4924 version 4
Page 1 of 5
Design, test, and release radio telecommunications products or
systems
Level
6
Credits
20
Purpose
This unit standard is for people who currently are, or will be, designing radio
telecommunications products or systems for internal and external customers.
People assessed as competent in this unit standard are able to design radio
telecommunications products or systems, test their viability, and release
these products to their customers.
Subfield
Telecommunications
Domain
Telecommunications - Provide Goods and Services
Status
Registered
Status date
28 July 1995
Date version published
25 January 2008
Planned review date
31 December 2012
Entry information
New Zealand Certificate in Engineering, or five years
relevant workplace experience; or demonstrate
equivalent knowledge and skills.
Accreditation
Evaluation of documentation and visit by NZQA, industry
and teaching professional in the same field from another
provider.
Standard setting body (SSB)
ElectroTechnology Industry Training Organisation
Accreditation and Moderation Action Plan (AMAP) reference
0003
This AMAP can be accessed at http://www.nzqa.govt.nz/framework/search/index.do.
Special notes
1
Applicable legislation
Health and Safety in Employment Act 1992, Resource Management Act 1991.
2
Complementary unit: Unit 4923, Define and produce design specifications for new
radio telecommunications products and services.
 New Zealand Qualifications Authority 2016
4924 version 4
Page 2 of 5
3
General Range
Radio products or systems: those radio products and services relating to radio
communication systems including transmission equipment, cabling, studios,
broadcast radio and transmitters, customer premise equipment, radar, direction
finding, jamming.
Elements and performance criteria
Element 1
Design radio telecommunications products or systems.
Performance criteria
1.1
Radio telecommunications product or system development plan is produced
and is agreed with relevant parties.
Range
1.2
includes organisational structure for design, personnel involved,
responsibilities, roles, identification of concurrent organisational
practices, timeframe for deliverables;
relevant parties – management, design team, marketing, finance.
Marketing and design specifications defining radio telecommunications product
or system requirements are accurate, complete, and practical.
Range
product requirements – colour, selling price, product composition,
features, benefits.
1.3
Design analysis is completed and includes rationalisation of components,
production methods, shipping route, packaging requirements, qualification
constraints, serviceability, maintenance, disposal after use, environmental
factors, recycling and hazard analysis.
1.4
Draft detailed design is produced by the agreed time, and complies with design
specification and product and system development plan.
Range
test procedures and methods, test equipment, calibration
requirements, test cases, test specifications.
1.5
Draft detailed design is reviewed by vendors and manufacturers for practicality
of design and cost.
1.6
Draft detailed design is reviewed by peers for appearance, practicality,
functionality, and future enhancements.
1.7
Prototypes of radio telecommunications products or systems are developed and
are available by the agreed time.
1.8
Configuration management is implemented and is accurate and complete.
Range
documentation, change control, samples, prototypes.
 New Zealand Qualifications Authority 2016
4924 version 4
Page 3 of 5
1.9
Milestone reviews are completed at pre-determined intervals with relevant
interested parties, and action is taken to ensure compliance with development
plan.
Range
milestone reviews – peer, manager, third party audit, type
approval specification;
interested parties – marketing, management, finance, engineering.
1.10
Design of radio telecommunications products or systems is completed by the
agreed time within budget.
1.11
Documentation relating to design of radio telecommunications products or
systems is in the agreed format and place, by the agreed time, and is available
to authorised personnel.
Element 2
Test and qualify design of radio telecommunication, products, or systems.
Performance criteria
2.1
Qualification test plan is reviewed and is accurate and complete.
2.2
Equipment, facilities, and environment required for qualification are available
and fit for purpose.
Range
equipment – test, prototypes.
2.3
Test environment simulates realistic working environment and is cost-effective.
2.4
Field testing of radio products or systems is completed at the agreed venue, by
the agreed time, and complies with test plan.
2.5
Test reports are documented in the agreed format, identify tests undertaken and
further required tests, are accurate and complete, and are disseminated to
relevant interested parties promptly.
Range
interested parties – marketing, management, finance, engineering.
2.6
Test equipment, facilities, and environment are restored to original condition or
disposed of in the correct manner after use.
2.7
Testing of radio telecommunications products or systems complies with
environmental and safety standards.
2.8
Test results confirm draft design of radio telecommunications products or
systems.
 New Zealand Qualifications Authority 2016
4924 version 4
Page 4 of 5
Element 3
Release radio telecommunications products or systems.
Performance criteria
3.1
Testing signoffs are sighted and are accurate and complete.
3.2
Test reports for radio telecommunications products or systems are approved.
3.3
Bills of materials are approved and schematics and assembly drawings are “asbuilt”.
3.4
Acceptance report of radio telecommunications products or systems is signed
by the customer, and payment for qualification testing is made or agreed prior to
release to customer.
3.5
Sample production run of radio telecommunications product or system meets
pre-defined performance criteria.
3.6
Radio telecommunications products or systems are released in compliance with
organisational policies and procedures.
3.7
Released radio telecommunications products or systems are certified by
relevant approval bodies and comply with external regulations and legislation.
Range
3.8
approval bodies – Federal Communication Commission and
international agencies, Marine Department, Department of
Conservation;
legislation – Health and Safety in Employment Act 1992, Resource
Management Act 1991.
Release of radio telecommunications products or systems is documented in the
agreed format and is filed in the correct place.
Please note
Providers must be accredited by NZQA, or an inter-institutional body with delegated
authority for quality assurance, before they can report credits from assessment against
unit standards or deliver courses of study leading to that assessment.
Industry Training Organisations must be accredited by NZQA before they can register
credits from assessment against unit standards.
Accredited providers and Industry Training Organisations assessing against unit standards
must engage with the moderation system that applies to those standards.
 New Zealand Qualifications Authority 2016
4924 version 4
Page 5 of 5
Accreditation requirements and an outline of the moderation system that applies to this
standard are outlined in the Accreditation and Moderation Action Plan (AMAP). The
AMAP also includes useful information about special requirements for organisations
wishing to develop education and training programmes, such as minimum qualifications for
tutors and assessors, and special resource requirements.
Comments on this unit standard
Please contact the ElectroTechnology Industry Training Organisation
reviewcomments@etito.co.nz if you wish to suggest changes to the content of this unit
standard.
 New Zealand Qualifications Authority 2016