Marriage Arrangement & Divorce By Zeina Nehme 6/27/2016

advertisement

4/16/2020

Marriage Arrangement

& Divorce

By Zeina Nehme

1

Hypothesis

Variables Used:

 V740-Marriage Arrangement

 V743-Attitude Towards Divorce

 V744-Frequency of Divorce

Arranged Marriages result in low divorce rate, hence the attitudes towards divorce are disapproved and the frequency of divorce is uncommon.

4/16/2020 2

Hypothesis (cont’d)

To test the hypothesis, I used Cross-

Tabulations with correlations and statistical significance.

I also researched authors who have coded these variables and they are:

Goody, Rosenblatt, Schlegel,

Coppinger, Eloul, etc…

4/16/2020 3

Count

Tables

Table 1a

 Cross-tab of Marriage Arrangement & Attitudes Towards

Divorce.

Crosstab

V743

V740 1 Selects and courts partner autonomous ly: approval not needed

2 Selects partner parental, kin approval needed

3 Suggests partner to parents ,is approved arrangements proceed

4 Individual choice & arranged marriages are alternatives

5 Parents choose partner: individual can object

6 Parents choose partner: individual cannot eas ily object

1 Expected, accepted, tolerated, not dis approved

3

2

1

1

2 Mildly dis approved attempts by other to reconcile couple

2

1

4

2

2

3 Approved if reasons are considered jus itified

1

2

2

2

4 Expected, accepted, tolerated, not dis approved in 1st years

1

5

1

5 Strongly dis approved, stigma attached to divorce

1

7 11 7 7 1

Total

12

2

2

8

6

3

Tables (cont’d)

Table 1b

 Symmetric Measures for the results from Table 1a

Symmetric Measures

Ordinal by Ordinal

N of Valid Cases

Kendall's tau-b

Value

-.248

33

As ymp.

Std. Error a

.139

Approx. T a. Not as suming the null hypothesis.

b. Us ing the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

-1.782

b

Approx. Sig.

.075

4/16/2020 5

Count

Tables (cont’d)

Table 2a

 Cross-tab of Marriage Arrangement & Frequency of Divorce.

Crosstab

1 Universal or almost univers al

2 Common, frequent, not uncommon

1 2

V744

3 Moderate: a s mall minority of couples divorce

4 Frequent in first years of marriage and before children

1

5 Rare, isolated ins tances, never Total

V740 1 Selects and courts partner autonomous ly: approval not needed

2 Selects partner parental, kin approval needed

3 Suggests partner to parents ,is approved arrangements proceed

4 Individual choice & arranged marriages are alternatives

5 Parents choose partner: individual can object

6 Parents choose partner: individual cannot eas ily object

3

1

5

9

3

2

2

18

2

3

2

1

8

2

1

1

2

7

2

1

2

5

4

18

1

8

8

4

6

43

Tables (cont’d)

Table 2b

 Symmetric Measures for the results from Table 2a

Symmetric Measures

Ordinal by Ordinal

N of Valid Cases

Kendall's tau-b

Value

.170

43

As ymp.

Std. Error a

.130

Approx. T a. Not as suming the null hypothesis.

b. Us ing the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

1.320

b

Approx. Sig.

.187

4/16/2020 7

Results

I reject the null hypothesis when I test it with the attitudes of divorce variable

 Divorce attitudes are stricter in societies where individuals select their partner as we can see in tables 1a & 1b. Therefore this proves my hypothesis wrong

 The correlation is a negative slope.

 P value is significant at .075

4/16/2020 8

Results (cont’d)

However, I accept the null hypothesis when I test it with the frequency of divorce variable

 Frequency of Divorce is more in societies where individuals select their partners and less in arranged marriage societies.

 The correlation is positive in this case

 P value is significant at .187

4/16/2020 9

Conclusion

The correlations of arranged marriage with attitudes towards divorce are opposite to those with frequency of divorce (behavior).

With a larger sample size, the standard error will be smaller, making the results more significant especially in the second case where frequency of divorce was tested and the p value is at .187, a larger sample would have reduced that value making it more significant. Whether a larger sample would produce significance would require testing with a larger sample.

4/16/2020 10

References

Bell, Robert R. “Marriage and Family

Interaction”. Illinois: The Dorsey Press,

1971.

Blood, Robert O. Jr. and Donald M.

Wolfe. “Husbands and Wives the

Dynamics of Married Living.” Illinois:

The Free Press of Glencoe, 1960.

4/16/2020 11

References (cont’d)

Goody, Jack. "Comparative Studies in

Kinship". Stanford: Stanford University Press,

1969.

Coppinger, Robert M. and Paul C.

Rosenblatt. “Romantic Love and Subsistence dependence of Spouses.” Southwestern

Journal of Anthropology: vol. 24, no.3, p.310-

319. Albuquerque, 1968.

4/16/2020 12

References (cont’d)

Goody, Jack. ed. "The Character of Kinship".

London/New York: Cambridge University

Press, 1973.

Goody, Jack. and S.J. Tambiah. eds.

"Bridewealth and Dowry". New York:

Cambridge University Press, 1973.

Rheinstein, Max. “Marriage Stability, Divorce, and the Law.” Chicago: The University of

Chicago Press, 1972.

4/16/2020 13

References (cont’d)

Rosenblatt, Paul C. “Marital Residence and the Function of Romantic Love.” Ethnology: vol. VI, no.4, p.471-480. Pittsburgh, 1967.

Schlegel, Alice and Rohn Eloul. “Marriage

Transactions: Labor, Property, Status.”

American Anthropologist: vol. 90, no.2, p.291-

309. Washington D.C., 1988.

4/16/2020 14

Download