Competition for Google AdWords

advertisement

Competition for Google

AdWords

A P

EEP 142

4/13/06

Company Overview

• incorporated in 1998

• stock valuation over $100 billion

• $6.1 billion revenue in 2005

• $1.5 billion accounting profits in

2005

Two main advertising programs

• AdWords

– Ads on search results pages, either above “organic listings” in a gray box or on the side of the page

– Targeted to keywords searched

• AdSense

– Ads appearing on other websites

– Generates $2.7 billion/year, but site host keeps about 80%

AdWords basic policies

• Custom, local, regional, national and international view options

• Cost-per-click (CPC) and cost-perthousand views (CPM) options

• Time-of-day options

• $5.00 to start advertising; no minimum monthly bill

AdWords pricing and placement

• Advertiser sets a cost-per-click max anywhere from $0.01 to $100.00

• Advertiser sets a daily max to control costs

• Electronic auction: “smart pricing” model automatically sets bid 1¢ higher than nearest rival

• Max cost-per-click and “quality score” determines position on list

“Quality score” and placement

• Quality score is a function of :

– Max cost-per-click bid

– Click-through rate

– Relevancy of ad text to user’s keyword search

• Advertisers want high quality scores because :

– Quality scores determine list order

– Users are more likely to click on ads at the top

– Ads below the top seven often won’t appear on the first page

How Google maximizes

AdWords revenue

• Total revenue-per-page:

– TR = Σ(p i

*q i

)

– q

1

= # of clicks on a given ad

– p

1

= $ per click on that ad

– Google maximizes revenue by charging high p to the ads with high q through

“quality”-based placement

(People are more likely to click on links at the top, and are more likely to click on links relevant to their search)

– Firms compete for top spots, raising p

Perfect price discrimination?

• No, because advertiser is only charged its exact willingness to pay when another firm is actively competing for the same spot

– Knowledgeable advertisers can get good results with relatively low cost keywords

• Also, presence and intensity of competition varies by geographic location of the user’s IP address

Advertisers’ shady behavior

• Using rival’s trademarks

– Generally legal in the U.S. to use rival’s trademarks in metatext (code invisible to user), but illegal to use rival’s trademarks in ad text visible to user.

– Example: another insurance company using “Geico” as a keyword, benefiting from Geico’s broadcast media ads

– As yet, no definitive court cases on trademark use in unseen code

More shady behavior

• Raising rivals’ costs:

– Using software that clicks on rivals’ ads and makes it look like each click is coming from a different computer

– Hiring low-wage workers in other countries to click on rivals’ ads

• Google writes code that identifies simple click-fraud operations, and sometimes issues refunds to advertisers

Conclusion

• Google tries to maximize AdWords revenue by offering many options and letting competition for placement drive up prices

• Google’s auction system absorbs consumer surplus for competitive keywords, varying by user’s location

• Some advertisers try to use rivals’ trademarks or raise rivals’ costs

Download