4/16/2020
By Zeina Nehme
1
Variables Used:
V740-Marriage Arrangement
V743-Attitude Towards Divorce
V744-Frequency of Divorce
Arranged Marriages result in low divorce rate, hence the attitudes towards divorce are disapproved and the frequency of divorce is uncommon.
4/16/2020 2
To test the hypothesis, I used Cross-
Tabulations with correlations and statistical significance.
I also researched authors who have coded these variables and they are:
Goody, Rosenblatt, Schlegel,
Coppinger, Eloul, etc…
4/16/2020 3
Count
Table 1a
Cross-tab of Marriage Arrangement & Attitudes Towards
Divorce.
Crosstab
V743
V740 1 Selects and courts partner autonomous ly: approval not needed
2 Selects partner parental, kin approval needed
3 Suggests partner to parents ,is approved arrangements proceed
4 Individual choice & arranged marriages are alternatives
5 Parents choose partner: individual can object
6 Parents choose partner: individual cannot eas ily object
1 Expected, accepted, tolerated, not dis approved
3
2
1
1
2 Mildly dis approved attempts by other to reconcile couple
2
1
4
2
2
3 Approved if reasons are considered jus itified
1
2
2
2
4 Expected, accepted, tolerated, not dis approved in 1st years
1
5
1
5 Strongly dis approved, stigma attached to divorce
1
7 11 7 7 1
Total
12
2
2
8
6
3
Table 1b
Symmetric Measures for the results from Table 1a
Symmetric Measures
Ordinal by Ordinal
N of Valid Cases
Kendall's tau-b
Value
-.248
33
As ymp.
Std. Error a
.139
Approx. T a. Not as suming the null hypothesis.
b. Us ing the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.
-1.782
b
Approx. Sig.
.075
4/16/2020 5
Count
Table 2a
Cross-tab of Marriage Arrangement & Frequency of Divorce.
Crosstab
1 Universal or almost univers al
2 Common, frequent, not uncommon
1 2
V744
3 Moderate: a s mall minority of couples divorce
4 Frequent in first years of marriage and before children
1
5 Rare, isolated ins tances, never Total
V740 1 Selects and courts partner autonomous ly: approval not needed
2 Selects partner parental, kin approval needed
3 Suggests partner to parents ,is approved arrangements proceed
4 Individual choice & arranged marriages are alternatives
5 Parents choose partner: individual can object
6 Parents choose partner: individual cannot eas ily object
3
1
5
9
3
2
2
18
2
3
2
1
8
2
1
1
2
7
2
1
2
5
4
18
1
8
8
4
6
43
Table 2b
Symmetric Measures for the results from Table 2a
Symmetric Measures
Ordinal by Ordinal
N of Valid Cases
Kendall's tau-b
Value
.170
43
As ymp.
Std. Error a
.130
Approx. T a. Not as suming the null hypothesis.
b. Us ing the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.
1.320
b
Approx. Sig.
.187
4/16/2020 7
I reject the null hypothesis when I test it with the attitudes of divorce variable
Divorce attitudes are stricter in societies where individuals select their partner as we can see in tables 1a & 1b. Therefore this proves my hypothesis wrong
The correlation is a negative slope.
P value is significant at .075
4/16/2020 8
However, I accept the null hypothesis when I test it with the frequency of divorce variable
Frequency of Divorce is more in societies where individuals select their partners and less in arranged marriage societies.
The correlation is positive in this case
P value is significant at .187
4/16/2020 9
The correlations of arranged marriage with attitudes towards divorce are opposite to those with frequency of divorce (behavior).
With a larger sample size, the standard error will be smaller, making the results more significant especially in the second case where frequency of divorce was tested and the p value is at .187, a larger sample would have reduced that value making it more significant. Whether a larger sample would produce significance would require testing with a larger sample.
4/16/2020 10
Bell, Robert R. “Marriage and Family
Interaction”. Illinois: The Dorsey Press,
1971.
Blood, Robert O. Jr. and Donald M.
Wolfe. “Husbands and Wives the
Dynamics of Married Living.” Illinois:
The Free Press of Glencoe, 1960.
4/16/2020 11
Goody, Jack. "Comparative Studies in
Kinship". Stanford: Stanford University Press,
1969.
Coppinger, Robert M. and Paul C.
Rosenblatt. “Romantic Love and Subsistence dependence of Spouses.” Southwestern
Journal of Anthropology: vol. 24, no.3, p.310-
319. Albuquerque, 1968.
4/16/2020 12
Goody, Jack. ed. "The Character of Kinship".
London/New York: Cambridge University
Press, 1973.
Goody, Jack. and S.J. Tambiah. eds.
"Bridewealth and Dowry". New York:
Cambridge University Press, 1973.
Rheinstein, Max. “Marriage Stability, Divorce, and the Law.” Chicago: The University of
Chicago Press, 1972.
4/16/2020 13
Rosenblatt, Paul C. “Marital Residence and the Function of Romantic Love.” Ethnology: vol. VI, no.4, p.471-480. Pittsburgh, 1967.
Schlegel, Alice and Rohn Eloul. “Marriage
Transactions: Labor, Property, Status.”
American Anthropologist: vol. 90, no.2, p.291-
309. Washington D.C., 1988.
4/16/2020 14