T3-3-4
工業管理學系
碩士論文（學位考試）評分表
學位名稱： MS in Industrial Management； Design Master in Industrial Management；
學號：
學生姓名：
論文名稱：
教育目標 Goal
核心能力 Objectives
達成指標 Traits
LG1 專業知能
學生具備且能應用專業管理進階 T1-1 專業知識技能.
知識
LG2 國際視野
學生具備體認多元文化價值對於 T2-1 國際思維
企業營運意涵的能力
LG3 創新整合
學生具備進階管理知識研究能力
T3-1 研究探索與分析
學生具備批判思維並解決問題
T3-2 批判思維與問題解決
LG4 資訊科技
學生具備資訊知能應用能力
T4-1 資訊知能應用能力
LG5倫理道德
學生能利用對企業倫理與社會責 T5-1 倫理
任的認知，探討公司決策對社會大
眾權益產生的影響
LG6 社會知能
學生具備有效溝通能力
優
T6-1-1 口語溝通
T6-1-2 書寫溝通
總分 (滿分為 100 分)
評核委員簽名
佳
可
劣
T3-3-4
評量尺規 Rubric for Student Achievements in Professional Knowledge and Skills
Trait：T1-1 專業知識技能.
Level
Excellence
Criteria
Discipline-specific
knowledge and
skills
Skillfully and
insightfully
interprets and
applies managerial
concepts and
principles
Good
Satisfactory
Poor
Reasonally interprets
and applies
managerial concepts
and principles
Interprets and
applies managerial
concepts and
principles
Good
Satisfactory
Poor
Analysis of impact
of some global
factors; some
inaccuracies in
analysis.
Incomplete
analysis of impact
of relevant global
issues; Erroneous
analysis of impact.
Satisfactory
Poor
Fails to interpret
and apply
managerial
concepts and
principles
Trait：T2-1 國際思維
Level
Criteria
Global thinking
Excellence
Clear, accurate and
detailed analysis of
impact of relevant
global factors.
Analysis of impact
of most global
factors; some
inaccuracies in
analysis.
Trait：T3-1 研究探索與分析
Level
Criteria
Excellence
Research, inquiry
and analysis
Thesis is clear, easy
to find, and
appropriate to the
assignment.
Thesis is supported
by the rest of the
paper.
Paper contains a
“roadmap” for the
reader.
There is a logical
flow to the
topics/arguments.
Conclusion follows
clearly from the
arguments
presented.
Trait：3-2 批判思維與問題解決
Level
Criteria
Critical thinking
and problem
solving
Excellence
Evaluation of
solutions is deep
and elegant (for
example, contains
thorough and
insightful
explanation) and
Good
Thesis is clear and
appropriate.
Thesis fairly well
supported.
Paper is fairly well
organized.
Conclusion follows
from the rest of the
paper.
Thesis is fairly
clear.
Inconsistent
support for thesis.
Paper weakly
organized.
Conclusion is
acceptable.
Thesis unclear
and/or
inappropriate.
Thesis not
supported.
Paper is not
organized.
Conclusion doesn’t
follow from the
rest of the paper.
Good
Satisfactory
Poor
Evaluation of
solutions is adequate
(for example,
contains thorough
explanation) and
includes the
following: considers
Evaluation of
solutions is brief
(for example,
explanation lacks
depth) and includes
the following:
considers history
Evaluation of
solutions is
superficial (for
example, contains
cursory, surface
level explanation)
and includes the
T3-3-4
includes, deeply and
thoroughly, all of
the following:
considers history of
problem, reviews
logic/reasoning,
examines feasibility
of solution, and
weighs impacts of
solution.
Trait：T4-1 資訊知能應用能力
Level
Criteria
Information
literacy
history of problem,
reviews
logic/reasoning,
examines feasibility
of solution, and
weighs impacts of
solution.
of problem,
reviews
logic/reasoning,
examines
feasibility of
solution, and
weighs impacts of
solution.
following:
considers history
of problem,
reviews
logic/reasoning,
examines
feasibility of
solution, and
weighs impacts of
solution.
Excellence
Good
Satisfactory
Poor
Communicates,
organizes and
synthesizes
information from
sources to fully
achieve a specific
purpose, with clarity
and depth
Communicates,
organizes and
synthesizes
information from
sources. Intended
purpose is achieved.
Communicates and
organizes
information from
sources. The
information is not
yet synthesized, so
the intended
purpose is not fully
achieved.
Communicates
information from
sources. The
information is
fragmented and/or
used
inappropriately
(misquoted, taken
out of context, or
incorrectly
paraphrased, etc.),
so the intended
purpose is not
achieved.
Excellence
Good
Satisfactory
Poor
Students recognize
adequately the
organization's (code
of conduct and
ethical culture) and
external entities
(government and
professional
organizations via
laws and
professional codes of
conduct) role in
creating effective
corporate
governance.
Students recognize
the organization's
(code of conduct
and ethical culture)
and external
entities
(government and
professional
organizations via
laws and
professional codes
of conduct) role in
creating effective
corporate
governance.
Student unable to
identify
components of
effective corporate
governance.
Good
Satisfactory
Poor
Trait：T5-1 倫理
Level
Criteria
Students recognize
thoroughly the
organization's (code
of conduct and
ethical culture) and
external entities
(government and
professional
organizations via
laws and
professional codes
of conduct) role in
creating effective
corporate
governance.
Trait：T6-1-1 口語溝通
Ethics
Level
Criteria
Oral
communication
Excellence
Student uses a clear
voice and correct,
Students’ voice is
clear. Student
Students’ voice is
low. Student
Student mumbles,
incorrectly
T3-3-4
precise
pronunciation of
terms so that all
audience members
can hear
presentation.
Trait：T6-1-2 書寫溝通
skills
Level
Criteria
Written
communication
skills
Excellence
Writing consistently
demonstrates variety
in word choice and
sentence/paragraph
structure. Writing
clear, concise & level
of formality well
suited to purpose.
pronounces most
words correctly.
Most audience
members can hear
presentation.
incorrectly
pronounces terms.
Audience members
have difficulty
hearing
presentation.
pronounces terms,
and speaks too
quietly for students
in the back of class
to hear.
Good
Satisfactory
Poor
Writing often
demonstrates
variety in word
choice and
sentence/paragrap
h structure.
Writing is clear,
concise & level of
formality is
appropriate.
Writing
demonstrates some
variety in word
choice and
sentence/paragraph
structure. Writing
communicates, but
some lapses in
clarity &
conciseness. Level
of formality
somewhat
appropriate.
Writing
demonstrates little
or no variety in
word choice &
sentence/paragraph
structure. Many
lapses in clarity
and conciseness.
Level or formality
is inappropriate to
purpose.