IMS FOCUS Group Raffaele De Peppe (Telecom Italia) © GSMA 2012 All GSMA meetings are conducted in full compliance with the GSMA’s anti-trust compliance policy GSMA IMS GS S Focus ocus G Group oup IMS is an increasingly important technology across all of telecoms – – Increased activity in GSMA WG’s WG s also shows the need for renewed focus on IMS. – – – – Many Fixed line operators have IMS networks Mobile operators are headed towards IMS as a result of RCS and VoLTE. IREG – VoLTE, VoHSPA, SR-VCC guidelines, Video over LTE. CPWP – IMS service i identification id tifi ti work, k LS exchange h with ith 3GPP 3GPP. IWG work on VoLTE commercial/business models and charging principles and subsequent work between IREG and 3GPP (RAVEL work item). RCS project. GSMA’s IMS activities are connected but in a limited way – need to have a consolidated and unified view of: – – – Why IMS is needed, and what it enables within GSMA context. What IMS could enable in the future – services, business opportunities… H How GSMA goes about b t ffostering t i innovation i ti and d an ecosystem. t 2 CONFIDENTIAL – BSC Doc 54_03 2 Mission of the IMS Focus Group 1. 2. 3. 4. To enable the Vision of an IMS-based future through following steps: Id tif requirements Identify i t tto b be mett tto enable bl IMS IMS-based b d services i tto deliver d li business models that foster competition – Consumer, interconnect and roaming g requirements q to shape p a carrier grade IMS reference architecture Focus on Service Innovation – new services and exposure of IMSbased services to 3rd Party developers developers. – New service ideas to be brainstormed within the Group; – scope setting g for IMS API Define a functional IMS Reference architecture, to provide the framework within which all current and future GSMA IMS work will exist – To be completed within the Focus Group – Will cover QoS/Policy Control and evolution from/integration with existing network and services Terminals implementation focus – Scope setting 3 CONFIDENTIAL – BSC Doc 54_03 Market a et Trends e ds a and d Business us ess Drivers e s ((1/2) / ) F d Fundamental t l shifts hift iin th the iindustry d t – – – Voice -> data for traffic dominance and revenue stream (although voice/SMS revenue still higher than data). TDM -> IP as technical basis for networks; SS7 evolution stops and IMS replaces this. Capability to deliver more than ‘just voice and text’ yet still have interoperable, ecosystem-creating services. Operator delivered services -> Applications as consumer service model, although Operator role is still to provide services that require high availability and reliability, and to provide connectivity for Applications to use. Applications that replicate and/or enhance operator services cause greatest disruption – VoIP, Messaging, Social Media, Enterprise applications all emerging from 3rd Party App community 4 CONFIDENTIAL – BSC Doc 54_03 Market a et Trends e ds a and d Business us ess Drivers e s ((2/2) / ) Challenge for operators has been understood for some time – IMS can enable this – – Harness the diversity and creativity of the App Developer community without exposing themselves to the associated risks Maintain the operator values of interoperability, availability, connectivity, ecosystem Expose operator ‘services’ services as ‘capabilities’ capabilities to application developers – why create your own IM component of an App if operators can include you in their wider service? Operators need to focus on the traditional value statements and not replicate or diverge in service implementation, then expose this value to app developers – interworking principles; roaming principles; charging principles; Naming conventions; interworking and compatibility with legacy; Service provisioning on handsets; Single subscription for multiple devices; exposure off APIs API 5 CONFIDENTIAL – BSC Doc 54_03 IMS S Quest Questionnaire o a e Distributed to GSMA asking about current and planned IMS deployments – – – Questions on the company characteristics Option to answer either as a company with current IMS deployment or with future plans Questions on architecture and services to be deployed deployed. 12 responses p – range g of g geographic g p focus,, size of company. p y 4 mobile only, 8 multiple access (mostly fixed and mobile) Spread of sizes from 10M subs to >100M 6 CONFIDENTIAL – BSC Doc 54_03 Service Se ce Innovation o at o ((1/2) / ) ‘E t ‘Extensively i l St Standardised d di d S Services’ i ’ – those th already l d b being i worked k d on – Innovative Services – new areas of p possible focus – – – VoLTE, Video over LTE, VoHSPA, RCS Unified Communications or ICT Integration Services – includes the ‘Enterprise Communication Suite’, and models like Rogers’ OneNumber. Social TV - covers both TV-based clients and device based interaction with TV content. Gaming, IMS-based eHealth, in-App IMS interactivity also considered. considered Much of the work from the ‘Extensively Standardised Services’ fulfils requirements for Innovative Services. – No need to invent new voice, IM, Video etc. capabilities. 7 CONFIDENTIAL – BSC Doc 54_03 Service Se ce Innovation o at o ((2/2) / ) E Exposure off IMS-based IMS b d capabilities biliti via i an API – – IMS API could be an extension of on-going RCS API work Re-use OMA RESTful API When defining new services or capabilities, key areas of specification are identified – – – – Description of the service – to ensure that re-use of existing capability is identified early. Billable events – so that the service can be charged for as the operator and/or market determines Terminal/User Agent impacts – what the device needs to support Technical interface definitions – User-Network, Network-Network and Roaming Interface requirements. 8 CONFIDENTIAL – BSC Doc 54_03 Reference e e e ce Architecture c tectu e ((1/2) / ) A hit t Architecture to t supportt key k requirements i t from f previous i chapters h t – – – – – – – – – Consistently implementable service-specific UNI Consistently implementable service-specific NNI Consistently implementable service-specific Roaming interfaces Access agnostic requirements to enable Fixed Mobile Convergence for relevant services. QoS and Policy enforcement capabilities. Service identification C Capability bilit tto charge h ffor services i Interface for exposure of IMS service capabilities to third Party developers. Security of using IMS services. 9 CONFIDENTIAL – BSC Doc 54_03 Reference e e e ce Architecture c tectu e ((2/2) / ) 3rd Party Applications (HSS, P/I/S-CSCF, MGCF+MGW. MRFC+MRFP) Ch i IInterfaces Charging t f 10 CONFIDENTIAL – BSC Doc 54_03 Interconnec ct IMS Elements El t Po olicy/QoS (Voice, Video Telephony, IM, Capability Exchange, Video Share, Image Share, other services from Chapter 3, …) ISBC Application Servers ASBC A Policy/QoS Accesss Interfa ace User Equipment IMS API Wholesale o esa e IMS S opt option o Local networks Centralised network 3rd Party Applications (HSS, P/I/S-CSCF, MGCF+MGW. MRFC+MRFP) Charging Interfaces L Local l and dC Central t l Billi Billing elements l t 11 CONFIDENTIAL – BSC Doc 54_03 Interc connect IMS Elements Polic cy/QoS (Voice, Video Telephony, IM, Capability Exchange, Video Share, Image Share, other services from Chapter 3, …) IS SBC A li ti S Application Servers ASBC Polic cy/QoS Accesss Interface User Equipmentt IMS API Conclusions Co c us o s Shift in attitude to IMS due to – – – Growing role of IMS in fixed network, where fixed and mobile access are present and so could be used for mobile too. Discontinuity in voice and SMS service delivery created by the implementation of LTE networks. Need to implement new person-to-person services, to offer similar service experience to OTT, but with the added value of interoperability, full reachability and security. On this basis, need to look at what IMS could offer if used more broadly. broadly – – – Understand the need to innovate in the service space building on operator values around interoperability and interconnect expose services to 3rd party app developers via an API Need an industry wide set of principles and technologies to enable this 12 CONFIDENTIAL – BSC Doc 54_03