Quantum Dots – Promise to practice Bala S. Manian www.qdots.com What are Quantum Dots Nanocrystals with extraordinary Optical Properties Like a molecular scale “LED” Engineer-able colors (infrared to blue) Compelling advantages over dyes – One color excitation – Large stokes shift – Highly stable –no photobleaching page 2 Physical Properties of Nanocrystals Qdot nanocrystals are highly fluorescent, molecular-sized semiconductor crystals 25nm CdSe Size: Tunable from ~2-10 nm (±3%) Structure: Highly crystalline page 3 Shells and Brightness A shell of a higher band-gap material (ZnS), produces a more stable and brighter structure S Zn S Zn S S Zn Zn S Zn Zn S S Zn Zn S S Zn Zn Zn S S Zn Zn S S S Zn Zn S S Zn S Zn Zn S S Zn Zn Zn S S Zn Zn S Zn S S Zn Zn S S Zn S Zn Zn S S Zn S Zn Zn S S Zn Cd S Zn Se S Zn Zn S Zn Se Zn S Cd Zn S Se Zn S Cd Zn Se Se Zn S Cd S Zn Se S Zn Cd S Zn Se Zn S Cd Cd S Zn Se Zn S Cd Zn Se Se Zn S Cd S Zn Se S Zn Cd S Zn Se Zn S Cd Cd S Zn Se Zn S Cd Zn Se Se Zn S Cd S Zn Se Se Zn Cd S Zn Se Zn S Cd Cd S Zn Se Zn S Cd Zn S Se Zn S Cd S Zn Se Se Zn Cd S Zn Se S Zn Cd S Zn Se Zn S Zn Zn S Se Zn S Zn Zn S S Zn Zn S Zn S S Zn Zn S Zn S S Zn Zn S S Zn S Zn Zn S S Zn S Zn Zn S S Zn Zn S Zn S S Zn Zn S S S Zn Zn S S Zn Zn Zn S S Zn Zn S S Zn Zn S S Zn Zn S S Zn S S Zn S Zn S S Emission Intensity (Normalized) Core and Core/Shell Emission Spectra Core/Shells 160 120 80 Cores 40 0 450 500 550 600 650 Wavelength (nm) page 4 700 750 S Fluorescence Band gap Absorption Valence Band Energy levels Radiationless decay Small Molecules page 5 Conduction Band Qdots® Have a Unique Electronic Structure Qdots Semiconductors Size Dependence Particle in a box (AU) Size Dependent Absorbance and Emission 2 1.8 1.6 1.4 1.2 1 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0 350 5.0 nm CdSe 2.2 nm CdSe 450 550 650 Wavelength (nm) L Eg ~ 1/L2 page 6 L Physical Properties of Qdots® • 100s to 1000s of atoms • 2-10 nm page 7 • Highly crystalline • Properties depend on size and material Optical properties of nanocrystals Ordinary light excites all color quantum dots. (Any light source “bluer” than the dot of interest works.) Quantum dots change color with size because additional energy is required to “confine” the semiconductor excitation to a smaller volume. page 8 Time controls size & size distribution X. G. Peng, J. Wickham, and A.. Alivisatos, J. Am.Chem. Soc. 120, pp. 5343-5344, 1998. Absorbance Photoluminescence Time (mins) Std.Dev(%) 240 injection injection 4 14 210 6 190 55 4 35 12 2 6 0 80 180 Time (minutes) 1 0.2 0 415 500 620 Wavelength (nm) page 9 Normalized PL Intensity 6 Absorbance (a.u.) Ave. Size (nm) 8 475 565 690 Wavelength (nm) Some problems with dye molecules in biology 1 Photochemical Instability Intensity 0.8 1 0.8 0.6 0.6 0.4 0.4 0.2 0.2 0 0 30 60 90 120 150 180 0 350 Red tail 400 O O O 450 500 550 N O Unique chemistries OH Fluorescein page 10 600 wavelength (nm) Time (sec) HO “Broad” Narrow Texas Red + N 650 Dyes Vs Qdots Fluorescein Narrow excitation Red tail Broad emission e ~ 80,000 M-1cm-1 Qdots® Broad excitation Symmetric emission Narrow emission e500 ~ 80,000 M-1cm-1 e350 ~ 400,000 M-1cm-1 page 11 Size- and Material-Dependent Optical Properties CdTe CdSe Normalized Intensity ZnSe 350 400 450 500 550 600 650 700 750 Emission Wavelength (nm) Excitation: ZnSe @ 290 nm, others 365 nm Material band-gap determines the emission range; particle size tunes the emission within the range Nanocrystal quantum yields are as high as 80% Narrow, symmetric emission spectra minimize overlap of adjacent colors page 12 Size Scale page 13 What is the “Promise” Many ‘sharp’ colors – Enables highly multiplexed analysis – Enables complex color bar-coding Brightness – High quantum yield Photostability – Integrate for longer to improve sensitivity – Much easier to use Size – Small enough to have minimal interference with biological binding events Single wavelength excitation – Simplified instrumentation page 14 Background of Quantum Dot Corp. Founded October, 1998 49 employees, 35 technical $38.5 million raised to date from VC syndicate Founding scientists – Paul Alivisatos, UC Berkeley; Moungi Bawendi, MIT; Shimon Weiss, LBL (now UCLA) Research collaborations – SmithKline Beecham, Genentech, Surromed – NIH, Carnegie Mellon, Cornell, Vanderbilt, U. Melbourne – Grants: NIST-ATP, SBIR page 15 Academic lab to Commercial products Application performance Production volume Shelf life/stability Manufacturing quality Cost page 16 Academic lab It worked in one test we published! It’ll be great in these other 10 things too! One graduate student can easily make a batch per week We use our material pretty much immediately We just use what we get. With a new batch of TOPO, it takes a while to get things working again. Well, the raw materials are very inexpensive Commercial product Works time and again in customers’ hands. Demonstrated advantages in applications. Sufficient to meet product needs, including QC. At least 6 months, and more depending on application. Ability to produce material within application-driven specifications. QC – measurement of quality The labor and capital costs are within range. The anatomy of a quantum dot bio-probe Core Nanocrystal Inorganic Shell Capping Group Organic coating Functionality Crosslinker and Biomolecule page 17 It is easier said (and published) than done! page 18 Areas re-designed and improved Core synthesis using Cd(II) v. Cd(0) precursors New polymer for water solubility and conjugation Core Nanocrystal Inorganic Shell Capping Group Organic coating Functionality Shell chemistry improved photostability page 19 Crosslinker and Biomolecule Different Precursors and Reactions Organometallic vs. Ionic Cadmium (CH3)2Cd Cd0 + C2H6 Cd2+ + 2RO- (evolves gas) Cd(OR)2 … + R3P=Se Ionic cadmium results in: Slower nucleation Faster growth A scaleable process A less chaotic process page 20 CdSe Cd(0) vs. Cd(II) synthesis Cd0 CdII Quantum Yield 35-45% 40-80% FWHM ~35nm <25nm Rxn. Scale (max.) 60ml at least 1L Rxn. Time (600nm) 3 hr. 10 min. Safety pyrophoric safe page 21 Batch reproducibility Emission Linewidth for Nanocrystals Synthesized via Two Different Processes Emission Linewidth 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 Old process New process 15 10 2000-2001 2001-2002 Batch page 22 Old process irreproducible (but we didn’t know until we tried) New process – higher performance and reproducibility Old v. new nanocrystal morphology Old Cd(0) core/shells •6.5 nm diameter •628 nm, 40 nm FWHM •35% quantum yield page 23 New Cd(II) core/shells 5.9 nm/10.9 nm dimensions 611 nm peak emission 22 nm FWHM 72% quantum yield Inorganic shell chemistry re-developed Core Nanocrystal Inorganic Shell Capping Group Organic coating Functionality Shell chemistry improved photostability page 24 Crosslinker and Biomolecule Dramatic photostability improvements Normalized Emission Intensity Relative Photo-stabilities of Red Core-Shell Nanocrystals under Deep UV Excitation 1 0.8 0.6 0.4 Standard Shell Mixed shell In Water 0.2 0 0 50 100 150 200 Time (s) page 25 New cores, shells, and water solubilization processes lead to big improvements in light-initiated decay Photostability Comparison Underlying quantum dot stability translates to a large difference in cell staining stability in a benchmarking test 0 min 1 min 2 min 3 min 2 min 3 min Texas Red 0 min 1 min 160-84 page 26 Organic coating and functionalization Core Nanocrystal New polymer for water solubility and conjugation Inorganic Shell Capping Group Organic coating Functionality Crosslinker and Biomolecule page 27 New chemistry – AMP strategy OH O octylamine modified poly-acrylic acid TOPO coated core-shell O OH O P NH NH O O O H N O N H H N H N H N OH O N H N H O O P O OH O O P O O O OH O P P HN OH O O HN O O O O O N H O O NH O N H H N O O P HO NH HN O O HO P O OH NH P O O O O O H N O P P O O OH O OH NH O HO O NH O HO O P NH HN O O O HO P O NH NH O O OH O P H N O O O OH H N OH O O O NH HN O OH HO N H O O HN HN HN OH O O O O O HO O O P O O P P conjugation adsorption OH O O O O OH NH HN O NH NH O O HO NH OH O H N OH O OH O HO O O N H N H P O N H H N O O P O O O P NH NH O O O O O OH O cross link O O O P OH O O P O O O O OH O P P HN OH HO HO O O O O O HO O HO page 28 O O N H O O O HO O N H H N O O P O N H H N H N H N HO P N H N H O H N HO O P O OH O P O O P O O P P O O O N H O OH O HO O P HO O O O H N O OH P O OH O NH OH O OH HO NH NH HN O NH O O H N O N H H N H N H N O O O O OH O O OH O HN O HN HN O NH HN O O O HO O HN O O H N OH O OH O O O OH HO HN N H O O HN HN O NH HN O O O HO O OH Non specific binding improvement Comparison of materials AMP-XL-PEG AMP-XL AMP dhla mua mpa maa 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 Counts, thousands Quantum yield normalized NSB signal on fixed permeabilized cells page 29 70 Specific intracellular staining of tubulin + SAv-Qdot nanocrystal + Goat anti-rabbit IgG-biotin + SAv-Qdot nanocrystal + Goat anti-rabbit IgG-biotin + Rabbit anti-tubulin NEGATIVE CONTROL Control page 30 SPECIFIC BINDING Consistent material improvements Quantum Yield in Organic/Water (%) Evolution of Quantum Yield Over Time 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 year page 31 Dramatic improvements have been made to all parts of the quantum dot technology These have translated into a robust, manufacturable technology, ready for commercialization The promise & challenge of nanotechnology Look at all of these things we can (or could) do. “Everything is a potential market for nanotechnology” BUT… Can we do any that can not be done any other way? page 32 Nanotechnology is not a market but it opens new market opportunities page 33 Products compete in their specific applications markets Nanotechnology can enable new features, improve efficiency and lower cost. Can Quantum dots not only compete against existing application-specific methodologies but give rise to new ones? Quantum dot as labels Incremental advantages Flow cytometry – Reduced system complexity – Multi-parameter labeling – Antigen density quantitation Microarray analysis (gene chips) – Improved sensitivity – Better reproducibility – Multiplexing Fluorescence microscopy market (cell analysis) – Better labels for confocal microscope – High sensitivity detection – Multi-parameter labeling page 34 Flow cytometry analysis Saturated intensity of qdots v. Alexa 488 and PerCP in FACScan cytometer 16000 14000 12000 10000 8000 6000 4000 2000 0 Dye Qdot now Qdot anticipated Green Red In collaboration with Bill Hyun, UCSF page 35 Flow Cytometers are not ideal platform for Qdots Multi-parameter measurements in simpler single excitation systems is the attraction. Static Cytometry »Laser Scan Capillary Sample Application Capillary with labeled cells Microarray/genechip analysis Quantum dot Cy-3 Improved sensitivity relative to industry-standard Cy3 and Cy5 dyes Sensitivity gains not realized on most existing scanners – Opportunity for new instrument platform page 38 Data courtesy of Mike Bittner, NIH Fluorescence microscopy analysis Sav-Alexa488 (100%) Sav-QdotTM Probe (425%) Data generated in collaboration with Genentech page 39 Big improvements in sensitivity, photostability and multianalyte detection ability Relatively small and fragmented market But, rapid growth in high information content drug screening applications Qdot Spectral Barcodes Wavelength n( m) Conventional barcodes line thickness and spacing give code Wavelength ( nm ) Qdot spectral codes - emission colors determine code. Can 'barcode' cells, beads, … Code using spectral information, spectral spacing, intensity,etc page 40 Number of codes increases exponentially Number of quantum dot colors used page 41 Binary (absent or present) Ternary (absent, low, or high) Quaternary (absent, low, medium, high) 1 2 3 4 2 4 9 16 3 8 27 64 4 16 81 256 5 32 243 1024 6 64 729 4096 7 128 2181 16384 Photostability and sensitivity also important attributes in this application Quantum dot coded microspheres 10,000 nm = 10 microns 10nm Different colored Qdot™ nanocrystals attached to the microsphere. Red Qdot™ nanocrystal labeled analyte binds to its partner on the microsphere. Ligand attached to the microsphere capable of binding its partner. page 42 Quantum dot ‘barcodes’ incorporated into beads Beads used in highly parallel biological assays The Qbead system HTS Beads Proteomics Genotyping Reader Platform The alternative to gene chip technology… page 43 Gene expression Applications Multiplexed SNP assays (with Glaxo SmithKline) Frequency of Blind Samples Q2 CYP1A1-T6235C Frequency of Blind Samples Q1 CYP1A1-A4889G Frequency of Blind Samples Q4 CYP2C18-T479C 60 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 50 40 30 Frequency 20 10 0. 02 5 0. 12 5 0. 22 5 0. 32 5 0. 42 5 0. 52 5 0. 62 5 0. 72 5 0. 82 5 0. 92 5 M or e Frequency of Blind Samples Q7 CYP2C8-C1479T Frequency of Blind Samples Q8 CYP2C8-G416A Frequency of Blind Samples Q6 CYP2C8-C1196T 20 15 Frequency 10 5 Frequency 0. 02 5 0. 12 5 0. 22 5 0. 32 5 0. 42 5 0. 52 5 0. 62 5 0. 72 5 0. 82 5 0. 92 5 M or e 0. 02 5 0. 12 5 0. 22 5 0. 32 5 0. 42 5 0. 52 5 0. 62 5 0. 72 5 0. 82 5 0. 92 5 M or e 0 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 Frequency of Blind Samples Q10 CYP2D6-C2938T 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 Frequency Blind Samples Q15 CYP3A5-T(-369)G Frequency Blind Samples Q13 CYP2D6-G4268C 30 25 60 25 20 50 20 15 40 15 Frequency Frequency 30 0. 02 5 0. 12 5 0. 22 5 0. 32 5 0. 42 5 0. 52 5 0. 62 5 0. 72 5 0. 82 5 0. 92 5 M or e 1 0.85 0.925 0.7 0.775 0.55 0.625 0.4 0 0.475 0 0.25 10 0.325 5 0 0.1 5 0.175 20 0.025 10 0. 02 5 0. 12 5 0. 22 5 0. 32 5 0. 42 5 0. 52 5 0. 62 5 0. 72 5 0. 82 5 0. 92 5 M or e 10 page 44 Frequency 0. 02 5 0. 12 5 0. 22 5 0. 32 5 0. 42 5 0. 52 5 0. 62 5 0. 72 5 0. 82 5 0. 92 5 M or e 25 Frequency 0. 02 5 0. 12 5 0. 22 5 0. 32 5 0. 42 5 0. 52 5 0. 62 5 0. 72 5 0. 82 5 0. 92 5 M or e 1 0. 02 5 0. 1 0. 17 5 0. 25 0. 32 5 0. 4 0. 47 5 0. 55 0. 62 5 0. 7 0. 77 5 0. 85 0. 92 5 0 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Frequency Multiplexed Assays Qbead liquid arrays allow for highly customizable genomic and proteomic assays 1 2 3 4 Lab in a test tube is the successor to gene/proteomic chips page 45 Qcell System Encoding/Detection Cells can be encoded in the same manner as beads and then sensitively detected and decoded by imaging Encode, Mix, Assay, Decode. Assays probe cellular functions BEYOND binding page 46 Qcell Codes 7 Normalized Codes (4 colors) Green Green 529nm Red & Orange 30 30 25 25 20 20 15 15 10 10 5 Red Red++ Orange Orange 5 0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 1 18 -5 2 3 4 5 6 Chartreuse 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 Red & Chartruese 35 Yellow-Green 569nm 7 -5 20 30 Red Red++ Chartreuse Yellow-Green 15 25 20 10 15 10 5 5 0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 1 18 -5 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 -5 Orange Orange & Green 40 25 35 20 Orange 612nm Orange Orange++ Green Green 30 25 15 20 10 15 10 5 5 0 0 -5 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 -5 Red 30 25 Red 630nm 20 15 10 5 0 1 -5 page 47 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 3-plex Ca2+ Assay Using Encoded Cells CHO cells (unencoded) Uninduced Orange 610 nm M1 Muscarinic Red 620 nm β2-Adrenergic Induced ( +Carbachol) Intensity (Fluo-3) Calcium Response of Qcell Assay 160 140 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 M1-Muscarinic B2-Adrenergic CHO Cell-type (based on code) page 48 Many different product opportunities in many different markets Quantum dot labels – Microarray labeling, microscopy, flow cytometry, and others – In vitro diagnostic tests – Others… Qbead system – Gene expression, protein profiling, SNP analysis, diagnostics. – Others… Qcell system – Drug specificity screening – Toxicology, others Non-biological applications – Security inks and color coding – Opto-electronics – Others… page 49 Promise reduced to Practice Innovations in the areas of inorganic and organic chemistry as well as in material science have made quantum dot application in life science a reality. Quantum dots use have been demonstrated as: – Fluorescent labels – Encoding beads for genomic and proteomic applications – Encoding cells to permit multiplexed cell function assays page 50 Where is the Killer apps? How is this innovation process unfolds? page 51 Conclusions Dramatic performance improvements seen over the past 2 years – Manufacturing of many quantum dot colors is at required scale and high quality page 52 Highly competitive in rapid-growth biological assays marketplace Many different business opportunities will allow significant QDC products, and partnerships leading to the new and exciting applications Acknowledgements Chemistry: Surface Chemistry Group Marcel Bruchez, Ed Adams, Bei Li, Jianquan Liu, Thearith Ung, Yanzheng Xu, Linh Nguyen, Kari Haley, Christopher Ng Nanocrystal Group Joe Treadway, Don Zehnder, Jeff Larson, Anh Truong, Mihai Buretea, Marc Schrier Biology: Cellular Imaging Group/Qbead™ Assays Xingyong Wu, Hongjian Liu, Hugh Daniels / Hongxia Xu, Mike Sha, Janet Uphoff, Edith Wong Cell Encoding Group Larry Mattheakis, Yun-Jung Choi, Jing Gong, Jennifer Diaz Engineering: Qbead™ Detection page 53 Jian Jin, Huayong Yong, Will Molenkamp Research Collaborations Pharma: GlaxoSmithKline, Genentech Academic: NIH, Novartis Institute, Carnegie Mellon, Cornell University, Vanderbilt University Federal: NIST-ATP, SBIR page 54