Massachusetts Department of
Elementary and Secondary Education
75 Pleasant Street, Malden, Massachusetts 02148-4096
Telephone: (781) 338-3700
TTY: N.E.T. Relay 1-800-439-2370
February 28, 2012
Ann Bradshaw, Superintendent
Mashpee Public School District
150-A Old Barnstable Road
Mashpee, MA 02649
Re: Mid-cycle Report
Dear Superintendent Bradshaw:
Enclosed is the Department of Elementary and Secondary Education's Mid-cycle Report based on the onsite
visit conducted in your district in February 2012. During the Mid-Cycle Review the Department monitored
selected special education criteria to determine your district’s compliance with special education laws and
regulations. The review consisted of information gathered from one or more of the following activities:
interviews, review of student records, examination of documentation, and classroom observation(s).
The Department determined that one or more of the criteria monitored in your district was “Partially
Implemented” or “Not Implemented.” In all instances where noncompliance was found, the Department has
prescribed corrective action for the district. This corrective action must be implemented as soon as possible,
but in no case later than a year from the date of this report. You will find these requirements for corrective
action included in the enclosed report, along with requirements for submitting progress reports using the
enclosed form.
Please provide the Department with your written assurance that all of the required corrective action will be
implemented by your district within the timelines specified in the report. You must submit your statement of
assurance to Darlene Lynch, Director, Program Quality Assurance Services, by March 16, 2012.
Your staff's cooperation throughout this Mid-cycle Review is appreciated. If you have questions about this
letter or the enclosed report, please do not hesitate to contact Coretta McCarter at 781-338-3733.
Sincerely,
Coretta McCarter, Mid-cycle Review Chairperson
Program Quality Assurance Services
Darlene A. Lynch, Director
Program Quality Assurance Services
cc:
Mitchell D. Chester, Ed.D., Commissioner of Elementary and Secondary Education
Vani Rastogi-Kelly, Supervisor, Program Quality Assurance Services
Kathy Stanley, School Committee Chairperson
Michele Brady, Local Program Review Coordinator
Encs:
Mid-cycle Report
Mid-cycle Progress Report Form
1
MASSACHUSETTS DEPARTMENT OF ELEMENTARY AND SECONDARY EDUCATION
MID-CYCLE REPORT
Mashpee Public School District
Dates of the Mid-cycle Review Onsite: February 15-16, 2012
Date of this Report: February 28, 2012
PLEASE NOTE THAT THIS REPORT IS IN TWO SECTIONS.
Required Special Education Criteria Monitored in this Mid-cycle Review
Current special education criteria available by scrolling down to the special education instrument at
http://www.doe.mass.edu/pqa/review/cpr/default.html
Criterion
SE 7
Transfer of
parental
rights and
student
participation
and consent
at age of
majority
Criterion
Implemented


Criterion
Partially
Implemented
(PI) or Not
Implemented
(NI)
Method(s) of
Investigation
Student
Records
Interviews
Basis of Determination about
Criterion
If Partially Implemented or Not
Implemented:
(a) Required Corrective
Action and
Timelines for Implementation
One year prior to the student
reaching age 18, the district
informs the student and the
parent/guardian of the rights that
will transfer from the
parent/guardian to the student upon
the student’s 18th birthday. The
notification provided to both the
student and the parent/guardian
states that all rights accorded to
parents under special education
Mashpee Public School District Coordinated Program Review Mid-cycle Report
February 28, 2012
Page 1 of 17
(b) Progress
Report Due
Date(s) and
Required
Elements
Criterion
Criterion
Implemented

Criterion
Partially
Implemented
(PI) or Not
Implemented
(NI)
Method(s) of
Investigation
Basis of Determination about
Criterion
If Partially Implemented or Not
Implemented:
(a) Required Corrective
Action and
Timelines for Implementation
(b) Progress
Report Due
Date(s) and
Required
Elements
law will transfer to the 18 year old
student.
PI
Student
Records
Interviews
SE 8
IEP Team
composition
and
attendance
Upon reaching the age of 18, the
district is consistently
implementing procedures to obtain
consent from the student to
continue the student’s special
education program. The district is
providing the IEP and the Notice
of Proposed School District Action
(N1) to the student as appropriate.
IEP Team meetings include a
representative with the authority to
commit resources from the district.
General education teachers from
the middle school attend the Team
meeting if the student is or may be
involved in a general education
program. If parents are unable to
attend, the district documents all
efforts to have parents participate.
There is not always a general
education teacher from the high
school in attendance at the Team
meeting if the student is or may be
involved in a general education
program. When a required member
of the Team does not attend the
Develop procedures for ensuring the
participation of the student’s general
education teacher at the high school,
if the student is or may be involved
in a general education program. In
these procedures indicate the
requirement to include the Special
Education Team Meeting
Attendance Sheet (N3A) in the
student record. Also develop
appropriate procedures for excusing
a required Team member from the
IEP Team meeting. These
procedures must indicate that to
excuse a required Team member:
1. The parent and district must
agree, in writing, that the
attendance of the Team member
Mashpee Public School District Coordinated Program Review Mid-cycle Report
February 28, 2012
Page 2 of 17
Provide a copy
of the
procedures and
evidence of staff
training,
including an
agenda and
signed
attendance
sheets
(indicating role
of staff). Submit
a description of
the oversight
and tracking
system and
identify the
person(s)
Criterion
Criterion
Implemented

Criterion
Partially
Implemented
(PI) or Not
Implemented
(NI)
Method(s) of
Investigation
Basis of Determination about
Criterion
IEP Team meeting, the district is
not following appropriate
procedures to excuse the required
Team member. In addition, not all
student records reviewed contained
a Special Education Team Meeting
Attendance Sheet (N3A) for the
IEP Team Meeting.
If Partially Implemented or Not
Implemented:
(a) Required Corrective
Action and
Timelines for Implementation
is not necessary because the
member’s area of the curriculum
or related services is not being
modified or discussed; or
2. The district and parent agree, in
writing, to excuse a required
Team member’s participation
and the excused member
provides written input into the
development of the IEP to the
parent and the IEP Team prior to
the meeting.
Train appropriate staff on these
procedures.
Develop an internal oversight and
tracking system for ensuring the
following:
1) The required Team members
attend the IEP Team meeting;
2) Appropriate excusal procedures
are followed if a required Team
member is unable to attend the
IEP Team meeting; and
3) The Attendance Sheet, signed by
all members at the meeting, is in
the student record.
The tracking system should include
supervisory oversight and periodic
reviews by the Special Education
Mashpee Public School District Coordinated Program Review Mid-cycle Report
February 28, 2012
Page 3 of 17
(b) Progress
Report Due
Date(s) and
Required
Elements
responsible for
the oversight.
Submit this
information by
May 18, 2012.
Submit a report
of the results of
an internal
review of
records and
include the
following:
 Number of
records
reviewed;
 Number of
records in
which a
general
education
teacher
attended the
Team
meeting, as
appropriate;
 Number of
records in
which
appropriate
Criterion
Criterion
Implemented

Criterion
Partially
Implemented
(PI) or Not
Implemented
(NI)
Method(s) of
Investigation
Basis of Determination about
Criterion
If Partially Implemented or Not
Implemented:
(a) Required Corrective
Action and
Timelines for Implementation
(b) Progress
Report Due
Date(s) and
Required
Elements
Director to ensure ongoing
compliance.
Develop a report of the results of an
internal review of student records in
which Team meetings were held
since implementation of all of the
district’s corrective actions for
evidence of compliance with IEP
Team composition and attendance,
excusal procedures, and inclusion of
the Team Meeting Attendance Sheet.
*Please note when conducting
internal monitoring the district
must maintain the following
documentation and make it
available to the Department upon
request: a) List of student names
and grade levels for the records
reviewed; b) Date of the review;
c) Name of person(s) who
conducted the review, with their
role(s) and signature(s).
Mashpee Public School District Coordinated Program Review Mid-cycle Report
February 28, 2012
Page 4 of 17


excusal
procedures
were
followed
when a
required
Team
member did
not attend
the IEP
Team
meeting;
Number of
records that
included a
completed
Special
Education
Team
Meeting
Attendance
Sheet
(N3A);
Results of
the root
cause
analysis of
any records
not in
compliance;
Criterion
Criterion
Implemented

Criterion
Partially
Implemented
(PI) or Not
Implemented
(NI)
Method(s) of
Investigation
Basis of Determination about
Criterion
If Partially Implemented or Not
Implemented:
(a) Required Corrective
Action and
Timelines for Implementation
(b) Progress
Report Due
Date(s) and
Required
Elements

Specific
actions
taken by the
district to
remedy any
noncompliance.
Submit this
report by
October 19,
2012.

Student
Records
The Present Levels of Educational
Performance (PLEP) B: Other
Educational Needs section of the
IEP is completed as appropriate.
Interviews
SE 18A
IEP
development
and content
IEP Teams consider and
specifically address the skills and
proficiencies needed to avoid and
respond to bullying, harassment, or
teasing when a student is identified
with a disability that affects social
skills development, when the
disability makes him or her
vulnerable to bullying, harassment,
or teasing, or when the student is
identified with a disability on the
autism spectrum.
Mashpee Public School District Coordinated Program Review Mid-cycle Report
February 28, 2012
Page 5 of 17
Criterion
Criterion
Implemented


Criterion
Partially
Implemented
(PI) or Not
Implemented
(NI)
Method(s) of
Investigation
Student
Records
Interviews
SE 25
Parental
consent
Basis of Determination about
Criterion
If Partially Implemented or Not
Implemented:
(a) Required Corrective
Action and
Timelines for Implementation
When a parent revokes consent, in
writing, to special education
services, the district provides
written notice to the parent of the
district’s proposal to discontinue
services based on the revocation of
consent, as well as information on
how the parent can obtain a copy
of his/her right to procedural
safeguards. The district provides
notice within a reasonable time
before it intends to discontinue
services. District staff were aware
that they may not use mediation or
request a due process hearing to
obtain agreement or a ruling for
continuation of services.
Mashpee Public School District Coordinated Program Review Mid-cycle Report
February 28, 2012
Page 6 of 17
(b) Progress
Report Due
Date(s) and
Required
Elements
Additional Special Education Criteria Monitored in this Mid-cycle Review
Current special education criteria available by scrolling down to the special education instrument at
http://www.doe.mass.edu/pqa/review/cpr/default.html
Criterion
SE 2
Required
and
optional
assessments
SE 4
Reports of
assessment
results
Criterion
Implemented

Criterion
Partially
Implemented
(PI) or Not
Implemented
(NI)

Method(s) of
Investigation
Student
Records
PI
Student
Records
Basis of Determination
about Criterion
The district conducts
assessments in all areas
related to the suspected
disability. Educational
assessments are also being
completed by a representative
of the school district,
including a history of the
student’s educational progress
in the general curriculum.
For children assessed at age
three, the district conducts an
observation of the child.
Reports of assessment results
do not consistently define in
detail and in educationally
relevant and common terms,
the student's needs, offering
explicit means of meeting
those needs.
If Partially Implemented or Not
Implemented:
(a) Required Corrective Action and
Timelines for Implementation
Identify the staff responsible for
writing reports of assessment results
and provide training to these staff
members on the required content.
Develop an internal oversight and
tracking system to ensure that reports
of assessment results include the
required information pertaining to the
student’s needs. The tracking system
should include supervisory oversight
and periodic reviews by the Special
Mashpee Public School District Coordinated Program Review Mid-cycle Report
February 28, 2012
Page 7 of 17
(b) Progress
Report Due Date(s)
and Required
Elements
Submit evidence of
staff training,
including the
agenda, training
materials and signed
attendance sheets
(indicating role of
staff). Submit a
description of the
internal oversight
and tracking system
and identify the
Criterion
Criterion
Implemented

Criterion
Partially
Implemented
(PI) or Not
Implemented
(NI)
Method(s) of
Investigation
Basis of Determination
about Criterion
If Partially Implemented or Not
Implemented:
(a) Required Corrective Action and
Timelines for Implementation
Education Director to ensure ongoing
compliance.
Develop a report of the results of an
internal review of student records in
which reports of assessment results
were written since implementation of
all of the district’s corrective actions
for evidence of compliance with the
required content.
* Please note when conducting
internal monitoring that the district
must maintain the following
documentation and make it
available to the Department upon
request: a) List of the student
names and grade levels for the
records reviewed; b) Date of the
review; c) Name of person(s) who
conducted the review, their role(s),
and signature(s).
Mashpee Public School District Coordinated Program Review Mid-cycle Report
February 28, 2012
Page 8 of 17
(b) Progress
Report Due Date(s)
and Required
Elements
person(s)
responsible for the
oversight. Submit
this information by
May 18, 2012.
Submit a report of
the results of an
internal review of
student records and
include the
following:
 Number of
records reviewed;
 Number of
records that
included
appropriately
written reports of
assessment
results;
 Results of the
root cause
analysis of any
records not in
compliance; and
 Specific actions
taken by the
district to remedy
any
noncompliance.
Criterion
Criterion
Implemented

Criterion
Partially
Implemented
(PI) or Not
Implemented
(NI)
Method(s) of
Investigation
Basis of Determination
about Criterion
If Partially Implemented or Not
Implemented:
(a) Required Corrective Action and
Timelines for Implementation
(b) Progress
Report Due Date(s)
and Required
Elements
Submit this report
by October 19,
2012.
SE 6
Determination of
transition
services
SE 13
Progress
Reports and
content
SE 14
Review and
revision of
IEPs
SE 15
Outreach
by the
School
District
(Student
Find)

Student
Records

Student
Records

Student
Records

Interviews
Document
Review
The Team discusses students’
transition needs annually,
beginning when students are
14 years old. Documentation
of updated discussions is
evident on the Transition
Planning Form.
Progress reports are specific
and include written
information on the student’s
progress towards the annual
goals in the IEP.
Team meetings are
consistently held annually, on
or before the anniversary date
of the IEP, to consider the
student’s progress and to
review, revise or develop a
new IEP.
The district has outreach and
continuous liaison with
clinical/health care agencies,
other agencies/organizations
and agencies serving migrant
and/or homeless persons
pursuant to the McKinneyVento Education Act for
Homeless Children.
Mashpee Public School District Coordinated Program Review Mid-cycle Report
February 28, 2012
Page 9 of 17
Criterion
SE 18B
Determination of
placement;
provision of
IEP to
parent
SE 19
Extended
evaluation
Criterion
Implemented


Criterion
Partially
Implemented
(PI) or Not
Implemented
(NI)
Method(s) of
Investigation
Student
Records
Interviews

Student
Records
Interviews
SE 20
Least
restrictive
program
selected
SE 21
School day
and school
year
requirements


Student
Records
Student
Records
Basis of Determination
about Criterion
If Partially Implemented or Not
Implemented:
(a) Required Corrective Action and
Timelines for Implementation
Immediately following the
development of the IEP, the
district provides the parent
with two copies of the
proposed IEP and proposed
placement along with the
required notice.
Extended evaluations are not
used for placements of
students in out-of-district
placements.
The IEP Non-Participation
Justification statements are
individualized and state why
the removal is considered
critical to the student’s
program, including the basis
for the Team’s conclusion
that education of the student
in a less restrictive
environment, with the use of
supplementary aids and
services, could not be
achieved satisfactorily.
The IEP Team discusses
extended school year
programming and documents
this discussion on the IEP.
Interviews
Mashpee Public School District Coordinated Program Review Mid-cycle Report
February 28, 2012
Page 10 of 17
(b) Progress
Report Due Date(s)
and Required
Elements
Criterion
SE 24
Notice to
parent
regarding
proposal or
refusal to
initiate or
change the
identification,
evaluation,
or
educational
placement
of the child
or the
provision of
FAPE
Criterion
Implemented

Criterion
Partially
Implemented
(PI) or Not
Implemented
(NI)
Method(s) of
Investigation
PI
Student
Records
Basis of Determination
about Criterion
If Partially Implemented or Not
Implemented:
(a) Required Corrective Action and
Timelines for Implementation
The Notice of Proposed
School District Action (N1)
does not meet all of the
federal content requirements,
as not all questions on page 2
of the N1 form are always
addressed, including:
 What rejected options
were considered and why
was each option rejected;
 What evaluation
procedure, test, record or
report was used as a basis
for the proposed action;
and
 What other factors were
relevant to the school’s
decision.
Review the N1 forms that have been
written this past school year and
analyze the information included in
these N1 forms to establish the root
cause(s) for the non-compliance.
Based on this root cause analysis,
indicate the specific corrective actions
taken to remedy the non-compliance.
The district responds to
referrals within the required
timelines for students who
transition from Early
Intervention.
Develop a report of the results of an
internal review of student records in
which an N1 form was written since
the implementation of all of the
district’s corrective actions for
evidence of compliance with
responding to all of the questions on
page 2 of the N1 form.
Develop an internal oversight and
tracking system to ensure that page 2
of the N1 form is appropriately
completed. The tracking system
should include supervisory oversight
prior to sending the N1 form to the
parent and periodic reviews by the
Special Education Director to ensure
ongoing compliance.
*Please note when conducting
internal monitoring the district
must maintain the following
Mashpee Public School District Coordinated Program Review Mid-cycle Report
February 28, 2012
Page 11 of 17
(b) Progress
Report Due Date(s)
and Required
Elements
Provide the
outcomes of the root
cause analysis with
the specific
proposal(s) for
remedying the noncompliance. Submit
a description of the
internal oversight
and tracking system
and identify the
person(s)
responsible for the
oversight.
Submit this
information by May
18, 2012.
Submit a report of
the results of an
internal review of
records and include
the following:
 Number of
records
reviewed;
 Number of
records in
which the
district
responded to all
Criterion
Criterion
Implemented

Criterion
Partially
Implemented
(PI) or Not
Implemented
(NI)
Method(s) of
Investigation
Basis of Determination
about Criterion
If Partially Implemented or Not
Implemented:
(a) Required Corrective Action and
Timelines for Implementation
documentation and make it
available to the Department upon
request: a) List of student names
and grade levels for the records
reviewed; b) Date of the review;
c) Name of person(s) who conducted
the review, with their role(s) and
signature(s).
SE 26
Parent
participation in
meetings
SE 29
Communi-

Student
Records

Student
The district makes reasonable
efforts to obtain parents’
participation in Team meeting
discussions and decisions. If
the district is unable to obtain
parent participation after
reasonable efforts are made,
the district conducts the Team
meeting and documents its
attempts to facilitate the
parents’ participation.
The district provides
documents to parents in both
Mashpee Public School District Coordinated Program Review Mid-cycle Report
February 28, 2012
Page 12 of 17
(b) Progress
Report Due Date(s)
and Required
Elements
of the questions
on page 2 of the
N1 form;
 Results of the
root cause
analysis of any
records not in
compliance;
 Specific
corrective
actions taken by
the district to
remedy any
noncompliance.
Submit this report
by October 19,
2012.
Criterion
Criterion
Implemented

cations are
in English
and primary
language of
home
SE 32
Parent
advisory
council for
special
education
SE 33
Involvement in the
general
curriculum
Criterion
Partially
Implemented
(PI) or Not
Implemented
(NI)
Method(s) of
Investigation
Basis of Determination
about Criterion
Records
English and the primary
language of the home if the
primary language is other
than English. In addition, the
district contracts with an
outside agency that has
interpreters who are fluent in
various languages and
familiar with special
education procedures,
programs and services.
The duties of the parent
advisory council for special
education (SEPAC) include
advising the district on
matters that pertain to the
education and safety of
students with disabilities and
participating in the planning,
development and evaluation
of the district’s special
education programs. The
district’s SEPAC is open to
all interested parties.
At least one member of all
IEP Teams is familiar with
the general curriculum and is
able to discuss an eligible
student’s appropriate access
to the general curriculum.
Interviews

Interviews
Document
Review

Student
Records
If Partially Implemented or Not
Implemented:
(a) Required Corrective Action and
Timelines for Implementation
Mashpee Public School District Coordinated Program Review Mid-cycle Report
February 28, 2012
Page 13 of 17
(b) Progress
Report Due Date(s)
and Required
Elements
Criterion
SE 36
IEP
implementation,
accountability and
financial
responsibility
SE 37
Procedures
for
approved
and
unapproved
out-ofdistrict
placements
SE 41
Age span
requirements
SE 45
Procedures
for
suspension
up to 10
days and
after 10
days:
Criterion
Implemented


Criterion
Partially
Implemented
(PI) or Not
Implemented
(NI)
Method(s) of
Investigation
Student
Records
Interviews

Student
Records
Interviews
Not
Applicable

Document
Review
Student
Records
Interviews
Document
Review
Basis of Determination
about Criterion
If Partially Implemented or Not
Implemented:
(a) Required Corrective Action and
Timelines for Implementation
Students at the Coombs
Elementary School are
consistently receiving
occupational therapy and
physical therapy services as
indicated in their IEPs
Written contracts with out-ofdistrict placements contain
the required language
regarding substantive and
procedural rights, as well as
the required language
allowing the district to
monitor and evaluate the
educational placement of the
student.
This criterion is not
applicable as the district no
longer houses the Cape Cod
Collaborative program.
The district no longer uses inhouse suspensions. After a
student with special needs has
been suspended for 10 days in
any school year, during any
subsequent removal the
district provides sufficient
services for the student to
Mashpee Public School District Coordinated Program Review Mid-cycle Report
February 28, 2012
Page 14 of 17
(b) Progress
Report Due Date(s)
and Required
Elements
Criterion
General
requirements
SE 46
Procedures
for
suspension
of students
with
disabilities
when
suspensions
exceed 10
consecutive
school days
or a pattern
has
developed
for
suspensions
exceeding
10
cumulative
days;
responsibilities of
the Team;
responsibilities of
the district
Criterion
Implemented

Criterion
Partially
Implemented
(PI) or Not
Implemented
(NI)
Method(s) of
Investigation
Basis of Determination
about Criterion
If Partially Implemented or Not
Implemented:
(a) Required Corrective Action and
Timelines for Implementation
continue to receive a free and
appropriate public education.

Student
Records
Interviews
Document
Review
Not later than the date of the
decision to take disciplinary
action, the district notifies the
parents of that decision and
provides them with the
written notice of procedural
safeguards. The manifestation
determination meetings are
now held on or before the
tenth day of suspension.
Mashpee Public School District Coordinated Program Review Mid-cycle Report
February 28, 2012
Page 15 of 17
(b) Progress
Report Due Date(s)
and Required
Elements
Criterion
Criterion
Implemented

SE 47
Procedural
requirements
applied to
students not
yet
determined
to be
eligible for
special
education

SE 55
Special
education
facilities
and
classrooms

Criterion
Partially
Implemented
(PI) or Not
Implemented
(NI)
Method(s) of
Investigation
Document
Review
Interviews
Observations
Interviews
Basis of Determination
about Criterion
If Partially Implemented or Not
Implemented:
(a) Required Corrective Action and
Timelines for Implementation
The district revised and
updated the following
policies, which now contain
current federal requirements
and state regulations related
to discipline:
 The School Committee
policy entitled
“Discipline of Students
with Disabilities”
 The School Committee
policy entitled
“Behavioral GuidelinesSpecial Education
Students.”
The Student Support Center
(SSC) for the middle and high
school offers academic
tutoring and support to both
general education and special
education students. Special
education students are not
isolated in the SSC and
special education students
attend inclusion classes
throughout the building.
At the Coombs Elementary
School, the rooms used for
related services are no longer
labeled OT/PT and Speech.
Mashpee Public School District Coordinated Program Review Mid-cycle Report
February 28, 2012
Page 16 of 17
(b) Progress
Report Due Date(s)
and Required
Elements
Criterion
Criterion
Implemented

Criterion
Partially
Implemented
(PI) or Not
Implemented
(NI)
Method(s) of
Investigation
Basis of Determination
about Criterion
If Partially Implemented or Not
Implemented:
(a) Required Corrective Action and
Timelines for Implementation
The rooms designated for use
by the substantially separate
programs are located
throughout the school among
the general education
classrooms.
Mashpee Public School District Coordinated Program Review Mid-cycle Report
February 28, 2012
Page 17 of 17
(b) Progress
Report Due Date(s)
and Required
Elements
MASSACHUSETTS DEPARTMENT OF ELEMENTARY AND SECONDARY EDUCATION
MID-CYCLE REVIEW
School District: Mashpee Public School District
M I D – CY C L E P R O G R E S S R E P O R T
Date Prepared: ____________________________________
Prepared by: __________________________________________________________________
(name and title)
Criterion: _______________________
Topic: ________________________________________________________________________
For each criterion for which you prepare a progress report, please



make a copy of this cover page,
fill in the information requested above, and
attach a complete description of the corrective action taken and any accompanying documentation.
(Description of corrective action for each criterion and any accompanying documentation should include all of the
“Progress Report Required Elements” for that criterion in the Mid-cycle Report.)
Send the whole set of completed progress reports to:
Darlene Lynch, Director
Program Quality Assurance Services
Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education
75 Pleasant Street
Malden, MA 02148-4906