Document 14540158

advertisement

Continuing Services Evaluation

Contract No. Project Name:

Firm Name-Architecture:

Firm Name-Engineering:

Contact Name

Contact Name

Firm Name-(Other):

Service(s) Rated:

(check all that apply)

Architecture

Phase Project Service(s) Rated

Engineering

Contact Name

Other

Pre-Construction (planning, design & bidding) Construction (construction & closeout )

Please rate the effectiveness of the professional service firms ’ performances on the capital improvement project across the following dimensions:

Evaluation Criteria: 0 = N/A 1 = Low 5 = Moderate 10 = High

Performance Dimensions: Value

Arch.

Score

Eng.

Score

1) Expertise, knowledge and experience

2) Problem solving and decision making

Fulfilled commitment to maintaining proposed Team for duration of project

(including EDGE).

Provided effective and creative problem solving and fair decision making.

3) Timeliness and responsiveness

Performed responsibilities and provided

4) Process facilitation, communication and partnering

5) Scope management

6) Schedule management

7) Budget management

8) Quality management

9) Risk management

10) Overall project management feedback to inquiries in a timely manner.

Effective project documentation and communication.

Identified, tracked and managed changes within project.

Effectively managed project schedule and completed deliverables on time

Provided valuable input and leadership to manage project on budget.

Ensured quality design/construction and deliverables.

Provided thorough guidance and effective action in managing/balancing project risks.

Delivered effective overall project management.

0-10

0-10

0-10

0-10

0-10

0-10

0-10

0-10

0-10

0-10

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Total 0 0

Would you recommend the professional service firm/team for comparable work in the future?

Architect: Yes No Engineer: Yes No (Other): Yes

Please provide any comments regarding the professional service firms:

(Other)

Score

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

No

Evaluator’s Name:

Stakeholder Group: FM FPC Other

Telephone Number:

If mailing completed evaluation, please forward to:

University of Houston, Plant Operations – Contracts Administration, 4211 Elgin Street, Houston, Texas 77204

Download