Final Review 09

advertisement

EEP 1/Econ 3 Review 2009

S and D

Curve vs. quantity

Movements and shifts

Complements and substitutes

Ceiling and floor; shortage surplus

Market and individual’s curves- horizontal addition

Elasticity

Consumer theory

Consumption bundle

Preferences

Budget line

Indifference curves

Slope down

Don’t cross

Moon shaped

Tangency of budget line and indifference curve

Normal and inferior

Derivation of demand curve

Stated and Revealed Preference

Use and Non-use value

Revealed preference

Averting

Hedonic

Travel cost

Stated Preference

Referendum “would you vote Y/N if it cost you $X”

Need to have specific project

Need to emphasize alternative uses of money

Lying possible when open ended (how much…) Hypothetical bias

Problems of Scope (big and little project worth same.)

Conjoint analysis

Production and the firm: the cost curve

Isoquant

Isoexpenditure or isocost

Chosen inputs

Derive cost curve

Isopleth, equal pollution lines.

TBES

Show how pollution charge gets right input bundle

TBES and Pollution charge differ in cost

Production: choosing Q

Opportunity cost

Economic v. business profit

Marginal cost

Area under mc is VC

C = fc + vc

AC is U shaped drawing and explanation

Supply curve: price taker

P = mc

Mc above avc

Long and short run supply

Long run compet. Equilibrium

Profits are zero

P = mc

S = D

Case where polluter pays = consumer pays

How standard and tax lead to different long run Q

Welfare

Total Willingness to Pay

Consumer surplus

EV and CV

For a public and private good.

Competition maximizes profits plus surplus

Specific Tax

Incidence

Deadweight loss

Farm Programs

Loan program

Target price-deficiency payment

DWL

Output tax or quota to solve pollution

MC of pollute and total MC

DWL from doing nothing

Tax revenue and quota rents

Monopoly

MR

Why in competition MR = P

MR=MC implies Q

D(Q) = P

Profits

DWL

Regulating Polluting input (done as we go along)

MCA = MBA or MBemit = MCemit

DWL if wrong

(could be clean air services itself, e.g. pollution)

TBES defined

Tax and standard, compared

Cost difference

Effect on AC, hence of LR compet equilibrium

Pollute tax changes pollute/output and output

Public Good

TWTP

Why compet doesn’t max TWTP – costs

Coase

MCA (Marginal cost of abatement)

Firm and Consumer MCA = Marginal Benefit

Two firm diagram: why trading good

Case where initial allocation doesn’t matter for pollution

What to do when transaction costs are high

Clean Air Act

Clean air act

NAAQS National goals

State plans

CA: Reclaim

New source TBES

Rules for cars, trucks etc TBES

National

CA exemption

Toxics

Acid Rain trading program

Download