Evaluation of Arctic Oil Spill Response Countermeasures Rational for International Polar Research

advertisement

Fisheries and Oceans

Pêches et Océans

Evaluation of Arctic Oil Spill Response

Countermeasures

Kenneth Lee

Fisheries and Oceans Canada

Rational for International Polar Research

• Significant changes are occurring (e.g. climate change)

• Growing economic and geopolitical importance

• Conditions have limited scientific studies

• Need to re-establish and enhance operational observing systems

• Region extends across national boundaries

• Science challenge exceeds the capabilities of any one nation

• Maximize outcomes and cost effectiveness

• International collaboration shares benefits and builds relationships

International Polar Year (IPY) Program

• A major, international scientific event featuring a global campaign of coordinated polar observations and analysis

• March 2007 - March 2009 to allow for year round observations over two summer field seasons

• Build on experience gathered during the International Polar

Years of 1887 and 1907 and the International Geophysical Year of 1957 which focused on the polar regions

• Expected to be the largest-ever polar research program, valued at several billion dollars, and involving at least 30, but possibly as many as 50 countries and 20,000 or more people from around the world.

Co-sponsored by the International Council of Science (ICSU) and the

World Meteorological Organization (WMO) with endorsements by:

Antarctic Treaty Consultative Meeting (ATCM)

Arctic Council (AC)

AC - Arctic Monitoring and Assessment Programme (AMAP)

AC - Conservation of Arctic Flora and Fauna (CAFF)

Arctic Climate Impacts Assessment (ACIA)

Arctic Ocean Science Board (AOSB)

Arctic and Sub-Arctic Ocean Flux Programme (ASOF)

Committee of Managers of National Antarctic Programmes (COMNAP)

European Polar Board (EPB)

European Space Agency (ESA)

Forum of Arctic Operators (FARO)

International Arctic Science Committee (IASC)

International Arctic Social Scientists Association (IASSA)

International Hydrographic Organisation (IHO)

• International Oceanographic Commission (IOC)

• International Ocean Institute (IOI)

• International Permafrost Association (IPA)

• International Society of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing (ISPRS)

• International Union of Geodesy and Geophysics (IUGG)

• International Union of Geological Sciences (IUGS)

• International Union of Radio Science (URSI)

• Scientific Committee on Antarctic Research (SCAR)

• Scientific Committee on Oceanographic Research (SCOR)

• University of the Arctic (UArctic)

• United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP)

• US Polar Research Board (US-PRB)

• US National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA)

Canada's Contribution to IPY

• $150 million in new funding over six years for innovative, interdisciplinary programs with international partners

• Priority: Science for climate change impacts and adaptation

Health and well-being of northern communities

• Funds available to government, university and community researchers through a competitive peer review process

• Provision of logistical support for research in Canada's North during the peak IPY period of 2007 to 2009

• Training, communication and outreach with Northern communities to increasing future the capacity to carry out science in Canada's North

• Consistent with the Northern Strategy Framework, including the promotion of northern science and research, reinforcing circumpolar cooperation, strengthening partnerships, and environmental protection

DFO Experimental Spill Experience

DFO has a history of collaborative international oil spill field trials (US, France, United Kingdom and Norway)

Fate of Marine Oil Spills: Physical, Chemical & Biological Processes

Atmospheric oxidation

(photo- oxidation)

Wind

Evaporation

Rain and/or

Fallout

Aerosol

Formation

Bulk surface discharge

Spreading Sea surface oil slick Spreading

Current movement

Water-in-oil emulsions

“chocolate mousse”

Tar balls

Dissolution

Sea surface Globular dispersion

Oil-in-water emulsion

Current movement and diffusion

Chemical degradation

Carbon cycle

Attachment to particulate matter

Dispersed crude oil

Biodegradation

Degradation or assimilation by fish

Bulk subsurface discharge

Biological detritus

Non-buoyant oil residues

Sea floor

Degradation or assimilation by bottom dwelling organisms

Sea floor sediments

Acceleration of Natural Recovery

Enhanced Dispersion:

Promotion of Oil Mineral Aggregate (OMA) Formation

Application of Chemical Oil Dispersants

Based on the premise of oil dispersion into the water column to concentrations below toxicity threshold limits and enhanced biodegradation of residual oil

Operational advantage – no need for physical removal and treatment of contaminated waste

Oil Mineral Aggregate (OMA) Formation

• Laboratory studies with oiled sediments from the Exxon

Valdez spill revealed that “micron-sized mineral fines, seawater and weathered oil” interact to form “clay-oil flocs”

(Bragg and Yang, 1993).

• The mechanism was responsible for the natural cleaning of sheltered shorelines in Prince Williams sound observed a year after the spill.

• Baffin Island Oil Spill (BIOS) Project - Natural cleansing was as effective as other tested countermeasures

• Clay-oil flocculation (Oil mineral aggregate formation – OMA) may be the cause of “natural self-cleaning” of shorelines affected by past oil spills.

Oil Mineral Aggregate (OMA) Formation

Interaction of micron-sized mineral fines (< 5 µm) with droplets of bulk oil to form solids-stabilized oil-in-water emulsion.

25 µm _____

Oil droplets

Mineral fines

Enhanced Biodegradation of n-alkanes with

Mineral Fines

oil oil + fines

100

80

60

40

20

0

100

80

60

40

20

0

DAY 7

DAY 56

Laboratory Study Conclusions

• OMA form with almost any kind of fine (<60 µm) mineral particles

• Incorporation of oil in OMA promotes its biodegradation and decreases oil toxicity and persistence in the environment.

• Significant amount of oil may be associated with OMA.

Enhanced OMA Formation as an Oil Spill

Response Countermeasure

Rational:

• The formation of Oil Mineral Aggregates (OMA) by the interaction between mineral fines and oil in seawater will facilitate natural dispersion.

• Oil droplets, once stablized by mineral fine interactions, stay separated and biodegrade at an accelerated rate.

Oil Loss - Site 3

2000

1500

1000

20

15

10

5 r ²=0.92

0

0 500 1000 1500

Kg of Oil Lost from Plot G / Day

500

No Treatment

Sediment Relocation

0

-10 0 10 20 30 40 50 60

Days

400

Results from Svalbard Experiment

• The quantity of OMA formed was proportional to the quantity of oil removed from the beach

• About 3% of the oil removed from the beach is likely to have settled within 1 km of the oiled sites

• The oil lost from the sites has been biodegraded and/or dispersed over a large area

• Toxicity in nearshore sediment and water samples was below allowable limits for ocean dumping of dredged spoils

Enhancement of OMA in the Presence of Ice in collaboration with the Canadian Coast Guard

Aim: Reduce costs of clean-up a spill in ice

• Investigate OMA formation at low temperature

• Evaluate mixing energy required

• Model significance

• Devise ways of dispensing minerals on or under the ice

• Biological effects

• Persistence of residual oil

Chemical Oil Dispersants

• Evaluation of factors controlling chemical oil dispersant efficacy

• Assessment of the net environmental effects

• Provision of data for dispersant use guidelines/policy

• Studies on oil dispersant / OMA interactions

• Arctic field trials

Enhancement of OMA in the Presence of Ice in collaboration with the Canadian Coast Guard

Aim: Reduce costs of clean-up a spill in ice

• Investigate OMA formation at low temperature

• Evaluate mixing energy required

• Model significance

• Devise ways of dispensing minerals on or under the ice

• Biological effects

• Persistence of residual oil

Download