Write a review-II Revise your review from the assignment “Write a review-I” now that you have more polymer knowledge under your belt. You will again be graded according to: Constructiveness of the comments—do they help the writer? Fairness of the conclusions—based on your comments, did you select an appropriate “thumbs-up” or “thumbs-down” box, make good recommendations, etc.? Logic—did you find appropriate fault with the manuscript and present your case in a clear, concise, organized fashion? Mechanics—how correct are your grammar, spelling, indentations? Style—did you manage to use words, figures, etc. effectively, in a memorable way? In addition, provide a well-written, concise one-page essay delineating what you learned from the manuscript (or proposal) reviewing process. Your document should include a self-assessment of the improvements you made since Write a Review-I and any other observations about the reviewing process. Grading will be based on: Organization Clarity Conciseness Thematic coherence (statement, exposition, close-the-loop) Mechanics Style