Foreign Policy Majoritarian Politics Foreign Policy perceived to provide widespread benefits by imposing widespread costs (in this scenario, president dominates with support from public Ex: Military Conflicts/Wars Military Alliances (NATO) Strategic Arms Limitations (SALT) Foreign Policy: Historical Context & World Views Distinct eras in the evolution of American foreign policy: Isolationism World Power Super Power Post Cold-War Post 9/11 Era (Pre- WWI) (Pre- WWII) (Post- WWII) (Following Fall of Soviet Union) (Sept. 2001) Foreign Policy and Public Opinion Usually formed by public and elite opinion (State/NSC) Support for “active” involvement persisted until Vietnam Public however tends to support President in “rally around the flag” effect (usually occurs in crises situations) Military casualties often leads to increased division in public opinion Elites tend to be more “internationalist” in nature 4 Historical World Views Four worldviews: a. Isolationism paradigm (WWI) - 20’s-30’s b. Containment paradigm (Cold War) 40’s-60’s c. Disengagement (Vietnam) paradigm 70’s - ? d. Human Rights (post WWII) paradigm, (applied unevenly ie., Europe not Africa) 4. New paradigm : War on terror Should the U.S. act unilaterally or with a broad coalition? (Bush Doctrine—Pre-emptive Strikes) Isolationism v. New Global Strategy Hot Wars replaced by “limited” action events (exception is Iraq; 2003)----”flexible response” Global Economics has U.S. flying flag all over the globe Strategies Vary Economic Sanctions (isolate the bad guys, e.g., Cuba, Russia) Nuclear Proliferation Build a Defense System (in Europe; opposed by Russians) Nuclear Treaties (NPT) N. Korea, Iran, Libya (prevention) Makers of Foreign Policy: Cooperation or Competition 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Constitution creates an “invitation to struggle” for the president and Congress on war powers President is the commander in chief but Congress appropriates the money President appoints ambassadors but Senate confirms them President negotiates treaties but the Senate must ratify them with a two-thirds vote Only Congress can regulate commerce with other nations and declare war But Americans think that the president is in charge and history confirms that belief Presidential Responsibility Support within the executive branch Sec.of State: Official responsible for foreign affairs Other cabinet officials: Commerce, Treasury, Defense, Agriculture all affected by foreign affairs National Security Council (NSC) Coordinates policy Members include Pres./V.P./Sec. Of State/Sec. Of Defense/CIA Chief/National Security Advisor Advisor has emerged as key player (e.g., Kissinger as Nixon’s advisor); loyalty not divided between President and cabinet; like the secretary of state Other Executive Branch Support Dept. of Homeland Security State Department: responsible for day to day management of foreign policy U.S. Information Agency: Radio Free Europe (P.R.) Director of National Intelligence: oversees 15 intelligence agencies CIA (created in 1947 to monitor Soviets) Functions: gather and evaluate intelligence (info on other nations) Covert operations (gov’t secrecy in democracy?) Intelligence oversight committees 9/11 renewed call for more effective CIA NSA: cryptologic and surveillance org. Influence on Foreign Policy Public Opinion Interest Groups Mass public unaware of foreign policy ~75% Opinion makers influence two publics “Think Tanks” (e.g., Council on Foreign Affairs) Ethnic Organizations (e.g., American-Israeli PAC) Foreign Nations’ Lobbyists Political Parties Tradition has been for U.S. to have “bipartisan” foreign policy (“Politics end at the water’s edge”)-----Only exception (Iraq War) Congressional Influence Congressional Checks (funding, war declaration, treaty ratification, approval of appointments; Senate Foreign Relations Committee) Trend in 20th C. to defer to President (w/ notable exceptions) Blockage of Treaty of Versailles Neutrality Acts of 1930’s Fulbright Hearings on Viet Nam War War Powers Act (1973) Opposition to Gulf War Rejection of Test Ban Treaty in 1999 Criticism of giving China MFN status Criticism of Bush security measures following 9/11 Increasing criticism of Iraq war policy (2006); deadline for withdraw