1161 version 8 Page 1 of 3 Demonstrate knowledge of the mowing of turf areas Level 3 Credits 4 Purpose People credited with this unit standard are able to: describe the tolerance and responses of turf species to mowing; evaluate turf mowing equipment and its use; and describe alternatives to mechanical mowing. Subfield Sports Turf Domain Sports Turf Management Status Registered Status date 17 October 2008 Date version published 17 October 2008 Planned review date 31 December 2013 Entry information Open. Accreditation Evaluation of documentation and visit by NZQA and industry. Standard setting body (SSB) Primary Industry Training Organisation Accreditation and Moderation Action Plan (AMAP) reference 0037 This AMAP can be accessed at http://www.nzqa.govt.nz/framework/search/index.do. Special notes Assessment This unit standard can be assessed against in either a sports turf or amenity turf context. New Zealand Qualifications Authority 2016 1161 version 8 Page 2 of 3 Elements and performance criteria Element 1 Describe the tolerance and responses of turf species to mowing. Performance criteria 1.1 Tolerance of turf species to mowing is described in terms of the range of acceptable cutting heights. Range must include at least three cool season turf species and two warm season turf species from – browntop, creeping bentgrass, Chewing’s fescue, red fescue, hard fescue, tall fescue, Kentucky bluegrass, Leptinella, Poa annua, perennial ryegrass, cynodon, Kikuyu, buffalo grass, carpet grass. 1.2 Bench setting and effective cutting height are distinguished in terms of their characteristics. 1.3 Physiological responses of turf plants are described in terms of mowing frequency and cutting height. Range 1.4 at least five of – shoot density, nitrogen response, seedhead formation, succulence, shoot/root ratio, leaf texture, carbohydrate production. Inappropriate mowing techniques are described in terms of consequences. Range at least five of – scalping, mowing frequency, mowing height, thatch formation, weed invasion, disease susceptibility, wear tolerance, leaf shredding, grain/nap. Element 2 Evaluate turf mowing equipment and its use, and describe alternatives to mechanical mowing. Performance criteria 2.1 Mowing equipment is compared in terms of cutting height, turf species, turf use, and cost-effectiveness. Range 2.2 reel, rotary, flail. Mowing equipment and use is evaluated in terms of factors affecting mowing quality. Range at least five of – number of reels and blades, reel clip rate, forward speed, height of cut, corrugation, leaf shredding, grooming, mowing patterns, clippings removal. New Zealand Qualifications Authority 2016 1161 version 8 Page 3 of 3 2.3 Mowing frequency is evaluated in terms of its relationship with shoot growth rate, environmental conditions, height of cut, and turf use. 2.4 Alternatives to mechanical mowing are described in terms of plant growth regulators and slow growing species. Please note Providers must be accredited by NZQA, or an inter-institutional body with delegated authority for quality assurance, before they can report credits from assessment against unit standards or deliver courses of study leading to that assessment. Industry Training Organisations must be accredited by NZQA before they can register credits from assessment against unit standards. Accredited providers and Industry Training Organisations assessing against unit standards must engage with the moderation system that applies to those standards. Accreditation requirements and an outline of the moderation system that applies to this standard are outlined in the Accreditation and Moderation Action Plan (AMAP). The AMAP also includes useful information about special requirements for organisations wishing to develop education and training programmes, such as minimum qualifications for tutors and assessors, and special resource requirements. Comments on this unit standard Please contact the Primary Industry Training Organisation standards@primaryito.ac.nz if you wish to suggest changes to the content of this unit standard. New Zealand Qualifications Authority 2016