Eval Tool 2015-16
Domain: Candidate
Sponsoring Organization:
OFFSITE
Offsite Submission
Outputs
Candidate Worksheet Prompt 1a & 1b
1
2
3
4
Rating Rationale:

Criterion:
Recruitment efforts
yield a diverse
candidate pool.
Demographic Data
Program Completer Survey*
-
?
+
Rating Rationale:

Areas for follow-up onsite:
ONSITE
Leadership Interview
Criterion Overall Rating
Commendation
Criteria Met
Finding
1
2
3
4
Criteria Overall Rating Statement:
Rating Rationale:

Professional Suggestion:
Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education 1
Eval Tool 2015-16
Domain: Candidate
Sponsoring Organization:
OFFSITE
Offsite Submission
Outputs
Candidate Worksheet Prompt 2a & 2b
Admission Policy
1
2
3
MTEL Data
Educator Evaluation Data*
4
Rating Rationale:

GPA Data*
Persistence Data*
-
?
+
Rating Rationale:

Criterion:
Admission criteria and
processes are rigorous
such that those
admitted demonstrate
success in the program
and during employment
in licensure role.
Areas for follow-up onsite:
ONSITE
Program Supervisor Focus Group
Supervising Practitioner Focus Group
Arts & Science Faculty Focus Group
Leadership Interview
Program Faculty Focus Group
1
2
3
4
Criterion Overall Rating
Commendation
Criteria Met
Finding
Criteria Overall Rating Statement:
Rating Rationale:

Professional Suggestion:
Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education 2
Eval Tool 2015-16
Domain: Candidate
Sponsoring Organization:
OFFSITE
Offsite Submission
Outputs
Candidate Worksheet Prompt 1a & 1b
1
2
3
Demographic Data
4
Rating Rationale:

-
?
+
Rating Rationale:

Criterion:
Areas for follow-up onsite:
Admission process
supports the selection of
a diverse candidate
pool.
ONSITE
Leadership Interview
Criterion Overall Rating
Commendation
Criteria Met
Finding
1
2
3
4
Criteria Overall Rating Statement:
Rating Rationale:

Professional Suggestion:
Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education 3
Eval Tool 2015-16
Domain: Candidate
Sponsoring Organization:
OFFSITE
Offsite Submission
Outputs
Candidate Worksheet Prompt 3
Admission Policy
1
2
3
MTEL Data
4
Rating Rationale:

-
?
+
Rating Rationale:

Criterion:
Areas for follow-up onsite:
Admission criteria for
post-baccalaureate
candidates verify
content knowledge
upon entrance to the
program.
ONSITE
Arts & Science Faculty Focus Group
Program Faculty Focus Group
Criterion Overall Rating
Commendation
Criteria Met
Finding
1
2
3
4
Criteria Overall Rating Statement:
Rating Rationale:

Professional Suggestion:
Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education 4
Eval Tool 2015-16
Domain: Candidate
Sponsoring Organization:
OFFSITE
Offsite Submission
Outputs
Candidate Worksheet Prompt 4
Advising Policy
Program Completer Survey*
Persistence Data*
1
2
3
4
Rating Rationale:

Criterion:
Structures and
processes ensure that
candidates receive
effective advising
throughout the
program.
-
?
+
Rating Rationale:
Areas for follow-up onsite:
ONSITE
Arts & Science Faculty Focus Group
Candidate Focus Group
Completer Focus Group
Program Faculty Focus Group
1
2
3
Criterion Overall Rating
Commendation
Criteria Met
Finding
4
Criteria Overall Rating Statement:
Rating Rationale:

Professional Suggestion:
Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education 5
Eval Tool 2015-16
Domain: Candidate
Sponsoring Organization:
OFFSITE
Offsite Submission
Outputs
Candidate Worksheet Prompt 5
Employment Data
Program Completer Survey*
1
2
3
4
Rating Rationale:

Criterion:
-
?
+
Rating Rationale:

Areas for follow-up onsite:
Career development and
ONSITE
placement services
Candidate Focus Group
support candidate
Completer Focus Group
employment upon
completion.
1
2
Criterion Overall Rating
Commendation
Criteria Met
Finding
3
4
Criteria Overall Rating Statement:
Rating Rationale:

Professional Suggestion:
Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education 6
Eval Tool 2015-16
Domain: Candidate
Sponsoring Organization:
OFFSITE
Offsite Submission
Outputs
Candidate Worksheet Prompt 6a & 6b
Advising OR admission policy
1
2
3
Program Completer Survey*
Persistence Data*
4
Rating Rationale:

-
?
+
Rating Rationale:
Criterion:
Candidates at-risk of not
meeting standards are
identified throughout
the program (in prepracticum, during
coursework, and while
in practicum) and
receive necessary
supports and guidance
to improve or exit.
Areas for follow-up onsite:
ONSITE
Program Supervisor Focus Group
Supervising Practitioner Focus Group
Arts & Science Faculty Focus Group
FBE Staff Focus Group
Program Faculty Focus Group
1
2
3
4
Criterion Overall Rating
Commendation
Criteria Met
Finding
Criteria Overall Rating Statement:
Rating Rationale:

Professional Suggestion:
Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education 7
Eval Tool 2015-16
Domain: Candidate
Sponsoring Organization:
OFFSITE
Offsite Submission
Outputs
Program Completer Survey*
Licensure Data*
1
2
3
4
Rating Rationale:
-
?
+
Rating Rationale:
Criterion:
Areas for follow-up onsite:
Candidates are
knowledgeable about
the requirements for
licensure.
ONSITE
Candidate Focus Group
Completer Focus Group
Criterion Overall Rating
Commendation
Criteria Met
Finding
1
2
3
4
Criteria Overall Rating Statement:
Rating Rationale:

Professional Suggestion:
Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education 8
Eval Tool 2015-16
Domain: Candidate
Sponsoring Organization:
OFFSITE
Offsite Submission
Outputs
Waiver Policy
1
2
3
4
Rating Rationale:

Criterion:
Waiver policy ensures
that academic and
professional standards
of the licensure role are
met.
-
?
+
Rating Rationale:
Areas for follow-up onsite:
ONSITE
Candidate Artifacts
Criterion Overall Rating
Commendation
Criteria Met
Finding
1
2
3
4
Criteria Overall Rating Statement:
Rating Rationale:

Professional Suggestion:
Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education 9
Eval Tool 2015-16
Domain: Candidate
Sponsoring Organization:
OFFSITE
Offsite Submission
1
2
3
Outputs
4
Rating Rationale:
-
?
+
Rating Rationale:
Criterion:
Areas for follow-up onsite:
Candidates are
endorsed for the
approved program of
study completed.
ONSITE
Candidate Artifacts
Criterion Overall Rating
Commendation
Criteria Met
Finding
1
2
3
4
Criteria Overall Rating Statement:
Rating Rationale:

Professional Suggestion:
Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education 10
Eval Tool 2015-16
Domain: Candidate
Sponsoring Organization:
Overall Domain Summary
Criterion
Offsite
Output
Onsite
Commendation
Criterion
Met
Finding
Recruitment efforts yield a diverse candidate
pool.
Admission criteria and processes are rigorous
such that those admitted demonstrate success
in the program and during employment in
licensure role.
Admission process supports the selection of a
diverse candidate pool.
Admission criteria for post-baccalaureate
candidates verify content knowledge upon
entrance to the program.
Structures and processes ensure that candidates
receive effective advising throughout the
program.
Career development and placement services
support candidate employment upon
completion.
Candidates at-risk of not meeting standards are
identified throughout the program (in prepracticum, during coursework, and while in
practicum) and receive necessary supports and
guidance to improve or exit.
Candidates are knowledgeable about the
requirements for licensure.
Waiver policy ensures that academic and
professional standards of the licensure role are
met.
Candidates are endorsed for the approved
program of study completed.
Domain Summary
Overall Domain Recommendation
Exemplary
Proficient
Needs
Improvement
Unsatisfactory
Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education 11