T3-3-5 工業管理學系 博士論文(學位考試)評分表 學位名稱: Ph.D. in Industrial Management; Ph.D. in Management 學號: 學生姓名: 論文名稱: 教育目標 Goal 核心能力 Objectives 達成指標 Traits 優 LG1 專業知能 O1-1 學生具備且能活用進階管理 T1-1 活用進階管理理論知 理論知識 識 O1-2 學生具備整合與原創專業領 T1-2 整合與原創專業知識 域進階知識的能力 LG2 國際視野 O2-1 學生具備掌握全球化企業研 T2-1 國際思維 究議題的能力 LG3 創新整合 O3-1 學生具備高階管理知識研究 T3-1 研究探索與分析 能力 O3-2 學生具備批判思維並解決問 T3-2 批判思維與問題解決 題 LG4 資訊科技 O4-1 學生具備資訊知能應用能力 T4-1 資訊知能應用能力 LG5倫理道德 O5-1 學生能以企業倫理與社會責 T5-1 倫理 任的角度,實踐於學術研究和知識 傳播 LG6 社會知能 O6-1 學生具備有效溝通能力 T6-1-1 口語溝通 T6-1-2 書寫溝通 總分 (滿分為 100 分) 評核委員簽名 佳 可 劣 T3-3-5 評量尺規 Rubric for Student Achievements in Professional Knowledge and Skills Trait:T1-1 活用進階管理理論知識 Level Excellence Criteria Advanced Skillfully and managerial theory insightfully application interprets and applies advanced managerial concepts and principles Good Satisfactory Poor Reasonally interprets and applies advanced managerial concepts and principles Interprets and applies advanced managerial concepts and principles Fails to interpret and apply advanced managerial concepts and principles Good Satisfactory Poor Trait:T1-2 整合與原創專業知識 Level Excellence Criteria Knowledge integration and innovation Successfully integrates interdisciplinary Partially integrates interdisciplinary skills and Attempts to integrate interdisciplinary Does not yet integrate interdisciplinary skills and knowledge. Demonstrates a high degree of intellectual acuity, imagination, and knowledge. Demonstrates intellectual acuity, imagination, and sensitivity. Demonstrates some skills and knowledge. Lacks depth of intellectual acuity, imagination, and sensitivity. skills and knowledge. Does not yet demonstrate intellectual acuity, imagination, and sensitivity. Clearly demonstrates an awareness of interrelationships among self, the discipline, society, and culture. awareness of interrelationships among self, the discipline, society, and culture. Demonstrates little awareness of interrelationships among self, the discipline, society, and culture. sensitivity. Does not yet demonstrate awareness of interrelationships among self, the discipline, society, and culture. Good Satisfactory Poor Trait:T2-1 國際思維 Level Criteria Global thinking Excellence Clear, accurate and detailed analysis of impact of relevant global factors. Analysis of impact of most global factors; some inaccuracies in analysis. Analysis of impact of some global factors; some inaccuracies in analysis. Incomplete analysis of impact of relevant global issues; Erroneous analysis of impact. Trait:T3-1 研究探索與分析 Level Criteria Research, inquiry and analysis Excellence Good Satisfactory Thesis is clear, easy to find, and appropriate to the assignment. Thesis is supported Thesis is clear and appropriate. Thesis fairly well supported. Paper is fairly well Thesis is fairly clear. Inconsistent support for thesis. Paper weakly Poor Thesis unclear and/or inappropriate. Thesis not supported. T3-3-5 by the rest of the paper. Paper contains a “roadmap” for the reader. There is a logical flow to the topics/arguments. Conclusion follows clearly from the arguments presented. Trait:T3-2 批判思維與問題解決 Level Criteria Critical thinking and problem solving organized. Conclusion follows from the rest of the paper. organized. Conclusion is acceptable. Paper is not organized. Conclusion doesn’t follow from the rest of the paper. Excellence Good Satisfactory Poor Evaluation of solutions is deep and elegant (for example, contains thorough and insightful explanation) and includes, deeply and thoroughly, all of the following: considers history of problem, reviews logic/reasoning, examines feasibility of solution, and weighs impacts of solution. Evaluation of solutions is adequate (for example, contains thorough explanation) and includes the following: considers history of problem, reviews logic/reasoning, examines feasibility of solution, and weighs impacts of solution. Evaluation of solutions is brief (for example, explanation lacks depth) and includes the following: considers history of problem, reviews logic/reasoning, examines feasibility of solution, and weighs impacts of solution. Evaluation of solutions is superficial (for example, contains cursory, surface level explanation) and includes the following: considers history of problem, reviews logic/reasoning, examines feasibility of solution, and weighs impacts of solution. Excellence Good Satisfactory Poor Communicates, organizes and synthesizes information from sources to fully achieve a specific purpose, with clarity and depth Communicates, organizes and synthesizes information from sources. Intended purpose is achieved. Communicates and organizes information from sources. The information is not yet synthesized, so the intended purpose is not fully achieved. Communicates information from sources. The information is fragmented and/or used inappropriately (misquoted, taken out of context, or incorrectly paraphrased, etc.), so the intended purpose is not achieved. Trait:T4-1 資訊知能應用能力 Level Criteria Information literacy Trait:T5-1 倫理 T3-3-5 Level Criteria Excellence Students recognize thoroughly the organization's (code of conduct and ethical culture) and external entities (government and professional organizations via laws and professional codes of conduct) role in creating effective corporate governance. Trait:T6-1-1 口語溝通 Ethics Level Criteria Excellence Student uses a clear voice and correct, precise pronunciation of terms so that all audience members can hear presentation. Trait:T6-1-2 書寫溝通 Oral communication skills Level Criteria Written communication skills Good Satisfactory Poor Students recognize adequately the organization's (code of conduct and ethical culture) and external entities (government and professional organizations via laws and professional codes of conduct) role in creating effective corporate governance. Students recognize the organization's (code of conduct and ethical culture) and external entities (government and professional organizations via laws and professional codes of conduct) role in creating effective corporate governance. Student unable to identify components of effective corporate governance. Good Satisfactory Poor Students’ voice is low. Student incorrectly pronounces terms. Audience members have difficulty hearing presentation. Student mumbles, incorrectly pronounces terms, and speaks too quietly for students in the back of class to hear. Satisfactory Poor Students’ voice is clear. Student pronounces most words correctly. Most audience members can hear presentation. Excellence Good Writing consistently demonstrates variety in word choice and sentence/paragraph structure. Writing clear, concise & level of formality well suited to purpose. Writing often demonstrates variety in word choice and sentence/paragraph structure. Writing is clear, concise & level of formality is appropriate. Writing demonstrates some variety in word choice and sentence/paragraph structure. Writing communicates, but some lapses in clarity & conciseness. Level of formality somewhat appropriate. Writing demonstrates little or no variety in word choice & sentence/paragraph structure. Many lapses in clarity and conciseness. Level or formality is inappropriate to purpose.