碩士論文評量尺規

advertisement
T3-3-4
學位論文 評分表
學位名稱: MS in Industrial Management; MS in Finance; MS in Public Policy and Management
學號:
學生姓名:
論文名稱:
教育目標 Goal
核心能力 Objectives
達成指標 Traits
優
LG1 專業知能 O1-1 學生具備公共政策與管理的 T1-1 公共政策與管理的進
進階知能
階知識與能力
LG2 國際視野 O2-1 學生具備體認多元文化價值 T2-1 國際思維
對於企業營運意涵的能力
LG3 創新整合 O3-1 學生具備進階管理知識研究 T3-1 研究探索與分析
能力
O3-2 學生具備批判思維並解決問 T3-2 批判思維與問題解決
題
LG4 資訊科技 O4-1 學生具備資訊知能應用能力
T4-1 資訊知能應用能力
LG5 倫理道德 O5-1 學生能利用對企業倫理與社 T5-1 倫理
會責任的認知,探討公司決策對社
會大眾權益產生的影響
LG6 社會知能 O6-1 學生具備有效溝通能力
T6-1-1 口語溝通
T6-1-2 書寫溝通
總分 (滿分為 100 分)
評核委員簽名
佳
可
劣
T3-3-4
評量尺規 Rubric for Student Achievements in Professional Knowledge and Skills
Trait:T1-1 專業知識技能.
Level
Criteria
Excellence
 Clearly and
Discipline
Level
Identification of
global factors
Satisfactory
Poor
 Applies
 Attempts
 Does not
appropriate
argumentation
and methodology
of the discipline.
 Demonstrates
coherent
interpretations,
perspectives, or
applications of
course content.
appropriate
argumentation
and methodology
of the discipline.
 Offers minimal
interpretations,
perspectives, or
applications of
course content.
incorporate
appropriate
argumentation
and methodology
of the discipline.
 Fails to interpret
or apply course
content.
Good
Satisfactory
Poor
Identification of
most of the relevant
factors.
Identification of
some or all of the
following relevant
global factors:
economic, cultural,
legal, demographic.
Incomplete
identification of the
following relevant
global factors:
economic, cultural,
legal, demographic.
Good
Satisfactory
Poor
Presents in-depth
information from
relevant sources
representing various
points of
view/approaches.
Presents
information from
relevant sources
representing limited
points of
view/approaches.
Presents
information from
irrelevant sources
representing limited
points of
view/approaches.
Excellence
Good
Satisfactory
Poor
Demonstrates the
ability to construct a
clear and insightful
problem statement
with evidence of all
relevant contextual
factors.
Demonstrates the
ability to construct a
problem statement
with evidence of
most relevant
contextual factors,
and problem
statement is
adequately detailed.
Begins to
demonstrate the
ability to construct a
problem statement
with evidence of
most relevant
contextual factors,
but problem
statement is
superficial.
Demonstrates a
limited ability in
identifying a
problem statement
or related contextual
factors.
reflectively
applies
appropriate
argumentation
and methodology
of the discipline.
 Demonstrates
highly innovative
interpretations,
perspectives, or
applications of
course content
Trait:T2-1 國際思維
Criteria
Good
Excellence
Clear and detailed
identification of
relevant factors.
Trait:T3-1 研究探索與分析
Level
Criteria
Excellence
Existing
Knowledge,
Research, and/or
Views
Synthesizes
in-depth
information from
relevant sources
representing various
points of
view/approaches.
Trait:3-2 批判思維與問題解決
Level
Criteria
Define Problem
T3-3-4
Trait:T4-1 資訊知能應用能力
Level
Excellence
Good
Satisfactory
Poor
Defines the scope of
the research
question or thesis
completely. Can
determine key
concepts. Types of
information
(sources) selected
relate to concepts or
answer research
question.
Defines the scope of
the research
question or thesis
incompletely (parts
are missing, remains
too broad or too
narrow, etc.). Can
determine key
concepts. Types of
information
(sources) selected
partially relate to
concepts or answer
research question.
Has difficulty
defining the scope
of the research
question or thesis.
Has difficulty
determining key
concepts. Types of
information
(sources) selected
do not relate to
concepts or answer
research question.
Excellence
Good
Satisfactory
Poor
Students apply a
thorough
understanding of
direct and indirect
stakeholders when
examining the role
and responsibility of
business in society.
Students apply an
adequate
understanding of
direct and indirect
stakeholders when
examining the role
and responsibility of
business in society.
Students identify
and understand:
direct stakeholders
when explaining the
role of business
(treatment of
employees, optimal
firm value) in
society. And indirect
stakeholders when
explaining the role
of business
(corporate
citizenship,
stakeholders' view)
in society.
Students unable to
explain the role of
business in society.
Students understand
monetary role
(profit
maximization) of
business in society.
Good
Satisfactory
Poor
Central message is
clear and consistent
with the supporting
material.
Central message is
basically
understandable but
is not often repeated
and is not
memorable.
Central message can
be deduced, but is
not explicitly stated
in the presentation.
Good
Satisfactory
Poor
Criteria
Determine the
Extent of
Information
Needed
Has difficulty
defining the scope
of the research
question or thesis.
Has difficulty
determining key
concepts. Types of
information
(sources) selected
do not relate to
concepts or answer
research question.
Trait:T5-1 倫理
Level
Criteria
Responsibility:
Students
demonstrate an
understanding of
the responsibility
of business in
society.
Trait:T6-1-1 口語溝通
Level
Criteria
Excellence
Central message
Central message is
compelling
(precisely stated,
appropriately
repeated,
memorable, and
strongly
supported.)
Trait:T6-1-2 書寫溝通
Level
Criteria
Excellence
T3-3-4
Context of and
purpose for
writing:
Includes
considerations of
audience,
purpose, and the
circumstances
surrounding the
writing task(s).
Demonstrates a
thorough
understanding of
context, audience,
and purpose that is
responsive to the
assigned task(s) and
focuses all elements
of the work.
Demonstrates
adequate
consideration of
context, audience,
and purpose and a
clear focus on the
assigned task(s)
(e.g., the task aligns
with audience,
purpose, and
context).
Demonstrates
awareness of
context, audience,
purpose, and to the
assigned tasks(s)
(e.g., begins to
show awareness of
audience's
perceptions and
assumptions).
Demonstrates
minimal attention to
context, audience,
purpose, and to the
assigned tasks(s)
(e.g., expectation of
instructor or self as
audience).
Download