Adapting Basing and Facilities Ashore
to Energy Challenges
RDML David Boone, Director, CNO Shore Readiness Division (Moderator)
CAPT Hugh Hemstreet, Commander NAVFAC Washington
Jeffrey Johnson, Chief Information Officer for Naval District Washington
Dr. William Waugaman, National Labs Liaison, NORAD & USNORTHCOM
Distribution Statement A: Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited.
2011 Climate & Energy Symposium
Navy Shore Energy Program
The Right Technology
at the Right Time
- Watch
- Partner
- Lead
Energy Security:
- Redundancy
- Resiliency
- Reliability
Navy
Energy Culture
Transform Navy From
Culture of Consumption to
Culture of Conservation
Through Transparency
and Accountability
ENERGY
SECURITY &
COMPLIANCE
Renewable Energy
& Sustainability
Energy
Efficiency First
Energy Efficiency
“Compliance” is unique to the Shore
2
Navy Shore Energy Program
Navy
Energy Culture
ENERGY
SECURITY &
COMPLIANCE
Renewable Energy
& Sustainability
Energy Efficiency
The Foundation: Secure, Integrated Enabling Systems (NDW Pilot)
Secure Integration of
Legacy Systems with
Advanced Metering
Energy Billing/Reporting Systems
Facilities Management Systems
Real-time Energy
Decision Support
3
Navy Shore Energy Program
Navy
Energy Culture
Navy Smart Energy Concept
of Operations (CONOPS)
Developed from NDW Pilot to
inform Navy-wide deployment
Infrastructure Change
- Maintenance Action
- Prioritized Energy RECAP
Culture Change
- Operations
- Behavior
ENERGY
SECURITY &
COMPLIANCE
Renewable Energy
& Sustainability
Energy Efficiency
The Foundation: Secure, Integrated Enabling Systems (NDW Pilot)
Secure Integration of
Legacy Systems with
Advanced Metering
Energy Billing/Reporting Systems
Facilities Management Systems
Real-time Energy
Decision Support
4
Navy Shore Energy Program
Utility Interface and Future National
Smart Grid
“SPIDERS” (Smart Power Infrastructure
Demonstration for Energy
Reliability and Security)
Electric Grid Cyber-security
Smart Grid Technologies
Secure Micro-Grid
Integration of Renewables
Demand-Side Management
Redundant Back-up Power
Navy
Energy Culture
Navy Smart Energy Concept
of Operations (CONOPS)
Developed from NDW Pilot to
inform Navy-wide deployment
Infrastructure Change
- Maintenance Action
- Prioritized Energy RECAP
Culture Change
- Operations
- Behavior
ENERGY
SECURITY &
COMPLIANCE
Renewable Energy
& Sustainability
Energy Efficiency
The Foundation: Secure, Integrated Enabling Systems (NDW Pilot)
Secure Integration of
Legacy Systems with
Advanced Metering
Energy Billing/Reporting Systems
Facilities Management Systems
Real-time Energy
Decision Support
5
Navy Shore Energy Program
Navy
Energy Culture
ENERGY
SECURITY &
COMPLIANCE
Renewable Energy
& Sustainability
Energy Efficiency
The Foundation: Secure, Integrated Enabling Systems (NDW Pilot)
Secure Integration of
Legacy Systems with
Advanced Metering
Energy Billing/Reporting Systems
Facilities Management Systems
Real-time Energy
Decision Support
6
Navy Smart Grid Pilot Naval District
Washington
Industrial Controls Systems Integration with
Critical Infrastructure Monitoring
30 MAR 2011
Jeffrey M. Johnson
NDW Command Information Officer (N6)
Discover, Certify, Accredit, Connect…
! Metering (AMI and Legacy)
! CIRCUITS (billing and reporting)
! DDC
! SCADA
Legacy Industrial Control
Systems (ICS)
! Facilities Management Systems
! GIS Systems
Secure integration of systems to provide transparency
Enabling - Command & Control, Emergency and Security Management, Data
Management, Energy Management)
8
NAVFAC WASHINGTON
Navy Advanced Metering (AMI) Program
9
NAVFAC WASHINGTON
Enterprise Industrial Controls Systems (ICS)
Mission
• Develop a centralized energy monitoring
capability which integrates DDC & SCADA
systems in support of Region Energy
Reduction Initiatives
• Develop an EICS model scalable for Navy
enterprise-wide deployment
PSNet
Capabilities
• Integrated EICS solutions
• Critical Infrastructure Monitoring using the Virtual Perimeter Monitoring System (VPMSTM)
EICS Subsystems
• Wireless Mesh Network
• “PSNET” Network Interface & Firewall
• Networked Programmable Logic Controller (PLC)
• Legacy DDC PLCs and Secondary Controllers
• EICS Management Server & Graphical User Interface
10
NAVFAC WASHINGTON
Secure ICS Architecture
Regional Monitoring Center
PSNET LAN
Installation Monitoring Center
PSNET LAN
11
NAVFAC WASHINGTON
System Capability Vignette
12
NAVFAC WASHINGTON
Device Page Example – AHUs
13
NAVFAC WASHINGTON
Device Page Example - Chillers
14
NAVFAC WASHINGTON
Alarm Console Example
15
NAVFAC WASHINGTON
Navy Shore Energy Program
Navy
Energy Culture
Navy Smart Energy Concept
of Operations (CONOPS)
Developed from NDW Pilot to
inform Navy-wide deployment
Infrastructure Change
- Maintenance Action
- Prioritized Energy RECAP
Culture Change
- Operations
- Behavior
ENERGY
SECURITY &
COMPLIANCE
Renewable Energy
& Sustainability
Energy Efficiency
The Foundation: Secure, Integrated Enabling Systems (NDW Pilot)
Secure Integration of
Legacy Systems with
Advanced Metering
Energy Billing/Reporting Systems
Facilities Management Systems
Real-time Energy
Decision Support
16
ACTIVITY NAME
Naval District Washington
SmartEnergy CONOPS
Presented By: Captain Hugh Hemstreet
CO NAVFAC Washington
March 30, 2011
3/31/11
NAVFAC Washington Energy Initiatives
SmartEnergy
CONOPS
Tying it all together
18
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
NDW Energy Vision
NDW AMI Project
NDW DDC/SCADA Initiative
ARRA PV Project
NFESC Energy Audit Contract
Demand Response Program
FY10 ESPC/UESC Projects (Planned
Awards)
8. FY10/11 ESPC/UESC Projects
(Preliminary Audits)
9. Revised UEM Core Organization
10. Energy Manager/REM Plan
11. Utility Energy Project Rebates
NAVFAC WASHINGTON
3/31/11
NDW SmartEnergy CONOPS
OBJECTIVES
• Reduce energy costs without impacting mission (also reduces
energy consumption)
• Reduce O&M costs without impacting mission
• Change operational behavior regarding energy to allow
transparent decisions regarding energy-saving opportunities
ACTION AREAS
1. Manage Facilities to as-Designed Condition
2. Indentify Energy Efficiency Upgrades
3. Generate Stakeholder Metrics that Change Behavior
4. Enhanced Demand Response
5. Networked SCADA (Supervisor Control and Data
Acquisition)
19
NAVFAC WASHINGTON
3/31/11
Integration of SmartEnergy System with
NAVFAC Databases
• Monthly electric
meter data – kW/
kWh/p.f.
• HDD/CDD
• 24 hr weather
• 72 hr weather
• DR Signal
Data Warehouse
Raw Data
Other
External
Data
• Facility condition,
deficiencies, costs, priorities
• Construction features per
facility
Maximo
EE Opportunity
• Maintenance planning
• Work order management
• Work order trends
Awareness
• Floor Plans
• EUI Metrics by
bldg #
Demand Response
• GIS data for facilities
• Floor plans
• Facility footprint
• Primary bldg enduse
Being migrated to CIRCUITS . . .
DRRS
FRES
CUBIC
• Utility invoices by meter
• Utility usage by meter
• Energy cons per facility
• Facility score – capability,
condition, capacity
Note: See additional database detail in Appendix
Data warehouse may be housed within CIRCUITS
20
RSIMS
SCADA
Not directly used . . .
FCAP
CIRCUITS
• Invoice approval and
processing
• Utility invoices by meter
• Utility usage
• Work Orders
• WO Trends
Operations
• NAVFAC
Energy Prices
• Utility commodity
prices
• Future prices
from NIST 135
• Meter/building #
NAVFAC WASHINGTON
DUERS
• Energy consumption per
Base
• Commodity cost
• By aggregated unit
iNFADS
• Primary source for utility
data
• Footprint, allocation,
characteristics
Example: SmartEnergy Data Analytics
Dahlgren Peak Electricity Demand
Opportunities to
reduce?
Is NEX commissary
unusually high?
AVG = 101.2
AVG = 14.6
AVG = 48.1
AVG = 23.4
95%
Percent of Peak Load
(by Metered Building kWh/ft2 – FY2010)
tics
y
l
a
n
le A trative
p
m
Sa r Illus
ses
– fo rpo100%
Pu
90%
85%
80%
75%
70%
60%
1
21
Reduce on
weekends?
Reduce at
night?
65%
7
Admin/Other
(as Percentage of Seasonal Peak Demand)
(Summer Months - June '09 - June '10)
Comp
Intensive
MWR and
Support
General RDT&E
NAVFAC WASHINGTON
3
Day of We
5
'#"
&" '!"
%"
$"
7
!" #"
ek (Mon =
1)
'&"
'$" '%"
#!" ##"
$1.0
$0.0
Nov 2010
FY07
2nd Qtr
FY08
500,000
Actual Rolling 12-month Utility Cost
$5.0M
Total FY10 Utility Budget
$5.5M
3,000,000 kWh
Monthly Electric Cost
$300,000
Bldg #
22
FY05 FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09 FY10
43
200
12
$0 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $600 $700
Target
Energy Intensity
Outliers
Top 5 Consumers ($000’s)
FY10
RDT&E Buildings
FY09
160
120
80
40
0
123
60
80
94
17
Bldg #
3-Month Ave
Region Ave
21/NA
Start
Funding
FY10
SP
FY11
NWCF
FY11
MILCON
FY13
SP
Thermal
P188- Lighting Retrofit
P120- Bldg 165- 1,000 more
employees
P190- Solar Panel Parking lot
0
NSWC
6
Bldg #
P160- Geothermal Heat Pumps
300
$40,000
HDD/CDD
IPL- Energy Related
600
FY10
78
5,000 mmBTU
Monthly Thermal Cost
4th Qtr
900
Electric Intensity
75
Total Square Footage
FY09
3rd Qtr
NSWC Energy Consumption
1,200
Top Energy Consumers
NSWC
Total Building Count
Monthly Thermal Consumption
$2.0
1st Qtr
Tenant:
Monthly Electric Consumption
$3.0
1,500
Top 5 Consumers ($000’s)
5
98
212
85
66
$0 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $600 $700
FY10
NAVFAC WASHINGTON
FY09
RDT&E Buildings
Thermal Intensity
Date:
NSWC
NSWC Utility Cost by Qtr
$4.0
Total Energy
Consumption (000
BTU)
Tenant:
“Example”
$5.0
Electric
Base:
Utility Cost ($M’s)
Example: SmartEnergy Metrics Scorecard
160
120
80
40
0
96
82
100
4
18
Bldg #
3-Month Ave
Region Ave
Example: SmartEnergy Facility Management
Facility Operations Centers: Proposed Sites
Location
Fenceline(s) Covered
WNY*
WNY, NSF Suitland, NSF Naval Observatory, NSF
Arlington
NSF Naval Research
Laboratory
NSF Naval Research Laboratory,
NSF Chesapeake Beach
NSF Carderock
NSF Carderock
JBAB
Joint Base Anacostia-Bolling
NSF Annapolis
NSF Annapolis, US Naval Academy, North Severn, NOSC
Baltimore
NSA Bethesda
NSA Bethesda
NAS Patuxent River
NAS Pax (main base), NRC Solomons, OLF Webster Field
NSF Indian Head*
NSF Indian Head (main base), Stump Neck Annex
NSF Dahlgren*
NSF Dahlgren (main base), Pumpkin Neck Annex
*Note: 1 of 3 locations for NDW SmartEnergy pilot
23
NAVFAC WASHINGTON
3/31/11
Five Elements of NDW Energy Vision 2035
Mission Efficient
Comfortable Conditions
A: Efficient End-Use Technology
•
•
•
•
E: Cost-Effective
Renewables
• Self-supporting electrical
and renewable thermal,
where cost effective
D: Aggressive Demand
Response
• Generator dispatch
• Building systems,
with no comfort impact
Tight building shell
Efficient lighting
Efficient mechanicals
Efficient plug loads
B: Cost-Efficient Energy Sources
and Distribution Infrastructure
• Low cost energy sources
• Efficient boiler/furnace
• Efficient on-base distribution
C: Networked SmartEnergy Management
Capabilities
•
•
•
•
•
24
Adequate metering and controls
Well-tuned control system
Controlled to match needs
Regularly monitored performance
Periodically diagnosed for improvement
NAVFAC WASHINGTON
24
Navy Shore Energy Program
Utility Interface and Future National
Smart Grid
“SPIDERS” (Smart Power Infrastructure
Demonstration for Energy
Reliability and Security)
Electric Grid Cyber-security
Smart Grid Technologies
Secure Micro-Grid
Integration of Renewables
Demand-Side Management
Redundant Back-up Power
Navy
Energy Culture
Navy Smart Energy Concept
of Operations (CONOPS)
Developed from NDW Pilot to
inform Navy-wide deployment
Infrastructure Change
- Maintenance Action
- Prioritized Energy RECAP
Culture Change
- Operations
- Behavior
ENERGY
SECURITY &
COMPLIANCE
Renewable Energy
& Sustainability
Energy Efficiency
The Foundation: Secure, Integrated Enabling Systems (NDW Pilot)
Secure Integration of
Legacy Systems with
Advanced Metering
Energy Billing/Reporting Systems
Facilities Management Systems
Real-time Energy
Decision Support
25
Smart Power Infrastructure
Demonstration for Energy Reliability
and Security (SPIDERS)
Sponsors: DoD, DOE, DHS
Operational Managers: PACOM and NORTHCOM
Technical Manager: USACE/EDRC-CERL
Asst Technical Manager: Sandia National Labs
Transition Manager: NAVFAC
Asst Transition Manager : Pacific Northwest National Lab
Points of contact: Mr. Ross Roley, PACOM, ross.roley.ctr@pacom.mil
and Dr. Bill Waugaman, NORTHCOM, william.waugaman@northcom.mil
Page-26
The Situation
Defense Science
Board
Feb 08 - “Critical national security and homeland defense
missions are at an unacceptably high risk of extended
outage from failure of the electric grid.”
May 09 - “Aurora threat revealed the possibility that
sophisticated hackers could seriously damage the grid by
destroying mechanisms downstream from the initial point of
attack.”
Feb 10 - “DoD will conduct a coordinated energy
assessment, prioritize critical assets, and promote
investments in energy efficiency to ensure that critical
installations are adequately prepared for prolonged outages
caused by natural disasters, accidents, or attacks.”
References:
•The Defense Science Board Task Force on DoD Energy Security, “More Fight – Less Fuel,” February 2008.
•Powering America’s Defense, Energy and the Risks to National Security, by the Center for Naval Analyses Military Advisory Board, May 2009
•Quadrennial Defense Review Report, February 2010
Page-27
The National Engine
Electricity
is our
“national
engine”
National Security
Energy Security
Electric Grid
Security
•Reliability
•Efficiency
•Security
•Resiliency
Page-28
28
Page-29
Nat’l
Security
Nat’l
Defense
Interagency
Coord
C4ISR
Cyber
Security
Physical
Security
Elect
ric G
rid
Dependence on a Fragile Grid
29
SPIDERS Summary
The ability of today’s warfighter to command, control, deploy, and
sustain forces is adversely impacted by a fragile, aging, and fossil
fuel dependent electricity grid, posing a significant threat to national
security.
The SPIDERS JCTD will address four critical deficiencies:
–
–
–
–
Inability to protect task critical assets from loss of power due to cyber attack
Inability to integrate renewable and other distributed generation electricity to power
task critical assets in times of emergency
Inability to sustain critical operations during prolonged power outages
Inability to manage installation electrical power and consumption efficiently, to reduce
petroleum demand, carbon “bootprint,” and cost
The modern military needs to evolve its power
infrastructure. New threats demand new defenses
Page-30
What is the SPIDERS JCTD?
Reduce the “unacceptably high risk”* of extended electric grid
outages by developing the capability to “island” installations
while maintaining operational surety & security
•
Demonstrate:
–
–
–
–
–
–
•
Results in:
–
–
–
•
Cyber-security of electric grid applying virtual secure enclave to SCADA
Smart Grid Technologies & applications
Secure micro-grid for sustained mission assurance and emergency support
Integration of distributed & variable renewable generation and storage
Demand-side management
Redundant back-up power systems
Assessment of VSE capability to SCADA networks
First complete DoD installation with a secure, smart “islandable” micro-grid
Template for DoD-wide installation & industry energy security
High Priority for Three Combatant Commands
*From Defense Science Board Task Force on DoD Energy Security, Feb 2008
Page-31
Expected SPIDERS Outcome
S
N
O
I
T
A
L
TAL
ECU
E
O
T
Y
A
W
IR
A
T
S
Phase 1
N
S
Y
G
ER
FT CARSON
MICRO-GRID
• Large Scale
• Smart Micro-Grid
• Critical Assets
• CONUS Homeland
Defense Demo
• COOP Exercise
Phase 3
CAMP SMITH
ENERGY ISLAND
Phase 2
HICKAM AFB CIRCUIT Renewables
LEVEL DEMO
• Vehicle-to-Grid
• Renewables
• Hydrogen Storage
• Hydrogen Fuel Cell
• Energy Management
• VSE SCADA Test at
Idaho National Lab
S
N
I
RE
• Entire Installation
Smart Micro-Grid
• Islanded Installation
• High Penetration of
Renewables
• Demand-Side
Management
• Redundant Backup
Power
• Makana Pahili
Hurricane Exercise
TRANSITION
• Template for DoDwide implementation
• CONOPS
• TTPs
• Training Plans
• DoD Adds Specs to
GSA Schedule
• Transition to
Commercial Sector
• Transition CyberSecurity to Federal
Sector and Utilities
CYBER-SECURITY STRATEGY
RIGOROUS ASSESSMENT WITH RED TEAMING IN EACH PHASE
Page-32
SPIDERS Participants
•
USPACOM, USNORTHCOM
DOE, and DHS
•
5 DOE Nat’l Labs
•
USACE/ERDC-CERL
•
Military Services
•
Naval Facilities Engineering
Command
•
Local Utility Companies
•
States of Hawaii & Colorado
Page-33
QUESTIONS?
Page-34