Independent Living: Policy to Practice Lillian Buchanan Dr Joanne McCarthy Outline • • • • Scope & aim of the research Methodology Irish public policy direction Engagement with people and their organisations • Policy implementation nationally • Case study • Recommendations Scope & Aim • Physical housing focus within the independent living concept – Only part but a basis for building life • Portray implementation when no legal rights based framework • Examine Irish experience in hard times as well as easy times Methodology • Probe government engagement with people and their voluntary organisations – Authors involvement in consultation structures • Examine policy developments – Documentation • Listen to experience as reported in one example Policy direction • Government endorses the legitimate expectation of people to be able to live independently – E.g. Towards 2016, National Housing Strategy for People with Disabilities – Range of support measures announced • But legal rights not a feature – E.g. UNCRPD not ratified Engagement • Evidence of government – listening to the diverse perspectives of people with disabilities, – involving them and their organisations in policy making, planning and implementation, and – following up to ensure good outcomes Policy to Practice • Are more people appropriately housed? • Is a person-centred approach used? • Pre and post austerity test of commitment Policy Pre Austerity • No strong focus on supporting people into mainstream communities – Capital funding for housing adaptations and for ‘special needs’ housing – but not significant share – Housing boom produced relatively few accessible units – Increase in PA hours provided but not monitored • Housing strategy for people with disabilities – Limited cross-agency working Capital Spending €180,000,000.00 €160,000,000.00 €140,000,000.00 €120,000,000.00 €100,000,000.00 CAS Expenditure Adapatation Schemes Expenditure €80,000,000.00 €60,000,000.00 €40,000,000.00 €20,000,000.00 €0.00 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Implementation under Austerity • Major capital and revenue spending cuts • Housing Strategy completed October 2011 – More effort at joint implementation • Focus on community living by HSE – Austerity squeeze on community supports • Continued resistance to entitlement to live independently Pump House on Londonbridge Road, Dublin 4 Opened by DCC in May 2009 with 24 apartments, x of which were designed with and for their mobility-impaired tenants Local Experience • People with mobility impairments in Dublin City with housing need – Getting onto the social housing waiting list – Waiting on that list, especially given shrinking sources of social housing supply – Cold shoulder for many of those not already getting personal supports – But examples of effective joint working for solutions Some recommendations • Strategy statements and domestic legislation insufficient – Need operational back-up such as Strategy’s proposed local authority-based steering committees and development of stronger accessible housing standards – Need legal backup such as ratification of the UN Convention and Housing Act amendment to recognise right to independent living Recommendations cont’d • Need procedures that factor in disability from the outset, such as systematic process to generate more Pump House-type housing • Need proactive voluntary disability organisations to assist people through difficult application processes, to monitor housing policy implementation, and to advocate for better outcomes • Need to implement the National Housing Strategy for People with Disabilities Thank you • For a copy of the draft paper, please email: • lillianbuchanan@disability-federation.ie