Only for an evaluation of the overall AACSB performance
I-SHOU UNIVERSITY
Department of Business Administration
Oral Defense Score Sheet of Master’s Thesis / Doctoral Dissertation
Only for Oral Examiners
Oral Examiner:
School’s Name:
Title:
Department:
Academic
Year
Student’s
Name
Semester
Student No.
Date of Oral
,
Defense  Doctoral(mm
dd, yyyy)
Degree
Degree
 Master’s Degree
Thesis (Dissertation) Title:
Ranking
Items and Scores
Research Topic &
Conceptual
Framework
Literature Review
Research Design
Organization &
Structure
Poor
Fair
Good
Excellent
<70
70~79
80~89
90~100
The research topic The research topic The research topic is The research topic is
and research results and research results valuable academically valuable in terms of
are valueless both are rarely valuable or in a practical respect. originality, academically,
academically and in both academically and The author can do a or in a practical respect.
a practical respect. in a practical respect. comprehensive research The author can do a
Alternatively, it is Although it is possible analysis and have comprehensive research
hardly possible to do to do a research analysis implications in a logical analysis and have
a research analysis and have implications way through theories. implications in a logical
and have implications through theories, the However, the research way through theories,
through theories, or to research model is unclear model is not clear and a clear research
establish a reasonable or incomplete.
enough.
model is established
research model.
accordingly.
There is no sufficient The literature review is A comprehensive An in-depth literature
literature review, the fairly satisfactory, so is literature review is review is conducted,
literature cited is not the literature cited. conducted. The literature the literature cited is
suitable for the research However, the correlation cited is suitable for the particularly suitable
topic, and the correlation among the literature is research topic. The for the research topic,
among the literature is relatively low.
correlation among the and the correlation
quite weak.
literature is fairly good. among the literature
is highly close.
There is no sufficient No proper data is The sample size is large The sample size is large
sample size, or the data collected through enough, and the data enough, and the data
collected are not properly the sampling. The collected are highly collected are highly
handled and analyzed, interpretation a n d diverse. However, the diverse. The data
thereby leading to flaws implications
are interpretation and collected are properly
in the interpretation and poorly reliable.
implications are poorly handled and analyzed,
implications.
reliable.
thereby leading to a
reliable interpretation and
implications.
The structure, the The structure is fairly The structure is complete, The structure is complete,
argument pattern, the complete, the argument the argument pattern is the argument pattern is
choice of words and pattern is clear, and the systematically arranged, systematically arranged,
the format are illogical choice of words and and the choice of words and the choice of words
and badly organized, the format are basically and the format are fairly and the format are
and important parts are correct.
good.
well-organized..
missing.
Total Score
(Required)
Oral Examiner
Department Chair
Signature:
Signature:
Office of Assessment
Accreditation
and
Signature:
Notes:
1. The scores for each item must be given based on a 100-point scale.
2. The scores given to each item will be an important reference to the student’s performance on each item (poor,
fair, good or excellent).