles of Geology. An ancient and ever-changing earth Hutton and Lyell inferred the Earth must be very old based on measurements of rates of ongoing rock forming processes (e.g., deposition of mud and sand). These developments in geology focused Darwin on the potential importance of gradual change in shaping structures. The intellectual environment In the early 1800’s the world was primed for a comprehensive theory of evolution to be developed. Multiple people put forward the idea that evolution had taken place, what was lacking was a workable mechanism. One influential scientist is this period was JeanBaptiste Lamarck. Jean-Baptiste Lamarck (1744-1829) Jean-Baptiste Lamarck In 1809 Lamarck suggested that organisms descended gradually from older less complex species. He considered lineages of organisms had an inherent tendency to become more complex over time and transformed over time. His primary mechanism was called the Inheritance of Acquired Characteristics (IAC). Inheritance of Acquired Characteritics IAC suggested that traits an organism acquired during its life could be passed on to its offspring. By this process of transformation, lineages would change over time. For example, a giraffe stretching its neck during its life would become slightly longer necked and pass this slightly longer neck to its offspring. Inheritance of Acquired Characteristics Lamarck’s ideas were widely discussed and influential in his time as there was no understanding of how heredity occurs. Obviously, Lamarck’s ideas about mechanism of evolution contradict current biological knowledge. Information flows from DNA to phenotype not in the reverse direction Charles Darwin (1809-1882) Was the son of a wealthy doctor, but he himself dropped out of medical school. Studied theology at university, but was more interested in natural history. Charles Darwin (1809-1882) After graduation Darwin signed on as the Captain’s companion for a round the world voyage aboard the surveying ship HMS Beagle. The Beagle Voyage On the voyage Darwin read Lyell’s Principles of Geology and was greatly influenced by Lyell’s emphasis of two major points . 1. The Earth is very old. 2. Geological features we see around us can be explained by the action of the slow, gradual processes we can observe every day (e.g. the eroding of rock by waves and wind; the slow deposition of sediment). The Beagle Voyage Darwin was Captain Fitzroy’s companion during the voyage (1831-1836). The Beagle mapped the coast of South America and circled the globe. Visited South America, Australia, Pacific Islands and South Africa. Famously visited the Galapagos Islands a group of volcanic (hence quite young islands) off the coast of Ecuador. Unique animals on Galapagos include giant tortoises, marine iguanas, and Darwin’s finches. Galapagos Giant Tortoise Observations convinced Darwin that life evolved The Beagle Voyage On the voyage Darwin noted many things that were puzzling from the point of view of a creationist explanation for the diversity of life. What Darwin observed South American fossils resembled living animals. Parts of the world with very similar habitats and climates (e.g. in Australia and South America) were populated by very different organisms. The plants and animals found on each continent are distinctive. Many species on oceanic islands are found only there (endemic). Endemic species on islands often closely resemble species on adjacent mainland. What Darwin observed These observations taken together don’t make sense if organisms are specially created. Why should similar habitats in different parts of the world have completely different faunas? Why should remote islands have faunas that differ from but resemble those on adjacent islands? Together these observations suggested to Darwin that species change over time i.e., evolution occurs. Natural Selection Convinced by the time he returned to England that evolution occurs, Darwin needed a mechanism to explain how evolution happens. His mechanism is the process of natural selection. Natural Selection An important event in developing natural selection was when Darwin read Thomas Malthus’ “Essay on population.” Malthus emphasized that the reproductive potential of animals and the rate at which populations could increase in size was much greater than the rate at which food resources might increase. Natural Selection Darwin realized that most organisms that were born could not survive to reproduce. There just were not enough resources. Thus, there must be “a struggle for existence” in which only some organisms survived to reproduce and the remainder did not. Natural Selection Darwin knew that individuals in populations are different from each other (there is variation). His insight was in realizing that if success in surviving and reproducing was related to variation (i.e., to the traits individuals possessed) that beneficial traits would become more common and populations would change over time. Darwinian Natural Selection: Artificial Selection Artificial Selection. Humans have selectively bred for desirable traits in domestic animals and plants for millenia. Process has produced our crop plants, garden plants, pets, and domestic animals. Darwin closely studied pigeon breeding. Pigeon breeding Pigeon fanciers by selecting for particular traits among Common Rock Doves by breeding from only certain individuals had been able to produce a huge variety of different breeds of domestic pigeons. These varieties were so different in appearance that they would have been considered to be different species if encountered in the wild. Common Rock Dove http://ibc.lynxeds.com/photo/rock-dovecolumba-livia/perched-my-balcony Hungarian Buga www.PigeonBreed.com Holle Cropper www.PigeonBreed.com Pomeranian Pouter www.PigeonBreed.com Frillback Crested www.PigeonBreed.com Evolution by Natural Selection Darwin envisaged a process similar to artificial selection that had produced organisms we see today. He called it Natural Selection. Instead of humans deciding who would breed, nature would. Evolution by Natural Selection Darwin proposed evolution was the inevitable outcome of 4 postulates: 1. There is variation in populations. Individuals within populations differ in their traits (color, size, hunting ability, etc). 2. Variation is heritable. Parents pass on their traits to their offspring. Evolution by Natural Selection 3. There is differential reproductive success. In every generation only some organisms survive to reproduce and they produce different numbers of offspring. Evolution by Natural Selection 4. Survival and reproduction are not random. It is not luck that determines who survives to reproduce. Those organisms whose traits fit the environment best are ‘naturally selected’ and they pass their genes on to the next generation. Because only some individuals reproduce it is only their genes that make it into the next generation. Thus the gene pool changes and the traits of the population change in the next generation. Evolution by Natural Selection If these 4 postulates are true then the population will change from one generation to the next. Evolution will occur. Darwin and Wallace Darwin realized his ideas would be controversial and delayed publishing them for fear of the backlash that would result. Instead he continued to gather evidence to support his ideas. It was not until he received a letter from Alfred Russel Wallace in 1858 in which Wallace outlined the idea of natural selection was Darwin finally prompted to publish his work. Darwin and Wallace 1858 Charles Darwin and Alfred Russel Wallace jointly proposed natural selection as the mechanism of evolution in a paper presented to the Royal Society. 1859 Origin of Species published The Modern Synthesis Idea of evolution accepted rapidly However, a lack of understanding of heredity and population genetics prevented natural selection being accepted as the primary mechanism until the 1930’s. The “Modern Synthesis” of genetics and Darwin’s ideas melded an understanding of population genetics and natural selection to explain gradual evolution, speciation, and macroevolution. The Modern Synthesis Genes are passed intact from parent to offspring. Genes are “particulate.” They do not “blend” with other genes. Some mutations are beneficial and these increase in frequency as a result of selection. Mutation is a major source of genetic variation, but sexual reproduction also produces massive amounts of genetic variation. The Modern Synthesis Many traits result from the interaction of multiple genes and some genes affect more than one trait. Thus, complex changes in phenotype can occur without assuming a large or sudden genotype change. Many genotype changes affect the phenotype (physical appearance of an organism). This variation in phenotype is the raw material for natural selection. The Modern Synthesis The synthesis showed there was no conflict between modern genetics and Darwin’s idea that evolution was largely a slow process driven by natural selection. Darwin’s theory has been expanded Sexual selection Selection for traits that provide a mating advantage Genetic drift Change in frequency of traits due to chance events