GLOBAL CONTAINER TERMINAL OPERATORS: FROM DIVERSIFICATION TO RATIONALIZATION? Theo Notteboom

advertisement

GLOBAL CONTAINER TERMINAL OPERATORS:

FROM DIVERSIFICATION TO

RATIONALIZATION?

Theo Notteboom

ITMMA - University of Antwerp and Antwerp Maritime Academy, Belgium

Jean-Paul Rodrigue

Dept. of Global Studies & Geography, Hofstra University, New York, USA

European Conference on Shipping & Ports

– ECONSHIP 2011

Chios, Greece, June 22-24 2011

The Charthouse Group

1) Emergence

2) Entry and Expansion

Global Terminal Operators: An Emerging

Geography of Intermodal Assets

3) How Global?

4) Rationalization?

The Charthouse Group

THE EMERGENCE OF GLOBAL

TERMINAL OPERATORS

The Charthouse Group

Typology of Global Port Operators: Three Sides of the same Coin

Stevedores

Horizontal integration

Port operations is the core business; Investment in container terminals for expansion and diversification.

Expansion through direct investment.

PSA (Public), HHLA (Public),

Eurogate (Private), HPH

(Private), ICTSI (Private), SSA

(Private).

Maritime Shipping

Companies

Vertical integration

Financial Holdings

Portfolio diversification

Maritime shipping is the main business; Investment in container terminals as a support function.

Financial assets management is the main business;

Investment in container terminals for valuation and revenue generation.

Expansion through direct investment or through parent companies.

Expansion through acquisitions, mergers and reorganization of assets.

APM (Private), COSCO

(Public), MSC (Private), APL

(Private), Hanjin (Private),

Evergreen (Private).

DPW (Sovereign Wealth

Fund), Ports America (AIG;

Fund), RREEF (Deutsche

Bank; Fund), Macquarie

Infrastructure (Fund), Morgan

Stanley Infrastructure (Fund).

The Charthouse Group

Port

Vertical and Horizontal Integration: Moving along the Foreland and Hinterland

Horizontal

Integration

Vertical

Integration

Maritime Services

Inland

Port

Port Services

Inland Services Intermediate hub

Port Holding

Terminal

Port

Rail / Barge

Distribution Center

Maritime

Shipping

Port Terminal

Operations

Inland Modes and Terminals

Commodity Chain

Distribution

Centers

The Charthouse Group

Top Twelve Global Container Terminal Operators in Equity-Based Throughput

APL

HHLA

CMA-CGM

Eurogate

SSA Marine

Evergreen

MSC

COSCO

APM Terminals

DPW

Hutchison Port Holdings

PSA

0

3,6

4,4

4,6

6,1

6,3

7,2

8,2

10,9

10

31,1

31,5

32,2

20 30

Million TEUs (2009)

40

45,0

50

The Charthouse Group

Number of Terminals and Total Hectares

Controlled by the Twelve Largest Port Holdings

CMA-CGM

ICTSI

Hanjin

Cosco Pacific

Shanghai International Port…

SSA Marine

Ports America

Eurogate

APM Terminals

Dubai Ports World

Port of Singapore Authority

Hutchison Port Holdings

412

466

559

686

734

939

1 270

1 646

2 038

2 347

2 604

3 248

0 1 000 2 000

Hectares (2010)

3 000

Terminals

14

16

13

14

10

20

50

38

47

11

9

42

4 000

The Charthouse Group

ENTRY AND EXPANSION STRATEGIES

IN THE TERMINAL OPERATOR

INDUSTRY

The Charthouse Group

Factors behind the Interest of Equity Firms in

Transport Terminals

Asset (Intrinsic value)

Source of income

(Operational value)

Diversification

(Risk mitigation value)

Globalization made terminal assets more valuable.

Terminals occupy premium locations (waterfront) that cannot be substituted.

Traffic growth linked with valuation.

Same amount of land generates a higher income.

Terminals as fairly liquid assets.

Income (rent) linked with traffic volume.

Constant revenue stream with limited, or predictable, seasonality.

Traffic growth expectations result in income growth expectations.

Sectorial and geographical asset diversification.

Terminals at different locations help mitigate risks linked with a specific regional or national market.

The Charthouse Group

Major Port Terminal Acquisitions Since 2005

Date

2005

Early 2006

Mid 2006

Mid 2006

End 2006

Early 2007

Mid 2007

July 2007

Transaction

DP World takes over CSX World Terminals

PSA acquires a 20% stake in HPH

DP World acquires P&O Ports

Goldman Sachs Consortium acquires ABP

AIG acquires P&O Ports North America

Ontario Teachers’ Pension Fund acquires OOIL Terminals

RREEF acquires Maher Terminals

Goldman Sachs acquires a majority share in Carrix, the parent company of SSA Marine

Price paid for transaction compared to EBITDA

14 times

17 times

19 times

14.5 times

24 times

23.5 times

25 times

Not disclosed

The Charthouse Group

The Strategies of Terminal Operators

Financial Assets Large financial assets and the capacity to tap global financial markets. Terminals as equity generating returns.

Managerial Expertise Experience in the management of containerized operations.

IT and compliance with a variety of procedures.

Gateway Access

Leverage

Traffic Capture

Global Perspective

Establishing hinterland access.

Creation of a “stronghold”.

Provides a stable flow of containerized shipments.

Development of related inland logistics activities.

Negotiate with maritime shippers and inland freight transport companies favorable conditions.

Some are subsidiaries of maritime shipping companies.

Capture and maintain traffic for their terminals.

Comprehensive view of the state of the industry.

Anticipate developments and opportunities.

The Charthouse Group

World’s Main Intermediate Hubs and Markets,

2008

The Charthouse Group

HOW ‘GLOBAL’ ARE GLOBAL

TERMINAL OPERATORS?

The Charthouse Group

Dimensions of the Global Orientation of Terminal

Operators

Geographical coverage

Regional orientation

Equity sharing agreements

Global financial institutions

The Charthouse Group

Geographical Coverage: Container Terminal

Surface of the World's Major Port Holdings, 2010

The Charthouse Group

Container Terminals of the World's Four Major

Port Holdings, 2010

The Charthouse Group

Container Terminals of Some of the World's

Minor Port Holdings, 2010

The Charthouse Group

Regional Share in the Terminal Portfolio of the

Twelve Largest Global Terminal Operators

(Hectares, 2010)

CMA-CGM

ICTSI

Hanjin

Cosco Pacific

Shanghai International Port…

SSA Marine

Ports America

Eurogate

APM Terminals

Dubai Ports World

Port of Singapore Authority

Hutchison Port Holdings

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Africa

Australia

North America

South America / Caribbean

Pacific Asia

South Asia / Middle East

Mediterranean

Europe Atlantic

The Charthouse Group

FROM DIVERSIFICATION TO

RATIONALIZATION?

The Charthouse Group

Potential Rationalization Strategies followed by

Global Terminal Operators

Intensified cost control

Review, postponement and cancellation of terminal projects

More selective investment decisions

Complex ownership and partnership structures to hedge risks

Divestment in terminals

Revisiting inland strategies

The Charthouse Group

Intensified cost control helped to keep margins level

GCTO

HPH

PSA

APMT

DPW

Eurogate

2008

60.6%

29.8%

18.4%

40.8%

28.3%

2009

60.3%

28.9%

24.4%

38.0%

25.3%

2010

58.6%

NA

25.3%

40.3%

26.5%

Note: EBITDA = Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation and Amortization.

Source: company websites (2010 figures) and Drewry 2010 (2008 and 2009 figures)

Revision of investment plans, equipment maintenance schedules, asset deployment strategies and renegotiation of concession agreements and throughput levels .

The Charthouse Group

Hedging the risks

Inter-firm Relationships in the Three

Main Container Ports of the Rhine-Scheldt Delta, 2010

HUTCHISON PORT

HOLDINGS

Majority shareholding

ECT

100% Delta Terminal

100%

50%

Waal- and

Eemhaven

Euromax phase 1

Rotterdam World Gateway

(Maasvlakte 2)

Operational by 2013

APM Terminal Maasvlakte

Terminal 1

(Maasvlakte 2)

Operational by 2014

ROTTERDAM

Minority

Shareholding (4)

50%

60%

30%

10%

20% PSA

100%

MSC

NYK

CYKH

Alliance

New World

Alliance

50%

50%

PSA

(Antwerp/

Zeebrugge)

100%

50%

50%

100%

42.5%

DP World

ZIM Line (1)

Cosco Pacific

CMA-CGM (2)

35%

10%

20%

10%

65%

100%

100%

APM Terminals

(AP Moller Group)

Shanghai

International Port

Group (SIPG)

100%

75%

25%

ANTWERP

MSC Home terminal

North Sea Terminal

Europe Terminal

Deurganck Terminal

Antwerp International

Terminal (AIT)

DP World Delwaidedock

Antwerp Gateway

CHZ

Albert II-dock north

APM Terminal

ZEEBRUGGE

Shipping Line

(Global) Terminal

Operator

Terminal

PORT

Financial Holding

The Charthouse Group

APL

NYK

100%

100%

Mitsui OSK 100%

Evergreen

Yangming

50%

40%

MSC

OOIL

K-Lines

Hyundai

Cosco Pacific

Hanjin

50%

100%

100%

100%

51%

60%

Global Gateway South

Yusen Terminals

TraPac Los Angeles Berth

136

APM Terminals Pier 400

Evergreen Terminal

West Basin Container

Terminal

LOS ANGELES

LONG BEACH

Terminal C60

Terminal A

Long Beach Container

Terminal

Pier G Berth

California United Terminals

Pacific Container Terminal

Total Terminals International

Hedging the risks

Inter-firm Relationships in the Three

Main Container Ports of North America, 2010

Ontario Teachers'

Pension Plan

100%

Global Container

Terminals

100%

50%

60%

50%

49%

40%

APM Terminals

(AP Moller Group) 100%

100%

Deutsche Bank

RREEF

100%

Maher Terminals 100%

Ports America

Stevedoring

Services of

America

Macquarie

Infrastructure

100%

100%

AIG Highstar

Capital

New York Container Terminal

Global Terminal and

Container Services

APM Terminals Port

Elizabeth

Maher Terminal

Port Newark Container

Terminal

NEW YORK

Shipping Line Terminal Operator Terminal PORT Financial Holding

The Charthouse Group

Modern

Terminals

Hedging the risks

Inter-firm Relationships in the

Main Container Ports of the Pearl River Delta, 2010

65%

20%

25%

APM Terminals

(AP Moller Group)

China Shipping

Group

ZHUHAI

Zhuhai International

Container Terminals

50%

20%

40%

50%

GUANGZHOU

Guangzhou South China

Oceangate Container

Terminal

Nansha Container Terminal

Nanhai International

Container Terminals

Guangzhou Huangpu

Xingang Terminal

Guangzhou Huangpu Xinsha

Terminal

Dongguan Container

Terminal

Shenzhen Yantian

Port Group

30%

Yantian International

Container Terminals

Da Chan Bay Terminal One

Shekou Container Terminals

Chiwan Container Terminal

SHENZHEN

70%

35%

HUTCHISON PORT

HOLDINGS

Shenzhen Municipal

Government

80%

75%

China Merchants

Holdings International

DP World

39%

41%

60%

49%

49%

50%

33%

67%

100%

66%

55%

Cosco Pacific

Guangzhou Port

Group

PSA

10%

Moderns Terminals

COSCO-HIT Terminal

Hong Kong International

Terminals

Asia Port Services

DP World Hong Kong

Asia Container Terminals

HONG KONG

10%

20%

33%

Shipping Line Terminal Operator Terminal PORT Financial Holding

The Charthouse Group

Changes in the Terminal Portfolio of APM

Terminals Between April 2008 and April 2011

= investment/entry

= divestment/exit

April 2008-April 2011

• April 2011 : Acquisition of an 80% share in Poti Sea Port (Georgia - Black Sea) from Ras Al Khaimah Investment Authority (RAKIA).

• April 2011 : Selected to run “Terminal Muelle Norte” in the port of Callao (at full capacity 2.9 million TEU).

• March 2011 : 33 year concession for the design, financing, construction, operation and maintenance of the new Moin Container Terminal (TCM) in Costa Rica.

• Dec 2010 : Idea launched to construct a new container terminal at the Port of Monfalcone in the North Adriatic.

• Oct 2010 : Signing of a 25‐year concession agreement for the operation of the Port of Monrovia in Liberia. Operations officially start ed in Feb 2011.

• Aug 2010 : Acqusition of 50% of the shares in Brasil Terminal Portuario (BTP), a container terminal being built in Santos. Partner is Terminal Investment Limited.

• July 2010 : Terminal Link, CMA CGM’s subsidiary dedicated to container terminal investment, increased its shares in Nord France Termina l International o.u.

(NFTI) from 30% to 91% through the acquisition of APM Terminals 61% share. The other 9% remain owned by the Port Authority of Dunkirk.

• July 2010 : Increase of share in Mobile Container Terminal LLC (MCT) from 80% to 100% through the acquisition of Terminal Link’s 20% share.

• June 2010 : APM Terminals and the Virginia Port Authority enter into an agreement that will lease APM Terminals’ Virginia facility to VPA for a term of 20 years.

APM Terminals will continue to own the facility and its principal capital assets.

• May 2010 : APM Terminals and Shanghai International Port Group (SIPG) finalized an agreement for SIPG to acquire a 25% share of APM Te rminals Zeebrugge for

EUR 27.16 million.

• May 2010 : Hanjin Pacific takes over APM Terminals facilities at Piers 76 and 77 in Kaohsiung, Taiwan.

• Dec 2009 : Announcement of extension of Aqaba Container Terminal (ACT) which will increase annual container throughout capacity to 2 million TEU.

• May 2009 : APM Terminals partner in Bolloré Africa Logistics consortium to develop a container terminal at Port of Pointe‐Noire in Congo (27‐year concession).

• February 2009 : APM Terminals (Jamaica) concludes operations management contract with the Kingston Container Terminal (KCT). KCT is owned by the Port

Authority of Jamaica and has been managed by APM Terminals since 2001. Management is transferred back to the port authority.

June 2008 : Opening of APM Terminals Apapa, Lagos, Nigeria

• April 2008 : APM Terminals has agreed to sell its 20% share in Qasim International Container Terminal Pakistan Limited (QICT), located in Karachi, Pakistan to DP

World. DP World is currently the operator and majority shareholder of the facility.

• April 2008 : APM Terminals assumes management and operational control of the container facility at the Port of Pecém in Northeastern Brazil.

• April 2008 : Vancouver Fraser Port Authority has selected a joint venture between APM Terminals North America and SNC‐Lavalin as the pre ferred proponent for the Terminal 2 Project.

The Charthouse Group

Changes in the Terminal Portfolio of DP World

Between April 2008 and April 2011

= investment/entry

= divestment/exit

April 2008-April 2011

• Feb 2011 : Vallarpadam terminal in Cochin – India officially opened.

• Jan 2011 : New container terminal in Port Qasim near Karachi in Pakistan officially opened.

• Dec 2010 : Marine terminal operations at Abu Dhabi’s Mina Zayed will be handled by Abu Dhabi Terminals (ADT) instead of DP World

• Dec 2010 : DP World Limited and Citi Infrastructure Investors (CII) formed a strategic partnership to invest in, operate and manage DP World’s five marine terminals in Australia (Brisbane, Sydney, Melbourne, Adelaide and Fremantle). This transaction sees DP World monetise 75% of its shares in DP World Australia. Management and staff of DP World Australia are retained.

• Nov 2010 : Official opening of Phase 1 of the expansion of DP World Tarragona, Spain.

• Oct 2010 : Agreement to double the size of DP World’s container operations in Sokhna Port, Egypt.

• Oct 2010 : DP World Callao in Peru officially inaugurated (concession was granted in July 2006).

• June 2010 : Concession for the port of Maputo in Mozambique extended to 2033 with an option to extend for a further ten years.

• March 2010 : Major work starts at DP World London Gateway, UK.

• Jan 2010 : Official opening of Saigon Premier Container Terminal (SPCT) in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.

• Aug 2009 : DP World and Odebrecht enter into a partnership to acquire a majority stake at Embraport, Santos, Brazil.

• June 2009 : DP World takes over operations at the Port of Djen Djen in Algeria (30-year operating concession).

• Feb 2009 : Opening of the Doraleh Container Terminal, Djibouti.

• July 2008 : DP World to operate and develop the container facilities at the Port of Aden.

• June 2008 : DP World acquires a 60% stake in Contarsa Sociedad de Estiba SA, concessionaire for Tarragona Container Port Terminal, Spain.

• May 2008 : DP World increases ownership of Chennai Container Terminal, India from 75% to 100%.

The Charthouse Group

Conclusion: A Globalized but Highly Regionalized

Industry

Four major terminal operators (HPH, APM, PSA and DPW) have a strong globally-oriented portfolio; Regional orientation remains prevalent.

More selective investment policy.

Cancellation or postponement of terminal projects.

Sale, equity swaps & divesture.

Rationalization inevitably leads to concentration?

The Charthouse Group

Download