Matakuliah : I0134/Metode Statistika Tahun : 2007 Pengujian Hipotesis Proporsi dan Beda Proporsi Pertemuan 21 A Summary of Forms for Null and Alternative Hypotheses about a Population Proportion • The equality part of the hypotheses always appears in the null hypothesis. • In general, a hypothesis test about the value of a population proportion p must take one of the following three forms (where p0 is the hypothesized value of the population proportion). H0: p > p0 Ha: p < p0 Bina Nusantara H0: p < p0 Ha: p > p0 H0: p = p0 Ha: p p0 Tests about a Population Proportion: Large-Sample Case (np > 5 and n(1 - p) > 5) • Test Statistic where: z p p p0 p p0 (1 p0 ) n • Rejection Rule One-Tailed H0: p p H0: p p H0: pp Bina Nusantara Two-Tailed Reject H0 if z > z Reject H0 if z < -z Reject H0 if |z| > z Example: NSC • Two-Tailed Test about a Population Proportion: Large n For a Christmas and New Year’s week, the National Safety Council estimated that 500 people would be killed and 25,000 injured on the nation’s roads. The NSC claimed that 50% of the accidents would be caused by drunk driving. A sample of 120 accidents showed that 67 were caused by drunk driving. Use these data to test the NSC’s claim with = 0.05. Bina Nusantara Example: NSC • Two-Tailed Test about a Population Proportion: Large n – Hypothesis H0: p = .5 Ha: p .5 – Test Statistic p0 (1 p0 ) .5(1 .5) p .045644 n 120 z Bina Nusantara p p0 p (67 /120) .5 1.278 .045644 Example: NSC • Two-Tailed Test about a Population Proportion: Large n – Rejection Rule Reject H0 if z < -1.96 or z > 1.96 – Conclusion Do not reject H0. For z = 1.278, the p-value is .201. If we reject H0, we exceed the maximum allowed risk of (p-value > .050). Bina Nusantara committing a Type I error Hypothesis Testing and Decision Making • In many decision-making situations the decision maker may want, and in some cases may be forced, to take action with both the conclusion do not reject H0 and the conclusion reject H0. • In such situations, it is recommended that the hypothesis-testing procedure be extended to include consideration of making a Type II error. Bina Nusantara Calculating the Probability of a Type II Error in Hypothesis Tests about a Population Mean 1. Formulate the null and alternative hypotheses. 2. Use the level of significance to establish a rejection rule based on the test statistic. 3. Using the rejection rule, solve for the value of the sample mean that identifies the rejection region. 4. Use the results from step 3 to state the values of the sample mean that lead to the acceptance of H0; this defines the acceptance region. x any value of from the 5. Using the sampling distribution of for alternative hypothesis, and the acceptance region from step 4, compute the probability that the sample mean will be in the acceptance region. Bina Nusantara Inferences About the Difference Between the Proportions of Two Populations • Sampling Distribution of p1 p2 • Interval Estimation of p1 - p2 • Hypothesis Tests about p1 - p2 Bina Nusantara Sampling Distribution of p1 p2 • Expected Value E ( p1 p2 ) p1 p2 • Standard Deviation p1 p2 p1 (1 p1 ) p2 (1 p2 ) n1 n2 • Distribution Form If the sample sizes are large (n1p1, n1(1 - p1), n2p2, and n2(1 - p2) are all greater than or equal to 5), the sampling distribution of p1 p2 can be approximated by a normal probability distribution. Bina Nusantara Interval Estimation of p1 - p2 • Interval Estimate p1 p2 z / 2 p1 p2 • Point Estimator of s p1 p2 Bina Nusantara p1 p2 p1 (1 p1 ) p2 (1 p2 ) n1 n2 Example: MRA MRA (Market Research Associates) is conducting research to evaluate the effectiveness of a client’s new advertising campaign. Before the new campaign began, a telephone survey of 150 households in the test market area showed 60 households “aware” of the client’s product. The new campaign has been initiated with TV and newspaper advertisements running for three weeks. A survey conducted immediately after the new campaign showed 120 of 250 households “aware” of the client’s product. Does the data support the position that the advertising campaign has provided an increased awareness of the client’s product? Bina Nusantara Example: MRA • Point Estimator of the Difference Between the Proportions of Two Populations 120 60 p1 p2 p1 p2 . 48. 40 . 08 250 150 p1 = proportion of the population of households “aware” of the product after the new campaign p2 = proportion of the population of households “aware” of the product before the new campaign p1 = sample proportion of households “aware” of the product after the new campaign p2= sample proportion of households “aware” of the product before the new campaign Bina Nusantara Example: MRA • Interval Estimate of p1 - p2: Large-Sample Case For = .05, z.025 = 1.96: . 48(.52) . 40(. 60) . 48. 40 1. 96 250 150 .08 + 1.96(.0510) .08 + .10 or -.02 to +.18 – Conclusion At a 95% confidence level, the interval estimate of the difference between the proportion of households aware of the client’s product before and after the new advertising campaign is -.02 to +.18. Bina Nusantara Hypothesis Tests about p1 - p2 H0: p1 - p2 < 0 Ha: p1 - p2 > 0 • Hypotheses • Test statistic z • Point Estimator of ( p1 p2 ) ( p1 p2 ) p1 p2 where p = p p1 p2 1 2 s p1 p2 p (1 p )(1 n1 1 n2 ) where: Bina Nusantara n1 p1 n2 p2 p n1 n2 Example: MRA • Hypothesis Tests about p1 - p2 Can we conclude, using a .05 level of significance, that the proportion of households aware of the client’s product increased after the new advertising campaign? p1 = proportion of the population of households “aware” of the product after the new campaign p2 = proportion of the population of households “aware” of the product before the new campaign – Hypotheses H0: p1 - p2 < 0 Ha: p1 - p2 > 0 Bina Nusantara Example: MRA • Hypothesis Tests about p1 - p2 – Rejection Rule – Test Statistic Reject H0 if z > 1.645 250(. 48) 150(. 40) 180 p . 45 250 150 400 s p1 p2 . 45(.55)( 1 1 ) . 0514 250 150 (. 48. 40) 0 . 08 z 1.56 . 0514 . 0514 – Conclusion Bina Nusantara Do not reject H0.