Imagining the Inclusive University of the Future

advertisement

Centre for Higher Education and Equity Research (CHEER)

Imagining the Inclusive

University of the Future

Professor Louise Morley

University of Sussex, UK

(http://www.sussex.ac.uk/cheer/).

18 April, 2020

The University of the Past

Elitism

Exclusion

Inequalities

18 April, 2020

The University of Today

Diversified

Liquified

Expanded

Globalised

Borderless/ Edgeless

Marketised

Technologised

Neo-liberalised

Privatised?

18 April, 2020

Turbulence and Torpor

Caught between:

 Archaism

 Hyper-modernisation

Negotiating:

 Nostalgia

 Frenzy

 Inertia

Tensions between:

 Desire

 Desiccation

 Distributive justice

18 April, 2020

Do These Discourses Excite and Delight You?

 Quality Assurance

 Excellence

 Knowledge Economy

 Innovation and Enterprise

 Knowledge Transfer

 Teaching and Learning

 Lifelong Learning

 Employability

 Globalisation

 Internationalisation

 Civic Engagement

 Digitisation

 Economic Impact

 League Tables

18 April, 2020

Futurology

Are current HE policy discourses:

 Limiting or generating creative thinking about the future of universities?

 Commensurate with aspirations/ desires of students/ staff?

 Reducing universities to delivery agencies for government-decreed outcomes?

(Young, 2004)

18 April, 2020

Technology or Ideology?

• Quality is frequently invoked when equality is raised.

• Is equality invoked in quality discourses?

• Top Universities in League

Tables have lowest numbers of women professors.

 UK = 20%

 Oxford = 9.4%

18 April, 2020

Whose Imaginary?

• Neo-liberalism/ austerity rather than academic imaginaries or social movements?

• Who/what is currently informing policy? (Ball and Exley, 2009)

• What new vocabularies can be marshalled to consider the morphology of the university of the future?

18 April, 2020

What Type of Future?

Probable

Possible

Desirable

(Appadurai, 2010)

18 April, 2020

Imagining the Future

18 April, 2020

Dystopian Futures and Cultures of

Closure

• Callousness of prestige

Decline in academic freedom

• Employees permanently temporary

Job training, not education

• Teacherless classrooms

Increased political, cultural and economic assault

Corporatisation/ academic-capitalist values

• Countercultures and opposition crushed.

18 April, 2020

(Bousquet, 2008)

The Edgeless University

(Bradwell,

2009)

Open Access Publishing

• Flexible learning outside the university

• Social media

• Progressive Austerity

(Reeves, 2009)

• Strategic technological investment

• New providers

• Collaborative research/ open research communities

• Universities as partners, not sole providers of learning, research

• Engaging stakeholders in course design

• New forms of accreditation.

18 April, 2020

Absences and Silences

• Learning Landscapes/ Aesthetics/

Spatial Justice/

(Lambert, 2010; Neary, 2010)

• Affective Domain

(Hey, 2009, 2011)

• Environment and Sustainability

(Sterling, 2004)

• Global North/ South Power

Geometries and Cognitive Justice

(Robinson, 2009; Santos, 2007)

• Equalities and Intersectionality of

Social Identities

(Morley et al, 2010)

18 April, 2020

Equalities and Identities

18 April, 2020

Desiring Higher Education

• Aligning personal aspirations with needs of economy

(Appadurai, 2003; Morley et al. 2010; Walkerdine, 2003,

2011).

Globally: 1960 - 13 million

2005 - 137.8 million

2025 - 262 million?

(UNESCO, 2009).

• Multiversities (Fallis, 2007) or

• Multiple providers

(Ball, 2008).

18 April, 2020

Global Expansion

Asia

 China enrolment is now 20%

(Marginson et al., 2011)

 India (world’s third largest HE system) plans 15% by 2012

Sub-Saharan Africa

 8.7% annual expansion

 5.1% for the world as a whole.

Regional Variations in Participation

 Iceland 65.6%

 Austria 60.7% (UNESCO, 2009)

 Tanzania 1% (DFID, 2008)

18 April, 2020

Toxic Correlations/ Access and Social

Identities

• 4% of UK poorer young people enter higher education.

(David et al, 2009; Hills Report, 2009).

• 5% of this group enter UK’s top 7 universities (HESA, 2010).

• More black young men in prison in

UK and US than in HE.

• Attainment gap in UK HE highest between black and white students

(

Ruebain, 2012).

• Universities = hereditary domain of financially advantaged

(Gopal,

2010).

18 April, 2020

Why Does This Matter?

The university

• generates social, educational and cultural opportunities

• plays a major role in social mobility

• produces workers for other influential institutions.

(Holmwood, 2011)

18 April, 2020

Reproducing Power and Privilege?

Graduates from elite universities control:

 the media

 politics

 the civil service

 the arts

 the City

 law

 medicine

 big business

 the armed forces

 the judiciary

 think tanks

( Monbiot, 2010)

18 April, 2020

Closing the Gender Gap?

Global Gender Parity Index of 1.08

(UNESCO, 2009).

The number of male students globally quadrupled from 17.7 to 75.1 million between 1970-2007.

The number of female students rose sixfold from 10.8 to 77.4 million.

• UK ranked 16 the Global Gender Gap

Index (13 in 2008)

(World Economic Forum, 2011).

In UK, women are:

57.1% of students

• 42.6% of academic staff

• 20% of professoriate

13% of Vice-Chancellors

(ECU, 2009).

18 April, 2020

Inclusion = Representational Space

Gender = access, smart economics, disadvantage and remediation.

• Women’s increased access = feminisation.

• Gender not intersected with other structures of inequality.

• HE products and processes = gender neutral.

Power and privilege = undertheorisation.

Redistributive measures = social engineering.

• Equity / Affirmative Action = threat to excellence.

18 April, 2020

Gender Mainstreaming?

• Sexual harassment

(Morley, 2011,

NUS, 2010);

• Gender insensitive pedagogy

(Welch, 2006);

• Women and Technology (Clegg,

2011);

• Promotion, professional development and tenure

(Acker,

2009; Knights and Richards, 2003);

• Knowledge production and dissemination

(Hughes, 2002);

• Curricula and subject choices

(Morley et al, 2006).

• Inequalities and gender mainstreaming (Morley, 2010; Rees,

2006).

18 April, 2020

Gender…

 is a demographic variable (noun), not something that is in continual production

(verb).

 continues to be relayed via everyday practices that elude quality audits.

 is ignored when women suffer discrimination/under-representation.

 is amplified in crisis form when women are

‘over-represented’.

 inequalities resistant to hypermodernisation forces?

18 April, 2020

Sociology of Absences

(De Sousa Santos)

18 April, 2020

Widening Participation in Higher

Education in Ghana and Tanzania

Measuring:

Sociological variables of gender, age, socio-economic status (SES)

In Relation to:

• Educational Outcomes: access, retention and achievement.

In Relation to:

• 4 Programmes of Study in each HEI.

2 Public and 2 private HEIs.

• Intersectionality

(Morley et al. 2010 http://www.sussex.ac.uk/wphegt

18 April, 2020

Equity Scorecard: Access to Level 200 on 4

Programmes at a Public University in Tanzania

According to Age, Gender and Socio Economic Status

Programme

Women

Low

SES

% of Students on the Programme

Age 30 or over

Mature and

Low

SES

Women and low

SES

Women

30 or over

Poor

Mature

Women

B. Commerce 32.41 8.59 1.13 0.16 0.32 0.0 0.0

LLB. Law 56.18 13.48 0.0

B.Sc.

Engineering

B. Science with

Education

25.05

11.20

11.65

28.00

1.36

4.80

0.0

0.0

1.6

5.06

1.36

0.80

0.0

1.17

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

18 April, 2020

Equity Scorecard: Access to Level 200 on 4

Programmes at a Public University in Ghana

According to Age, Gender and Socio Economic Status

(SES)

% of Students on the Programme

Programme

Women

Low

SES

Age 30 or over

Mature and

Low

SES

Women and low

SES

Women

30 or over

Poor

Mature

Women

B.Commerce

29.92

1.66

5.82

0.00

1.11

0.28

0.00

B.

Management

Studies

47.06

2.94

6.30

0.00

1.68

3.36

0.00

B.Education

(Primary)

B.Sc.

Optometry

36.36

30.77

8.08

0.00

65.66

0.00

8.08

0.00

2.02

0.00

21.21

0.00

2.02

0.00

18 April, 2020

Steep Social Gradients

• Opportunity hording by privileged social groups?

• Middle class capture of affirmative action?

• Are we now educating

‘doctors' daughters rather than doctors' sons’?

(Williams/ Eagleton 2008)

18 April, 2020

‘Now’ (Inclusive) Universities Built on

Yesterday’s (Exclusive) Foundations

Hyper-modernisation of:

• Liquified globalisation

• Entrepreneurial, corporate, commercialised universities

• Digitisation

• Turbo-charged consuming, multitasking students.

Archaism of:

• Male dominance of leadership

• Gender inequalities and feminisation fears

• Unequal participation rates for different social groups.

18 April, 2020

The (Inclusive) University of the

Future Needs to...

Recover critical knowledge and be a think tank and policy driver.

Discover new conceptual grammars to include equalities, identities and affective domains.

Consider the collective/ public as well as the private benefits of knowledge/

HE.

Include more accountability on social inequalities.

• Contribute to wealth/ opportunity distribution as well as to wealth creation.

18 April, 2020

CHEER

ESRC Seminar Series:

‘Imagining the University of the

Future’ http://www.sussex.ac.uk/cheer/esrcseminars

Special issue of Contemporary Social

Science (Volume 6:2, 2011) entitled:

‘Challenge, Change or Crisis in Global

Higher Education?’

18 April, 2020

Download